Spotify to hike premium subscription price in select markets from September
The subscription price will rise to 11.99 euros ($13.86) per month from 10.99 euros in markets including South Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region.
Spotify's shares rose more than 5 per cent in premarket trading. They have gained about 40 per cent so far this year.
The company said subscribers will receive an email explaining the price increase over the next month.
Price increases in the past, combined with cost-cutting efforts in recent years, have helped Spotify achieve its first annual profit for 2024.
But the company forecast its third-quarter profit below analysts' estimates last month, as higher taxes related to employee salaries outweighed music streaming demand. It saw an increase in monthly active users and premium subscribers during the second quarter.
Spotify is also benefiting from Apple's approval of the Swedish company's U.S. app update to show subscription prices and external payment links, after a judge barred the iPhone maker from charging commission on off-app purchases.
The audio streaming company's CEO Daniel Ek said this change has led to "a very positive uptick" in the U.S. He also said that if similar rules are adopted in Europe and the UK, it would benefit both Spotify and other app developers.
Spotify has been expanding its library of video content to attract subscribers, including through its partner program, which is designed to help podcast creators by offering them monetization options.
A growing number of creators are joining the Spotify Partner Program, resulting in a significant increase in video content on our platform, Ek had earlier told Reuters.
($1 = 0.8650 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: The AI job cuts are accelerating
LONDON: Microsoft, by chief executive Satya Nadella's own description, is 'thriving'. Its quarterly profits soared by almost 25 per cent and its market valuation hit US$4 trillion last week. In any normal situation, it would seem incongruent that the company is at the same time slashing its workforce by the thousands. The pursuit of a leaner workforce is not new. In times of economic uncertainty, companies prune excesses - cutting headcount and eliminating inefficiencies. But today it is not just about doing more with fewer people. Companies are preparing for a time where there might be less work for their employees altogether. Even as business leaders claim AI is 'redesigning' jobs rather than cutting them, the headlines tell another story. It is not just Microsoft but Intel and BT that are among a host of major companies announcing thousands of layoffs explicitly linked to AI. Previously when job cuts were announced, there was a sense that these were regrettable choices. Now executives consider them a sign of progress. Companies are pursuing greater profits with fewer people. THE RISE OF ONE-PERSON FIRMS For the tech industry, revenue per employee has become a prized performance metric. Y Combinator start-ups brag about building companies with skeleton teams. A website called the 'Tiny Teams Hall of Fame' lists companies bringing in tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue with just a handful of employees. OpenAI's Sam Altman has gone further, predicting the eventual rise of a one-person US$1 billion company. That may still sound far-fetched - but it is undeniable large language models are already reshaping white-collar work. While new jobs are being created in the AI age and some workers redeployed, a lot of positions will be eliminated. Companies are increasingly saying the tasks of those workers no longer exist. Already it's clear the hiring of coders has dropped off a cliff. And almost daily, my inbox delivers examples of AI's prowess versus humans. Among the latest is how one Big Four firm has slashed turnaround times for research by 75 per cent, reclaiming 3,600 analyst hours by using AI-generated reports. FEWER STARTER JOBS AND FRAGMENTED CAREER PATHS Younger workers should be particularly concerned about this trend. Entire rungs on the career ladder are taking a hit, undermining traditional job pathways. This is not only about AI of course. Offshoring, post-COVID budget discipline, and years of underwhelming growth have made entry-level hiring an easy thing to cut. But AI is adding to pressures. Dirk Hahn, chief executive of recruiter Hays, said to me: 'While there will be exceptions, the rise of AI could constrain the recovery in some junior white-collar roles.' If the footholds are eroding, where does that leave future workers? What shape do organisations take if there are fewer starter jobs and middle management positions? Professional development and leadership pipelines need to be redefined. The consequences are cultural as well as economic. If jobs aren't readily available, will a university degree retain its value? Careers already are increasingly 'squiggly' and not linear. The rise of freelancing and hiring of contractors has already fragmented the nature of work in many cases. AI will only propel this. CAN LEANER FIRMS LAST? But are leaner organisations necessarily better ones? I am not convinced these companies are more resilient even if they perform better financially. Faster decision making and lower overheads are great, but does this mean fewer resources for R&D, legal functions or compliance? What about a company's ability to withstand shocks - from supply chain disruptions to employee turnover and dare I say it, runaway robots? Some companies such as Klarna have reversed tack, realising that firing hundreds of staff and relying on AI resulted in a poorer customer service experience. Now the payments company wants them back. The tech bros touting people-light companies underestimate the complexity of business operations and corporate cultures that are built on very human relationships and interactions. In fact, while AI can indeed handle the tedium, there should be a new premium on the human - from creativity and emotional intelligence to complex judgment. But that can only happen if we invest in those who bring those qualities and teach the next generation of workers - and right now, the door is closing on many of them.
CNA
7 hours ago
- CNA
Americans face price rises for luxury watches after Trump's Swiss tariffs
Switzerland's watch industry is facing a threat to sales after Donald Trump said he would impose 39 per cent tariffs on the country, raising the prospect of significantly higher prices in one of its biggest markets. The elevated levy will push prices up for US consumers and hit volumes at some brands, analysts warned. The US accounted for 16.8 per cent of Swiss watch exports in 2024, worth roughly SFr4.4bn (US$5.4 billion, S$6.96 billion). Swiss manufacturers The Swatch Group and Richemont, as well as London-listed Watches of Switzerland, a big Rolex and Patek Philippe dealer, all face 'pain' if tariffs kick in next week as planned, Jefferies said. At 39 per cent, the levy exceeds the 31 per cent proposed by Trump on 'liberation day' in April, and far outstrips the 15 per cent facing Switzerland's EU neighbours. Even at the lower rate, some retailers previously said they would need price rises 'in the mid to high teens' to preserve US gross profit, according to Jefferies. Watches of Switzerland shares fell 8 per cent in London trading on Friday. The company said it would 'continue to work closely with our brand partners to mitigate any potential impact'. Brian Duffy, chief executive, said the tariff level was 'a shock' but insisted the business was better positioned than some rivals, with its wealthy customers, many of whom wait years for chosen timepieces, able to bear higher prices. 'Half our business is in the US and half is waiting lists. It impacts us less than others,' he added. 'Demand for watches still exceeds supply.' The company — which had already warned investors of the impact of tariffs, saying last month that some of the brands it sells had already raised prices in the US — will try to bring forward orders and ship stock earlier to beat the changes. However, it is limited by how much stock is on hand, and Duffy acknowledged that watches 'could get more expensive' in the US. Barclays warned that even high-end brands such as Rolex and Patek Philippe — which deliberately limit supply to boost desirability and value — may struggle with such steep tariffs, while 'non-supply-constrained brands will find substantial price increases more difficult' and risk volume declines. The tariffs compound existing issues for Swiss watchmakers. The weaker dollar — down roughly 5 per cent against the Swiss franc since mid-2024 — had already made Swiss watches more expensive for American consumers. June export data showed Switzerland's watch exports to the US were down 18 per cent on a year earlier. Swiss watch exports have been weakening overall, declining by 2.8 per cent to SFr26bn in 2024 — the first annual drop since a pandemic rebound in 2020. Vincent Subilia, head of Geneva's chamber of commerce, warned that 'the US consumer will unfortunately have to pay the price' of what he labelled an 'irrational' US tax policy. Oliver Muller, founder of LuxeConsult, which advises the watch industry, said Swiss watchmakers were 'perceiving the punitive new custom duties . . . as being particularly unfair, because we are not threatening any US-based industry . . . Apart from a few niche watch brands, the US watch industry disappeared a long time ago.'
Business Times
14 hours ago
- Business Times
Spotify to raise premium subscription price in select markets from September
[STOCKHOLM] Spotify Technology shares gained in premarket trading after the company announced it is raising premium subscription prices across many markets outside the US. The Swedish music streaming company is updating prices across South Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region, according to a statement on Monday (Aug 4). Over the next month, customers will receive an email outlining the new price plan. Subscription prices vary by country, but the statement included a sample email describing a price increase of 1 euro per month to 11.99 euros (S$17.87). Spotify shares have risen about 40 per cent so far this year. Investors and record labels have been encouraging Spotify to raise prices further to capitalise on demand. The company has shown it has fiercely loyal listeners, who have spent sometimes years building music and audio libraries. Spotify listeners are the least likely to cancel among the major video or audio streaming services in the US, according to a report from research firm Antenna last year. The company raised prices in the US twice last year, up to US$11.99 a month. In the second quarter, Spotify reported that subscribers increased 12 per cent from a year earlier to 276 million, reflecting 'growth across all regions.' The company has 696 million monthly active users. The price hikes follow a disappointing earnings release last week, where the company reported it had swung to a loss due to high-than-expected expenses related to employee compensation. The platform has introduced audio books as part of its premium subscription plan and has spent this year focused on expanding its video and advertising business. Spotify executives said last week that the company is run to 'optimise for long-term, not short-term gains.' Chief Business Officer Alex Norström said Spotify would raise prices 'when it's appropriate for the business.' Speaking to analysts after the earnings report, he said Spotify essentially raises prices all the time. In the last quarter, the company increased subscription costs in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. 'And I can report to you that, on churn, we did not see anything out of the ordinary for Spotify.' REUTERS
