logo
The World's Largest Banks 2025: JPMorgan Tops Global 2000 For Third Straight Year

The World's Largest Banks 2025: JPMorgan Tops Global 2000 For Third Straight Year

Forbes12-06-2025
It has been a solid year for the banking industry, characterized by strong profitability, steady deposit growth and a continued rebound in investment banking fees and trading revenues. U.S.-based and Chinese banks once again dominate the 2025 Forbes Global 2000 list, which measures the world's largest and most successful companies. Half of the top ten companies on the list are banks based in the United States or China.
JPMorgan Chase claimed the top spot overall for the third year in a row, after rising from fourth place in 2022 following its acquisition of First Republic out of insolvency. The bank has $4.3 trillion in assets. The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China ($6.6 trillion in assets) followed close behind, rising one spot to No. 3 overall on the list.
The global banking sector remained resilient over the last twelve months despite ongoing challenges, as net interest margins have been helped by higher interest rates. In the United States, net income is well above pre-pandemic levels, liquidity is stable and capital levels have increased. Many of the largest banks saw sizable asset growth during the first quarter of this year, benefiting from a normalization of the yield curve (where longer-term loans once again have higher rates than short-term loans). Expectations for rate cuts and a more business-friendly regulatory environment have also driven optimism over a rebound in loan demand and M&A activity.
Despite rising profits, many U.S. bank executives have noted the potential impact of uncertainty arising from the Trump administration's tariff announcements. According to research from Fitch Ratings, 'uncertainty on end-state trade policy, potential foreign retaliation and second order effects, raise doubts about the ability to imply future bank performance from first quarter results.' Banks, which are in the business of profiting from making loans, are understandably concerned that the uncertainty created by Trump Administration's erratic trade and other economic policies, will continue to paralyze businesses which have trouble making and executing strategic growth plans when the ground is constantly shifting.
Besides JPMorgan, there are five other U.S. banks among the top 50, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and Morgan Stanley.
China's mega banks, meanwhile, saw slight declines in net profit and operating income earlier in 2025 as net interest margins have continued a multi-year decline. The downturn in the property sector has led to more non-performing loans, subsequently squeezing net interest margins due to lower lending rates and a slowdown in loan demand. Total assets have increased, however, especially as banks in China continue to shift toward new growth areas like emerging industry loans (sectors deemed crucial for the country's future economic growth, such as in areas like electric vehicles or artificial intelligence), which have seen solid growth.
'Entering a cycle where both interest rates and net interest margins are low, the banking industry is facing increased uncertainty in the macro-environment,' according to Kelvin Leung, Greater China Financial Services Partner at Ernst & Young. In response to these challenges, he notes that Chinese-listed banks are fortifying themselves by diversifying revenue sources, in emerging industries and replenishing capital, as well as looking to optimize debt structure and costs.
Besides China's ICBC, three other banks—all regular mainstays on this list—were among the biggest in the world: China Construction Bank ($5.5 trillion in assets) at No. 3, Agricultural Bank of China ($5.9 trillion) at No. 8 and the Bank of China ($4.8 trillion) at No. 12.
European banks also managed to grow net interest income, but still face challenges amid ongoing economic uncertainty, potential interest rate cuts and the impact of tariffs. 'European bank revenues are likely to be adversely affected by rate cuts, whereas for Canadian banks potential U.S. tariffs create significant uncertainties," according to Sonja Förster, Senior Vice President, European Financial Institutions at Morningstar DBRS. "However, these factors do not represent a rating risk, as underlying fundamentals of European and Canadian banks are generally strong."
Britain's HSBC Holdings was once again the largest bank outside of the U.S. and China, keeping the No. 15 spot with more than $3 trillion in assets. Next is the Royal Bank of Canada, up one spot from last year to No. 26., with $1.5 trillion in assets. The biggest gainer among the 50 largest banks in the world was Spanish bank Santander ($1.9 trillion), which rose seven spots to No. 29 on this year's list. France's BNP Paribas, meanwhile, lost several spots, falling from No. 32 to No. 35., despite its assets of $2.8 trillion. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial reclaimed its position ahead of Sumitomo Mitsui Financial as Japan's largest bank, with assets surpassing $2.6 trillion, taking the No. 34 spot overall.
In total there are 328 banks on the 2025 Global 2000 list, up from 315 last year.
Forbes compiled the Global 2000 list using data from FactSet Research to screen for the biggest public companies in four metrics: sales, profits, assets and market value. The market value calculations use closing prices as of April 25, 2025 and include all common shares outstanding.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Aug. 17
Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Aug. 17

CNET

time11 minutes ago

  • CNET

Today's NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Aug. 17

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today's Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles. If you know your state capitals, especially a certain one that isn't spelled the way it's pronounced, you'll do well on today's puzzle. Need some help with today's Mini Crossword? Read on. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips. If you're looking for today's Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET's NYT puzzle hints page. Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword Let's get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers. The completed NYT Mini Crossword puzzle for Aug. 17, 2025. NYT/Screenshot by CNET Mini across clues and answers 1A clue: Salsa, hummus, queso, etc. Answer: DIPS 5A clue: U.S. state capital that rhymes with 9-Across (not 7-Across!) Answer: PIERRE 7A clue: What broadcasters are on Answer: THEAIR 8A clue: "Yes and no ..." Answer: SORTOF 9A clue: Societal equal Answer: PEER Mini down clues and answers 1D clue: John ___ (tractor company) Answer: DEERE 2D clue: Boiling mad Answer: IRATE 3D clue: "Sorry, I have a ___ commitment" Answer: PRIOR 4D clue: Laborer in medieval times Answer: SERF 5D clue: A touchdown is worth six: Abbr. Answer: PTS 6D clue: Breakfast chain typically open 24 hours a day Answer: IHOP

The global divide on ‘de-banking': How the US, UK and EU approach risk
The global divide on ‘de-banking': How the US, UK and EU approach risk

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The global divide on ‘de-banking': How the US, UK and EU approach risk

Imagine logging into your bank account one morning and finding everything frozen—cards declined, standing orders stopped and your savings untouchable. No fraud alert, no bounced cheque. Just a brief message: 'We are closing your account. Please make alternative arrangements.' This is not a rare nightmare. Around the world, more people and businesses are being 'de-banked'—cut off from basic banking services. In the financial industry, the practice is called 'de-risking' or when banks sever ties with clients or even whole sectors to avoid regulatory or reputational risk. While it might sound like a niche compliance issue, in reality, it sits at the intersection of financial crime prevention, political rights, trade flows and everyday access to money—and the UK, US and EU are taking sharply different approaches to it. The US: Concerns over "woke capitalism"? Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at preventing banks from denying services based on political or religious beliefs. The order bans the use of 'reputational risk' as a justification for closing accounts and directs banking regulators to review practices within 180 days. Supporters say the move protects freedom of political expression and stops discrimination against conservatives, who claim they have been disproportionately targeted. Critics warn it could force banks to keep serving clients engaged in activities that create genuine financial crime or security risks. As with many issues Trump is passionate about, the topic of de-banking in the US was spurred by his personal experiences. He repeatedly accused JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America of refusing his business after his first term as president because of his and his supporters' conservative views. He claims JPMorgan gave him 20 days to close his account and that Bank of America refused a large deposit even though both banks have denied politically motivated action. Related EU urges China to drop sanctions on Lithuanian banks amid tensions over Russia and Taiwan Another high-profile case was that of the National Council for Religious Freedom (NCRF), an organization founded in 2022 that explicitly backs politicians who support combining politics with religion and vote against bills such as the Equality Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity and sexual orientation, "because it prohibits religious freedoms." Groups like these, especially if they rise to national prominence quickly and start depositing large sums into their accounts without providing sufficient background or donor transparency, can trigger automatic responses from banks worried about compliance with anti-money laundering regulation and are subject to enhanced monitoring. So when NCRF's accounts at JPMorgan Chase were suspended, it was probably not based on their clients political beliefs. Banks are profit-maximising institutions who aim to serve a wide yet reliable client base—drawing political attention to their work is the stuff of literal nightmares for them, especially banking behemoths like JPMorgan Chase. In a letter, the bank said the closure was due to incomplete compliance documentation—not religious or political reasons. Yet the NCRF used this decision to decry "woke capitalism" and launch a national campaign in the US to limit decisions, including reputational risk, and focus solely on quantifiable risks like credit, operational or compliance issues. The new executive order is cause for headaches for bankers. In practice, lenders may have to review thousands of past account closures, document decisions more extensively and possibly reinstate customers they previously cut off. Related Conservative-leaning AI platform Perplexity makes shock bid to buy 'rival' Google Chrome How Elon Musk, a social media powerhouse, boosted hard-right figures in Europe The UK: Farage, Coutts and public outrage In Britain, the debate was turbo-charged by the 2023 Nigel Farage–Coutts affair. When the high-end bank closed the Brexit campaigner's account, internal documents later revealed the decision factored in his political views. The row became front-page news, prompting government promises to strengthen transparency. From a compliance and commercial standpoint, there are reasons why Coutts' decision may have been well within the norms of risk management. Farage's status as a politician makes him a Politically Exposed Person or PEP under anti–money laundering rules. UK banks are required to apply enhanced due diligence to PEPs, including detailed checks on sources of wealth, closer transaction monitoring and ongoing reassessment of any potential links to corruption or financial crime. That doesn't imply wrongdoing—but it does mean the account demands more resources and carries a higher regulatory burden. For a bank whose value proposition is built on discreet, low-risk relationships, this can tip the cost-benefit balance. Reports at the time suggested that Farage's account had fallen below Coutts' minimum financial thresholds for certain services. When a client no longer meets profitability benchmarks, but still demands high levels of compliance oversight and carries reputational sensitivities, a private bank has strong incentives to part ways. In that light, Coutts' choice looks less like a political purge and more like a calculated alignment of its client book with its risk appetite and commercial strategy. However, that was not the angle that dominated the headlines, and it ended up shaping de-risking and de-banking policy in a significant way in the UK. In 2024, complaints to the Financial Ombudsman Service about account closures rose 44% to nearly 3,900, with a higher proportion upheld in favour of consumers. Meanwhile, over 140,000 business accounts were closed in 2023—raising concerns, especially for small businesses and non‑profits. Since then, UK banks must give customers at least 90 days notice before closure and provide more detail on why accounts are terminated. The conversation is still dominated by high-profile, politically sensitive cases—rather than the wider economic and trade implications of de-risking. The EU: Quiet, technical and high stakes By contrast, Brussels has treated de-risking as a long-standing, largely technical policy challenge. For years, EU institutions have issued guidance to safeguard financial inclusion while enforcing anti–money laundering and counter–terrorism financing (AML/CFT) rules. "European Banking Federation (EBF) member banks often find themselves caught between a rock and a hard place: they must comply with stringent AML/CFT requirements—they are required to end relationships with their riskiest clients—yet they are requested to ensure access to basic banking services for legitimate customers," the European Banking Federation told Euronews in a statement. "Hence their de-risking decisions should remain proportionate and risk-based, not indiscriminate bans on entire countries or customer groups," they continued. According to the EBF, most banks in Europe focus on individual, case-by-case de-risking and pay particular attention to 'red flags'. For example, situations where a customer's identity cannot be verified using secure, government-approved ID checks, or any transaction in which they cannot confidently confirm who the person or company really are or who the "beneficial owner" is. Related Mega crypto exchange Binance partners with Spain's BBVA in a bid to restore investor confidence For member banks, it is a matter of weighing whether the risks can be reduced enough to comply with regulations and protect the bank's reputation, and whether managing that risk would require more time, money, and effort than the account is ultimately worth. "In the EU, de-risking is increasingly recognised as a significant consumer issue, though it is neither a new concern nor one that fully mirrors the priorities of the Trump Administration," the EBF statement continues. "For years, EU institutions—most notably the European Banking Authority—have issued guidance aimed at safeguarding financial inclusion and ensuring that legitimate customers are not unfairly excluded from the banking system."

This Red-Hot Vanguard ETF Just Hit an All-Time High. Here's Why It's Still Worth Buying in August.
This Red-Hot Vanguard ETF Just Hit an All-Time High. Here's Why It's Still Worth Buying in August.

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This Red-Hot Vanguard ETF Just Hit an All-Time High. Here's Why It's Still Worth Buying in August.

Key Points The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF is hovering around an all-time high due to the strong performance of megacap stocks. Unlike some income-oriented ETFs, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF has considerable exposure to growth-focused sectors like technology. Many companies outside the ten largest holdings in the ETF have high dividend yields and multi-decade track records of boosting their payouts. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF › Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are a way to invest in dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of stocks under a single ticker. Some ETFs track indexes, while others target themes, such as growth stocks, value stocks, or passive income. The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (NYSEMKT: VIG) is unique because it accomplishes several investment objectives -- from holding positions in top growth stocks to being a decent vehicle for collecting passive income. Here's why the ETF is still worth buying in August, even though it's at an all-time high. Not your typical list of top dividend stocks Instead of focusing solely on dividend yield, the Dividend Appreciation ETF targets companies that are growing their earnings and can support future dividend raises. Company Percentage of Fund Dividend Yield Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) 6.1% 0.7% Microsoft 5.2% 0.6% JPMorgan Chase 4.1% 1.8% Apple 3.4% 0.4% Eli Lilly 2.9% 0.8% Visa 2.7% 0.7% ExxonMobil 2.4% 3.7% Mastercard 2.3% 0.6% Costco Wholesale 2.0% 0.5% Walmart 2.1% 0.9% Data sources: Vanguard, YCharts. As you can see in the table, eight of the 10 largest holdings in the ETF have yields under 1%. However, the lineup features industry leaders across a variety of sectors -- including technology, financials, consumer staples, healthcare, and energy. Funds that pursue higher-yielding stocks tend to be overweight low-growth sectors and underweight growth-focused sectors -- like tech. But because the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF prioritizes companies that can support a growing dividend with higher earnings, it can include tech giants like Broadcom, Apple, and Microsoft. Broadcom and Apple have increased their dividends for 14 consecutive years, and Microsoft has a 15-year streak. These stocks sport low yields not because they haven't been boosting their payouts, but because their stock prices have gone up by so much. In this vein, the Dividend Appreciation ETF doesn't penalize companies for having low yields because they have been winning investments. A higher yield and lower valuation than the S&P 500 Many of the largest holdings in the ETF sport low yields. But the top 10 holdings only make up 32.6% of the ETF. Just outside of the top 10, holdings 11 through 20 are Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Home Depot, Oracle, AbbVie, Bank of America, UnitedHealth Group, Cisco Systems, Coca-Cola, and International Business Machines. Combined, these names make up 15.8% of the fund. However, many of these names have higher yields and extensive track records of boosting their payouts. Because a sizable chunk of the larger holdings in the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF are blue chip stocks with higher yields and reasonable valuations, the fund sports a relatively attractive valuation and dividend yield compared to the S&P 500. In fact, the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF is 25.7 and its yield is 1.7% compared to the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) -- which has a 27.8 P/E and a 1.2% yield. A balanced fund you can confidently buy and hold Buying stocks or ETFs at all-time highs seems counterintuitive. After all, who wants to pay a record price for something? However, the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF could appeal to investors who are looking to put capital to work in the market without betting big on companies with lofty valuations. The ETF's emphasis on dividend quality over quantity will appeal to long-term investors who want to make sure they aren't achieving a high yield just by investing in mediocre companies. The fund could be an especially good pick for folks who don't want to collect passive income at the expense of limiting their exposure to tech stocks. Nvidia has been the poster child of artificial intelligence investor excitement, but Broadcom, the largest holding in the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, has been no slouch -- with a staggering 474% gain in just three years. All told, the ETF is a great way to balance exposure to megacap growth stocks and blue chip dividend-paying value stocks -- which could make the fund a better buy for certain investors than the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. Should you buy stock in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Daniel Foelber has positions in Nvidia and Procter & Gamble. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AbbVie, Apple, Cisco Systems, Costco Wholesale, Home Depot, International Business Machines, JPMorgan Chase, Mastercard, Microsoft, Nvidia, Oracle, Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF, Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, Visa, and Walmart. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom, Johnson & Johnson, and UnitedHealth Group and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This Red-Hot Vanguard ETF Just Hit an All-Time High. Here's Why It's Still Worth Buying in August. was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store