logo
The full, untold story of Trump's U-turn on Ukraine

The full, untold story of Trump's U-turn on Ukraine

Telegraph25-07-2025
It was early morning on July 4 when Gen Keith Kellogg's phone was illuminated with a call from Poland.
On the other end of the line was Radoslaw Sikorski, Poland's foreign minister, with what could be one of the defining interventions of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Overnight, the Polish consulate in central Kyiv had been damaged in a barrage of Russian missiles and drones.
'Putin is mocking your peace efforts,' Mr Sikorski told Gen Kellogg, a retired lieutenant general who serves as Donald Trump's lead Ukraine envoy.
'Please restore supplies of anti-aircraft ammunition to Ukraine,' he added.
Weapon deliveries had suddenly been frozen two days before, leading many to believe the Trump administration was once again abandoning Ukraine.
During the phone call, it was the heads-up about the embassy strike that appeared to resonate most with Gen Kellogg.
As a retired three-star general, he knew this was the type of incident that leads to wars escalating and eventually spiralling out of control.
What happened next can be seen as the first in a series of events which ushered in Mr Trump's pivot on Ukraine.
Almost immediately after ending his call with Mr Sikorski, Gen Kellogg dialled the president's number.
Mr Trump answered almost straight away.
After the July 4 well-wishes and congratulations for the ' one, big, beautiful bill ', the pair got down to the business of Ukraine.
Overnight, Kyiv had been pummelled with 11 missiles and 539 drones, in what was at the time the largest Russian barrage against the Ukrainian capital since the war began.
More crucially, the strikes came hours after Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, and Mr Trump had spoken on the telephone to discuss ending the war.
It was already known that the US president had grown frustrated with his Russian counterpart's refusal to halt strikes on Ukrainian cities while dismissing an American offer of a ceasefire.
Gen Kellogg briefed his boss on the latest attack and how Nato ally Poland's embassy had been caught up in the strikes.
The envoy then used the call to promote a resumption of Patriot air-defence missiles being sent to Ukraine.
There were discussions on the potential risks and rewards of increasing Kyiv's access to the American-made surface-to-air batteries and the interceptors fired from them.
Mr Trump's response was swift: tell the Pentagon to release some of the Pac-3 systems that had been caught up in a temporary freeze on US aid while officials assessed American stockpiles.
He also ordered Gen Kellogg to contact Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, to resume deliveries to Kyiv.
Mr Trump had been blindsided previously after Mr Hegseth authorised a pause in aid to Ukraine without informing the White House or Congress of his decision, it later emerged.
The likes of Gen Kellogg and Marco Rubio, the secretary of state and national security adviser, only learnt about his decision from press reports.
But this time would be different – and Gen Kellogg made sure of that. When he called Mr Hegseth, he told him of the president's decision to resume shipments of Patriot missiles to Ukraine.
He told Mr Hegseth that if he did not believe him, he should call Mr Trump himself.
It was also on July 4 that the US president promised Volodymyr Zelensky, Ukraine's president, that he would finally assist with Kyiv's air defence needs.
Privately, amongst Washington's most hawkish Ukraine supporters, this decision was seen as the first time Mr Trump had realised the significance of using American might to strengthen Kyiv's hand as a potential route to a peace deal.
However, it took the Pentagon at least four days to get the first batch of Patriot missiles on the move.
There had been 40 Pac-3 interceptors ordered by former president Joe Biden's administration in Poland en route to Ukraine.
A dozen of them were eventually released following Mr Trump's call with Gen Kellogg.
This volte face was then leapt on by European capitals confident of tempting the US president to go further in support of Kyiv.
Friedrich Merz, Germany's chancellor, started offering to buy Patriot systems that would be sent to boost the war-torn nation's defences.
Mark Rutte, Nato's secretary-general, went further, offering Mr Trump the opportunity to be reimbursed by European allies and Canada to the tune of billions of dollars in American-made weapons shipped to Ukraine.
It was a deal lapped up by the US president, who had been quietly lobbied by advisers, like Gen Kellogg, that having European nations pay for American weapons shipped to Europe was a demonstration of his 'Make America Great Again' principles.
Those weapons would not only convince Putin to come to the negotiating table, but also exhibit the effectiveness of American weapons during a European attempt to rearm itself through domestic production.
It took Mr Trump just nine more days to announce, alongside Mr Rutte, his $10bn aid pipeline on July 13, as well as the prospect of crippling trade tariffs on Russia and any country that bought its fossil fuels.
By the end of that week, a Patriot air-defence system and more interceptors had already arrived in Ukraine, thanks to a deal with Germany.
The Pentagon and the White House used that move to try to convince European nations to take risks by sending their available stocks to Kyiv while waiting for America to backfill them.
However, it is a tough ask for some countries, given that their Patriots will not be replaced until early next year.
Earlier this week, Berlin announced an agreement with Washington to donate a further five batteries to Ukraine.
Germany will provide funds for two of the systems, while Norway has promised to pay for a third.
The replacements are expected to come from orders once promised to Switzerland.
Bern last week revealed it had been told by Washington that deliveries destined for the neutral nation were being diverted to support Kyiv.
Mr Trump was advised that diverting the Swiss order would help free up the systems necessary to support Ukraine.
In 2022, Switzerland ordered five Patriot systems, with the expectation that deliveries would start in 2026 and end two years later.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Has to sting': MTG turned on GOP after Trump snubbed her ambitions to be governor, expert says
‘Has to sting': MTG turned on GOP after Trump snubbed her ambitions to be governor, expert says

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

‘Has to sting': MTG turned on GOP after Trump snubbed her ambitions to be governor, expert says

Donald Trump 's apparent reluctance to publicly back Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene 's gubernatorial bid triggered her potential break with the GOP, according to an expert. Once one of the president's most loyal supporters, Greene ramped up her anti-Republican rhetoric over the weekend, claiming that she had become disillusioned with the party and questioned its treatment of female politicians. In an interview with the Daily Mail, the conservative firebrand blasted the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, criticized U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in June and condemned Israel over its actions in Gaza. Gabby Birenbaum, The Texas Tribune 's Washington correspondent, pointed to one possible source of Greene's fury: her reported ambitions to run for Georgia governor and Trump's lack of public support. 'I think part of the subtext here, right, is she wanted to run for higher office in Georgia, and reportedly he discouraged her,' she told CNN Tuesday morning. 'I mean, I'm sure that has to sting if you're her.' In public, Greene has maintained that she 'has always been Trump's most outspoken ally,' and there is no 'break' between her and the president. Greene announced last Tuesday (July 29) that she will not run for governor next November, citing a desire to focus on her district and a growing frustration with what she called Georgia's 'good ole boy' political system. 'I am humbled and grateful by the massive statewide support that I have to run for Governor, and if I wanted to run we all know I would win,' she wrote in a lengthy X post. 'It's not even debatable.' Weeks before shutting down rumors surrounding a potential gubernatorial bid, Greene pulled her name out of the race for the U.S. Senate seat up for grabs held by Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff. The Congresswoman was reportedly under fire from GOP colleagues – including Trump – who were concerned she might win big at the conservative primary but come up short in a general election. Trump's political team commissioned a poll that showed Greene losing a potential Senate race in Georgia by double digits, sources told the Wall Street Journal last month. The president reportedly shared the result with Greene to discourage her from running in 2026, the sources added.

Lobbyists have spent over $2M on TV ads in Palm Beach hoping to catch Trump's attention at Mar-a-Lago
Lobbyists have spent over $2M on TV ads in Palm Beach hoping to catch Trump's attention at Mar-a-Lago

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Lobbyists have spent over $2M on TV ads in Palm Beach hoping to catch Trump's attention at Mar-a-Lago

Lobbyists in Florida have spent around $2 million on cable TV ads in the Palm Beach area in an apparent attempt to catch the attention of Donald Trump. The president is known to be an avid television watcher, both at home at his Mar-a-Lago residence and during trips to his multiple golf clubs for tournaments. Analysis of advertising data from AdImpact showed the immense amount of cash being focussed on advertising in West Palm Beach, with the Wall Street Journal reporting that the strategy is often referred to by interest groups as targeting an 'audience of one.' A total of $3.1 million had been spent in the market in the first four months of 2025, compared to $629,000 in the same timeframe in 2023 and $183,000 in 2021, according to the data. AdImpact notes that cable makes up 69 percent of the spending (just over $2 million), likely targeting the local Fox News cable networks – the president's favored outlet. Both the Journal and Palm Beach Post cite commercials, including one which includes a clip of the president promising cures to cancer and Alzheimer's disease. The ad is produced by a group with ties to the pharmaceutical industry that are trying to lobby Trump to overturn pricing policy implemented by the Biden administration. Another, produced by the Alliance for Automotive Innovation – noted to be one of the top advertisers in West Palm Beach – is more direct. 'Mr President. Together we can drive innovation and American manufacturing. Let's do it,' the ad reads. John Bozzella, the president of the AAI, told the Journal that the commercial was really 'intended to reintroduce the new administration to the country's largest manufacturing sector.' On a wider scale, WSJ analysis also showed that since Trump's return to the Oval Office in January, more than a dozen groups pushing national issues had bought broadcast and cable ads only in Washington, D.C., and West Palm Beach, according to AdImpact. The data shows that overall spending on Fox News has surged in 2025, as advertisers hope to reach Trump's eyes on the network. Through April, Fox News has seen $19.0 million in national spending, representing 69 percent of all national network spending. The surge in activity in the West Palm Beach market since the president's return to office means that the area now ranks third among national-issue advertising markets, ahead of much larger metro-centers such as Los Angeles, Dallas and Chicago. By contrast, before Trump's return and during the 2024 presidential election, West Palm Beach ranked 40th on the list of areas targeted for national issues-based advertising.

Russia vows ‘no limits' on nuke missiles in chilling threat to West as tensions rise
Russia vows ‘no limits' on nuke missiles in chilling threat to West as tensions rise

Daily Mirror

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Russia vows ‘no limits' on nuke missiles in chilling threat to West as tensions rise

A chilling warning has been issued by Russia to the West that it no longer has any "limitations" over its deployment of nuclear missiles as tensions continue to escalate Russia says it 'no longer has any limitations' over nuclear missile deployment as it upped the ante with a chilling threat to the West. ‌ Setting the stage for a new arms race as tensions between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump escalate, Russia declared that it no longer considers itself bound by a self-imposed moratorium on the positioning of nuclear-capable intermediate range missiles. In a statement Monday, the Russian Foreign Ministry linked the decision to efforts by the West to develop intermediate range weapons and preparations for their deployment in Europe and other parts of the world. ‌ It specifically cited US plans to deploy Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. It comes after Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. ‌ ‌ The ministry noted that placing missiles in Germany created 'destabilizing missile potentials' near Russia, causing a 'direct threat to the security of our country' and carry 'significant harmful consequences for regional and global stability, including a dangerous escalation of tensions between nuclear powers.' It didn't say what specific moves the Kremlin might take, but Putin has previously announced that Moscow was planning to deploy its new Oreshnik missiles on the territory of its neighbour and ally Belarus later this year. Asked where and when Russia could potentially deploy intermediate-range weapons, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that it's not something to be announced in advance, reports The Sun. ‌ 'Russia no longer has any limitations, Russia no longer considers itself to be constrained by anything,' Peskov told reporters. 'Therefore Russia believes it has the right to take respective steps if necessary." While the Foreign Ministry said: 'Decisions on specific parameters of response measures will be made by the leadership of the Russian Federation based on an interdepartmental analysis of the scale of deployment of American and other Western land-based intermediate-range missiles, as well as the development of the overall situation in the area of international security and strategic stability." ‌ Trump's announced on Friday that he would reposition two US nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of Dmitry Medvedev. Trump's statement came as his deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in Ukraine approaches later this week. Trump said he was alarmed by Medvedev's attitude. Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council chaired by Putin, has apparently sought to curry favour with his mentor by making provocative statements and frequently lobbing nuclear threats. Last week, he responded to Trump's deadline for Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine or face sanctions by warning him against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' and declaring that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war.' ‌ Medvedev also commented on the Foreign Ministry's statement, describing Moscow's withdrawal from the moratorium as 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy.' 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with,' he wrote on X. 'Expect further steps.' Intermediate-range missiles can fly between 310 to 3,400 miles. Such land-based weapons were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. ‌ Trump withdrew from the pact in his first term, citing Russian violations, which Moscow denied. It, in turn, alleged the U.S. had committed violations. The treaty was terminated in 2019, but the Kremlin declared its self-imposed moratorium on their deployment until the U.S. makes such a move. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the U.S. and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilizing because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. Russia's missile forces chief has declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. The Russian leader has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store