Cuomo, Mamdani neck and neck in final NYC mayoral poll
New York Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani has effectively drawn even with former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor and surpasses him in the final round of a ranked-choice simulation, according to a new poll released Monday.
In a final survey of the race from Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill, Cuomo led Mamdani 35 percent to 32 percent overall, which is within the poll's margin of error. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander came in at 13 percent, followed by City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams at 8% and former Comptroller Scott Stringer at 3 percent. Four percent of voters were undecided.
But the survey also allowed respondents to rank their top choices. In the first round of voting, Cuomo led Mamdani 36 percent to 34 percent. In the eighth round of voting, once all the other candidates were eliminated, Mamdani came out on top, beating Cuomo 52 percent to 48 percent.
New York City uses a ranked-choice voting system for its mayoral primary, meaning voters are able to select their top five candidates in order of preference. If no candidate surpasses 50 percent in the first round of voting, the candidate who's last is eliminated and their votes are redistributed to the other candidates according to how they ranked their other choices.
The latest findings point to continued momentum for Mamdani, a democratic socialist who has emerged as the leading progressive choice in the Democratic race to succeed Mayor Eric Adams (D), who is running as an independent. In the last Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey, taken in May, Cuomo led Mamdani 35 percent to 23 percent.
'Over five months, Mamdani's support has surged from 1% to 32%, while Cuomo finishes near where he began,' said Spencer Kimball, Emerson College Polling's executive director. 'In the ranked-choice simulation, Mamdani gains 18 points compared to Cuomo's 12, putting him ahead in the final round for the first time in an Emerson poll.'
The survey is the latest to point to a close race as voters head to the polls on Tuesday. A Marist poll released last week found Cuomo leading Mamdani in the seventh round of voting, 55 percent to 45 percent.
Cuomo has been the clear favorite as Democrats look to oust Adams, who was the subject of a federal corruption case that was eventually dropped by the Justice Department, drawing accusations that the mayor had sought to curry favor with President Trump.
A win by Cuomo this week would represent a stunning resurgence for the former governor, who resigned from his job as the Empire State's top executive in 2021 amid sexual harassment allegations and a brewing scandal involving accusations that his administration concealed nursing home deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Even with his baggage, Cuomo has earned the backing of many notable figures in the Democratic Party, most recently Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), the influential Black Congressional Caucus member. And while Mamdani has emerged as the clear progressive favorite, scoring the endorsement of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), he has also drawn criticism from the establishment. Last week, The New York Times editorial board urged voters not to support Mamdani despite pledging not to endorse in local elections.
The Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey was conducted from June 18 to June 20 with a sample size of 833 likely voters and a margin of error of plus or minus 3.3 percent. The first round of ranked-choice voting was conducted with a sample size of 800 likely voters and a margin of error of plus or minus 3.4 percent. The final round was conducted with 729 voters and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.6 percent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
Are Blacks and American Jews still political allies?
We need to talk about antisemitism. And by 'we,' I mean Black people. With news of Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, there is a pulsing, bright racial line in American political debate. The divide is tied to the tensions between Jews and the heavily Muslim population in the Middle East. In Tuesday's New York City Democratic mayoral primary, many Jewish groups have lined up in opposition to Zohran Mamdani, an outspoken critic of Israel's war against Hamas. A Ugandan immigrant, born to Indian parents, Mamdani openly rails against what he calls Israel's 'genocide' against Palestinians. Mamdani vows to 'arrest' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot in New York City during his mayoralty. Mamdani's political rise is based on strong support from progressive white voters, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Latino voters, as well as his fellow Muslims and Black voters under 45. The idea of Black New Yorkers giving support to Mamdani because of his opposition to Israel is, well, bizarre. Does that mean liberals of color who are not Jews support Hamas? Hamas's Muslim fundamentalism is diametrically opposed to the principled history of the Black civil rights struggle. Is the American left similarly willing to oppose Israel's war on Iran without considering Iran's long history of funding murderous terrorist groups? As the author of history books on the U.S. civil rights movement, trust me when I say the pillars elevating that cause remain clear: The belief in equal rights for everyone under law, including voting rights, respect for religious rights and free speech. Hamas and Iran have never stood for any of that. Look at their lack of support for women's rights. And forget about gay rights. Ask Salman Rushdie, the author living under death threats, about support for artistic freedom from those locked into Muslim orthodoxy. But that history is being short-circuited by gut-level empathy. It comes from people of color identifying with Palestinians, a people of color being dominated by superior military firepower and wealth held by the largely white leaders of Israel. This is certainly the case with some younger Black Americans, who did not live through the 20th-century civil rights struggle and now see 55,000 Palestinians and at least 250 humanitarian aid workers killed due to Israel's attacks on Gaza. Meanwhile, President Trump has used allegations of antisemitism as a pretext to silence his left-wing critics on college campuses. In March, the administration canceled millions of dollars in funding to Columbia University, accusing the school of 'inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students.' ICE agents detained Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia protest leader and foreign national, on charges that he had promoted antisemitism. But when a judge found the charge weak, prosecutors shifted to alleged errors in his application for U.S. residency. The judge ordered Khalil released on Friday. Trump's flimsy pretext of combating antisemitism to wage a war on universities has stirred opposition — most of all to his refusal to push back against Israel's aggression in Gaza. Add to that Trump's slams on diversity efforts — a federal judge ruled last week that his administration's pattern of cuts to research grants showed 'government racial discrimination.' But note well that Black, Latino and Asian American students are largely not organizing the angry campus protests against Israel. It is mostly Arab American and international students at the front of the protests, who are most often the source of Jewish students feeling ostracized, even threatened. Fear of being charged with antisemitism has also kept many Black and Latino members of Congress out of the debate over U.S. support for Israel, despite legitimate questions from people of all colors around the world about Israel's handling of Palestinians and Iran. Criticism of Israeli policy is not necessarily based on antisemitism. The lack of congressional debate is directly tied to the two Black Democrats — Missouri's Cori Bush and New York's Jamaal Bowman — who openly criticized Israeli policies. Pro-Israel groups supported candidates against them in their Democratic primaries, and both lost in 2024. Another factor is that in national politics, Jewish voters remain strong Democrats. In the 2024 presidential race, 79 percent of Jewish voters supported Vice President Kamala Harris, according to NBC News exit polls. Trump famously told Jewish voters in a speech last year, 'You have a big protector in me.' He preemptively blamed Jews for any chance he might lose, saying that 'the Jewish people would really have a lot to do with' him losing the election. But Trump's claim to be an ally of American Jews requires blinders. With Trump leading the GOP since 2016, a UMass-Amherst poll from 2022 found that two-thirds of Republicans endorse some form of the tenets of the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory, which holds that Jews are trying to diminish the white working class by bringing in dark-skinned immigrants. For decades before Trump's rise, there existed a deep vein of antisemitism in conservative politics. Pat Buchanan, once a GOP presidential contender, famously said in 1990 that Capitol Hill was 'Israeli-occupied territory.' Now there is a very real problem with Trump's disingenuous use of claims about antisemitism to further his right-wing agenda. A cynic, especially a Black cynic, could be forgiven for thinking Trump pretends to care about protecting Jews as a pretext for pursuing an agenda that is antithetical to Jewish values. Juan Williams is senior political analyst for Fox News Channel and a prize-winning civil rights historian. He is the author of the new book 'New Prize for These Eyes: The Rise of America's Second Civil Rights Movement.'
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
If New York elects a far-left mayor, Miami stands to gain — again
There's a saying down here in Miami: When New York sneezes, Miami catches the money. If candidate Zohran Mamdani survives Tuesday's New York Democratic mayoral primary and becomes mayor in November, Miami will need tissues by the truckload. As the former mayor of Miami Beach — affectionately known as New York's Sixth Borough — I say that only half-jokingly. I love New York. I root for it. And as a centrist Democrat, I don't believe a left-of-center leader spells doom for a city. But Mamdani isn't left of center. He's left of reality. He's a self-proclaimed Democratic socialist with a policy agenda that reads like a Berkeley dorm room manifesto: a $30-an-hour minimum wage, free public buses, city-run grocery stores and a $100 billion social housing scheme. To fund it? You already know: massive tax hikes on businesses and high earners like millionaires and billionaires — the people who create jobs and power the city's economy. The exodus to Miami and other parts of the state this would cause wouldn't be about money alone. It would also be about sanity — just like the great COVID exodus of 2020. Back then, thousands of families, entrepreneurs and business leaders fled a city that felt increasingly hostile to success, safety and common sense. Many came to Miami, where we offered stability, sunshine and tax breaks. New York will take three steps back with Mamdani. He wants to freeze rents, double city debt, replace cops with 'community responders' and punish development unless it's socialized. It's the Bill de Blasio era on steroids, with a dash of anti-Israel dogma mixed in. Remember: This is the same Mamdani who called Israel an apartheid state and refused to condemn Hamas on Oct. 7, yet he appears to be gaining ground in a field of 11 candidates. Electing Mamdani mayor of the most Jewish city in America would send a chilling message that extremism and antisemitism have a home in New York's city hall. Compare that to Miami. According to the 2024 Jewish Miami Community Study from Brandeis University, roughly 25% of Jewish adults here moved to the area in the past decade — and a staggering 26% came from New York. They brought with them a strong sense of community and a drive for prosperity. That's why, as catastrophic as Mamdani would be for New York, he'd be a gift-wrapped economic boom for Miami. Every time New York rejects capitalism or turns public safety into a sociology experiment, another U-Haul parks on Brickell. And why not? We've got the lifestyle, the diversity and the infrastructure — without the ideological baggage. While New York debates whether capitalism is a moral good, Miami is living proof that it is. But here's where I'm torn. As much as I want what's best for Miami, I still believe in New York. It's more than a city — it's a symbol of the American dream. If someone like former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is also running for mayor of New York, mounted a comeback and won, it would be good for New York and good for America. It would show that competence is back in style. Cuomo represents a New York that's tough but fair, progressive but not allergic to prosperity. His return would signal that the city is done flirting with the political fringe. That would slow the migration south and tell investors the Empire State wants governance over activism. And yes, it might dim Miami's shine a bit. But we can handle the competition. The truth is, there's room for more than one great city in America. I believe in a future where New York and Miami are competing to make each other better, safer, freer and more aspirational. I hope that happens. But if New York chooses the other path — if it sneezes — Miami will be ready with the tissues. After all, someone's got to be the real capital of the American dream. Philip Levine, a cruise industry entrepreneur, is a former two-term mayor of Miami Beach and a onetime Democratic candidate for governor of Florida.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The Latest: The White House defends its massive bombing campaign against Iran
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News on Monday morning that Iran was an 'imminent threat' and that President Donald Trump is the 'first president with the guts to actually do something about it.' She was definitive about the outcome of U.S. strikes, saying they 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb.' Over the weekend, American stealth bombers, fighter jets and a submarine struck Iran with bombs and missiles - joining Israel's attempt to wipe out Iran's nuclear program. 'The president was just simply raising a question that I think many people around the world are asking,' she told reporters on Monday morning. She added, 'if they refuse to engage in diplomacy moving forward, why shouldn't the Iranian people rise up against this brutal terrorist regime?' Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'We did make bipartisan calls,' Leavitt told Fox News. She said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries 'couldn't be reached.' Traditionally, there are bipartisan briefings for congressional leaders, even for classified missions. Leavitt insisted the White House was 'not obligated to tell anybody' about the plans but 'we gave these calls as a courtesy.' Pakistan condemns Trump shortly after nominating him for Nobel Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit.
