logo
Warehouse roof destroyed by huge fire

Warehouse roof destroyed by huge fire

Yahoo23-06-2025
A warehouse in Loughborough has been badly damaged in a large fire.
Eight crews were sent to tackle the blaze at the single-storey industrial unit in Great Central Road at about 03:00 BST on Sunday, according to Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service.
Firefighters wearing breathing equipment entered the partially-disused building to tackle the flames while they were doused from an aerial platform.
The roof of the building was destroyed with parts of the rest of the property badly damaged, a fire service spokesperson added.
National Grid and gas network operator Cadent were also called to isolate supplies to the property.
Fire crews remained at the scene throughout Sunday to ensure hotspots did not reignite.
The cause of the fire has not yet been revealed.
Follow BBC Leicester on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

August 13 morning weather update
August 13 morning weather update

Washington Post

time3 hours ago

  • Washington Post

August 13 morning weather update

Cookie Choices for EU, Swiss & UK Residents We and our 919 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting I Accept enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. Selecting Reject All or withdrawing your consent will disable them. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Manage Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy. If you click 'I accept,' in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized advertising. If you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our If you click 'I accept,' in addition to processing data using cookies and similar technologies for the purposes to the right, you also agree we may process the profile information you provide and your interactions with our surveys and other interactive content for personalized you are an EU, Swiss, or UK resident and you do not accept, we will process cookies and associated data for strictly necessary purposes and process non-cookie data as set forth in our Privacy Policy (consistent with law and, if applicable, other choices you have made).

Villagers face 'bureaucracy' in fight against sea
Villagers face 'bureaucracy' in fight against sea

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Villagers face 'bureaucracy' in fight against sea

Residents of a coastal village say they are willing to pay for defences to protect their homes from the sea but are being thwarted by bureaucracy and delay. One home in Thorpeness, Suffolk, was demolished in 2022 after it was left perilously close to the cliff edge, and villagers fear two more could be lost this winter. Maureen Jones, chair of Aldringham-cum-Thorpe Parish Council, said residents were willing to invest money in defending their homes but had been met with challenges. East Suffolk Council told the BBC that getting the necessary permission for such defences took time. Defences, including rocks, gabions and geobags, have been installed to manage the effects of coastal erosion, but last year up to 23ft (7m) of coast was lost to the sea. Some residents want to install more defences "Residents in Thorpeness are prepared to put in money and they have put in for planning but unfortunately at the moment they are coming up against a brick wall because there's about 10 agencies concerned in getting planning through," said Jones. Sophie Marple, who bought her home in Thorpeness about 20 years ago, describes it as her "happy place". In 2010, after the area was hit with a "big surge" and more defences were installed, she decided to invest and rebuild the property. "It gave us a feeling of security. There was a thought if they maintained, we would have a life of at least 25 years," she said. However, over the past winter there have been "constant" northerly winds which have stripped back shingle on the beach and left defences exposed. She said she had received a warning from East Suffolk Council that once the erosion reached a certain point, she would be told to demolish her home. "We are going to fight to do something. One of the things this does do is bring the people together who are most affected," she said. Lucy Ansbro has already spent £450,000 on rock defences to protect her home. She and others have applied for permission to install more, but have been told this would require a full environmental impact assessment, which could take months. The council has launched a survey, asking villagers what they think should be done. It said the latest erosion had outpaced plans to install more rocks and it was doing all it could to support homeowners. Mark Packard, Liberal Democrat cabinet member for planning and coastal management, said: "It does take time and you have to have specialists doing that. "That's going to slow things up tremendously, and then you have to get all these permissions from Natural England, from the Environment Agency, from the Crown Estates - all sorts of people - and they take their time." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. More on this story Push to protect village from erosion threat begins Plans made to defend cliffs with more rocks Erosion fears affecting mental health - residents Coastal dwellers may pay more towards defences Related internet links Aldringham-cum-Thorpe Parish Council East Suffolk Council

Campaign to protect green space loved by residents continues
Campaign to protect green space loved by residents continues

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Campaign to protect green space loved by residents continues

The campaign to save a green space from development continues, with residents illustrating its importance within the community with posters. Harwood residents are desperately trying to stop the land from being lost and be replaced by a new housing estate. The a two-year saga between developer Oak Tree Ltd and Harwood residents has now gone to the planning inspectorate for a final decision. The plans were first submitted in 2022 – originally an application for two dozen houses – but was amended to 20 just off Longsight Lane. Campaigners for Longsight Park. (Image: Leah Collins) They were rejected by the planning committee on November 18 last year – but the developer filed an appeal on May 16 – almost exactly six months after the decision. Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) The Friends of Longsight Park have since campaigned against the appeal and to keep the site and to also keep a public right of way, intact. READ MORE: Bolton Council rejects planning application for houses in Harwood Locals dismayed at appeal over rejected Longsight Lane plan Dozens gather in protest against plans to develop in Harwood Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) READ MORE: Longsight Park, Harwood is a hidden gem for all to enjoy Speaking to The Bolton News, Belinda Williams, who runs one of the sub-groups in the campaign said: 'We have painted placards and posters with love and care to show the planning inspectorate just how much Harwood is loved and cherished. 'The residents are all keen on saving this green space because its so special. It's a green corridor that cuts through the Millennium Wood and when it's gone it's gone. "There are approximately 320 species across the two fields. "Some of the friends who've painted signs include Mandy, Lisa, Jackie, Maria, Julie and myself. A road is planned to intersect this area. (Image: Leah Collins) 'The planned development will also feature a road that goes through the Old Ned's Lane, which is a public right of way. Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) "The proposed sites are along a green corridor, its vital that this stays intact as to ruin this would disrupt the wildlife here. 'The spaces will also affect tree roots, there are trees in the ancient hedge row that have long roots spread out and will go under the development. 'One in four British mammals are at risk of extinction, but here we have rabbit, fox, roe deer and wood mice frequently crossing and living on the site. Signs decorated by campaigners. (Image: Leah Collins) 'How will they survive?' Ward councillor Les Webb said: 'Having supported residents through this arduous journey so far, where this potential development is solely about profit for the developers and not providing sufficient affordable houses. "This application was correctly refused by the elected councillors at the planning meeting and these level of complaints are only manifesting due to greed of the developers. The development is proposed for this site. (Image: Leah Collins) 'I sincerely hope the Planning Inspectorate will protect the Green Spaces , Wildlife corridors as well as ancient trees and hedge rows and this debacle to bed once and for all. 'Also let it be a lesson to other developers who see Harwood as a quick buck our residents will fight for our Green Belt and remind BMBC of the Brown Belt first policy as well as the directives of Places for Everyone. 'Our villages infrastructures can not support further expansion, school places are at capacity, doctors surgery's without appointments and a grid locked road system relying on data from 2007 - 2009 since any data was collected, Harwood is full!' Speaking at the planning meeting where the plan was rejected, Cllr John Walsh said: "This development is cause for serious concern specifically because of its proximity to a site of biological interest and the significant negative impact on this will not be lost. It is for that reason I'm refusing the application."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store