logo
Why a flock of seagulls will steal your lunch — but a lone gull won't act on its own

Why a flock of seagulls will steal your lunch — but a lone gull won't act on its own

Business Mayor21-05-2025

Sign up for our free Health Check email to receive exclusive analysis on the week in health Get our free Health Check email
A seagull eyeing your lunch or ice cream is unlikely to try to steal it if not part of a flock, scientists have found.
Due to an instinct known as neophobia, which means a fear of the unknown, scientists have discovered that herring gulls are mostly reluctant to attack when on their own.
But, according to researchers at Ghent University, this fear diminishes when seagulls are part of a flock – potentially putting your food at greater risk. (Getty/iStock)
In a study published in the Royal Society Open Science journal, scientists carried out experiments involving a group of 54 seagulls they had reared from hatching.
In order to gauge how quickly the gulls would take to approach their food if faced with an unfamiliar object nearby, the scientists placed a range of items – a multicoloured ball, a bucket, brush, folder and jerrycan – next to the gulls' food supply. Some of these objects were familiar to the birds and others were new to them.
They found that, when alone, the gulls took an average of 9.81 seconds to approach their food bowl when faced with an unfamiliar object – compared with just 3.52 seconds when in a group.
Notably, 24 of the gulls did not eat at all when alone and faced with an unfamiliar object.
The scientists also found that the birds were willing to spend more time near their food when in a group than those on their own. Lone gulls spent an average of just 38.8 seconds near their food, compared with 111.8 seconds when in a group – while 16 birds did not approach their food at all. (Pexels/Engin Akyurt)
The study states: 'Individuals tested in groups were quicker to eat and spent more time near a novel object than individuals tested alone.
'The results of our study suggest that the presence of group members reduces perceived individual risk, allowing individuals to behave less cautiously.'
Noting that 'each bird likely perceives the risk to be shared by the group', the authors said their findings were consistent with previous studies showing that social animals often rely on the presence of the group to make quicker decisions and engage in potentially risky situations.
An accompanying release from the Royal Society added: 'When confronted by a gull after your chips it might be best to catch them one-on-one.'
While there may be some comfort in the findings that a lone seagull could pose less of a threat of theft, a previous study has suggested that gulls actually prefer food that they have seen being handled by humans, as opposed to food left lying unattended.
Although in a further possible line of defence, an earlier study suggested that staring at a seagull could help to deter it from trying to take your food.
Scientists at the University of Exeter found that gulls took an average of 21 seconds longer to approach a bag of chips if they could see they were being watched, with just 27 out of 74 birds observed being too cautious to take a chip when a human was nearby.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scientists May Have Found What Makes Cats Purr
Scientists May Have Found What Makes Cats Purr

Newsweek

time3 days ago

  • Newsweek

Scientists May Have Found What Makes Cats Purr

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Our enigmatic little furry friends may have just given up one of their secrets, as scientists think they have discovered the gene which underpins purring in cats. Cats are believed to purr for various reasons, from expressive contentment and self-soothing to even helping promote bone regeneration and heal fractures. The study—which was undertaken by Yume Okamoto and colleagues at the Kyoto University Wildlife Research Center in Japan—focused on variations in the so-called androgen receptor gene, which has been linked to various feline behaviors. "Through our research, we hope to deepen our understanding of cats and contribute to building happier relationships between cats and humans," Okamoto said in a statement. Stock image of a purring cat Stock image of a purring cat Konstantin Aksenov/iStock / Getty Images Plus In their study, the researchers worked with 280 domestic cats, all of whom were neutered or spayed mixed breeds kept as indoor pets. The team both conducted behavioral assessments on the felines and collected DNA samples—allowing them to compare the androgen receptor gene with those in the other species of Felidae, the wider cat family. The findings supported the hypothesis that a genetic basis exists for both purring and other forms of vocal communication in cats. Specifically, those cats with the "short-type" androgen receptor gene were reported as purring more by their owners than those with the "long-type" gene. Male cats with the short-type gene also tended to be more vocal with humans, while their female counterparts exhibited more stranger-directed aggression. When the researchers compared the domestic cats' DNA with those of 11 other Felidae species—including cheetahs, leopards and tigers—they found that domestic cats carried longer-type androgen receptor genes not found in other members of the Felidae family. The findings revealed that those cats raised by humans since kittenhood—which are typically pure-breed cats—tend to rely less on vocal communication. Previous studies have indicated that pure-breed cats are more likely to carry the long-type gene. Of the cats in the study, many of the mixed breed felines were former strays, suggesting that rescue cats may be more vocal. The team also noted that both the fishing and leopard cats—which are both closely related to domestic felines—possessed only the short-type version of the androgen receptor gene. Put together, the findings suggest that the emergence of the longer-type genes may be a result of genetic changes associated with domestication and selective breeding. With their initial study complete, the researchers are now planning to expand the focus of their research to include other species of the Felidae family. In the meantime, the findings may help us better understand our feline friends—and how best to care for them. "When we called for participants, we were moved to receive responses from 265 cat owners from across Japan in just a single day—and received kind messages," Okamoto said. She concluded: "This reminded us of the strong public interest in cat research." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about cats? Let us know via science@ Reference Okamoto, Y., Hattori, M., & Inoue-Murayama, M. (2025). Association between androgen receptor gene and behavioral traits in cats (Felis catus). PLOS ONE, 20(5).

Mysterious Surface Changes on Jupiter's Moon Point to Something Deep Below
Mysterious Surface Changes on Jupiter's Moon Point to Something Deep Below

Newsweek

time3 days ago

  • Newsweek

Mysterious Surface Changes on Jupiter's Moon Point to Something Deep Below

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The icy surface of Jupiter's moon Europa appears to be constantly changing, new data from the James Webb Space Telescope has revealed. This phenomena, the team explained, is heightened in so-called "chaos regions" where surface features like cracks, plains and ridges end up jumbled and ensnared together. "We think that the surface is fairly porous and warm enough in some areas to allow the ice to recrystallize rapidly," said paper author and geologist Richard Cartwright of Johns Hopkins University in a statement. The different rates of crystallization across the icy moon point to a complex mix of geological processes at play—and provide further evidence for Europa harboring a liquid ocean beneath its frozen surface. An artist's impression of Europa, with Jupiter in the background An artist's impression of Europa, with Jupiter in the background dottedhippo/iStock / Getty Images Plus Astronomers refer to what we would call ice as "water ice." This distinguishes it from other frozen molecules such as carbon dioxide in the form of "dry ice," for example. Here on Earth, water ice has a hexagonal crystalline structure that results from the hydrogen bonding at play between the water molecules. (This structure actually spreads out the molecules more than in liquid water, making ice less dense than water, explaining why ice floats.) On the surface of Europa, however, water ice is constantly bombarded by charged particles, disrupting the crystalline structure to form "amorphous ice" with a disordered layout. Scientists have long speculated that Europa's surface is covered by a very thin veneer of amorphous ice—only around a fiftieth of an inch thick—which shields crystalline ice beneath. In the new study, however, the researchers found evidence of crystalline ice both at depth but also on the surface of Europa, in particular in an area known as Tara Regio. "Also, in this same region—generally referred to as a chaos region—we see a lot of other unusual things," said Cartwright. These, he explained, includes "the best evidence for sodium chloride, like table salt, probably originating from its interior ocean. We also see some of the strongest evidence for carbon dioxide and hydrogen peroxide on Europa. The chemistry in this location is really strange and exciting." Map of water ice types on Europa Map of water ice types on Europa SwRI According to the researchers, this region of fractured surface materials hints at geological processes pushing up materials from below. "Our data showed strong indications that what we are seeing must be sourced from the interior, perhaps from a subsurface ocean nearly 20 miles beneath Europa's thick icy shell," said paper author and physicist Ujjwal Raut of the Southwest Research Institute in a statement. "When we see evidence of carbon dioxide at the surface, we think it must have come from an ocean below the surface. "The evidence for a liquid ocean underneath Europa's icy shell is mounting, which makes this so exciting as we continue to learn more." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about Europa? Let us know via science@ Reference Cartwright, R. J., Hibbitts, C. A., Holler, B. J., Raut, U., Nordheim, T. A., Neveu, M., Protopapa, S., Glein, C. R., Leonard, E. J., Roth, L., Beddingfield, C. B., & Villanueva, G. L. (2025). JWST Reveals Spectral Tracers of Recent Surface Modification on Europa. The Planetary Science Journal, 6(5), 125.

Can you picture an apple in your mind? If not, you might have this condition.
Can you picture an apple in your mind? If not, you might have this condition.

National Geographic

time4 days ago

  • National Geographic

Can you picture an apple in your mind? If not, you might have this condition.

The "apple test"—asking participants to close their eyes and picture an apple—has become a quick way to test how vividly an individual can recall memories. Photograph by Jose A. Bernat Bacete, Getty Close your eyes and imagine an apple. Can you see its shape? What color is it? Is it floating in the air, or being held by a hand, or sitting on a table? If you find yourself struggling, you might have arecently coined condition called aphantasia. People with aphantasia, or 'aphants,' say they lack the ability to effectively visualize in their mind's eye. They might have vivid imaginations, and lead very creative lives, but their brains work a little differently when it comes to visual imagery. Twenty-five years ago, Adam Zeman, a professor of cognitive and behavioral neurology previously at the University of Exeter, now an honorary fellow at the Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences in Edinburgh, was introduced to the curious case of a man who had lost the ability to visualize following a heart procedure. That someone who previously had a vivid mind's eye could suddenly lose it was novel case to Zeman, and one that raised questions about the way imagery functioned within the human brain. Zeman's research on this patient, when published in 2010, resonated with people: ones who hadn't suddenly lost their ability to visualize, but instead had realized, thanks to the description of the patient in the study, that they'd never actually had that ability at all. 'Over the next few years, people began to get in touch saying, I'm just like [the patient], except that I always have been [non-visualizing],' Zeman remembers. He incorporated 21 of these new non-visualizers into a study which he suggested a modified version of the Greek word for imagination—phantasia—to describe those who claimed they had no visual memory. Measuring the mind Psychological studies and self-reporting made up much of the initial research on aphantasia, but this kind of subjective approach tends to provoke skepticism in laypeople, according to Christian Scholz, a PhD student at the Ruhr University Bochum in Germany studying the condition. Skeptics suggest the real difference is not a person's ability to produce a mental image but instead how they differently describe what it's like to conjure a mental image. 'One argument against aphantasia being a real thing is—'well, it's just language anyway,'' he points out. Scholz says 'the people who tend to have more vivid [mental] imagery are also more skeptical of aphantasia'—it's hard for a lifelong visualizer to believe someone else can lack the ability. More recently, scientists have been able to test physiological differences between those who report a strong visual imagination and those who don't. 'If you look into the sun, your pupils constrict. If you have imagery and you imagine looking into the sun, it turns out that your pupils constrict [as well]—and that doesn't happen in people with aphantasia,' Zeman explains, referring to a 2022 study. One study conducted in 2021 attached sensors to the fingertips of participants that measured changes in emotional arousal. Some participants were read a scary story while others were shown scary images. Compared to a control group of those who reported a strong visual memory, aphantasics failed to register fear responses to the stories, though their response to the images was the same as the control group. This indicated to researchers that mental imagery was the mediating factor between something purely conceptual, like a story read aloud, and the listener's gut reaction. Another study published earlier this year measured brain activity in the visual cortex using MRI scans. Results suggested that visualization might be present in aphantasic brains, but only at levels too low for images to be decoded by the conscious mind. 'You see in people with hyperphantasia—vivid imagery—stronger connections between areas at the front of the brain and the [hindbrain] visual network than you do in people with aphantasia,' Zeman explains. A different way to remember the world Sarah Shomstein, a professor of psychological and brain sciences at George Washington University, says the condition is not a disability and could shed light on how human perception and imagination has evolved and continues to evolve. 'There is no damage, there's no deficit,' she says. 'It's a different way [of processing] which has to do with wiring, or some thresholding for activation. And it might be adaptive; it might not be.' She suggests that aphants' brains might be saving energy by processing visual stimuli differently than strong visualizers—rerouted through different areas of the brain that bypass the conscious mind. If it is an adaptive trait, perhaps a larger proportion of the population might grow to have it in the future, she suggests. The apple test is how Shomstein realized that her own ability to form mental images differed from most people. This came well after she'd attained her PhD in cognitive neuroscience, and many years after she dismissed early reports of 'aphantasia' as pseudoscience. That doesn't mean that she, or aphantasics in general, have no imagination. Far from it. 'I can imagine things, I can create very complex imagery,' she explains. 'It is just not in [a] visual form. So for me, everything is black—but I have a concept, I mentalize it.' An individual's unique consciousness Zeman estimates that millions of people around the world have aphantasia—so why is the condition so poorly understood? While the term was only coined in 2015, scientists have been grappling with how to describe differences in perception and memory for centuries. Francis Galton, the prolific 19th century psychologist and founder of eugenics, distributed a questionnaire in 1880 that revealed 12 out of 100 men could not visualize their own breakfast table. W. H. R. Rivers, a prominent psychotherapist who treated shell-shock patients during World War I, lacked the ability to visualize and hypothesized that he had lost it as a child due to a traumatic experience in his home. These observations, however, weren't replicated by formal studies at the time. Tom Ebeyer, founder of the Aphantasia Network community group and an aphant since birth, thinks the condition has been long ignored because there aren't documented negative impacts. 'When you look at outcomes, visualizers and non-visualizers have very common outcomes,' he says. Thousands of visitors to the Aphantasia Network's site have taken the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire, allowing them to pinpoint their own level of visualization and provide useful data points in understanding the prevalence of aphantasia. According to Ebeyer, members of the 60,000-strong network become artists, architects, authors, and take up other visualization-heavy careers. Both aphants and visualizers report being able to recognize faces of family and friends and navigate their way to familiar places. Another place aphants congregate is the Reddit community /r/Aphantasia, where over 70,000 active members share personal experiences and discuss the latest research on the condition. 'I'd always assumed when people "counted sheep" to sleep or "pictured the audience naked" they were speaking metaphorically,' said one anonymous member of the aphantasia subreddit. 'I would have gone through my whole life never noticing I was different in this way had the subject not come out on the internet,' says subreddit member Megan Lee. But for some members of Ebeyer's Aphantasia Network, they worry their diminished mind's eye cheats them out of memories others might experience vividly. 'I think that's where people see the most impact in their daily life,' he says. 'You can romanticize the ability to relive your past experiences, maybe revisit your loved ones in your mind, see what they look like,' an ability aphantasics feel they lack. Zeman confirms that based on the latest research, 'the most conspicuous consistent difference which emerges [..] is that [aphants] have a rather poor autobiographical memory.' What's next for the aphantasia community? Brought together by an experience which only a small percent of the world's population shares, they are working to develop the vocabulary necessary to describe their experiences and communicate them to researchers. 'It's an intriguing invisible difference,' says Zeman, 'and it reminds us that we all tend to take our own experience as the norm, but actually the experience of others may be very different.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store