logo
Scientists May Have Found What Makes Cats Purr

Scientists May Have Found What Makes Cats Purr

Newsweek4 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Our enigmatic little furry friends may have just given up one of their secrets, as scientists think they have discovered the gene which underpins purring in cats.
Cats are believed to purr for various reasons, from expressive contentment and self-soothing to even helping promote bone regeneration and heal fractures.
The study—which was undertaken by Yume Okamoto and colleagues at the Kyoto University Wildlife Research Center in Japan—focused on variations in the so-called androgen receptor gene, which has been linked to various feline behaviors.
"Through our research, we hope to deepen our understanding of cats and contribute to building happier relationships between cats and humans," Okamoto said in a statement.
Stock image of a purring cat
Stock image of a purring cat
Konstantin Aksenov/iStock / Getty Images Plus
In their study, the researchers worked with 280 domestic cats, all of whom were neutered or spayed mixed breeds kept as indoor pets.
The team both conducted behavioral assessments on the felines and collected DNA samples—allowing them to compare the androgen receptor gene with those in the other species of Felidae, the wider cat family.
The findings supported the hypothesis that a genetic basis exists for both purring and other forms of vocal communication in cats.
Specifically, those cats with the "short-type" androgen receptor gene were reported as purring more by their owners than those with the "long-type" gene.
Male cats with the short-type gene also tended to be more vocal with humans, while their female counterparts exhibited more stranger-directed aggression.
When the researchers compared the domestic cats' DNA with those of 11 other Felidae species—including cheetahs, leopards and tigers—they found that domestic cats carried longer-type androgen receptor genes not found in other members of the Felidae family.
The findings revealed that those cats raised by humans since kittenhood—which are typically pure-breed cats—tend to rely less on vocal communication. Previous studies have indicated that pure-breed cats are more likely to carry the long-type gene.
Of the cats in the study, many of the mixed breed felines were former strays, suggesting that rescue cats may be more vocal.
The team also noted that both the fishing and leopard cats—which are both closely related to domestic felines—possessed only the short-type version of the androgen receptor gene.
Put together, the findings suggest that the emergence of the longer-type genes may be a result of genetic changes associated with domestication and selective breeding.
With their initial study complete, the researchers are now planning to expand the focus of their research to include other species of the Felidae family.
In the meantime, the findings may help us better understand our feline friends—and how best to care for them.
"When we called for participants, we were moved to receive responses from 265 cat owners from across Japan in just a single day—and received kind messages," Okamoto said.
She concluded: "This reminded us of the strong public interest in cat research."
Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about cats? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference
Okamoto, Y., Hattori, M., & Inoue-Murayama, M. (2025). Association between androgen receptor gene and behavioral traits in cats (Felis catus). PLOS ONE, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324055

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

People in California Warned Over Parasite-Riddled Fish
People in California Warned Over Parasite-Riddled Fish

Newsweek

time8 hours ago

  • Newsweek

People in California Warned Over Parasite-Riddled Fish

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Southern Californians have been warned that more than 90 percent of popular game fish have been found to contain invasive, parasitic worms that can infect humans. Two species of the parasitic flatworms known as "trematodes" were found infecting five species of freshwater fish from San Diego County in a study by researchers from University of California, San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Infection with the worms typically causes gastrointestinal problems, lethargy and weight loss in humans—but severe cases have even been known to cause heart attack and strokes. "Americans don't usually think about parasites when they eat freshwater fish because it hasn't historically been an issue here," said paper author and ecologist Ryan Hechinger in a statement. However, he added: "These parasites are here in the U.S., and they're infecting fish that people are eating. "We hope this study can help make public health officials, doctors and the public more aware." This bluegill analyzed by the team (main) was found to contain 16,973 'Haplorchis pumilio' parasitic worms (inset) This bluegill analyzed by the team (main) was found to contain 16,973 'Haplorchis pumilio' parasitic worms (inset) Emma Palmer / Hudson Pinto In their study, the researchers sampled 84 fish—representing seven species, including largemouth bass and bluegill—from five popular fishing spots around San Diego County. The team identified two species of invasive trematode in the fish: Haplorchis pumilio and Centrocestus formosanus. H. pumilio was found in 93 percent of all fish sampled—with some individual fish harboring thousands of the parasitic worms. C. formosanus, meanwhile, occurred in 91 percent of the fish from two of the locations. Both worms are believed to have arrived in the U.S. from Southeast Asia more than a decade ago, traveling inside the bodies of one of their hosts—an invasive aquatic species known as the Malaysian trumpet snail (Melanoides tuberculata.) Today, M. tuberculata can be found in 17 states, as well as Puerto Rico—and both it and its parasites are widespread in California. The worms have a life cycle that involves living inside three hosts: first, the trumpet snail; then, a fish; and finally a warm-blooded vertebrate like birds or humans that are unlucky enough to eat the infected fish. Hechinger said there is "no need to panic," as the risk from the parasites can be neutralized by either cooking the fish or, if planning to consume them raw, freezing for at least one week beforehand. A survey of social-media videos conducted by the team alongside their field work, however, revealed that some Americans are consuming freshwater fish raw without these precautions—putting them at risk of infections. "Nearly 5 million views shows there is widespread interest and possibly a widespread practice of folks eating freshwater fish raw," said paper author and marine scientist Emma Palmer of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in a statement. Palmer conducted the research into the parasites while undertaking her graduate studies at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Stock image: A Malaysian trumpet snail ('Melanoides tuberculata') is seen on a white background. Stock image: A Malaysian trumpet snail ('Melanoides tuberculata') is seen on a white background. Marlonneke/iStock / Getty Images Plus It is unclear what impact the invasive worms might be having on the fish connoisseurs of Southern California, the researchers said. "There haven't been any reported cases of these parasites infecting Americans, but nobody is looking for cases, and doctors aren't required to report them," said Hechinger. He added: "This kind of research is so important to identifying new public health threats." Based on their findings, to better track the parasites, the researchers have recommended that these fish-borne worm infections be added to the list of diseases that doctors are required to report to public-health officials. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about astronomy? Let us know via science@ Reference Palmer, E. M., Metz, D.C.G., & Hechinger, R. F. (2025). Further Evidence for Plausible Transmission of Fishborne Trematodiases in the United States: Game Fish Carry Human-Infectious Trematodes and Are Eaten Raw. The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

Divorce Increases Children's Risk of Death by 55%, Study Reveals
Divorce Increases Children's Risk of Death by 55%, Study Reveals

Newsweek

time9 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Divorce Increases Children's Risk of Death by 55%, Study Reveals

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Children whose parents divorce when they are aged five or younger are more likely to experience early death, a new study has claimed. The research paper—authored by professor Nolan Pope of the University of Maryland, Andrew C. Johnston at the University of California, Merced and Maggie R. Jones of the U.S. Census Bureau, found that American children whose parents divorce while they are still in infancy face a variety of marked disadvantages through life as a result. These include reduced earnings and an increased likelihood of teen pregnancy, incarceration and early death. Much of this was attributed to the disruption divorce causes to the family household. Parents move apart as a result, household income falls, single parents then often work longer hours, move more often and relocate to poorer neighborhoods with fewer economic opportunities. All of which leads to social and financial struggles for their children. The authors write: "These changes in family life reveal that, rather than an isolated legal shock, divorce represents a bundle of treatments—including income loss, neighborhood changes and family restructuring—each of which might affect children's outcomes." File photo of a smashed picture frame. File photo of a smashed picture frame. Jupiter Images/Getty The researchers linked data on more than 5 million children born between 1988 and 1993 from federal tax records, the Social Security Administration and the Census Bureau. This allowed them to compare siblings with different lengths of exposure to the same divorce. Unsurprisingly, household income was found to drop by around 50 percent when families split into separate households. However, the research also revealed that these households were only able to recover around half of the initial income loss in the decade following a divorce. The probability of moving was also found to nearly triple in the wake of divorce with families relocating to neighborhoods with lower incomes. Half of the parents also remarried within five years of divorce, introducing stepparents to children's lives, and adding more dependents to the household as a result. The research paper also identified how a "lot of things with family life change" as a result of divorce. Mothers were found to work 8 percent more hours while fathers 16 percent. By far the most concerning statistics from the study, however, concerned the impact on children of divorce under the age of 5 when their parents split. While the downward shift in family finances was found to impact educational outcomes, even more worrying was the data showing that experiencing a parental divorce before the age of 5 increased teen births by roughly 60 percent and mortality by as much as 55 percent. The authors were keen to note the study offered no insight on the impact of remaining in a harmful or unhappy marriage and that the findings offer a generalized view on the issue. "As such, I would not want our results to deter someone from an abusive or highly damaging relationship from seeking help and potentially getting divorced," Pope said. "There are many additional dimensions of divorce—particularly the impact on the lives and happiness of the parents—that our study is unable to address, which are also important when making decisions about divorce." The findings touch on those of a 2017 study which found children whose parents divorce were more likely to experience frequent bouts of sickness as adults. In 2014, another piece of research found that parents' separation can increase behavior problems for children—especially those 5 or younger—but mostly in high-income families, not lower-income ones. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about the impact of divorce? Let us know via science@

NASA Image Reveals Wildfire Haze Over US So Big It Can Be Seen From Space
NASA Image Reveals Wildfire Haze Over US So Big It Can Be Seen From Space

Newsweek

time9 hours ago

  • Newsweek

NASA Image Reveals Wildfire Haze Over US So Big It Can Be Seen From Space

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new satellite image released by NASA has captured dramatic clouds of smoke and dust from the wildfires that have ravaged parts of Canada. The plumes from some blazes were so thick and widespread that they could be seen from a viewpoint in space well beyond that of the moon. The image was taken on May 31 by NASA's EPIC (Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera) on the DSCOVR satellite of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). EPIC is positioned a million miles from the Earth's surface, around four times farther than the orbit of the moon. (For comparison's sake, most polar orbiting satellites observe the Earth fat an altitude of less than 621 miles.) An image of plumes of smoke and dust from Canada's wildfires captured by NASA's EPIC (Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera) on NOAA's DSCOVR satellite acquired this image on May 31, 2025. An image of plumes of smoke and dust from Canada's wildfires captured by NASA's EPIC (Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera) on NOAA's DSCOVR satellite acquired this image on May 31, 2025. NASA Earth Observatory The satellite image captures smoke mostly from the fires in the Canadian provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The plumes extend north across Nunavut, Canada's largest and northernmost territory, and toward the coast of Greenland and south across the United States. A patch of smoke is also visible over the Atlantic Ocean near Europe, while "the hazy air west of Africa is not smoke but dust that has blown westward from the Sahara Desert," NASA notes. More than 180 wildfires were reported to have burned across Canada on Sunday, with air quality and visibility worsening in Canada and in some U.S. states along the border. This marks the first instance of excessive Canadian wildfire smoke descending into the U.S. since 2023 when wildfires worsened air quality to dangerous levels for millions in the northeast. Air quality has degraded in several parts of the U.S., including in Michigan, which issued an advisory last week, warning residents that "conditions maybe unhealthy for sensitive groups and there is a possibility that hourly levels could reach the unhealthy range for a short period of time." On Monday, an advisory was also issued in Minnesota warning residents that the air quality is expected to reach a level that is "hazardous for everyone." The advisory is in effect until Wednesday. The jet stream has sent the plumes further south, with an image captured by NASA's VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite) on the NOAA-21 satellite showing smoke reaching northern Florida. An image captured by NASA's VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite) on the NOAA-21 satellite showing smoke reaching northern Florida. An image captured by NASA's VIIRS (Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite) on the NOAA-21 satellite showing smoke reaching northern Florida. NASA Earth Observatory Over 25,000 residents have been evacuated across three Canadian provinces as dozens of wildfires remained active Sunday. A state of emergency was declared in Manitoba last week, where by Saturday around 17,000 people had been evacuated, along with 1,300 in the Alberta province. About 8,000 in the Saskatchewan province were relocated, with leaders warning the figure may rise, the Associated Press reported Sunday. The wildfire season in Canada runs from late April to August, but fires can occur at any time of the year. So far this year, 1,586 fires have scorched more than a million hectares of Canada, according to a report on June 1 by the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Center. Last year, the country saw 1,343 fires burn less than half a million hectares by the same date. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about wildfires? Let us know via science@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store