This is how Parliament approves the National Budget
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
The stage is set for a pivotal moment in South Africa's budget process as the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) gears up to consider and vote on the Appropriation Bill on Wednesday
This action comes on the heels of the National Assembly's (NA) adoption of the bill on July 23, 2025, marking a significant step in the nation's fiscal planning for the coming year.
The NCOP's role is integral in ensuring that provincial interests are adequately represented in the national budget, particularly in the allocation and utilisation of public funds. As a Section 77 money bill originating from the NA, the Appropriation Bill serves as an essential framework allowing the government to utilise specified public funds across various departments and services.
The budget process and the Appropriation Bill
The budget process kicks off each February with the Minister of Finance's presentation of budget documents to Parliament, which includes: The Fiscal Framework and Revenue Proposals, detailing the country's economic outlook and tax policies.
The Division of Revenue Bill, outlining the distribution of funds among national, provincial, and local governments.
The Appropriation Bill, which allocates specific monetary amounts to each national department.
Following the tabling of the budget, Parliament must approve the Fiscal Framework within 16 days, after which the Division of Revenue Bill is passed. This sets the stage for the introduction of the Appropriation Bill, essential for funding the operational goals of government departments.
Stages within the NCOP
The NCOP's consideration of the Appropriation Bill unfolds in three main stages, allowing for a thorough examination: Consideration by Select Committee: The bill is referred to the Select Committee on Appropriations, where its implications on service delivery and provincial impact are scrutinised. The committee will prepare a report recommending the bill's adoption.
The bill is referred to the Select Committee on Appropriations, where its implications on service delivery and provincial impact are scrutinised. The committee will prepare a report recommending the bill's adoption. Consideration of Department Votes and Schedule: Members will assess the budget allocation for each department, referred to as 'Votes.' Political parties can express their intentions through declarations of Vote. A total of 90 votes are possible, with each delegate from the provinces holding one vote.
Members will assess the budget allocation for each department, referred to as 'Votes.' Political parties can express their intentions through declarations of Vote. A total of 90 votes are possible, with each delegate from the provinces holding one vote. Final Consideration:
After all departmental Votes are adopted, the Select Committee's report on the Appropriation Bill is presented to the House, where a final vote on the bill as a whole occurs.
While the NCOP cannot amend the Appropriation Bill, it may propose amendments. If the bill is rejected, it will be returned to the NA, which possesses the authority to override the NCOP's decision by passing the bill once again.
The finalisation process
The Appropriation Bill will only be regarded as passed once both Houses of Parliament – the NCOP and the NA – have approved it. Upon agreement, the bill is sent to the President for assent, becoming an Act of Parliament. This Act then officially authorises government departments to allocate and spend public funds in line with the budget approved by Parliament.
IOL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
14 hours ago
- The Citizen
ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation
The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has ruled that the appointments of five commissioners to the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) are invalid, citing Parliament's failure to ensure adequate public participation in the selection process. The ruling follows a legal challenge brought by the non-profit organisation Corruption Watch. The respondents in the matter included the speaker of the National Assembly, the president, the Information Regulator, and the five CGE commissioners. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank unlawfully interfered in Absa chair appointment, says court Media Monitoring Africa was admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Corruption Watch contested the appointments of CGE commissioners chairperson Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Subrayan Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia Leigh-Ann Van Der Merwe, all of whom took office in March 2023. These appointments, for terms of up to five years, were made by the president upon recommendation by Parliament. CGE commissioners' appointment process challenged The nomination process was led by Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities. It began in June 2022 and closed nearly a month later. A shortlist of four candidates was compiled in late August, while public comment was invited between 2 and 16 September. Submissions were to be made via an online form linked through Parliament's website. The link led to a spreadsheet listing candidates' names and qualifications, but their full CVs were not published. READ MORE: Initiation schools: Commission wants answers on why recommendations haven't been carried out Despite Corruption Watch requesting an extension of the public comment period to 30 days, the removal of the character limit on submissions, and the release of CVs, the National Assembly proceeded with its recommendations to the president following candidate interviews. The appointments were announced on 25 February 2023, and the commissioners assumed office on 1 March. Corruption Watch then brought its application before the ConCourt under section 167(4)(e) of the Constitution, which grants the court exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the National Assembly has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation. The organisation argued that Parliament's process was flawed due to the limited public access to information about candidates, a 2 000-character restriction on submissions, and the short 14-day window for public comment. (4/4) CCT 333/23 Corruption Watch (RF) NPC v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others August 1, 2025 The speaker defended the process, stating it was reasonable and consistent with past procedures. It was argued that the 14-day period was sufficient, that public comments were properly considered, and that CVs could not be published without candidates' consent in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia). However, the Information Regulator clarified in an affidavit that such consent is not required when the information is needed for the performance of public duties. ConCourt judgment In a unanimous ruling delivered on Friday, the ConCourt sided with Corruption Watch and found that the public participation process was insufficient. 'In the circumstances, the appointment process conducted by the National Assembly therefore did not comply with the obligations imposed by section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and is therefore invalid,' the summary of the 1 August judgement reads. The declaration of invalidity has been suspended for 12 months from the date of the order, giving Parliament time to conduct a constitutionally compliant appointment process and allowing the president to make appointments. Reactions The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. 'The commission remains committed to its legislative mandate and will continue to discharge its responsibilities while Parliament undertakes its processes. 'The commission will not make further public pronouncements or respond to media enquiries on this matter,' the statement reads. In addition, Corruption Watch welcomed the outcome. 'South African citizens have a right to participate fully in these processes, particularly where such institutions are at the forefront of ensuring justice and enforcement of human rights in the country. 'The opportunity for people to have their say in the appointment of representatives to Chapter 9 institutions like the CGE, is an important example of that process,' the organisation said in a statement. The CGE operates under section 187 of the Constitution, with a mandate to promote and protect gender equality. In March last year, six other commissioners – Seeham Samaai, Mulalo Grace Nemathaheni, Mfundo Nomvungu, Yanga Malotana, Kamohelo Rodney Teele, and Marion Lynn Stevens – were recommended by Parliament and subsequently approved by the president. NOW READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
No funding requests received for R5 billion flood damage in Eastern Cape, says Godongwana
Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana says the verified cost of damages caused by the June floods in the Eastern Cape stood at R5 billion as assessed by the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agency. Image: Independent Newspapers Despite R546 million set aside by the National Treasury in the 2025/26 financial year for immediate response to disasters, no funds have been allocated following last month's devastating floods in the Eastern Cape. This is according to Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana when he was replying to written parliamentary questions from EFF MP Veronica Mente-Nkuna. 'The National Treasury has not yet received disaster response funding applications for the Eastern Cape floods from the Department of Cooperative Governance (DCoG). Therefore, funds are yet to be allocated to Eastern Cape departments and municipalities from both grants,' Godongwana said. He said the 2025 Division of Revenue Bill has a provision for R395m in the Municipal Disaster Response Grant and R151m in the Provincial Disaster Response Grant that are administered by the DCoG. Both grants are not allocated to specific municipalities and provinces at the time of the tabling of the Bill, he said. Godongwana also said a further R518m was allocated in the Emergency Housing Fund, which is administered by the Department of Human Settlements. 'The Minister of Human Settlements is best placed to advise on how much, if any, has been allocated to respond to the Eastern Cape floods.' He explained that both the disaster grant and emergency funding are for urgent repairs to infrastructure and housing. 'The Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs and the Minister of Human Settlements are best placed to advise on the specific line items for the repairs provided for.' Responding to separate questions from EFF MP Vuyani Pambo, Godongwana said the verified cost of damages caused by the June floods stood at R5 billion as assessed by the Municipal Infrastructure Support Agency. He reiterated that the National Treasury has not yet received funding applications from DCoG. 'These applications are expected to account for insurance coverage and the reprioritisation of existing revenues by the affected organs of state. 'Once DCoG submits its recommendations and the applications are processed, any allocations from the national fiscus will be governed by the conditions set out in the relevant conditional grant frameworks, including the reporting requirements stipulated in Section 12 of the Division of Revenue Act.' Meanwhile, Cooperative and Governance Minister Velenkosini Hlabisa confirmed that 22 people were accommodated in temporary emergency accommodation in Butterworth and Mthatha, which fall under the Mnquma and King Sabata Dalindyebo municipalities. 'According to the province, no Temporary Relief Units (TRUs) have been provided by the Department of Human Settlements to the affected households in the Eastern Cape yet, as the province has been advised to reprioritise their existing grants for intervention measures. 'This reprioritisation of funds has been enabled by the classification of a disaster by the National Disaster Management Centre,' Hlabisa said. He also said the provincial Department of Human Settlements has applied to the National Department of Human Settlements for the reprioritisation of the Informal Settlements Upgrading Grant and the Human Settlements Development Grant for disaster intervention measures. 'The Department of Human Settlements has activated emergency procurement policy to source contractors for additional TRUs utilising the existing panel of contractors, and the estimated appointment is by the 3rd week of July 2025.' Meanwhile, the Eastern Cape Cabinet earlier this week commended the provincial departments for setting aside 2% of their budgets for disaster response efforts. 'The Cabinet noted the reprioritisation of funds by departments to accommodate the response to this disaster,' said provincial government spokesperson Khuselwa Rantjie. Rantjie also said the provincial government has prioritised the construction and allocation of TRUs in the high-priority areas affected by the floods in Mthatha and Butterworth. The construction of TRUs is at an advanced stage, with 28 ready for occupation and three expected to be completed on Thursday in Butterworth.
IOL News
20 hours ago
- IOL News
Deputy President Paul Mashatile denies misuse of public funds amid luxury property claims
Deputy President Paul Mashatile denies claims of misusing public funds, insisting luxury properties linked to him are privately owned by family. Deputy President Paul Mashatile has denied allegations that he uses his government position to amass wealth and live in luxury. Speaking at the official opening of the Inkosi Simingaye Shopping Centre on the sideline of KwaXimba near Cato Ridge, west of Durban on Thursday, Mashatile addressed reports about a property in Constantia that had been linked to him in Parliament. IOL previously reported that Mashatile is facing scrutiny for declaring two luxury properties worth a combined R65 million, despite an annual salary of just over R3 million. Among these is a Constantia estate in Cape Town valued at R28.9 million, which he previously claimed was owned by his son-in-law's company. The other is a Waterfall property in Midrand, reportedly valued at R37 million. Within a year, Mashatile has declared at least two high-value properties, including the Constantia estate he once denied owning. The declarations have intensified public debate around the wealth of public servants and the transparency of their financial disclosures. These declarations came as members of Parliament made their latest financial disclosures public through the June 2025 Register of Members' Interests. 'People must read. That's the first thing you must learn in life. There's nothing in Parliament that I said I own a house. I said I live there. That house is owned by my son-in-law. It's a very simple thing to read. So what's the problem?'
