Palestine recognition is 'worthless' without concrete action, expert says
More than 250 MPs have called on Keir Starmer to follow French president Emmanuel Macron, with Labour minister Jonathan Reynolds saying the Government will recognise Palestine in this parliament 'if it delivers the breakthrough we need'.
But Richard McNeil-Willson, who lectures the Islamic and Middle Eastern studies department at Edinburgh University, told The National while a discussion about recognising [[Palestine]] is needed, it won't mean anything without concrete action against Israel.
'The recognition of [[Palestine]] as a state is so farcically below the bare minimum of what is required right now in the midst of a genocide and man-made famine in Gaza,' he said.
READ MORE: Neal Ascherson: In a Unionist media wasteland, support The National now
'This is not to say the recognition of a state is nothing, it is something that is needed and has been pushed for for a long time by Palestinians and there is a difference between being recognised as someone from a state and being recognised as a stateless individual.
'So this is a conversation that's needed [but] the way that's been gone about is appalling. Historically, the UK is hugely culpable for the present day occupation of Palestine, for the genocide, and the displacement of Palestinian people, all the way from the Balfour Declaration all the way through to today, and it's taken two years of genocide, indiscriminate bombings and famine for Western states to even consider accepting Palestinian people as equal enough to be allowed a state.
'If we look at the UK context, it's taken France to push for this recognition for this conversation to be had in the UK governmental level.'
McNeil-Willson added that recognition of a Palestinian state by the UK could also be 'an attempt to pivot away from complicity in war crimes', suggesting that it was 'cynical' the way in which the discussion was gathering pace.
'It's now at the point where you've got 250 MPs demanding this,' he said.
'There seems to be no moral drive by the Starmer government in order to make this decision. This is the case of it being dragged into recognising a Palestinian state which will mean next to nothing if there are no concrete steps made alongside.'
In September last year, the UK Government suspended 30 out of around 350 arms exports licences to Israel.
But the UK continues to licence exports of F-35 fighter jet parts, which have been documented being used by Israel in Gaza.
(Image: Supplied) McNeil-Willson (above) added: 'The remedy should focus around not giving British support to Israel in terms of weapons, in terms of intelligence. We should be prosecuting IDF soldiers in Britain who have been taking part in war crimes, and I think we should follow the BDS model of isolating Israeli companies that are actively participating in the genocide, or complicit in the genocide, and preventing them from operation in the UK.'
Keir Starmer held an emergency cabinet meeting on Gaza on Tuesday, but the UK Government did not report any concrete decisions made on recognising Palestine.
The move by Macron has seen him place emphasis on a 'demilitarised Palestinian state' living side-by-side with Israel in peace and security.
McNeil-Willson said he fears this would be a way of entrenching the status quo, where Palestinians' core rights – such as a right to self-defence – continue to be denied.
In a piece for The Converstion, law lecturer Malak Benslama-Dabdoub – based at Royal Holloway University of London – outlined how analysts have warned that recognition of this kind risks formalising a state in name only – a fragmented, non-sovereign entity without control over its borders, resources or defence.
McNeil-Willson added there also needs to be a warning around the idea of a two-state solution.
'The two-state solution has been continuously used in order to create this idea of a Palestinian state that wouldn't have autonomy,' he said.
'I still don't think the two-state solution is a viable solution. So, in recognising a Palestinian state, it mustn't push us towards imagining hat a two-state solution is viable.'
If the UK was ever to recognise Palestinian statehood, McNeil-Willson said there needs to be a serious discussion too about what that state would look like.
He said: 'Currently, what Palestine is there? There is a ruinous Gaza in the grips of famine, there's an occupied West Bank that's continually being sliced up by ever-expanding settlements, those Palestinians that can are leaving.
'This is not the basis for a state in any form. If there is going to be recognition of a Palestinian state, it needs to be clear what that state would look like and it needs to conform to the international understanding of what a state is.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
20 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Tories demand Reeves ‘urgently rule out' investment tax hikes
The Tories claim scrapping the £500 dividend allowance will drag an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying investment levies. The party is seeking to pile pressure on ministers after a memo sent by Angela Rayner to Ms Reeves, in which the Deputy Prime Minister suggested a series of tax hikes, was leaked to the press. In the document, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to raise around £325 million a year in revenue, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, the Telegraph reported. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. 'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Blundering Starmer is rewarding evil
The emotional impact of the desperate crisis in Gaza is as strong as ever. Video footage released by Hamas depicts a starving Israeli hostage barely able to hold a shovel as he digs what he says could be his own grave. Hamas may have lost its ability to pose a strategic challenge to Israel, as more than 500 former Israeli intelligence officials suggested in an open letter this week, but it retains its power as a propaganda machine, capable of mobilising and hoodwinking supporters across the world. Hamas's messaging from the warzone: the blocking of food aid into Gaza by Israel not only starves Palestinians but punishes captive Israelis. This is the Hamas-constructed elephant trap into which Sir Keir Starmer has stumbled. The prime minister's new readiness to use recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state as leverage against Israel has emboldened a ruthless terrorist organisation banned in Britain. Sir Keir has set conditions on Israel if it is to stave off British recognition of a Palestinian state at the United Nations next month. Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's hardline prime minister, must improve food distribution in Gaza, agree a ceasefire and commit to a two-state solution. Initially, Hamas was not obliged to do anything to secure recognition. Its drastically thinned leadership can hardly conceal their glee. Sir Keir's initiative, coming after France's unconditional promise to recognise Palestine and Canada's commitment to a state so long as a Hamas-free election is held next year, brings three G7 powers to the table. Downing Street's calculation is that a combination of G7 and Arab nations, led by Saudi Arabia, will be enough to nudge Donald Trump into overriding Mr Netanyahu's opposition to two states. That is quite a gamble. Consider how Ghazi Hamad, a senior member of Hamas, assessed Britain's latest contribution to Middle East diplomacy. 'The initiative by several countries to recognise a Palestinian state is one of the fruits of October 7', he said, referring to the 2023 massacre of Israelis. 'We have proven that victory over Israel is not impossible, and our weapons are a symbol of Palestinian honour.' Hamas believes it has been handed an 11th-hour victory. Not only is this gambit unlikely to help free Israeli hostages held by Hamas — some 20 are thought to be still alive in tunnels under Gaza — it is being billed as a reward for evil. • Israel plans new military operation to free hostages held in Gaza Perhaps Jonathan Powell, the prime minister's national security adviser, calculates that treating Hamas as a kind of victor will clear the way for a settlement in the Middle East. But he must surely realise that Mr Trump is highly unlikely to elevate Hamas. A more likely explanation for this cackhanded diplomacy is Sir Keir's fear of the Palestine issue's internal effect on his party and external effect on young new voters. His nervousness has been clear since February last year, when he was involved in backroom machinations to sabotage a Scottish National Party motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and curbs on arms exports to Israel. At the time, some 50 Labour backbenchers were thought ready to rebel. Meanwhile, pro-Palestine activism is a potent mobiliser in Labour constituencies with large Muslim populations. This has been enough to rattle Sir Keir and, by extension, distort British diplomacy. If Sir Keir is to recover his authority and exercise some influence in the Middle East he must stabilise alliances and build bridges. Hamas's backers must be sanctioned, even if they are based in Qatar, the broker in recent peace talks. More engagement with Egypt is also essential. Workmanlike diplomacy is more useful than simply waiting in hope for Mr Trump to lean on Mr Netanyahu. Sir Keir should be careful in future not to allow Labour's internal bickering to infect his foreign policy. In his blundering approach to recognition, the prime minister has ended up effectively rewarding the barbarism of Hamas.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Detentions expected 'within days' as UK-France migrant returns deal comes into force
The UK and France's "one in, one out" deal to return migrants who cross the Channel on small boats comes into force on Tuesday, with detentions expected to begin within days. The deal, which has now been approved by the European Commission, means the UK will be able to send people crossing the Channel in small boats back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with ties to Britain. It also means that anyone arriving in a small boat can be detained immediately, and space has been set aside at immigration removal centres, in the expectation that detentions will begin within days. The ratification of the treaty comes after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron agreed the "one in, one out" pilot scheme last month. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 'This is the product of months of grown-up diplomacy, delivering real results for British people, as we broker deals no government has been able to achieve and strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model. 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "For the first time, under this groundbreaking new treaty, people who undertake illegal, dangerous journeys to the UK – putting lives at risk and fuelling organised crime – can be returned to France. "In return, we will take people who apply legally with appropriate documentation to be transferred to the UK, subject to clear eligibility criteria and stringent security checks." Cooper added: 'It is also right to make clear that – while the UK will always be ready to play its part alongside other countries in helping those fleeing persecution and conflict – this must be done in a controlled and managed legal way, not through dangerous, illegal, and uncontrolled routes." Under the new agreement, adult migrants who cross the Channel on a small boat can be returned to France if their claim for asylum is considered inadmissible. An equal number of migrants who pass security checks will also be eligible to come to the UK through a new, legal route if they have not attempted to cross the Channel before. Anyone who arrives on a small boat and is returned to France will not be eligible to apply for the legal route to the UK, the Home Office said. Migrants in France who want to come to the UK legally will be able to submit an Expression of Interest application online, but will need to "satisfactorily establish" their identity and nationality, as well as pass security and eligibility checks. The returns treaty will remain in force until 2026, and will be continually reviewed by both the UK and France. The government says returns to other countries and immigration work will continue alongside the treaty, adding that they have returned more than 35,000 people who do not have the right to be in the UK within the last year. But opposition parties have criticised the deal amid reports that the pilot scheme will see only 50 people a week returned to France while this year has seen a weekly average of more than 800 people make the crossing. The deal has also been criticised by refugee charities, which have urged the government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead. Ministers have so far declined to say how many people could be returned under the deal, and insist that if the pilot is successful the figure will increase. It comes as the Home Office announced £100 million of extra funding to support the returns agreement between the UK and France on Monday. The cash will also pay for up to 300 more National Crime Agency (NCA) officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence-gathering on smuggling gangs. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp attacked the plans, saying they would return 'just 6% of illegal arrivals' and 'make no difference whatsoever'. He added: 'The Rwanda removals deterrent, under which 100% of illegal arrivals would be removed, was ready to go last summer but Labour cancelled it just days before it was due to start with no proper replacement plan. As a result, this year so far has been the worst ever for illegal immigrants crossing the Channel. 'Only removing all illegal immigrants upon arrival will provide the necessary deterrent to stop the crossings. This is the Conservative plan, but Labour is too weak to implement it and as a result they have lost control of our borders.' While the Conservatives' Rwanda plan was in theory uncapped, it was expected to take only around 1,000 asylum seekers in its first five years of operation thanks to limited capacity in the East African nation. The plan, which Starmer had previously dismissed as a 'gimmick', was scrapped as one of the first acts of the incoming Labour Government last year.
