logo
Rabindranath Tagore will always be relevant to Bangladesh

Rabindranath Tagore will always be relevant to Bangladesh

Indian Express18-06-2025
The recent vandalism at Rabindranath Tagore's ancestral Kuthi Bari at Sirajganj in Bangladesh has raised justified criticism in both India and Bangladesh. The present interim government, headed by Muhammad Yunus, has condemned it, and two persons have been taken into custody. The government has also clarified that such incidents are unwarranted and undesirable. It also stated that Tagore remains a continuing source of inspiration, and such stray incidents do not, in any way, diminish his towering presence in the historical evolution of Bangladesh.
In erstwhile East Pakistan, there was a concerted effort to denigrate Tagore. The state-approved radio was not allowed to play his songs. But his works had a significant influence on the 1952 Language Movement, which eventually led to the emergence of Bangladesh. Linguistic nationalism triumphed over communalism and challenged the very basis of the two-nation theory.
For Maulana Bhashani, who played a historic role in challenging the government's diktat and helped in creating a firmer basis of Bengali nationalism, Tagore's works were an integral component of Bengali culture and heritage. One of the canards that was perpetrated by a small section of Islamists was that Tagore opposed the establishment of Dacca (now Dhaka) University, for which there is no historical evidence. The Dacca Nawab family also denied any truth in this. In fact, when Tagore visited the University in 1926, he was carried by students from the railway station to the place where he stayed. Similarly, there is a small section among Bangladeshi elites who wish to replace Amar Sonar Bangla, Bangladesh's national anthem.
Qazi Abdul Mannan, a well-known Bangladeshi Tagore scholar, commented on Tagore's respect for medieval Sufi saints. Mannan observed that Tagore placed his faith in those who transcended narrow religious boundaries and hoped that humanists from both communities would be able to cement the gulf. For Tagore, the solution needed to be social rather than merely political. Tagore showed that even during the medieval period, many holy figures — many of them Muslims — attempted to bridge the divide. Tagore acknowledged Kazi Nazrul Islam's literary qualities and encouraged young Muslims in their literary pursuits. The song Amar Sonar Bangla reflected a hope of ushering in a new age.
Tagore's best and most productive period was spent at Kuthi Bari in Shilaidaha on the banks of the Padma in the 1890s. His finest literary writings of this period include one of his most popular poems, Nirjharer Swapna Bhanga, which seemed to contain the rudimentary philosophy of Visva-Bharati. Here, he penned another classic: Dui Bigha Jomi. On January 10, 1972, when Sheikh Mujibur Rahman landed at Delhi airport, his speech included a quote from Tagore: 'Rikta āmi Nishma āmi dēbār kichu nē'I, āchē śudhu bhālōbāsa tā'i diẏē jai' (I am empty, I am free, I have nothing to give, only love, so I give). Hundreds of young Bangladeshis still visit Shilaidaha daily.
Mannan noted that Tagore looked to the Hindu-Muslim riots as a sign of degradation of the contemporary Indian situation and made efforts to find an amicable solution. For instance, to elicit the opinion of intellectuals on the Hindu-Muslim conflict, Tagore initiated the Nizam Lectures in 1936, and Qazi Abdul Wadood delivered three lectures on this subject.
The Tagore family led an autonomous and somewhat isolated existence among the Hindu Bengali elites of the late-nineteenth century. The family was considered 'Pirali' Brahmins – the word comes from the belief that Pir and Ali dined with the ancestors of the Tagores and converted them – who were ostracised socially by their orthodox counterparts. Nawab Wajid Ali Shah had considerable influence on the family. According to Bangladeshi author Ghulam Murshid: 'Bengal has not had a second genius as great and as many-sided as Tagore. But Tagore did not reach such heights by genius alone. The family and environment that he was born into stoked his genius and encouraged it to grow. This is true not just of his literary creativity but also of all other aspects of his genius.'
Among the many stalwarts of modern Bengali literature, including Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay, Tagore is the most secular, modern, cosmopolitan, and Gladstonian liberal. He not only championed Bengali language and culture, but also minced no words to criticise them when needed. In one of his poems titled Bangamata, he held Bengal's affectionate, motherly culture responsible for its lack of interest in exploring the world beyond the confines of their comfort zone. His words transcend any religion or localism. He was — and will remain — relevant to Bangladesh, India and the world.
The writer taught Political Science at Delhi University
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Gurgaon detentions, Punjab and Haryana HC seeks SOP for identifying illegal migrants
After Gurgaon detentions, Punjab and Haryana HC seeks SOP for identifying illegal migrants

Indian Express

time39 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

After Gurgaon detentions, Punjab and Haryana HC seeks SOP for identifying illegal migrants

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Wednesday asked the Haryana government to place on record whether any standard operating procedure (SOP) exists for verification of migrant workers after a petition alleged that several bona fide citizens were wrongly picked up in Gurgaon and kept in 'inhumane' conditions. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a lawyer sought directions for framing a uniform procedure for identifying illegal migrants. The petitioner told the bench that the police in Gurgaon had rounded up people from minority linguistic groups, branding them as illegal foreign nationals, despite their possessing Aadhaar, voter ID, ration cards and documents proving parentage. 'They were detained in community centres, sometimes in groups of two to three hundred, with no access to family members or lawyers,' the counsel submitted, adding that even when local police and gram panchayats from West Bengal certified that the detainees were Indian citizens, they were not released for days. The petitioner argued that while both Punjab and Haryana must already have a verification procedure in place, it was either absent or being 'flagrantly violated'. He relied on documents citing a May 2, 2025, communication of the Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) Foreigners Branch, which reportedly authorised states to detain and deport Bangladeshi and Rohingya nationals. However, he pointed out that the SOP referred to in those instructions was not traceable on the MHA website. The counsel for Haryana defended the detentions, saying the state police had acted in accordance with directions issued by the Union government. 'Special search operations were launched in Gurugram to find illegal residents. Those found without valid proof of nationality were kept in holding centres as per MHA instructions,' the state submitted. At this, the bench asked the government counsel to either produce the SOP on record or categorically state through an affidavit that no such SOP was available. 'Unless you produce it before us, we will not be able to assess the validity of the procedure,' the court observed. The court directed Haryana to file an affidavit clarifying whether the SOP exists on the MHA website and, if so, to place it on record. The matter was then adjourned. The police over the last few weeks allegedly rounded up several migrant workers as part of the drive aimed at identifying illegal immigrants in Gurgaon, and it sparked panic among the Bengali-speaking migrant community, prompting many to leave the city.

Let students dream
Let students dream

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Let students dream

A senior assistant editor with the Times of India, Mohammed Wajihuddin writes about Muslims, their issues, hopes and aspirations. Committed to upholding inclusiveness, communal amity and freedom to dissent and debate, he endeavours to promote peaceful existence. A passionate reader of Islam, he endeavours to save the faith from the clutches of the jihadists. An ardent lover of Urdu poetry, he believes words are the best weapons to fight jingoism. LESS ... MORE Students of AMU have called off their three-week strike, and those on a hunger strike ended it after VC Prof Naeema Khatun promised the students' union election in December. The demand to reduce the hiked fees has also been accepted. Khatun offered a glass of juice to the students on a hunger strike. This is neither the first time a VC visited the dharna spot and persuaded students to end the hunger strike by offering a glass of juice. Nor will it be the last. In its history of over a century, AMU has seen such situations several times. But one incident during the tenure of Dr Zakir Hussain as AMU's VC has gone down in the varsity's folklore. Former AMU Students' Union President and founder of Iqra International Educational Foundation Dr Abidullah Ghazi (1936-2021) did M A in Political Science from AMU–former Vice-president M Hamid Ansari was his classmate in the 1960s. Abidullah came from a family of noted Islamic scholars and freedom fighters. It was his great-grandfather, Abdullah Ansari, whom Sir Syed Ahmed Khan, AMU's founder, invited to set up the Sunni Theology Department at Mohammedan Anglo Oriental College. MAO College metamorphosed into AMU in 1920. Ansari also led the funeral prayer of Sir Syed in 1898. Abidullah Ghazi, in his Urdu autobiography 'Jahad-e-Musalsal: Aligarh Se Aligarh Tak,' recalls an interesting incident from his student days on the AMU campus. During his tenure as AMU's VC, Zakir Husain reduced the Muharram holidays, enraging Shia students. One student leader named Jaffer Mehdi Tabaan sat on a hunger strike to protest this decision. The Students' union meeting, attended by both Shia and Sunni students, decided to show solidarity with Tabaan as his condition worsened. Interestingly, even Zakir Sahab attended this meeting. Student leader Saeed Anda (Egg), who was notorious for coining colourful terms and slogans, gave a fiery speech in which he used a line that became memorable: 'Afsos hai ke is Jamia mein Zakir Hussain Zikre Hussain ko mana karta hai (It is regrettable that in this university a Zakir Husain is stopping pupils from commemorating Hussain).' In Muharram, especially in the initial 10 days, Shias intensely mourn the martyrdom of the Prophet's grandson Imam Hussain at Karbala (Iraq), and Zakir Sahab had substantially reduced the holidays for this commemoration. His argument was that the students should commemorate Hussain's martyrdom by attending classes. After giving a good speech on the life of Imam Hussain, Zakir Sahab went to meet the student who was on a hunger strike. He admired Tabaan's spirit and persuaded him to end the strike by offering him a glass of juice. That was Zakir Sahab, whom PM Pandit Nehru and education minister Maulana Azad had sent to Aligarh to save it from the stormy winds which threatened it in the aftermath of the partition. Zakir Sahab injected hope, confidence among the AMU community and saved the chaman of Sir Syed, which faced an existential crisis. Another interesting anecdote from Zakir Sahab's time as AMU's VC is that once a student delegation went to meet him with a complaint. The sherwani of one of the students in the delegation was unbuttoned. Zakir Sahab stood up from his chair, came closer to the student and spoke to him softly while buttoning his Sherwani. Such small gestures won the hearts of the students. To a VC, students are like his or her children. Youth is the time when we humans want to change the world. Blessed with boundless energy, many of the youth become idealists. This is a phase when they dream, create, experiment, commit mistakes and also disrupt the most. Let the students dream, create and commit mistakes. Post-script: I just saw a video clip of a student who was on a hunger strike. He claims he was offered juice by the VC. He took a sip but did not gulp it. He says the boys and girls who were on strike are not happy with the notice they received after the strike was called off. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.

Murder in August: Pakistan's covert role in Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination
Murder in August: Pakistan's covert role in Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Murder in August: Pakistan's covert role in Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination

Pakistan has never fully accepted Bangladesh's independence, and its actions since 1971 prove it remains a persistent adversary of the country's sovereignty A man is silhouetted as he passes by a graffiti of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Reuters The birth of Bangladesh in 1971 cannot be reduced to a mere civil war. It was the culmination of decades of political, cultural, and emotional alienation between West Pakistan and the Bengali-speaking population of the East. From the very beginning, Pakistan's ruling elite viewed the Bengali identity—with its distinct language, heritage, and democratic aspirations—as a threat to their Urdu-centric, militarized state structure. India's recognition and military support during the Bangladesh Liberation War sealed Pakistan's defeat but did not diminish its ambitions to control or destabilize the region. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on August 15, 1975, barely four years after Bangladesh's independence, marked a grim turning point in the country's history. It bears the fingerprints of both internal betrayal and external orchestration. This year, as we observe the golden jubilee of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's assassination, we revisit the deep-rooted tensions, the language-based suppression, and the geopolitical motives that suggest Pakistan never stopped seeing Bangladesh as a province that slipped away—and Mujib as the man who made it happen. The Oppression of East Pakistan Before 1971, East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) endured relentless discrimination under West Pakistan's political and military establishment, culminating in one of the darkest chapters of South Asian history. Despite Bengalis being the demographic majority, they faced systemic marginalization, economic exploitation, and cultural suppression—including the infamous attempt to impose Urdu as the sole state language, which triggered the 1952 Language Movement and the killing of unarmed students in Dhaka. The crisis deepened when Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's Awami League won a decisive majority in the 1970 general elections, but West Pakistan's leadership refused to hand over power, sowing the seeds of rebellion. Horrors of Operation Searchlight On March 25, 1971, the Pakistan Army launched Operation Searchlight, a coordinated campaign of mass murder, rape, and terror in Dhaka and other cities. International media, including The New York Times and The Sunday Times (London), reported horrifying scenes of bodies piled in the streets and widespread accounts of atrocities, including brutal sexual violence against women and even young girls. A 1971 report by Time magazine described Dhaka University as 'a slaughterhouse,' where students and professors were executed in large numbers. In the face of this genocide, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman became the unwavering voice of Bengali resistance, embodying the spirit of liberation and unity. Resistance, Liberation, and Refugees The brutal crackdown by the Pakistan Army in 1971, marked by mass killings and systematic oppression, ignited a nationwide resistance movement and a full-scale liberation struggle. As violence escalated, millions of Bengali refugees fled into India, triggering a massive humanitarian crisis. Under Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, India extended political, military, and moral support to the Bengali freedom fighters—the Mukti Bahini. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On December 3, 1971, after Pakistan launched pre-emptive airstrikes on Indian airbases, India formally entered the war. In just 13 days, Indian forces, in joint operations with the Mukti Bahini, overwhelmed the Pakistani military. On December 16, 1971, 93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered in Dhaka—one of the largest mass capitulations in modern military history. This decisive victory shattered Pakistan's oppressive regime in the East and gave birth to an independent Bangladesh, fulfilling the long-cherished dream of a sovereign Bengali nation. Saddled with Humiliation After its humiliating defeat in the 1971 Liberation War, Pakistan was reluctant to recognise Bangladesh as an independent nation and continued to view it as a 'lost province.' Driven by vengeance and bitterness over global embarrassment, Pakistan delayed formal recognition until 1974 and remained hostile even afterward. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the architect of Bangladesh's independence, became Pakistan's prime target. Determined to destabilize the young nation, Pakistan is believed to have orchestrated a covert plan to eliminate Mujib, working through pro-Pakistan elements within the Bangladesh Army, including officers ideologically aligned with Islamabad. This conspiracy culminated in the brutal assassination of Mujib and most of his family members on the dark morning of August 15, 1975. It was far more than a political killing—it was an attack on the very soul of Bangladesh, intended to erase the legacy of its founding father and plunge the nation into uncertainty. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Legacy of Bangabandhu Revered as Bangabandhu ('Friend of Bengal') and the Father of the Nation, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman led the oppressed people of East Pakistan through decades of exploitation, poverty, and unspeakable atrocities, including mass killings and systematic sexual violence by the West Pakistani regime. Through unshakable determination, Mujib united a broken and victimized region, transforming it into an independent Bangladesh in 1971. His vision, courage, and compassion made him a beacon of hope for the Bengali people. His assassination on August 15, 1975, sent shockwaves not only across Bangladesh but around the world. The global community mourned the loss of a leader who symbolised justice, freedom, and dignity for the oppressed. Islamabad at Odds with Reality Pakistan has never fully accepted Bangladesh's independence, and its actions since 1971 prove it remains a persistent adversary of the country's sovereignty. The assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and his family in 1975 was Pakistan's first hidden victory in its long-term strategy to destabilise Bangladesh. That conspiracy, executed through pro-Pakistani officers within Bangladesh's own military, silenced the very voice that gave birth to the nation. Decades later, Pakistan's shadow looms again—this time allegedly supporting unrest, funding misinformation, and fomenting student uprisings against Sheikh Hasina, Mujib's daughter and the current Prime Minister. The recent political upheaval and shifts in power can be seen as Pakistan's second strategic success in weakening Bangladesh from within. As citizens of a free nation—born out of blood and sacrifice—it would be a betrayal to forget Sheikh Mujibur Rahman's leadership, vision, and ultimate sacrifice. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD To neglect his legacy is to deny our identity. To ignore Pakistan's ongoing interference is to risk losing the very sovereignty that was won at such immense cost. Lt Gen Dushyant Singh (Retd) is the Director General of the Centre for Land Warfare Studies (CLAWS). Views expressed are personal and do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store