
Jane Street Scrutiny in India Puts Secretive Firm in the Spotlight
Jane Street is one of Wall Street's most profitable and secretive firms. And when Indian regulators accused it of market manipulation earlier this month, it rocked the finance world.
On today's Big Take podcast, Bloomberg finance reporter Katherine Doherty joins host Sarah Holder to go inside Jane Street's unique trading strategy and what new regulatory scrutiny could mean for the high frequency trading industry.
Listen and follow The Big Take on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Terminal clients: click here to subscribe.
Here is a lightly edited transcript of the conversation:
Sarah Holder: Jane Street is one of Wall Street's most profitable trading firms. You've maybe heard the name. But unless you're a Wall Street insider, you might not know who they are, or what exactly they do.
Katherine Doherty: They are the middleman in many ways.
Holder: Katherine Doherty is a finance reporter for Bloomberg.
Doherty: Even though they're such a powerful player in finance, you wouldn't really know that you are interacting with them in the market.
Holder: If you've ever bought stock on Robinhood or made an investment with your retirement fund, chances are… Jane Street, or a firm like it, helped process that trade, behind the scenes. Every day, they facilitate billions of transactions between buyers and sellers, across markets.
Doherty: Jane Street is connected to all of the pipes, all of the plumbing of the market.
Holder: And that means Jane Street makes a lot of money from trades. In 2024, its revenue was $20.5 billion, almost double what it brought in, in 2023. But that growth has also come with new scrutiny. Earlier this month, India's main financial regulator accused the firm of market manipulation.
Bloomberg TV: India's market regulator is barring Jane Street from access to its local securities market.
Bloomberg TV: It may actually be the biggest fine if it materializes ever, uh, you know, for such kind of market manipulation, alleged market manipulation.
Holder: Jane Street has called the regulator's conclusions 'fundamentally mistaken' and has said it will assess its legal options. But Katherine says, the rest of the industry is watching to see whether this investigation sets off a reckoning that could change the way firms like Jane Street operate around the world. And just how fast they might grow.
I'm Sarah Holder, and this is the Big Take from Bloomberg News.
Today on the show: we take a look at one of Wall Street's most secretive firms. How Jane Street's trading got it in hot water — and what that could mean for regulation in a corner of the industry that not many people pay attention to.
Jane Street has a reputation as a firm with highly-compensated, high-performing talent.
Doherty: The people at Jane Street are often described as mathematical. A lot of them play poker. They have puzzles in their offices. They're problem solvers in the most advanced way.
Holder: And those puzzle-playing problem solvers spend their days helping institutions and other investors make trades.
Doherty: Essentially, they're matching a buyer and a seller. You think that when you place an order it's as if you go to the grocery store and you're buying something. Well in the markets, there needs to be someone that actually helps make that match happen. Jane Street is that firm.
Holder: They're the middlemen for all sorts of transactions. If you buy stock in a company through a trading app or if you ask a broker to invest your money, Jane Street might be the firm behind the curtain, helping move that money around. Or you might be interacting with one of its competitors.
Doherty: And you don't know if it was Jane Street or if it was Citadel Securities or Susquehanna. There are so many of these market-making firms, and frankly, until the meme stock craze, retail traders didn't seem to care, or at least there wasn't as much discussion.
Holder: Jane Street is a private company — and not a bank. While it has to abide by market rules, it isn't subject to the same degree of regulation that big banks such as JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs have faced since the 2008 financial crisis. Those other financial institutions are under pressure to avoid risk-taking. And that gives Jane Street an edge.
Doherty: They can invest in their technology in the way that banks can't because banks have to be a little bit more conservative with their own money.
And the secret sauce is that they're able to code in this special language as well. And what that means is it is hard for other firms to copy exactly what Jane Street is doing. And they're able to take really big bets in the market.
They're not in the game to necessarily invest in a company because they think that the company's earnings are going to increase over time. Or they're not looking to invest in even a sector because they believe in that sector. Their primary goal is to just be greasing the pipes of the markets.
Holder: They're not just using elbow grease. They're using powerful technology to guide their trades. If they can anticipate how markets are moving from one second to the next, they can offer the right prices — and profit.
Doherty: So they've developed algorithms. They're using data and they're digesting that data to make inferences, they're guessing where the market's going to be moving. So if they, for example, see a share, maybe it's a share of Apple and there's a buyer in the market that is looking to buy at a certain price and there's a seller in the market, their algorithm is telling them to match at a certain time, at a certain price, and it is in milliseconds.
So this is very, very fast. And they're doing this with so many shares that the way that they make money is they're taking a tiny profit—the difference between where the share is sold and where the share is bought—and they're pocketing that, and it might be pennies.
You might think, 'oh, this company that makes $20 billion in a year, how do they do that?' It adds up over time, and because they're using their algorithms, their technology, their people, over time they make billions of dollars.
Holder: So it's a volume game and it's a speed game.
Doherty: Yes.
Holder: A volume and speed game known as high-frequency trading.
Still, there's a lot about the firm we don't know. And that sense of secrecy is deeply embedded in the company's culture. Its offices even hung a poster with a famous World War II slogan: 'Loose Lips Sink Ships.'
Doherty: You don't see a lot of Jane Street executives in the public eye. They're not ever really on TV or even in really niche financial conferences. If you go on LinkedIn, at one time, profiles were discouraged. And now if you do see a profile, there's often not a title attached to a person's name, and that is reflective of how this firm operates in terms of its culture.
The times that it has been brought into the public eye, it's probably something they would not want.
Holder: One of those moments came with the collapse of FTX, the multibillion-dollar crypto company that had been founded by a former Jane Street employee, Sam Bankman-Fried.
Doherty: When FTX collapsed, there was a lot of discussion about the risk-taking that Sam's firm took, and some comparisons to Jane Street.
Holder: But Jane Street hasn't been the target of any major regulatory investigations itself. Until… now.
Earlier this month, India's regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board, or SEBI, started investigating the firm for market manipulation.
Holder: Why did regulators start circling? Do we know what made them want to investigate Jane Street in India?
Doherty: So it all stems back to a lawsuit that the firm had with former employees that went to the hedge fund Millennium, and they were suing these former employees for, we didn't know it at the time, but ended up being identified as an options trading strategy.
They identified what they didn't want to lose as proprietary information. Through this case, the number, the profit that they were making in options specifically, and in India, came out. It was such a large number that the regulators in India said, 'hold on a second. We have to look into this.'
Holder: We get into what those regulators found, and what it could mean for the way firms like Jane Street operate around the world…. After the break.
Holder: In the past few years, Jane Street and other market-making firms saw an opportunity to expand their presence in Indian markets. Over the past five years, India's options market has boomed — along with the number of retail traders.
That growth has also led to more volatility, and a higher potential for profit. And for Jane Street, that paid off — the firm made more than $4 billion in India in just over two years.
Meanwhile, regulators in India said nine out of 10 individual traders who bet on futures and options lost a significant amount of money doing so. And that's part of what got regulators looking at how these firms were operating.
Bloomberg's Katherine Doherty walked me through what happened.
Doherty: You have the options market and you have the equity market. They're directly correlated.
Holder: The equities market is where you buy or sell stocks. The options market is where you buy the option to buy or sell stocks at a certain price at a future date. The key is betting on which direction the stock price might go… Something that's influenced by activity in the equities market.
Doherty: The regulator in India, the Securities and Exchange Board, is accusing the firm of manipulating the market. Using its money to place such large bets on one market that it moves the other market in a way that the firm knows they're going to profit from it.
The firm has said that this is the term 'arbitrage.' Arbitrage is just when you spot a dislocation or you can see that the market is inefficient in a way that you can profit from that. And you can essentially, what the firm would argue is, we were actually making the marketplace better. We were making it more efficient. So yes, it might have moved, but it was moving, in some ways, closer to where it should.
Holder: Basically, the regulator is accusing Jane Street of playing both sides of these markets — and alleging that the firm was putting so much money on one market that it was impacting the other.
The regulator ordered the seizure of about $570 million in profits from the firm, which it claims were unlawful gains. It also temporarily banned Jane Street from trading in the Indian securities market, while it conducts its investigation.
Holder: I mean, the Indian options market is pretty unique. What could this order mean for Jane Street's or other similar market-making firms' operations elsewhere around the world?
Doherty: First and foremost, there's nothing stopping a regulator from looking into a firm that they regulate. That's their job. So anytime a firm is in the news, like, like Jane Street, there's increased scrutiny.
Holder: Does it mean that other regulators from other countries where Jane Street operates might be wanting to turn over more stones?
Doherty: Yes. I talked to someone that said, regulators don't wanna be asleep at the wheel. So even if it's just precautionary, it's very likely that a regulator might take a second look at what they have access to. And if they don't have access or they have more questions, they might ask Jane Street to answer those questions, just so they have some reassurance that there's nothing that they see as potentially nefarious or manipulative.
And it goes the same for a peer of Jane's. I've talked to other market participants that would be competitors to Jane, other market-makers, and one firm said that right after this order came out, they were digging through the order and they also had an internal meeting amongst themselves to say, 'hey, are we doing anything that might not be exactly the same as what Jane Street was doing, but let's look through our trading strategies to make sure there's nothing that comes across as questionable or that could be brought up by regulators as nefarious.' And this person was quick to say, like, 'We didn't, you know, come to that conclusion.' But you have to be proactive.
Holder: Jane Street has set aside nearly $570 million in an escrow account, to comply with SEBI's order while it investigates. A person familiar with the matter told Bloomberg that the firm doesn't plan to immediately return to India's options market.
For now, market-watchers will wait to see what the regulator's investigation turns up, and whether Jane Street decides to file an appeal.
Holder: What could this scrutiny of Jane Street mean for the entire high frequency trading, market-making industry?
Doherty: It's a really important question, and it depends who you ask. People in the industry even when I ask that question just about Jane Street's future, I had a quick answer from someone that said they're so large and they're so good at what they do, that this won't impact the amount of trading that they're still able to facilitate and that they're just going to keep doing what they do because they have such an important role, across global markets.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
1 in 3 US smartphone imports now made in India, China's lead shrinks
India's share in US smartphone imports surged to nearly 36 per cent in the first five months of 2025, from about 11 per cent in 2024. China, which continues to dominate the product category, saw its share drop from 82 per cent to 49 per cent over the same period. India's growing share — now 1 in 3, driven largely by Apple iPhones — comes amid ongoing trade talks with the US. While smartphones are India's top export to the US by value, President Donald Trump has threatened a 25 per cent tariff on Indian-made iPhones. US smartphone imports from India jumped by over three times year-on-year to 21.3 million units between January and May this year, according to data from the US International Trade Commis-sion (USITC). In value terms (CIF), imports of Indian-made smartphones increased 182 per cent y-o-y to $9.35 billion, already higher than around $7 billion in the whole of 2024. In May, Apple CEO Tim Cook had said the company expects most iPhones sold in the US in the April-June quarter to have India as their country of origin. Roughly 20 per cent of Apple's global iPhone production capacity is now based in India. Meanwhile, China exported 29.4 million smartphones to the US between January and May — a 27 per cent y-o-y drop — valued at around $10 billion. China (49 per cent) and India (36 per cent) were followed by Vietnam with 8.3 million units exported, accounting for a share of 14 per cent. Apple doubled down on production in India in 2020, after the government announced its flagship Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme to support smartphone manufacturing in the country. Through its contract manufacturers, the company has been the biggest beneficiary of the scheme, which has helped it move some production away from China. While it started by making some of its older iPhones in India, Apple today produces all models, including the higher-end Pro range, in the country. Apple's pivot to India from China for US-bound exports has drawn criticism from Trump, who, in May, said he's told Apple's chief executive that he does not want the company to expand its manufacturing operations in India. 'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else. If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US. Thank you for your attention to this matter,' Trump had said in a social media post. However, Apple is unlikely to overhaul its India expansion plans in the near-term. In May, its contract manufacturer Foxconn informed the London Stock Exchange of a $1.49 billion investment in one of its India units, Yuzhan Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd. The new plant is expected to come up in Tamil Nadu, where Foxconn already has a major iPhone production base. There are some challenges though. Of Apple's latest official supplier list, in 2023, as many as 157 of the company's various vendors and suppliers manufactured in mainland China, up from 151 the previous year. The number of Indian suppliers was 14. People in the know say that number has now risen to 64, marking a slow but steady shift of Apple's supplier base to India. In a Lok Sabha reply on Wednesday, Union MoS for Electronics and Information Technology Jitin Prasada said mobile manufacturing units in India have increased to 300 in 2024-25, from just 2 in 2014-15. At the same time, production of mobile phones increased 28 times to Rs 5.45 lakh crore, while exports increased 127 times to Rs 2 lakh crore. 'Total FDI in field of electronics manufacturing in last 5 years (i.e. since FY 2020-21) is US$ 4,071 mn, cumulative FDI of US$ 2,802 mn has been contributed by MeitY PLI beneficiaries,' Prasada said. Aggam Walia is a Correspondent at The Indian Express, reporting on power, renewables, and mining. His work unpacks intricate ties between corporations, government, and policy, often relying on documents sourced via the RTI Act. Off the beat, he enjoys running through Delhi's parks and forests, walking to places, and cooking pasta. ... Read More Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India not ‘tariff king', says Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal
Commerce Secretary Sunil Barthwal on Friday said that India can face competition and is not the 'tariff king', as India's average tariffs for the UK following the trade deal are set to drop to 3 per cent compared to the current levels of 15 per cent. Barthwal said at a press briefing that India and the UK have managed to strike the 'right balance between strengths and sensitivities', and that the government will begin capacity-building of exporters to make full use of the tariff concessions achieved in the UK trade deal. 'FTAs are done, but the gains from the concessions can only come through stakeholder involvement. We have got concessions in textiles, leather footwear and processed footwear sectors, where tariffs were as high as 70 per cent. Now, the Commerce and Industry Ministry will begin capacity-building of our exporters,' Barthwal said. Barthwal said that fears of dumping are unfounded, as the trade deal has rules of origin and product-specific rules in place to address such concerns, adding that the deal is expected to be ratified by the UK government within a year, as it must pass through both Houses of the British Parliament. 'The regulatory ecosystem between the two countries will also be improved. In this FTA, there are timelines as to when the mutual recognition agreement is supposed to be completed. This will improve certainty for businesses operating in both countries,' Barthwal said. Government officials said that India's major exports — from labour-intensive sectors like textiles, gems & jewellery, leather and footwear, machinery, pharmaceuticals, and processed foods — are set to gain a major edge with zero-duty access to the UK, improving the competitiveness of Indian goods in the UK market. 'The UK market opens up duty-free for nearly all Indian agri-exports, with just a few limited exceptions like pork, chicken, eggs, rice, and sugar. A golden opportunity for our farmers and agri-entrepreneurs to shine on a global stage,' the Commerce and Industry Ministry said. The ministry said India has safeguarded its sensitive sectors — dairy, cereals and millets, pulses, and vegetables to high-value items like gold, jewellery, lab-grown diamonds, and certain essential oils. 'Strategic exclusions also cover critical energy fuels, marine vessels, worn clothing, and critical polymers and their monofilaments, smartphones, optical fibres — a strong stand to protect farmers, MSMEs, and national interests,' the ministry said. Notably, India has opened 89.5 per cent of its tariff lines, covering 91 per cent of the UK's exports, and only 24.5 per cent of the UK's export value will enjoy immediate duty-free market access. 'Strategically important products — particularly those where domestic capacity is being built under flagship initiatives like Make in India and PLI — will see concessions over periods of 5, 7, or even 10 years with gradual tariff reduction,' the ministry said. Joint Secretary in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Darpan Jain, said that the UK has offered its best FTA deal to India compared to all its trade partners in services adding that the UK has provided comprehensive and deep market access in 137 sub-sectors. India has a trade surplus of around $6.6 billion with the UK, with exports of $19.8 billion and imports of $13.2 billion in FY25. Jain said the UK's commitments on mobility are comprehensive and the best in any FTA. 'The UK has provided an assured mobility regime for various categories of natural persons: Business Visitors (BV) for all sectors — 90 days in any six-month period; Intra-Corporate Transferees (ICT) for all sectors including partner and dependent — three years.' The ministry said that the UK has accorded Indian suppliers a legal guarantee to participate in the UK procurement market — worth approximately $122 billion — for procurements conducted at the Central level of government and certain utilities. India, similarly, opens up a market opportunity of $114 billion. 'For the first time, the UK agreed to take a binding commitment to provide non-discriminatory treatment to our suppliers under the UK's Social Value regime. The UK's threshold for goods and services is approximately Rs 1.6 crore; India's threshold is approximately Rs 5.5 crore. For procurement related to construction services, both sides have agreed to a similar threshold of Rs 60 crore,' the ministry said. A government official said that India has taken a complete carve-out for its MSME preferential procurement policy. 'With respect to the Make in India policy, access to UK suppliers is restricted to eligibility to participate as deemed 'Class-II local suppliers' in domestic tenders above the agreed thresholds. Indian suppliers will continue to receive preferential treatment as 'Class-I local suppliers' in the UK,' the official explained.


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Nagaraju asks banks to raise capital, lend more
Banks need to further step up lending to meet the economy's demanding growth requirements, and should not hesitate to explore multiple avenues to raise the capital needed, financial services secretary M Nagaraju said on Friday. He assured all necessary policy support to the lenders, and hinted at relaxations in the foreign direct investment (FDI) rules. Speaking to Financial Express Deputy Managing Editor Shobhana Subramanian at the FE Modern BFSI Summit here, Nagaraju said: 'We also actually need to look at reviewing the current FDI rules in the banking sector to enable Indian banks to raise more capital…more patient capital.' The FDI in private banks is currently capped at 74 per cent, whereas the limit is 20 per cent for public sector banks (PSBs); any single entity cannot hold more than 15 per cent in any Indian bank unless exemption is granted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). 'If foreign capital comes at a cheaper rate, I think we should welcome (it). Currently, it is 15 per cent (single entity cap), and if it can be more, the banks will be able to expand credit, that's the goal,' the DFS secretary said. He stressed the need to have sustained high growth in credit flows to the needy sectors of the economy, including MSMEs. As of June 27, 2025, credit offtake was up 9.5 per cent on year, lagging deposit growth of 10.1 per cent. Nagaraju's comments come at a time when the State Bank of India (SBI) has raised Rs 25,000 crore through qualified institutional placements (QIPs) to bolster its capital base, and other state-run banks among themselves are set to raise Rs 20,000 crore via this route in the current financial year. 'Credit growth is a little slower in this quarter, but we are expecting that it will pick up… we also want the banks to lend,' the official said. With large corporations flush with cash, credit growth is now largely directed at MSMEs, the secretary said. In March 2025, the aggregate capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 46 major banks reached a record high of 17.2 per cent, but the credit flows haven't been exactly keeping pace with this, or the investment demand to the assisted via bank capital. With banks required to play a pivotal role in driving India's ambition of becoming a $30-trillion economy by 2047, he said bank credit to the private non-financial sector should reach around 130 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) from 56 per cent now. According to Nagaraju, banks and financial institutions need to explore and expand various avenues of raising capital, including conventional equity markets, issuance of Basel III-compliant AT1 bonds and tier 2 instruments. They could also explore innovative methods like tapping global financial hubs, green bonds, sustainability-linked loans and also foreign debt markets to fund domestic credit expansion. He also urged large incumbent banks to focus on capital conservation by reducing operational costs with the use of technology. Nagaraju said banks ought to reimagine deposit mobilisation and increase leverage and productivity, deepen digital and data capabilities, and build future-readiness in terms of ESG-resilience and governance. By advancing these strategic themes, Indian banks could actually transform themselves into stronger institutions, he said. 'Therefore, access to capital from all sources needs to be looked at and worked upon by all of us. We need multiple globally competitive large banks facilitating access to global funds, best talent and technical expertise,' he said. Currently, only two Indian banks — SBI and HDFC — are in the top 100 global banks by total assets, which is not enough, he said, drawing comparison to lenders in China and the US. On further consolidation of PSBs, he said the previous mergers have yielded good results. 'We would see that wherever the synergies are, we can always look at them (more PSB mergers).' Banks anchor inclusive growth by bringing the unbanked under formal financial systems, enabling millions through schemes like Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana, and more, he added.