
State cap on local school spending sparks heated debate
Osborne: School spending cap would arrest 'runaway' local tax hikes
Jason Osborne
By Kevin Landrigan
House Majority Leader Jason Osborne said the New Hampshire Property Tax Relief Act — a state cap on local school spending increases tucked into the proposed House budget — would rescue homeowners 'held hostage by runaway' tax hikes.
Megan Tuttle, president of the National Education Association of New Hampshire, said the cap 'ignores the will of the voters' since residents in 17 towns rejected per-pupil spending caps at town and school district meetings last month.
The budget is up for a final vote today. (Thursday)
While the issue has gotten much less attention in the budget than significant cuts to higher education, the arts, energy and human service programs, both sides agree the proposal, if adopted, could have the biggest impact on budgets at the local level.
'The Property Tax Protection Act is the heart of this budget,' House Speaker Sherman Packard, R-Londonderry, said in a recent statement that adjusted the bill's branding a bit.
'It will ensure municipalities stay fiscally responsible, curb runaway budgets, and protect Granite Staters from tax hikes — without cutting essential services.'
If signed into law, the cap would limit school budget spending to the previous year, minus what's been spent on facility purchase and construction, times the five-year average of the U.S. Consumer Price Index.
To go above that school spending cap would require a two-thirds vote of a city council or voters at town or school district meeting.
Tuttle said all voters presented with this concept have rejected it.
In March alone, school voters turned down such budget-cap warrant articles in Bedford, ConVal, Epping, Epsom, Greenland, Haverhill, Hollis, Salem, Thornton and Weare.
'As taxpayers, educators understand the frustration with the rise in property taxes — and we feel it, too,' Tuttle said.
'But putting arbitrary spending caps on our local school budgets is not the way to address a funding crisis created by the state's failure to fully fund an adequate education.'
Critics point out the Legislature just last year adopted a bill allowing residents to propose caps on their school district budgets, which led to last month's votes.
In January, Kearsarge Regional School District was one of the first to overwhelmingly reject a budget cap article and Osborne reacted to that news right away.
'Perhaps, if voters are unwilling to cap themselves, the state will step in and cap local taxes for them,' the Auburn Republican said on Jan. 5.
The bill (HB 675) as introduced days later, deals with several property tax issues that got pared down to this school spending cap.
'For too long, New Hampshire homeowners have been held hostage by runaway property taxes driven by out-of-control local school and municipal budgets,' Osborne wrote in a recent Union Leader op-ed on the topic.
'Hardworking families who play by the rules, work hard, pay their taxes, and contribute to their communities should not be forced to bankroll unchecked spending by local officials.'
Osborne said Democrats accuse Republicans of adopting policies that raise local property taxes, and this is a response.
'It pressures school budgets to stay within responsible limits, discouraging the never-ending tax hikes that make it harder for families to afford their homes. With the Property Tax Relief Act in place, local school budgets will be challenged to exercise fiscal discipline, ensuring that future generations don't have to bear the burden of today's overspending,' Osborne wrote.
Backers note the cap can also be overridden in case of emergency by using an existing state law.
Getting the proposal this far has been no easy task.
Despite the House GOP majority, the bill faced a major scare last month when a Democrat's move to table it barely failed, 189-187.
Then the bill narrowly won initial approval on a roll call vote, 190-185.
Packard sent the bill to the House Finance Committee, which decided to retain the separate legislation until next year and instead tuck the proposal into the state budget's trailer bill (HB 2).
Supporters believe having it in the trailer bill increases likelihood it could become part of a final budget compromise.
Gov. Kelly Ayotte said she hadn't seen the details.
'I haven't studied the specifics of that. I certainly believe in local control, but I also think it is important that local officials protect taxpayers at the local level,' Ayotte said.
Estimated cap: 4.1%
The nonpartisan Reaching Higher NH is the only group to have done an analysis on its impact.
It concludes the maximum budget increase for 2026, based on the five-year Consumer Price Index average increase, is 4.1%.
According to this study, the relevant spending on schools minus facilities could go up by these amounts in some sample communities:
• Manchester: $78.4 million this year to $81.6 million in 2026 and $84.9 million in 2027.
• Nashua: $54.8 million to $57.1 million in 2026 and $59.4 million in 2027.
• Bedford: $55.2 million to $57.5 million in 2026 and $59.9 million in 2027.
• Londonderry: $62.8 million to $65.4 million in 2026 and $68 million in 2027.
• Rochester: $35.4 million to $36.8 million in 2026 and $38.3 million in 2027.
• Salem: $49.7 million to $51.8 million in 2026 and $53.9 million in 2027.
But the Reaching Higher NH report warns of a bleaker picture.
'The mandated budget cap would actually reduce funding for most school districts, even before accounting for inflation, over the next five years,' it concluded.
Critics warn school spending cap would lock in inequities
David Luneau
Rep. David Luneau, D-Hopkinton, the ranking Democrat on the House Education Funding Committee, said the proposal would perpetuate inequities between property-rich and property-poor towns.
'Great for Waterville Valley spending $36K per student; not so good for Manchester. It's bad for kids and locks in opportunity gaps,' Luneau said.
Rep. Dan McGuire, R-Epsom, said while public school enrollment has dropped 11% in the past 30 years, the number of school staff has increased 55%.
Spending per pupil in the last decade has gone up 58% over the past decade, topping the 35% inflation rate over the period, McGuire said.
Rep. Hope Damon, D-Sunapee, said a spending cap would only be fair if the state wasn't near the bottom in state support for its public schools.
'There may be merit to a cap on school district budgets in the future — but certainly not before we have equitable funding from the state to municipalities so that a student's ZIP Code doesn't determine the adequacy of their education resources,' Damon added.
Katherine Blume of Weare supported the idea in her written testimony.
'Everyone is concerned what will happen to their school district if it's the only one around with a budget cap. This bill levels the playing field,' Blume said.
Christine Hodsdon of Exeter had the opposite view.
'This kind of extreme legislation is anti-democratic, anti-public education, anti-student and will hurt the nearly 90% of students in New Hampshire who attend their local public school,' Hodsdon added.
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Bengals' Trey Hendrickson contract standoff gets a hot take from VP JD Vance
Bengals' Trey Hendrickson contract standoff gets a hot take from VP JD Vance Cincinnati Bengals defensive end Trey Hendrickson now has politicians talking about his contract standoff with the team. Appearing on Theo Von's podcast this week, Vice President JD Vance joked around about the contract standoff, with the Middletown, Ohio, politician expressing optimism about the Bengals in the process. "Trey, if you're watching this show: If you're a Republican, I will show up to a Bengals game and take a photo with you if you sign on with the Bengals," Vance joked. "And if you're a Democrat, I'll stay the hell away. Just sign with the Bengals, because we've got a chance, man." RELATED: Bengals news: Jermaine Burton buzz, practice urgency and more As Bengals fans know all too well, though, outside noise doesn't really have a way of impacting how the team does business. That's a rule that will certainly apply to an office as high as Vance's right now, even if he does happen to hail from Ohio. Joe Burrow and others have commented on Hendrickson's standoff with the team recently, too. The next entry in the saga will happen soon when it's revealed if the star pass-rusher shows up to mandatory minicamp or gets fined by the team. RELATED: Bengals' Andrei Iosivas adds 15 pounds while eyeing breakout season


CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 06/06/25
The war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which seemed to escalate almost hourly, has already cost real money in the capital markets. Overnight, Musk's personal net worth reportedly fell by approximately $34 billion. By aligning the timing of their social media exchanges with Tesla's stock movements, a clear pattern emerges: as the feud grew more intense, with language becoming increasingly blunt and emotional, Tesla's share price continued to slide. Many analysts believe that Tesla's stock is likely to remain volatile. To assess its future trajectory, we can start with the trigger of this conflict: a recently passed House spending bill. One provision would eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles—directly impacting Tesla. JPMorgan analysts estimate that the new legislation could cut Tesla's annual profits by around $1.2 billion. However, some market observers note that both Musk and others in the industry had long anticipated that the Trump administration would eventually scrap EV subsidies. This expectation has been priced in—it was only a matter of timing. But of even greater consequence is the second layer of impact: the broader regulatory posture of the White House toward Musk, particularly in the autonomous driving space. Timing is critical. Next week, Tesla is expected to debut its long-awaited Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Progress in self-driving technology has been a key reason many investors remain bullish on Tesla. But the breakdown in Musk's relationship with Trump could undermine those expectations. "there's a view that the battle here going on between musk and Trump, that this is going to continue to sort of, you know, increase, and with that, ultimately does is that autonomous and the regulatory vision does Trump now, now not start to play nice in the sandbox with musk.""Elon Musk, as brilliant as he can be, can also be mercurial and impetuous. CUT TO from a trading perspective, I think the stock could easily trade down into the 250s 260s until you get some support." Beyond the personal feud, the spotlight is also shifting to the broader relationship between Silicon Valley—the U.S. tech hub—and Washington, D.C.—the political center. As Musk and Trump move from allies to adversaries, their split is drawing attention to the evolving dynamic between big tech and federal power. Analysts told CNBC that during Trump's first term, major tech firms often found themselves in the administration's crosshairs. Companies like Meta, Google, and to some extent Apple were all named in antitrust inquiries. Now, the rift between Musk and Trump may open new doors for tech leaders who have had tense relations with Musk. For instance, Jeff Bezos—who also leads a space company—has in recent months made efforts to court Trump more closely, reportedly taking cues from Musk's political playbook. This shift may also present an opportunity for Sam Altman, CEO of AI startup OpenAI. "If you're a startup that's trying to make big names or big headlines with investments for the US, that's probably a good place to be." Still, some analysts caution that this overnight drama may not deserve too much attention. A defining feature of the Trump-era policymaking process has always been its volatility—things can shift dramatically within just a few hours. What ultimately matters is returning to the fundamentals and taking a long-term view of where the industry—and the economy—are heading.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who won the first NYC Democratic mayoral primary debate?
Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo won Wednesday night's Democratic mayoral primary debate — because his opponents' relentless attacks did more to elevate him than drag him down, a Post panel of veteran campaign strategists said. The thrice-elected Democrat took some gut punches, but there was no knockout blow or major blunder on his part, the political analysts on both sides of the aisle said. 'I tuned in to see a mayoral debate, not a debate about Andrew Cuomo,' quipped campaign strategist Ken Frydman of the nine-person debate moderated by NBC 4 NY and Politico. 'By making Andrew the debate, they elevated him,' said Frydman. Because Cuomo was constantly under fire, he got more airtime to respond to each jab and by default dominated the more than two-hour debate, the political experts said. 'Everyone tried to land a punch on Andrew Cuomo, but failed,' said campaign strategist O' Brien 'OB' Murray. 'The first 20 minutes gave Cuomo the center stage, literally and figuratively,' he said, referring to the ex-gov's position in the middle of the group of candidates standing on the dais at 30 Rockefeller Center. 'He handled the attacks and was able to deflect. They actually gave him more airtime than they should have,' Murray said. Republican campaign strategist Bill O'Reilly said the verbal pummeling Cuomo received from most of his eight primary rivals does not alter his status as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination. 'It was Andrew Cuomo vs. the Lilliputians, and the Lilliputians fell short. That's the bottom line,' O'Reilly said. 'Someone needed to trip up the former governor to slow his momentum, but it was clear from the jump that wouldn't happen. Cuomo hasn't lost a step since leaving Albany, and the field lacked the skill to crack him.' Cuomo also counter-attacked, taking shots at his biggest threats in the polls — 33-year-old Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, a state Assembly member from Queens, and City Comptroller Brad Lander. The former governor delivered the best line when he said, '[President] Trump would go through Mamdani like a hot knife through butter,' O'Reilly noted. Frydman said the candidates and moderators did force Cuomo to squirm to defend his record as governor, including his controversial nursing home policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and his approval of the unpopular 2019 bail reforms. They also tried to make him answer for the spate of sexual misconduct accusations leveled against him — which he denied, but which forced his resignation in 2021. Some of the other candidates had 'breakout moments' — including former Bronx Assemblyman Michael Blake, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and Mamdani, said political adviser Yvette Buckner. 'That will have voters wanting to learn more about them, their policies and their candidacy,' she said. Frydman too said Adams' performance 'moved the needle' for her campaign, which has been slow to gain momentum despite support from state Attorney General Letitia James. 'She introduced herself to Democratic voters well enough on substance to move up in ranked-choice voting,' he said. But Cuomo's comfortable lead over second-place Mamdani in recent polls should hold, Frydman said. O'Reilly agreed, but said Mamdani remains Cuomo's 'greatest threat' for the nomination in the June 24 primary. Two of the panelists agreed that Lander is competent, but his persona didn't translate on TV. 'He oozes insincerity in a car-salesman-type way,' O'Reilly said. But he said Brooklyn state Sen. Zellnor Myrie's sincerity came across 'easily,' calling him a rising star in the Democratic Party. Murray concurred, saying Lander has a 'stage presence for radio and a delivery for print. He confirmed why he has his wife and daughter on videos, instead of himself.' Another candidate, former city Comptroller Scott Stringer, who previously ran for mayor in 2021, didn't break through, the panelists said. 'Stringer was Stringer — flat, and after a second run for mayor, still didn't connect to voters,' Murray said. All but two of the Democratic contenders will debate again on June 12, save for Blake and state Sen. Jessica Ramos, who failed to meet the campaign funding threshold. Nine days of early voting will precede the primary, beginning on June 14.