Greenback's reign isn't over, but cracks are showing
THE US dollar remains the undisputed heavyweight in the global financial system: Central banks hoard it; global trade is priced on it; and financial markets are built around it. However, that dominance, long taken for granted, is being tested.
From shifting geopolitical alliances to evolving investment behaviour, the forces nibbling at the dollar's dominance are multiplying. There is no clear successor so far, but cracks are forming in its foundation.
For decades, the dollar has anchored the global monetary system, thanks not only to the US' economic power, but also to its deep, liquid capital markets and perceived political stability. However, these advantages are no longer absolute. International investors, once content to be heavily exposed to US assets, are starting to hedge their bets more actively.
Combine that with rising US debt, policy unpredictability and a trend toward regional currency use in trade, and the case for a weaker dollar, at least in the near term, starts to build.
Dollar's gradually diminishing role
Let us be clear: there is still no real alternative to the dollar. The euro lacks a true fiscal union and deep bond markets. The yuan remains constrained by capital controls. Even with all the talk about multipolar currencies, the dollar remains deeply embedded in how the world trades, borrows and invests.
The dollar currently makes up 58 per cent of global foreign exchange reserves, more than 80 per cent of global FX turnover and a third of global debt is issued in dollars. These are not numbers that shift quickly. Two decades ago, the dollar's reserve share was closer to 70 per cent. Central banks have steadily diversified – into the euro, yen, sterling, and the 'others' category that includes the Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and Swiss franc. Growing geopolitical tensions and trade fragmentation are only accelerating that shift.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Trade fragmentation chips away at dollar dominance
The dollar still dominates trade between advanced and emerging economies (EM). But trade between EMs is increasingly bypassing the dollar, with more transactions being settled in local currencies or alternatives.
As at 2022, about three quarters of global trade involved advanced economies, and only a quarter of it was EM to EM or EM to China trade. That smaller slice in trade among EMs is where de-dollarisation is gaining ground. It's not enough to unseat the greenback, but it is reshaping parts of the global economy.
Structural risks from within
The bigger risks to the dollar may come from within. The US federal debt is projected to hit 99 per cent of GDP in 2024 and 118 per cent within a decade, according to the US Congressional Budget Office. This raises concerns about the long-term appeal of US government bonds (Treasuries) as the world's preferred safe asset.
Foreign ownership of Treasuries is already slipping. For years, overseas investors, especially official institutions such as central banks, held large portions of US debt. However, with slower reserve accumulation and greater diversification, foreign holdings of Treasuries and corporate bonds have fallen to about 30 per cent of outstanding amounts.
There are no signs of a broad sell-off, but the US may have to offer higher yields to keep attracting global capital as issuance continues to rise.
Hedging FX risks increasingly important
Beyond central banks and trade, a quiet shift is happening among institutional investors. Foreign investors have accumulated US$56.6 trillion in US financial assets, up from just US$2.2 trillion in 1990. That includes US$16.5 trillion in equities and another US$14.5 trillion in debt securities, with foreign direct investment accounting for a further US$16.5 trillion.
For many years, many investors – pension funds, insurance companies, sovereign wealth funds – did not hedge their dollar exposure aggressively. The dollar's historical tendency to rise in times of stress made it a natural portfolio hedge. This so-called 'USD smile' worked well for years, but it is fading.
Treasuries and the dollar have become less reliable during market stress. That has made the cost of being unhedged far more painful. As a result, we are seeing early signs of increased FX hedging activity. If this continues, it could create sustained downward pressure on the dollar through active USD selling.
Gold: diversification in uncertain times
If there is a winner from the de-dollarisation push, it is gold. Central banks, especially those in EMs, have ramped up gold purchases. The People's Bank of China, for instance, resumed gold buying in 2022 after a three-year pause.
The World Gold Council said net central bank gold purchases reached 1,045 metric tonnes in 2024. Gold now accounts for an estimated 14 per cent of global reserves, up from 8.3 per cent in 2018. Part hedge, part symbol, the appeal of the yellow metal is clear in a world of rising inflation, geopolitical friction and currency uncertainty.
What this means for portfolios
In the near term, these forces point to a softer dollar, especially if FX hedging continues to increase. Over time, the dollar is unlikely to lose its primacy, but its share in global reserves, debt markets and transactions may continue to gradually erode. Investors, policymakers and institutions would be wise to plan for a world where the dollar's leadership becomes more contested.
It is important for global investors to distinguish between cyclical and structural dollar weakness. Cyclical weakness, driven by interest rate differentials, relative US equity market underperformance or mean reversion in terms of valuations, calls for tactical repositioning away from the dollar. But structural weakness, rooted in lasting shifts in global trade, reserve composition and capital flows, would require rethinking strategic asset allocation.
For now, tactical allocation shifts would involve increasing exposure to non-US equities and local-currency bonds, or adding to gold on dips – not just as a short-term hedge, but also as a long-term diversifier. In structural allocations, the dollar remains a foundation currency, but portfolios will likely need to be tweaked in the coming years to reflect the global rebalancing of economic, trade and geopolitical shifts.
The writer is head of asset allocation at Standard Chartered Bank's wealth solutions chief investment office
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
25 minutes ago
- Business Times
US: Stocks rally fades after China trade framework
[NEW YORK] Wall Street stocks finished lower on Wednesday despite positive movement in the US-China trade conflict and a benign US inflation report. Following two days of talks in London, top US and Chinese negotiators announced a 'framework' agreement late on Tuesday that included Chinese concessions on rare earth materials and Washington allowing Chinese students to study at US universities. But stocks fell in what described as a 'sell the news' response to a breakthrough that had been largely priced in. The broad-based S&P 500, which rose the last three days, finished down 0.3 per cent at 6,022.24. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was flat at 42,865.77, while the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index dropped 0.5 per cent to 19,615.88. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned a broader deal with China would take a 'longer process,' saying it was possible to rebalance economic ties with Beijing only if Beijing proved a 'reliable partner in trade negotiations.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up And for partners 'negotiating in good faith,' Bessent told a congressional committee, there could be an extended pause before higher threatened tariff rates take effect in July. Besides trade, markets digested key inflation data. Consumer prices rose 2.4 per cent compared with a year ago, up from a 2.3 per cent reading for the prior month, a modest uptick that analysts said still did not fully reflect the impact from Trump's tariffs. Sam Stovall of CFRA Research described Wednesday's session as a 'rollercoaster,' positing that the negative finale may reflect unease at reports Trump could appoint a 'shadow' Federal Reserve Chair to try to influence monetary policy without firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Stovall also highlighted the possibility that 'the market is overbought and due for some sort of digestion of gains.' Among those falling, large tech names including Amazon, Facebook parent Meta and Apple lost more than one per cent. AFP

Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Qantas sheds Jetstar Asia to protect lead in core domestic Australian market
Qantas said its domestic profit margin was 17 per cent at its half-yearly results in February. PHOTO: ST FILE SYDNEY – National carrier Qantas promotes itself with the proudly patriotic slogan 'Spirit of Australia' – and its decision to close its Singapore-based subsidiary Jetstar Asia was widely seen as a shrewd move to return to the comfort of its highly profitable domestic market. Analysts saw the move as a bid to shift aircraft and capital from the competitive low-cost market in South-east Asia to the Australian market, where Qantas' only serious competitor is Virgin Australia. The Australian domestic market is particularly lucrative now that other rivals such as Rex and Bonza have struggled or collapsed, noted Professor Rico Merkert, an international transport expert from the University of Sydney. 'The Australian market is very profitable. Qantas was probably thinking about how it can benefit more from the high demand and quite nice yields at the moment.' Meanwhile, Qantas has reaped growing domestic profits as the airline and Virgin were both more 'disciplined' and abandoned their all-out war over capacity and prices, he told The Straits Times. 'Closing Jetstar Asia is a sensible decision that will help Jetstar to become more profitable,' he said. Jetstar is Qantas's low-cost domestic subsidiary. Qantas said its domestic profit margin was 17 per cent at its half-yearly results in February, compared with 8 per cent for international and freight. Its move is seen as an attempt to refocus on Australia, as Virgin Australia relists as a public company on June 24, five years after it was taken over by Bain Capital. Mr Ian Thomas, an aviation expert from Sydney-based CAPA Consulting, told ST that Qantas was 'tying off loose ends' as it faced potential increased competition from Virgin. 'Within Australia, Virgin's refloating has put some pressure on Qantas internally,' he said. Virgin Australia had a domestic market share of 35 per cent as at December 2024, compared with Qantas' 63.6 per cent (including Jetstar), according to a Feb 18 report by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. 'Qantas has never really invested the amount of money it needed to establish (Jetstar Asia) on a viable basis. It really didn't have the fleet size,' Mr Thomas added. He said Qantas had been reluctant to properly invest in the competitive low-cost Asian market, which left (Jetstar Asia) struggling against bigger players such as Scoot, the low-cost arm of Singapore Airlines, which maintains a fleet of about 50 jets including high-capacity long-haul Boeing Dreamliners. In contrast, Jetstar Asia operates 13 medium-capacity single-aisle Airbus jets. Nine of these A320 jets are slated for Jetstar's for use in Australia and New Zealand, while four will be used on routes servicing mining workers in Western Australia. 'Qantas has fantastic demand domestically but not enough aircraft,' Professor Merkert noted. 'It is not easy to get new aircraft at the moment. The easiest way to do it is for Qantas to redeploy assets that it already has in the fleet.' Qantas said on June 11 the decision to shut down Jetstar Asia after July 31 stems from escalating supplier costs, airport fees and aviation charges in recent years amid intensifying competition and growing capacity, particularly after the Covid-19 pandemic. Jetstar chief executive Stephanie Tully told reporters on June 11 that Jetstar Asia has only been profitable for six years in its two decades operating out of Singapore since 2004. The intra-Asia carrier was expecting to post an underlying loss of A$35 million (S$29.3 million) before interest and tax in the financial year ending June 30. 'Qantas has much bigger (profit) margins in Australia. It would have been more appropriate to use that capital in the Australian domestic market, which it is now proposing to do,' Professor Greg Bamber, an aviation specialist from Monash University, told ST. 'It was probably a mistake for Qantas to have invested in Jetstar Asia in the first place.' He said abandoning the carrier would enable Qantas to focus on reaping profits from routes serving the 'golden triangle' – the east-coast cities of Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane where Australia's vast population is centred. These three cities offer massive demand for travel, but with no high-speed rail to connect them. The move by Qantas also signals a change of direction under group chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was formerly chief financial officer. She took over in 2023, ending the 15-year reign of Alan Joyce. Mr Joyce was the head of Jetstar when it announced plans to launch Jetstar Asia in 2004. Jetstar Asia marked the first of Qantas's ventures aimed at low-cost travellers in Asia. The airline later launched Jetstar Pacific, operating in Vietnam, but later ended its involvement in the venture. It also launched Jetstar Japan, which some analysts viewed as a more successful model than Jetstar Asia because it involves a partnership with a local carrier, Japan Airlines. Despite the closure of Jetstar Asia, Jetstar will continue to fly from Australia into Asia, including to Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Japan and South Korea. It is also looking to return flying to the Philippines after ending its connection there about a decade ago. Ms Hudson, unlike Mr Joyce, never headed Jetstar – and is clearly willing to shed non-performing legacy aspects of her predecessor's era. 'Alan Joyce cut his teeth in Jetstar and had an affinity with its operations,' Mr Thomas said. 'Vanessa Hudson, being the new broom, is going through their strengths and weaknesses. She is reviewing everything and has decided to draw a red pen through Jetstar Asia.' Jonathan Pearlman writes about Australia and the Pacific for The Straits Times. Based in Sydney, he explains matters on Australia and the Pacific to readers outside the Oceania region. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Business Times
10 hours ago
- Business Times
Hong Kong funds plan to cut Treasuries if US loses AAA score: sources
[HONG KONG] Hong Kong's pension fund managers have formed a preliminary plan to sell down their Treasury holdings within as soon as three months if the US loses its last recognised top credit rating, according to people familiar with the matter. Industry groups including the Hong Kong Investment Funds Association and the Hong Kong Trustees' Association discussed the proposal with the pensions regulator on Wednesday (Jun 11), the people said, asking not to be identified as the meeting was private. Under local regulations, managers of the city's HK$1.3 trillion (S$213 billion) Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) system can only invest more than 10 per cent of their funds in Treasuries if the US has a AAA or equivalent rating from an approved agency. The downgrade of US sovereign debt by Moody's Ratings last month left Japan's Rating & Investment Information as the only remaining approved firm with the highest score. While R&I has said that it is not considering cutting its US rating, the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority last month urged pension fund managers to draw up 'contingency plans' in case of a downgrade. London Stock Exchange Group's FTSE Russell, which runs the MPF World government Bond Index, a key benchmark that pension fund managers widely use for exposure to Treasuries, formulated an analysis of the divestment plan at the request of the industry groups earlier this month, according to the people. Ka Shi Lau, chair of Hong Kong Trustees' Association, said that a deck of materials on the potential impacts and analysis was given to the regulator. Lau also confirmed Wednesday's meeting. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Representatives from the MPF Schemes Authority and FTSE Russell declined to comment. The Hong Kong Investment Funds Association did not respond to a request for comment. The situation highlights the risks of the US falling foul of the unusually strict investment mandates governed by Hong Kong regulations. The bulk of global investors do not require the top-tier rating to invest freely in US Treasuries, minimising the risk of forced sales. While any potential forced sales in Hong Kong are unlikely to materially rock the global market for US Treasuries given its size and liquidity, it is a headache for portfolio managers who must contemplate an overhaul of their investment strategies. For funds focusing exclusively on government debt, options are limited given the lack of large issuers comparable to the US. Long-dated US Treasuries underperformed shorter notes on Wednesday. The yields on 10- and 30-year bonds reached the day's highs after the report, at 4.50 per cent and 4.96 per cent respectively. Concerns about demand for long-end Treasuries have caused the yield on 30-year bonds to spike to some of the highest levels since 2023. An auction on Thursday will be closely watched for clues about investor appetite at a time when the Trump administration's tax-and-spending bill is expected to swell the nation's debt. Under the plan, the weighting of Treasuries in FTSE Russell's bond index would need to fall considerably if R&I downgrades US debt. US government bonds make up the biggest portion at 46.37 per cent, followed by China, France, Japan and Germany. To provide a buffer against market fluctuations, Treasuries would need to be kept at around 9 per cent of the benchmark to avoid breaching the 10 per cent limit, the people said. Pension fund managers proposed to be given three to six months to rebalance positions in the event of a downgrade, the people noted. Allocations would shift to other sovereign bonds of issuers with AAA ratings, and those with large market values, they added. Germany and Singapore, which are in the FTSE index, are rated AAA by major agencies. Potential impacts of the reallocation were included in the materials shown to the regulator, the people said. The bond gauge has returned an annualised 1.03 per cent on a hedged basis since inception. Pension fund managers had earlier asked the authority to reconsider the rule. But the regulator pushed back with its request for trustees to develop contingency plans and make 'timely and orderly' adjustments to their asset allocations in response to possible market developments. The MPF, introduced in 2000, has more than four million contributing members, with various financial institutions managing funds under the system. BLOOMBERG