2025 Income Tax Bill Changes: More Tax-Free Lump Sum, Bigger Penalties For Early UPS/NPS Withdrawals
1. Tax-Free Withdrawals at Retirement
UPS subscribers will be allowed to withdraw up to 60 percent of their pension corpus at the time of retirement, voluntary retirement, or superannuation without paying any income tax.
2. Lump Sum Payment on Superannuation
Upon superannuation, subscribers can receive a lump sum amount equal to 10 percent of their monthly salary (basic pay + dearness allowance) for every six months of qualifying service completed. This payment will not reduce the subscriber's assured monthly pension.
3. Tax on Early Withdrawals
If a subscriber or their nominee withdraws money from their UPS account before retirement or superannuation, the entire amount withdrawn will be treated as income and taxed in that financial year.
4. Exit from the Scheme or Account Closure
Closing a UPS account or opting out of the scheme before retirement will also make the withdrawn amount, including any accrued interest or returns, fully taxable in the year of withdrawal.
5. Transfer to Pool Corpus
At retirement, if any remaining balance in the subscriber's corpus is moved to the pool corpus for purchasing annuities, this transfer will not be treated as taxable income.
6. Rules at Age 60
When a subscriber turns 60, they can withdraw 60 percent of the total pension corpus tax-free, while the remaining 40 percent must be used to purchase an annuity plan. The income from the annuity will be taxed as per the subscriber's applicable income tax slab.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ban on money-based online games will sound death knell for us, says industry
Representational image NEW DELHI: The Indian gaming industry, which till just a few years back was seen as a sunrise sector, was shell-shocked by govt's proposed move to ban "online money game", claiming it would sound the death knell for firms. Industry experts pointed out that the measure would put 4 lakh companies, 2 lakh jobs, investments of Rs 25,000 crore and annual GST of Rs 20,000 crore at risk. As draft copies of the Bill started circulating online, gaming executives said they would "need to wind down operations with no plausible source of revenue in sight" in case the law is enacted. "We will fold up if this becomes a reality," a top official said. Gaming In Numbers 'We will fold up if this becomes a reality,' a top official at one of the biggest gaming companies in India said. 'What is surprising is that, while govt regularly consulted us on most of the issues, there was virtually no discussion this time around on a proposal that has the capacity to decimate us,' the official — whose company is big in fantasy gaming, where again real-money transactions are popular — told TOI. There will be a downstream impact to domestic sports as fantasy sponsorship keeps most non-top T20 leagues afloat, with state and city leagues likely to be hit, weakening the talent pipeline, industry players said. Most companies insisted that large Indian gaming players, with regulatory structures and strong funding, including FDI, were 'not engaging in any illegal activities' such as betting, money laundering, terror financing or gambling. Dream11 , Games 24x7, MPL, Gameskraft, Nazara Technologies, Zupee and WinZO are among the big players in this space. 'Our operations were broadly focused on skill-based real-money games. These have been the source of most of our revenues, which has seen us build valuations, provide jobs to engineers and graphic designers, gain global recognition and FDI funding and provide GST and tax to govt,' another founder of a top company said. Industry sources said there is also a risk of some the platforms moving offshore or other apps taking advantage of the gap, with weak KYC and anti-money laundering provisions and in turn, impacting tax collections. Countries such as the UK, the US and Australia regulate and licence the business with strict KYC, and advertising rules and enforcement, instead of a ban, and industry players suggested that even in India this should be the preferred model to regulate and monetise the industry. The 2023 framework, which is sought to be junked, had created rules and a self-regulatory organisation path for 'permissible' real-money games, which should be strengthened, they suggested. Besides, the bill leaves several gaps as there is no transition plan. If a law is legislated, there is a need for wind-down, ensuring user balance refunds and employee protections to avoid a cliff-edge shock, said experts. A balanced outcome can be achieved by licensing onshore operators, setting deposit and loss limits, along with affordability checks, localising data, and blocking illegal offshore sites aggressively, they added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'
NEW DELHI: Cabinet on Tuesday approved a bill that seeks to ban "online money game", where users pay a fee or deposit money, proposing a maximum three years in jail or fine of up to Rs 1 crore for those involved in offering, encouraging or inducing players to participate, which also extends to banks facilitating these transactions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which will be introduced in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, seeks to promote e-sports and online social games where no money is involved. A regulator body is planned to oversee the functioning of the sector, sources told TOI. The proposed legislation defines "online money game" as an online game played by a user by paying fees, depositing money or other stakes in expectation of winning. 2 years' jail, ₹50L fine likely for those advertising online games Online social games have been defined as those that don't involve exchange of money, although users may be allowed to pay a subscription or one-time access fee. Govt has proposed the new law considering unregulated online money gaming platforms pose threats to national and economic security as they use digital wallets and cryptocurrencies for money laundering and illicit money transfer, cross-border data flows without compliance of data protection law, sources said. Moreover, offshore entities are seen to be circumventing tax and legal obligations. The proposed legislation also assumes significance as online money gaming poses serious concerns, including addiction among children and youth, mental health issues, financial losses leading to suicides and lack of uniform regulation across states. Law enforcing agencies face problems in tracking and regulating these platforms, particularly those hosted or operated from outside India. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sources said the govt proposes penalties of up to two years in jail or with a maximum fine of Rs 50 lakh or both for any entity advertising such games in media. For those offering online money games and banks engaged in transactions face violations of the proposed law will be "cognisable and non-bailable" offences. Every subsequent violation after conviction would attract penalties of at least three years' jail and fine of Rs 10-20 lakh. In the case of advertisers, such penalties would be 2-3 years in jail and fine of Rs 5-10 lakh. The bill proposes to hold senior executives of the companies liable, if it's established that the offences have been committed with the consent or connivance or due to their neglect. It also proposes blocking of platforms and money gaming services, if the entities or individuals fail to comply with the law. According to the proposal, the bill seeks to encourage Indian startups to build culturally relevant content, reduce dependence on foreign platforms and promote self-reliance in the digital gaming ecosystem.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Akrama-Sakrama redux? Bill passed to regularise 15% building violations
Bengaluru: The assembly Tuesday passed the Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Amendment) Bill, 2025, enabling municipal commissioners to regularise unlawful buildings by levying a penalty, a move that drew comparisons with the Akrama-Sakrama scheme still pending adjudication in the Supreme Court. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Piloting the bill, urban development minister BS Suresha (Byrathi) said the amendment would apply only to unlawful buildings that can be regularised under existing building bylaws or relevant Acts. "This will not apply to buildings that have been ordered for demolition," he said. Under the provisions, municipal commissioners can issue occupancy certificates (OCs) by levying a penalty if they had not obtained commencement certificates (CCs) before construction. A penalty can also be levied for deviations from sanctioned plan or zonal regulation limit as may be specified in the bylaws. Suresha said the threshold for permissible building plan violations is being raised from 5% to 15%. He recalled that in Jan 2017, the Supreme Court stayed the Akrama-Sakrama scheme, which sought to regularise unauthorised urban buildings for a fee. "We cannot frame rules (for Akrama-Sakrama) as the matter is pending before the court. But we can regularise small sites," he said. "We will specify the size in the rules, but it'll be mostly 20x30 and 30x40 sites. We are exempting them from requiring CC and OC. This will help the poor and middle-class." He emphasised: "This is not the same Akrama-Sakrama scheme. Unlicensed properties are not being exempted from CC/OC requirement." Professionals to sanction plans The bill also allows municipal corporations to empanel professional architects, engineers, structural consultants, environment consultants and town planners as 'authorised persons' to inspect buildings before, during and after construction, sanction building plans, and certify compliance. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Empanelled engineers will be allowed to approve building plans up to 4,000 sq ft," Suresha told the House. In another key provision, the authority to sanction building plans will now rest with the commissioner or chief executive of urban local bodies (ULBs), instead of elected councils. Opposition members objected, calling it undemocratic. But Suresha said: "We are proposing to enable the commissioner or CEO to sanction building plans, as there are instances of the council not meeting for more than six months despite the norm that they must meet once a month. The proposed bill is being brought to ensure speedy issuance of plan sanction." Opposition members including CN Ashwath Narayan, opposed the clause making CC and OC mandatory for electricity connections. Suresha responded: "This clause is to comply with Supreme Court's directions."
