
Companies from Stanley Black & Decker to Conagra are saying tariffs will cost them hundreds of millions
Firms are gearing up for the long-awaited Friday deadline, when the White House says it will start imposing higher import taxes on foreign countries. Now businesses in a range of industries are saying this shakeup in global trading practices will cost them.
Tool maker Stanley Black & Decker said Tuesday it expects an $800 annualized hit from policy changes tied to tariffs. That doesn't include costs in connection with steps the company is taking to mitigate the effects of the levies, according to finance chief Patrick Hallinan.
For Marie Callender's and Slim Jim parent Conagra Brands, higher tariffs are expected to raise its costs of goods sold by 3%, equivalent to an annual increase of more than $200 million, CEO Sean Connolly said earlier this month.
Most of the Chicago-based company's production is in the U.S., but management says it still has to contend with steel and aluminum tariffs that will raise the cost of packaging.
Tesla, led by President Trump's erstwhile ally Elon Musk, said that costs tied to tariffs have increased by about $300 million. Roughly two-thirds of that is tied to the electric vehicle maker's auto business, while the rest is from the energy arm.
"While we are doing our best to manage these impacts, we are in an unpredictable environment on the tariff front," finance chief Vaibhav Taneja told analysts and investors on Tesla's earnings call last week.
Those pressures extend throughout the auto industry. General Motors said earnings before interest and taxes in the latest quarter suffered a $1.1 billion hit that the Detroit-based automaker chalked up to the net effect of tariffs.
Air conditioner maker Carrier Global said Tuesday that it now expects to spend about $200 million to offset the impact of tariffs. The same day, appliance maker Whirlpool said North American sales and earnings were hurt in the second quarter as Asian competitors rushed to export goods to the U.S. in advance of higher tariffs.
U.S. consumers haven't yet experienced meaningful bumps to inflation as a result of higher tariffs. That can be attributed to domestic companies currently absorbing cost hikes, but some economists warn that business may soon start passing the increases on to shoppers after this week's deadline passes.
As a result, the "core" version of the consumer price index, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, should rise at an annual rate of 3.2% in the third quarter, up from 2.1% in the second quarter, according to Nancy Lazar, Piper Sandler's chief global economist.
Foreign exporters have been covering "very little" of the tariffs and have been "getting off easy," Lazar said in a recent note to clients.
Still, not every American company is taking a hands-off approach and swallowing the higher costs.
Paul De Cock, operations chief at carpet manufacturer Mohawk Industries, said last week that it is implementing 8% price increases. There may be need for further price hikes in the sector if tariffs further raise costs, he said.
"We continue to work with customers and suppliers to manage the impact of tariff costs as the situation evolves," De Cock said on the Georgia-based company's earnings call.
Mohawk is encouraging consumers to look at domestically produced alternatives, he said. The company is also expanding capacity for quartz countertops made in Tennessee, which will increase the supply of goods not subject to tariffs, de Cock added.
For its part, the White House is aiming to soothe companies' concerns about the looming deadline for tariffs, which were a core tenet of Trump's campaign last year. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, for example, told CNBC on Tuesday that countries facing high tariff rates can lower them by negotiating a deal with the U.S.
"I would think that it's not the end of the world if these snapback tariffs are on for anywhere from a few days to a few weeks, as long as the countries are moving forward and trying to negotiate in good faith," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
23 minutes ago
- NBC News
Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia University, alleging merchandise too similar and causes confusion
For decades, T-shirts, sweatshirts and other clothing under the Columbia Sportswear brand and clothing emblazoned with the Columbia University name coexisted more or less peacefully without confusion. But now, the Portland-based outdoor retailer has sued the New York-based university over alleged trademark infringement and a breach of contract, among other charges. It claims that the university's merchandise looks too similar to what's being sold at more than 800 retail locations including more than 150 of its branded stores as well as its website and third-party marketplaces. In a lawsuit filed July 23 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Columbia Sportswear, whose roots date back to 1938, alleges that the university intentionally violated an agreement the parties signed on June 13, 2023. That agreement dictated how the university could use the word 'Columbia' on its own apparel. As part of the pact, the university could feature 'Columbia' on its merchandise provided that the name included a recognizable school insignia or its mascot, the word 'university,' the name of the academic department or the founding year of the university — 1754 — or a combination. But Columbia Sportswear alleges the university breached the agreement a little more than a year later, with the company noticing several garments without any of the school logos being sold at the Columbia University online store. Many of the garments feature a bright blue color that is 'confusingly similar' to the blue color that has long been associated with Columbia Sportswear, the suit alleged. The lawsuit offered photos of some of the Columbia University items that say only Columbia. 'The likelihood of deception, confusion, and mistake engendered by the university's misappropriation and misuse of the Columbia name is causing irreparable harm to the brand and goodwill symbolized by Columbia Sportswear's registered mark Columbia and the reputation for quality it embodies,' the lawsuit alleged. The lawsuit comes at a time when Columbia University has been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support. Last week, Columbia University reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. Columbia Sportswear aims to stop all sales of clothing that violate the agreement, recall any products already sold and donate any remaining merchandise to charity. Columbia Sportswear is also seeking three times the amount of actual damages determined by a jury.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What's More Likely: Rich Eisen Talks Ravens, Colts, Eagles and More
Rich Eisen the Los Angeles Chargers, Detroit Lions, Denver Broncos, San Francisco 49ers, Baltimore Ravens, Indianapolis Colts, Cincinnati Bengals, Philadelphia Eagles, Las Vegas Raiders, Seattle Seahawks, Chicago Bears, Minnesota Vikings, and the big-name NFL contract squabbles.

Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
NFL on the verge of selling media assets to ESPN for an equity stake in the network, AP sources say
The NFL and ESPN are expected to announce an agreement next week under which most of the league's significant media holdings would go to the sports network. People familiar with the transaction said the multibillion-dollar deal would give the NFL an equity stake in ESPN. The people spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the deal has not been finalized. It was first reported by The Athletic. The NFL and ESPN had no comment. The NFL has been trying to sell its media properties for nearly five years. ESPN and the league have been involved in on-again, off-again talks for the past three years. The proposed move comes as ESPN is expected to soon launch its direct-to-consumer service, possibly before the end of August. The service would give cord cutters access to all of ESPN's programs and networks for $29.99 per month. Most cable, satellite and viewers who have streaming services will receive the service for free as part of their subscription. ESPN would get access to the popular RedZone channel, as well as NFL Network and an additional seven regular-season games (six international and a Saturday afternoon late-season contest). A couple of weeks ago, ESPN announced that NFL Network host Rich Eisen's three-hour program would air on ESPN Radio as well as stream on Disney+ and ESPN+. 'The Rich Eisen Show' is not affiliated with NFL Network. ESPN has carried NFL games since 1987 and 'Monday Night Football' since 2006. Under the current TV contract, it will have the 2027 and 2031 Super Bowls for the first time. NFL Network started in November 2003 and was the second major pro league to have its own network. NBA TV started in 1999, MLB Network in 2009 and NHL Network in the United States in 2007.