Half of requests for complex dental work are being rejected under national insurance plan
Health Canada says 52 per cent of requests for pre-authorized dental work between November 2024 and June 2025 have been rejected.
While the vast majority of claims don't need pre-authorization, it's required for more complex and often more expensive procedures, like crowns or partial dentures. Clinics must submit extra documentation like X-rays and dental charts to show the work is medically necessary before it can be covered and completed.
"There's been a lot of confusion for dentists who send in what we would normally send in to a private plan, and it comes back rejected," said Dr. Bruce Ward, a Vancouver dentist and president of the Canadian Dental Association.
"It's a much, much, much higher rejection rate than private plans."
The multibillion-dollar Canadian Dental Care Plan helps cover the cost of dental work for Canadian residents with a family income below $90,000 who don't have access to private insurance. The program fully expanded to cover people aged 18 to 64 last month.
Health Canada says 5.2 million people have been approved for coverage so far, but only about half — 2.2 million — have received care.
And some new patients are getting an unexpected bill, while certain parts of the country are struggling to keep up with a huge influx of appointments, Ward said.
Still, providers told CBC News the program is providing Canadians much-needed access to care — and that issues with the program are improving.
Clinics submit the pre-authorizations through Sun Life, the insurance provider that the federal government contracted to run the program.
Dental offices are sometimes waiting weeks or months for a response, only to be told Sun Life needs additional documentation — further slowing down the process, Ward said.
"A lot of people have been waiting for crowns to be pre-authorized," Ward said. "There was an avalanche of approvals that got sent in."
Health Canada said rejections and delays in pre-authorizations are caused by several factors, including an unexpected high volume of submissions that were missing information.
Oral health-care providers also tell CBC News there were many technical issues with the submission software that have since been largely resolved.
Health Canada has worked to streamline the process and educate providers about how to complete the applications, a spokesperson said.
Eighty per cent of the pre-authorizations are now being processed within seven business days. And more than 90 per cent of the claims, like basic cleanings or fillings, don't require pre-authorization.
But Donna Wells, manager of professional practice at the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association, said the program needs to better cover preventive care.
The plan currently allots one hour of scaling per year for adults. Teenagers get just 15 minutes of scaling.
"These are patients who have not had oral health care, in some cases, for a number of years, because it's been such a financial barrier for them," Wells said.
She said pre-authorization applications for additional scaling are being rejected en masse.
Health Canada says over a million Canadians signed on to the program when it expanded in June, and 94,980 of them received dental care.
But that influx of patients has led to a backlog in some parts of the country, like Atlantic Canada."This program is wonderful, but it's putting a strain on providers," said Natalie Marsh, a dental assistant in North Sydney, N.S., and vice-president of the Canadian Dental Assistants Association.
She said her clinic is already booking appointments for spring 2026.
"You're seeing people who haven't seen a dentist in a long time. So they're coming in with a lot of work to be done," she said.
Providers said patients continue to be under the impression their dental work will be free of charge. But the program reimburses clinics at a rate lower than provincial fee guides, which they often use to set their rates.
That means dental offices can "balance bill," charging the difference between the price of the procedure and what Ottawa will pay them.
"I just had somebody in my office a couple of weeks ago who was very upset, because they'd been told that they were covered 100 per cent," Ward said.
Ward said patients, including seniors, should remember they need to reapply every year.
Despite those challenges, Ward said overall he's found the dental care plan to be "very good" to work with. That sentiment is echoed by other oral health associations.
"It's been a huge boon to a lot of people who frankly would never have been able to afford to have their mouths taken care of," Ward said.
"It's remarkable," he said. "And yes, there's going to be some growing pains."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
5 things doctors want you to know before you start taking a GLP-1
Roughly 16 million American adults are taking GLP-1 medications. They are a major breakthrough for people to shed pounds and manage conditions such as Type 2 diabetes. However, doctors say there's a perception that weight-loss drugs such as semaglutide (brand names Ozempic and Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Zepbound) are all you need to live a healthier life.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
It's late. You're hungry. 9 midnight snacks you can eat without sabotaging your sleep.
Late-night snacking has a bad reputation — and for good reason, to be honest. It can mess with your sleep and your digestion (triggering acid reflux, in particular). And rather than reaching for celery sticks and carrots, people tend to gravitate toward less-than-healthy choices — namely, foods high in fat, salt and sugar like chips, crackers and cookies — when snacking after dark. But when it's 10 p.m., you're bingeing your favorite Netflix series and that late-night craving for something strikes, it can be hard to fight that urge and not make a beeline for the pantry or fridge. The good news is: Late-night bites don't have to be off the table. Finding the perfect bedtime snack can be part of a healthy lifestyle. The trick is to find something you can nosh on that will satisfy you without robbing you of a good night's rest. That means avoiding high-fat, spicy or acidic foods that can keep you up, and instead choosing ones that are high in tryptophan, antioxidants, melatonin and micronutrients. Other good options include snacks with fiber and protein to help stabilize blood sugar and keep you sated until it's time to break the fast. Here's a list of 9 midnight snacks that fit the bill: 'Greek yogurt has magnesium and zinc, which are two minerals that help with sleep,' Leah Murnane, a dietitian and owner of Lettuce Eat Dessert, tells Yahoo. Combine that with a small glass of tart cherry juice, which has natural melatonin, 'helping you fall asleep and stay asleep,' she says. Kiwi is a natural source of melatonin, which plays an important role in our sleep cycles. Julie Pace, a dietitian and owner of Core Nutrition Health and Wellness, says, 'Studies suggest [kiwi] can help you fall asleep faster and improve your quality of sleep. Plus, with kiwi, you get the added benefit of vitamin C to support collagen production while you sleep.' Pair it with string cheese for a boost of protein. Bananas are rich in tryptophan and magnesium, which help your body relax and prepare for sleep. Almonds contain melatonin, while peanuts are high in vitamin E and magnesium. Peanut butter, in particular, has been shown to improve sleep quality. 'This combo offers natural carbs, healthy fats and a little protein to help stabilize blood sugar and keep you satisfied,' Pace says. Half of a turkey-and-cheese sandwich on whole-grain bread gives you a well-rounded and filling snack full of protein, fiber and sleep-inducing tryptophan. Eating a balanced diet that includes milk and other dairy may improve sleep quality. Pair a cup of milk with a few graham crackers for a satisfying snack. Simple, creamy and delicious, this antioxidant-rich combo is hard to beat. If you're a regular late-night snacker, prepare a few hard-boiled eggs in advance so you have them at the ready. Enjoy with a small handful of your favorite mixed nuts for extra protein. This snack is full of filling fiber, healthy fat and B vitamins. Want a snack option that's quick and easy? Choose a high-fiber cereal with low added sugar and top with your favorite milk. Katie Drakeford is a registered dietitian and freelance nutrition writer based in Oklahoma City, Okla.


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Doctors Think AI Shows Promise—But Worry It Will Mislead Patients
getty F or over a decade now, healthcare workers have had to deal with 'Doctor Google'—when patients turn to Google for medical advice instead of a professional. It's a practice that organizations including Brown University Health, Orlando Health and the Northeast Georgia Physicians Group have advised against, citing both the years of education and experience physicians have as well as the tendency for people to gravitate to worst-case scenarios. Today, Doctor Google has a new rival: ChatGPT. That's according to a new report from academic publishing company Elsevier, which also makes AI tools for doctors, such as research assistant Scopus AI and chemical discovery tool Reaxys. For the report, which will be released today, the company surveyed 2,206 doctors and nurses from 109 countries this past spring. This included 268 clinicians in North America, 1,170 in the Asia Pacific, 439 in Europe, 164 in Latin America and 147 in the Middle East and Africa. Eighteen declined to disclose their location. These clinicians were asked about the role they thought AI plays in healthcare today and its potential implications for the future. The company emailed a link to the survey to healthcare workers who had recently published books or journal articles, served on certain third-party panels or were otherwise known to Elsevier. The authors acknowledged that because it's not a randomized sample, these results are not necessarily generalizable. One of the biggest concerns the survey respondents had was regarding patient use of ChatGPT and similar tools. They reported that patients often arrive with preconceived—and sometimes wrong—ideas about their health issues because of what these tools provided. One major issue? These models are frequently wrong. For example, OpenAI's 03 and 04-mini models hallucinate—that is, makes up its own answers to questions—around 30 to 50% of the time, per the company's own recent tests. This creates an additional burden for healthcare workers, who are often already overwhelmed by their work and the amount of patients they see. In North America, 34% of clinicians who reported being time-strapped noted that patients have numerous questions. Globally, this number was about 22%. Even more concerning, Jan Herzhoff, president of Elsevier's global healthcare businesses and a sponsor of the study, told Forbes , is that patients may decide to skip the hospital altogether and rely solely on ChatGPT and other websites for advice. He said that over 50% of U.S.-based clinicians predict that most patients will self-diagnose rather than seeing a professional within the next three years, though it's not clear how often patients are skipping their doctor in favor of AI right now. Though healthcare workers may have concerns about their patients' use of AI, more are finding themselves using such tools. In the past year, the percentage of doctors and nurses who have used AI in a clinical setting jumped from 26% to 48%, the survey found. The survey respondents are also optimistic about AI's ability to streamline their workflows, though at the same time few say that their own institutions were using AI to effectively solve current problems. A majority of clinicians surveyed predicted that AI will save them time, provide faster and more accurate diagnoses, and improve patient outcomes within the next three years. Many startups are developing such tools, including K Health and Innovaccer, which have respectively raised $384 million and $675 million in total venture funding as of recent. According to PwC's Strategy& team, the AI healthcare market is expected to reach $868 billion by 2030. 'As an organization, we see AI as a tool to augment the capabilities of the clinician,' Herzhoff said. Not one that replaces them. Herzhoff himself is equally optimistic about AI in healthcare, especially for administrative tasks. Right now, the survey finds that doctors and nurses are using AI tools to identify potentially harmful drug interactions before writing a new prescription and or to write letters to patients. Of clinicians who've used AI, 50% use generalist tools like ChatGPT or Gemini frequently or always; only 22% use specialist tools with the same frequency. One reason for this might be how healthcare systems are deploying AI tools. Only about a third of clinicians said that their workplace provides sufficient access to digital tools and AI training. Only 29% said that their institutions provide effective AI governance. As more healthcare-focused AI tools are developed, ensuring that these new technologies are trained on high-quality, peer-reviewed material is another priority for those surveyed, with 70% of doctors and 60% of nurses saying this is vital. Herzhoff noted that while AI tools may help clinicians save time in the future, the effort they need to put in now to learn AI, particularly how to write detailed and useful prompts, presents a barrier. Already, 47% of clinicians report that being tired has impacted their abilities to treat patients. 'Paradoxically, they don't have the time, and they don't find the time to use these tools,' Herzhoff said. Although doctors and nurses look forward to using AI to speed up their day-to-day work, they are much more skeptical about using it to make decisions about patients. Only 16% said they were using AI in this way, while 37% expressed an unwillingness to use AI to make clinical decisions. 'AI should provide the information I need to make good decisions,' one doctor who responded to the survey said. 'I don't believe I should abrogate responsibility for clinical assessment to AI—I need to keep authority over the final outcomes.'