Apple Joins the Prime Day Frenzy, Mac Mini M4 Drops to a New Low with This Coupon
For a short while, and exclusive to Prime members (yes, even those who are free-trialing for 30 days), the 2024 Mac Mini M4 is discounted to its all-time lowest price of $499 after coupon redemption on Amazon, down from $599.
See at Amazon
The Mac Mini M4 has the new Apple M4 chip, featuring a 10-core CPU and a 10-core GPU with the level of performance making everything feel satisfyingly fast and responsive. This chip is also designed for Apple Intelligence, Apple's new personal intelligence platform.
Inside its compact five-by-five-inch frame, the Mac Mini M4 is a powerhouse capable of anything you need for a workspace. The compact footprint means it can slide in easily alongside any monitor or even stashed out of the way but without ever feeling constrained in ability. With 16GB of shared memory and 256GB SSD storage (there's a 512GB version also on sale), there is plenty of elbow room for multitasking and storing your critical files.
At the back you have Thunderbolt, HDMI, and Gigabit Ethernet connections, so you have plenty of options for plugging in monitors, external drives, and networks. Apple has for the first time added front-facing USB-C ports and a headphone jack so it's even more convenient to plug in accessories or audio devices where you need them.
This Prime Day offer is exclusive to Prime members and, given the popularity of Apple products, is likely to sell out quickly.
See at Amazon
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's GPT-5 Met With Mixed Reviews, Confusion in First Day
(Bloomberg) -- For months, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has been hyping up the capabilities of GPT-5, setting up the launch as a seminal moment for the company. But in the first 24 hours after its release, the new model was met with mixed reviews. All Hail the Humble Speed Hump Three Deaths Reported as NYC Legionnaires' Outbreak Spreads Mayor Asked to Explain $1.4 Billion of Wasted Johannesburg Funds Major Istanbul Projects Are Stalling as City Leaders Sit in Jail Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms In its announcement Thursday, OpenAI said GPT-5 was better at coding and reasoning through complex problems, and touted it as advanced enough to turn chatbot ChatGPT into a Ph.D.-level expert. Some with early access praised the model, with caveats. 'It's my new favorite model,' developer Simon Willison wrote in a blog post, calling it 'competent' and 'occasionally impressive.' He added: 'It's not a dramatic departure from what we've had before.' On various social media platforms, however, ChatGPT users expressed frustration that GPT-5 continued to make up information and trip over simple math and spelling questions. Noah Giansiracusa, an associate professor of mathematics at Bentley University, said he felt the launch was 'underwhelming.' While there were 'some improvements,' he said, 'they were much more marginal than I would've hoped.' At least some of the reaction may come down to confusion over what's happening under the hood. Unlike OpenAI's prior software, GPT-5 automatically switches between models of varying levels of sophistication depending on the query. This approach can help maximize the company's computing resources, but it also means users may not always be engaging with the most powerful version of OpenAI's technology. Asked to identify how many times the letter 'b' shows up in 'blueberry,' for example, GPT-5 initially said 'three' in one test. When told to 'think harder,' however, GPT-5 appeared to engage its more advanced reasoning model and came up with the correct answer. On Friday, Altman responded to some of the feedback and said there was an issue with the system. 'GPT-5 will seem smarter starting today,' he said. 'Yesterday, the autoswitcher broke and was out of commission for a chunk of the day, and the result was GPT-5 seemed way dumber.' The stakes are high for the rollout. OpenAI is vying to keep ahead of growing AI competition from rivals in the US and China. The company is also fighting to convince businesses and individual users to pay up for its premium services to help offset the enormous amount it's spending on talent, chips and data centers to support AI development. The San Francisco-based company kicked off the generative AI boom nearly three years ago with the release of ChatGPT, which was originally powered by an earlier model called GPT-3.5. Since then, the company has released a series of increasingly sophisticated systems, including multiple options that mimic the process of human reasoning. As AI systems advance, it's become harder to say definitively how various services stack up. As of midday Friday, GPT-5 had risen to the top of various categories on LMArena, a popular leaderboard for AI models based on user rankings. But a different benchmark, ARC-AGI-2, puts GPT-5 behind the latest version of Grok from Elon Musk's xAI. In the absence of more definitive assessments, the model wars sometimes come down to vibes. And with nearly 700 million people now using ChatGPT each week, some are bound to disagree over how the model feels. It also takes longer than a day to gauge the value of a new AI system in someone's personal and professional life. Ethan Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania who frequently experiments with AI models, marveled at GPT-5's ability to do research, come up with clever written responses and make programming simple, even for a novice. 'GPT-5 just does stuff, often extraordinary stuff, sometimes weird stuff, sometimes very AI stuff, on its own,' he wrote in a blog post. 'And that is what makes it so interesting.' On Reddit, however, the reactions were very different. During an 'Ask Me Anything' session Friday on the platform, Altman fielded pushback from users who were frustrated not to have more say and visibility into which model responds to their queries. Altman said OpenAI would take some steps to address these complaints, including making it 'more transparent.' At one point, Altman responded to a Reddit user's question by noting that OpenAI thinks the 'writing quality' in one version of GPT-5 is better than GPT-4.5. Then he asked: 'Do you find it to be worse?' One user after another were quick to respond: yes. The Pizza Oven Startup With a Plan to Own Every Piece of the Pie Digital Nomads Are Transforming Medellín's Housing Russia's Secret War and the Plot to Kill a German CEO It's Only a Matter of Time Until Americans Pay for Trump's Tariffs The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Apple's $704 Billion Decade-Long Buybacks Exceed Market Cap Of All But 13 Companies Worldwide
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Tim Cook-led Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) has amplified its shareholder value for several years with a robust share repurchase program, so much so that only 13 firms worldwide have a market capitalization higher than the shares that AAPL has bought back. What Happened: Data shared by the Chief Market Strategist at Creative Planning, Charlie Bilello, shows that Apple has bought back $704 billion in stock over the past decade. That $704 billion figure exceeds the market capitalization of all but 13 companies globally and is greater than that of 488 companies in the S&P 500 index. Trending: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — According to the chart shared by him, AAPL's current outstanding shares amount to 14.84 billion units, while it has bought back 95.66 billion shares in 10 years, on a trailing like Eli Lilly And Co. (NYSE:LLY), Visa Inc. (NYSE:V), Mastercard Inc. (NYSE:MA), and Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX) have a market capitalization lower than that of Apple's buybacks in the last 10 years. However, experts have stated their frustration with Apple's share repurchase strategy. CNBC's 'Mad Money' host Jim Cramer has reiterated that the buybacks aren't working, and they need to make an acquisition in the AI space with its cash primary reason for promoting this acquisition of the AI-powered search engine, Perplexity AI, stems from the U.S. government's antitrust ruling against Alphabet Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) expected in this month. It could force Google to end default search deals with Apple's Safari It Matters: Wedbush Securities' Tech Bull, Daniel Ives, popularly known as Dan Ives, shares the same views as Cramer. In July, Ives said that Apple's "treadmill approach" needs to end, and it needs to eye a big splashing partnership with either Perplexity or Anthropic. According to him, "It's a matter of when and not if, in other words, Apple needs to make a move, and it's clear. Perplexity to me seems like a no-brainer, relative to how it would fit." "The reason the stock can go up in the second half of the year is that I think Apple is going to make a move. I know they still haven't done an acquisition since Beats, being the biggest one, but now is the time for Cook and Cupertino to move away from the treadmill approach,' he added. Ives reiterated Apple with an Outperform and a $270 price forecast on Wednesday after it announced a new $100 billion commitment to increase investments in the U.S., bringing the company's total commitment up to $600 billion. Jones indices were trading higher. Read Next: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can invest today for just $0.30/share. If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends would you invest in it? Photo courtesy: jamesteohart / This article Apple's $704 Billion Decade-Long Buybacks Exceed Market Cap Of All But 13 Companies Worldwide originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Sam Altman addresses ‘bumpy' GPT-5 rollout, bringing 4o back, and the ‘chart crime'
During a Reddit ask-me-anything session on Friday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and key members of the GPT-5 team were peppered with questions about the new model and requests to bring back its previous model, GPT-4o. They also asked Altman about the most embarrassing – and perhaps funniest – snafu in the presentation, the 'chart crime.' One of the new features that GPT-5 rolled out is a real-time router that decides which model to use for a particular prompt, either responding quickly or taking additional time to 'think' through answers. But multiple people in the AMA on the r/ChatGPT Reddit complained GPT-5 wasn't working as well for them as 4o did. Altman said the reason GPT-5 seemed 'dumber' was the router wasn't working properly when it was rolled out Thursday. 'GPT-5 will seem smarter starting today. Yesterday, we had a sev and the autoswitcher was out of commission for a chunk of the day, and the result was GPT-5 seemed way dumber. Also, we are making some interventions to how the decision boundary works that should help you get the right model more often. We will make it more transparent about which model is answering a given query,' Altman promised. Still, people on the AMA lobbied so hard to bring 4o back for Plus subscribers that Altman promised to at least look into that. 'We are looking into letting Plus users to continue to use 4o. We are trying to gather more data on the tradeoffs,' he wrote. And Altman also promised, 'We are going to double rate limits for Plus users as we finish rollout.' This should give people a chance to play and learn the new model, adopt it to their use cases without worry of running out of monthly prompts. Predictably, he was also asked about the wildly inaccurate chart the team presented during the live presentation that quickly became the butt of many 'chart crime' jokes. The chart presented a lower benchmark score with a much taller bar. Altman didn't answer questions about the chart during the AMA, but on Thursday he did call the chart a 'mega chart screwup' on X. Others noted the charts in the published blog post were correct. But the damage was done. Jokes ensued about using GPT for charts in a corporate presentation. GPT-5 reviewer Simon Willison, who had early access and generally liked the model's performance, also pointed out that turning data into a table was 'good example of a GPT-5 failure.' In any case, Altman promised fixes to the items that seemed to concern people the most. He ended the AMA with a promise that 'We will continue to work to get things stable and will keep listening to feedback.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
