Foster care crisis won't ever improve if West Virginia lawmakers don't address the issues
A Necco foster care in Milton, W.Va. (Leann Ray | West Virginia Watch)
West Virginia has a foster care problem, and despite lawmakers introducing several bills to try to address the issues, only one of those passed both chambers. The governor has yet to sign it into law.
That one bill — House Bill 2880 — passed on the final night of the legislative session. Sponsored by Del. Adam Burkhammer, R-Lewis — who is a foster parent — the bill will create a 'Parent Resource Navigator' to help reunite a parent and child.
That's the main goal of foster care — to reunite children with their parents once they are safely able to care for them. But we have to be realistic and understand that unfortunately many of these children will be in the foster care system until they age out.
There are currently 5,955 children in the state's custody. As Amelia Ferrell Knisely has reported, many of these children aren't even in foster homes because there's a shortage of foster parents. Many children are sleeping in hotels in the state because there's not enough beds available for them, and the state spent $70 million in 2024 to send children to out-of-state facilities.
The majority of children who end up in foster care in West Virginia are there in part because of parental substance use disorder or neglect, the West Virginia Centers on Budget and Policy reported. Child abuse allegations involving drug endangerment here is four times the national average.
There were no bills introduced to increase recovery efforts for people who lost custody of their children. And last week, Gov. Patrick Morrisey cut from the state budget $250,000 for Lily's Place, a nonprofit organization in Cabell County that provides support for families dealing with substance use disorder.
There were plenty of bills related to foster care that were introduced during the 60-day session, showing that some lawmakers do care about improving the situation. Let's take a look at the bills that died.
HB 2035 would have established a three-year guardian ad litem pilot program in three judicial courts. Cindy Largent-Hill, director of the state Supreme Court of Appeals Division of Children's Services, told lawmakers during the legislative session that there aren't nearly enough lawyers for child abuse cases, and the ones who are available are assigned to a child's case as a guardian ad litem for a least one year. Most guardians ad litem cover 12 counties, she said. The bill died in House Finance.
HB 2047 would have prohibited cameras and recording devices in bedrooms and bathrooms of foster children. The bill clarifies that baby monitors may be used when age appropriate for the child, or if the child has been medically diagnosed with severe physical disabilities or behavioral, cognitive, or psychological disorders. Children deserve their privacy and to not be monitored in their private spaces if there's no medical need for it.The bill died in the Senate Health and Human Resources.
HB 3382 would have required the Department of Human Services to establish, either on its own or through a contract, a central reception center and emergency resource homes for foster children for up to 72 hours when a home can't be found immediately for them. There are currently 148 children living in the state's emergency shelters. The bill died in House Finance.
HB 3379 would minimize children bouncing from home to home, and it would allow the state to terminate parental rights more quickly to allow a child to find a permanent foster home. West Virginia permanently terminates parent rights more often than any state — at a speed nearly 40% faster than the national average, according to the West Virginia Centers on Budget and Policy. The bill also would have shortened the timeframe to reunite foster children with their biological siblings, and would have loosened requirements for reuniting if it wasn't in the child's best interest. The bill received pushback from child welfare groups who said the requirements conflict with federal child welfare laws that prioritize biological family and sibling reuniting. The bill died in House Health and Human Resources.
HB 2086 would have developed a plan to monitor and improve reading and math skills of children who have been in the foster care system. The bill died in House Education
HB 2033 would have loosened vaccination requirements for biological children of foster parents and allowed families to foster despite their religious beliefs related to sexual orientation and sexual identity. This bill would have put LGBTQ+ children in danger. Luckily, this bill died in House Health and Human Resources.
HB 2542 would have required Child Protective Services workers to record audio of all interactions during CPS visits. A committee substitute removed language to require recordings, changing it to 'permitting' audio recording instead. The bill died in House Health and Human Resources.
HB 2027 would have prevented children from being removed from foster homes if they had been placed there for 15 months or 50% of their life unless it was in the best interest of the child to do so. The bill died in Health and Human Resources.
It's great that there were so many bills introduced related to helping children in the foster care system, but why couldn't lawmakers get them over the finish line? Why were other bills prioritized over these?
If there are so many children that we don't have enough room to house them all, the state should be working to create more homes and more beds for them to sleep in. The state could be offering incentives for people to foster children, or do literally anything to make child care options more available and more affordable. Think of the obstacles that keep families from choosing to foster, and try to eliminate them.
From 2017 until July 2024, there were more than 6,000 children in foster care in the state every year. Last summer was the first time that number dipped below 6,000, and now that number is still more than 5,950.
If the state can spend $70 million a year to send children out of state, surely it can spend $70 million to build new facilities, or expand existing ones. If lawmakers aren't going to address the issues relating to foster care, then they need to accept that we're going to have around 6,000 children who need homes, and to have enough space for all of them.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
WV Legislature may be called for PEIA special session in July
The Public Employees Insurance Agency is proposing increasing premiums by 14% for state employees and by 16% for local government employees during the 2026 fiscal year. (Lori Kersey | West Virginia Watch) While West Virginia employees prepare for their health insurance to take up more of their paychecks this summer, a special session may be coming in July — the same month those increases take effect — to deal with ongoing cost and sustainability challenges at the Public Employees Insurance Agency. At the finance board's regular meeting Thursday, Chairman Eric Householder said the agency has been working with Gov. Patrick Morrisey's office as he prepares to call the special legislative session. 'I know currently … we are working providing data to the governor,' Householder said. 'There's been no decision on what to do, just providing data, having roundtable discussions. That's all we're doing right now.' Householder said Morrisey tentatively intends to call a special session for PEIA in mid July. Beginning in July, PEIA premiums are increasing by 14% for state employees and by 16% for local government employees. Out-of-pocket and copay costs will also go up. The agency will also raise premiums by 12% for retirees. PEIA leaders have said that the rising cost of health care — particularly inflation on prescription GLP-1 drugs that treat obesity and diabetes — are a major driver of the rate increases. Union leaders and state employees have repeatedly called on the Legislature to come up with a solution to PEIA's rising costs, but the issue largely went unaddressed during the 2025 regular session. Morrisey said in April that he plans to call a special session for PEIA, but he has not said how exactly the issue of increasing costs will be addressed.. 'That was kicked down the road for many, many years,' the governor said in April. 'I don't intend to kick it down the road. We have to bring everyone together, all the stakeholders: listen, learn and then you'll be seeing some activity.' In a news release Thursday, leadership from the West Virginia Democratic Party blamed Morrisey for 'falling to act' and letting 'devastating' PEIA increases go into effect. 'Pay-Cut Patrick failed to take action to stabilize PEIA premiums,' Democratic Party Chair Mike Pushkin said in the statement. 'So now, state employees, including law enforcement officers, school teachers, school service personnel, CPS workers, and retirees will soon be paying a price for his inaction. Morrisey had a choice — he could have fought to protect working West Virginians. Instead, he did what he always does: protect his political donors and let working families bear the burden.' In an email Thursday, Morrisey spokesman Drew Galang said the governor has emphasized that the state 'must address the inherited challenges facing PEIA and its long term sustainability.' He said Morrisey had 'already indicated' that a special session to do so would occur in 'mid to late July.' Galang did not respond to an email asking to clarify when, publicly, the July timeframe had been set by Morrisey and no such references to it have been made clear in previous PEIA meetings or announcements prior to Thursday. A spokeswoman for the House of Delegates and one for the state Senate said the governor has not formally told lawmakers the special session will be in July. Dale Lee, president of the West Virginia Education Association, told Householder the discussions about PEIA solutions should include public employees and their representatives. 'The employees can't be the ones providing all of this,' Lee said of the cost increases. 'We have to have the Legislature. There has to be not only the Legislature but also the providers. That's why I continue to ask that we all go back to the table and that we come up with a plan that people can agree on.' Lee, who has repeatedly criticized state leaders for failing to act on the recommendations of a task force called by former Gov. Jim Justice after statewide teacher strikes in 2018 and 2019, said it's important that the Legislature act upon a plan for PEIA this time. '[It] never even got on a committee agenda,' he said of the recommendations. 'That's just disingenuous.'
Yahoo
13-05-2025
- Yahoo
‘We're collateral damage' — WV school district hires attorney to review Morrisey's vaccine mandate
Inside a Kanawha County elementary classroom in West Virginia. (Lexi Browning | West Virginia Watch) A West Virginia school district is hiring an attorney to sort out who has the authority to set school vaccination polices — is it the governor, the Legislature or the state health department? It's the tip of the iceberg for legal questions and likely court challenges as county school boards and the state board of education are grappling with how to handle Gov. Patrick Morrisey's executive order mandating that public schools permit religious and philosophical exemptions to the state's strict school immunization rules. The state's vaccine laws remain unchanged after the GOP-led House of Delegates voted down a broad vaccine exemption bill, and other attempts to revive the legislation failed, as well. Lawmakers who voted down the measure cited constituents' pleas for upholding vaccine laws during a wave of measles cases. 'I think we're collateral damage,' said Ohio County School Board President David Croft, adding that the school district will have outside counsel determine before the end of the month if the state's immunization laws or the executive order should take precedence. 'Our goal, and I hope the rest of the state follows, is to understand that the issue is not if a single board member is or is not in favor of vaccinations. But it is trying to [do] their duties as a county board of education member appropriately by following West Virginia laws,' he said. Morrisey says that, regardless that the state immunization laws remain unchanged, public schools must comply with his executive order, citing a 2023 religious freedom law as its legal justification. While some private schools say they won't comply, parents have already begun requesting a religious exemption to vaccine rules from the state health department. 'It's a complex legal analysis that has to be done here,' said Croft, who is an attorney. He said the analysis will have to look at kids' constitutional rights to a safe education versus religious freedom, along with a disagreement between the executive and legislative branches of government. 'Our goal at the end of the day is to put our kids in the best position we can — and our teachers,' Croft added. The issue is likely to end up before a judge ahead of next school year. Croft noted that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which could preside over a possible challenge, already ruled in a 2011 lawsuit involving a Mingo County student that the state's vaccines laws were constitutional and did not overly burden a parent's right to free exercise of religion. The push to edit the state's vaccine laws has been spearheaded by Sen. Laura Chapman, R-Ohio. She was the lead sponsor of a bill earlier this year that would have allowed religious exemptions for school vaccine requirements and revised the existing medical exemption process. Chapman, a mother and attorney, said she wholeheartedly supports Morrisey's executive order regarding religious exemptions. 'Gov. Morrisey's executive action is well-grounded in law based on the Equal Protection for Religion Act, which protects against government discrimination against a sincerely held religious belief,' she said. Prior to the executive order, West Virginia was among five states that didn't allow exemptions to school vaccine requirements based on religious or philosophical beliefs. State laws only allowed medical exemptions. 'We are one of the most religious states in the nation and we unfortunately are lumped in with liberal states like California and New York,' Chapman said. 'Each of our surrounding states offer a religious exemption and the [Centers for Disease Control] numbers are sub-herd immunity levels. There is no reason to believe West Virginia will be any different. Ultimately, a family should not be required to give up their religious beliefs in order to go to our fantastic public and private schools.' Del. Shawn Fluharty, D-Ohio, was among the House's no votes on changing the state's vaccine laws. The bill was voted down 42-56 in March. 'We elect public officials to pass public policy, we don't elect kings and queens,' Fluharty said. 'This session, public officials listened to their constituents, medical professionals and experts by rightfully voting down this bad public policy. It's a shame the governor and his handlers want to circumvent this process.' On Wednesday, the West Virginia school board will discuss religion exemptions from school vaccinations, according to their agenda. State Schools Superintendent Michele Blatt earlier this month issued guidance to school superintendents recommending that students not be allowed to attend schools next year without the required vaccinations. She rescinded the memo at the request of Morrisey and is now working with the governor's office to issue clear guidance to schools about how to comply with the executive order, according to her statement. Del. Hollis Lewis, D-Kanawha, has called on the state school board to maintain its current immunization requirements. He wrote a letter to the board on Tuesday, saying that Morrisey's executive order conflicts with existing statutory law and oversteps constitutional authority. Hollis wrote that the current vaccine law 'protects the health and safety of West Virginia's children, families and communities.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
23-04-2025
- Yahoo
Foster care crisis won't ever improve if West Virginia lawmakers don't address the issues
A Necco foster care in Milton, (Leann Ray | West Virginia Watch) West Virginia has a foster care problem, and despite lawmakers introducing several bills to try to address the issues, only one of those passed both chambers. The governor has yet to sign it into law. That one bill — House Bill 2880 — passed on the final night of the legislative session. Sponsored by Del. Adam Burkhammer, R-Lewis — who is a foster parent — the bill will create a 'Parent Resource Navigator' to help reunite a parent and child. That's the main goal of foster care — to reunite children with their parents once they are safely able to care for them. But we have to be realistic and understand that unfortunately many of these children will be in the foster care system until they age out. There are currently 5,955 children in the state's custody. As Amelia Ferrell Knisely has reported, many of these children aren't even in foster homes because there's a shortage of foster parents. Many children are sleeping in hotels in the state because there's not enough beds available for them, and the state spent $70 million in 2024 to send children to out-of-state facilities. The majority of children who end up in foster care in West Virginia are there in part because of parental substance use disorder or neglect, the West Virginia Centers on Budget and Policy reported. Child abuse allegations involving drug endangerment here is four times the national average. There were no bills introduced to increase recovery efforts for people who lost custody of their children. And last week, Gov. Patrick Morrisey cut from the state budget $250,000 for Lily's Place, a nonprofit organization in Cabell County that provides support for families dealing with substance use disorder. There were plenty of bills related to foster care that were introduced during the 60-day session, showing that some lawmakers do care about improving the situation. Let's take a look at the bills that died. HB 2035 would have established a three-year guardian ad litem pilot program in three judicial courts. Cindy Largent-Hill, director of the state Supreme Court of Appeals Division of Children's Services, told lawmakers during the legislative session that there aren't nearly enough lawyers for child abuse cases, and the ones who are available are assigned to a child's case as a guardian ad litem for a least one year. Most guardians ad litem cover 12 counties, she said. The bill died in House Finance. HB 2047 would have prohibited cameras and recording devices in bedrooms and bathrooms of foster children. The bill clarifies that baby monitors may be used when age appropriate for the child, or if the child has been medically diagnosed with severe physical disabilities or behavioral, cognitive, or psychological disorders. Children deserve their privacy and to not be monitored in their private spaces if there's no medical need for bill died in the Senate Health and Human Resources. HB 3382 would have required the Department of Human Services to establish, either on its own or through a contract, a central reception center and emergency resource homes for foster children for up to 72 hours when a home can't be found immediately for them. There are currently 148 children living in the state's emergency shelters. The bill died in House Finance. HB 3379 would minimize children bouncing from home to home, and it would allow the state to terminate parental rights more quickly to allow a child to find a permanent foster home. West Virginia permanently terminates parent rights more often than any state — at a speed nearly 40% faster than the national average, according to the West Virginia Centers on Budget and Policy. The bill also would have shortened the timeframe to reunite foster children with their biological siblings, and would have loosened requirements for reuniting if it wasn't in the child's best interest. The bill received pushback from child welfare groups who said the requirements conflict with federal child welfare laws that prioritize biological family and sibling reuniting. The bill died in House Health and Human Resources. HB 2086 would have developed a plan to monitor and improve reading and math skills of children who have been in the foster care system. The bill died in House Education HB 2033 would have loosened vaccination requirements for biological children of foster parents and allowed families to foster despite their religious beliefs related to sexual orientation and sexual identity. This bill would have put LGBTQ+ children in danger. Luckily, this bill died in House Health and Human Resources. HB 2542 would have required Child Protective Services workers to record audio of all interactions during CPS visits. A committee substitute removed language to require recordings, changing it to 'permitting' audio recording instead. The bill died in House Health and Human Resources. HB 2027 would have prevented children from being removed from foster homes if they had been placed there for 15 months or 50% of their life unless it was in the best interest of the child to do so. The bill died in Health and Human Resources. It's great that there were so many bills introduced related to helping children in the foster care system, but why couldn't lawmakers get them over the finish line? Why were other bills prioritized over these? If there are so many children that we don't have enough room to house them all, the state should be working to create more homes and more beds for them to sleep in. The state could be offering incentives for people to foster children, or do literally anything to make child care options more available and more affordable. Think of the obstacles that keep families from choosing to foster, and try to eliminate them. From 2017 until July 2024, there were more than 6,000 children in foster care in the state every year. Last summer was the first time that number dipped below 6,000, and now that number is still more than 5,950. If the state can spend $70 million a year to send children out of state, surely it can spend $70 million to build new facilities, or expand existing ones. If lawmakers aren't going to address the issues relating to foster care, then they need to accept that we're going to have around 6,000 children who need homes, and to have enough space for all of them. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
