Global salmon populations are in trouble. How will the trend affect groceries in Canada?
A new report has found young wild salmon populations are decreasing around the world, with the trend expected to have 'minimal' impact on fresh fish at grocery stores in Canada.
However, James Grant, a professor at Concordia University in Montreal and co-author of the study, says if the decline continues to accelerate, shoppers will see more of an effect on prices of certain fish products.
The Concordia University study shows wild salmon, trout and related fish known as salmonids have declined globally by nearly 40 per cent since 1980. The study was published in the journal Fish and Fisheries. It is based on data from more than 1,000 rivers and streams in 27 countries involving 11 salmonid species. The fish sampling noted in the data occurred from 1937 to 2021.
Most salmon or trout sold in Canadian grocery stores are typically from aquaculture, or fish farms, which Grant says is different from fish caught wild from oceans, adding that most of the wild salmon he sees at grocery stores are typically canned.
'Our study shows that salmonid numbers are down over a long period of time,' Grant told CTVNews.ca in a Zoom interview Tuesday. 'That's probably why aquaculture has moved into that space at providing … inexpensive, high quality fish protein.'
'A huge environmental cost'
The Concordia study focused on wild fish and the rivers and streams where they spawn, not fish that are sold in grocery stores and born in aquaculture. At the same time, Grant said wild salmon populations are decreasing.
'Aquaculture has made fish prices very inexpensive, but there's a huge environmental cost that we're all paying, including that's one of the main drivers of the decreases in wild salmon,' Grant said.
He said aquaculture fishes are a source of potentially deadly sea lice and can pollute the ocean floor with their waste -- both negatively affecting wild fish.
Grant says the fishes that Concordia researchers studied are the smaller types that Canadians might catch at the cottage, as well as wild juvenile fishes that travel from streams to the ocean and grow to become bigger adults that people or trawlers may catch.
'If the juveniles are in decline in rivers, then the adults are inevitably going to be in decline as well,' Grant said, adding that the researchers focused on salmon streams because more data is available and they're more accessible to humans.
'But streams are embedded within our forests and farms,' he said. 'And so streams give you a very good indication of how we're treating our flowing water in Canada and the rest of the world.'
Other impacts of salmon's decline
Salmon species are in trouble not only on the West Coast.
'On the East Coast, the Atlantic salmon has been in decline for a long time,' Grant said in a separate interview with CTV Your Morning on Tuesday. 'We no longer fish them, and even the sport fishing industry is primarily catch and release because the numbers are so low. So huge economic costs we are paying.'
The salmon's plight is also detrimental in other ways.
The loss of fish is devastating for Indigenous Peoples across the country who have close relationships to these fish, including those on the West Coast who built their cultures around Pacific salmon, Grant said.
Fishing is one of the top hobbies for Canadians, he told Your Morning.
'It generates money for our economy and makes us feel better about the world,' Grant said. 'These fish are also great indicators of ecosystem health.'
In a May 27 press release from Concordia, lead author Kyleisha Foote noted that the sharp decline is not surprising but it's hard to determine the exact cause. She said many rivers are suffering from serious issues related to habitat degradation, climate warming and overexploitation.
Watch the video above for the full CTV Your Morning interview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
Canadian detained in U.A.E. says he felt abandoned by embassy
Ghazwan Abdel-Jeleel says he was wrongfully detained in the United Arab Emirates for 10 months and denied critical diabetes medications. He says Canada's embassy there didn't do enough to help.
CBC
6 hours ago
- CBC
What health experts are saying about Alberta's COVID-19 vaccination program
Social Sharing Health experts, advocates and unions are sounding the alarm over Alberta's plan for paid COVID-19 shots, calling it concerning and confusing. On Monday, two months after the province announced it was adding a fee, it opened online pre-ordering for the vaccine. Albertans still need to book appointments for the shots, starting in October. Dr. James Talbot, the province's former chief medical officer of health, said the government appears to be doing everything it can to make this year's immunization campaign a "failure" by making it less available, less accessible and less affordable. "They are basically sabotaging their own COVID campaign," he said. He's among a chorus of critics warning it could lead to more hospitalizations and stress on the health-care system. Talbot and other public health experts and physicians penned an opinion piece in the Edmonton Journal last week, arguing the plan creates unfair barriers and puts Albertans at risk. "You've created this unfairness where if you're rich, you can get protected, but if you're poor, you may not be able to," Talbot said. Leigh Allard, president and CEO of Alberta Lung, part of the National Lung Health Alliance, said the government's policy makes it an extreme outlier and its precedent could ripple across the country. Those who suffer from lung conditions like asthma, cystic fibrosis or pulmonary fibrosis are vulnerable, she added. This year, Albertans also won't be able to walk into a pharmacy to get a COVID-19 shot, where the vast majority of doses were given last year. They must go to a public health clinic. Allard said people are confused over the plan. She's also concerned many won't be able to access a clinic for a shot, especially if hours aren't extended, or some simply won't be able to afford it. She said she expects an uptake in Alberta Lung's financial assistance programs. "As a charity, we should not be supplementing what the government should be doing." The government said it will still pay for some to get shots, including those who have compromised immune systems or are on social programs. Seniors in congregate settings will also be covered. However, the specifics of the qualifying health conditions have not been released. It's estimated a shot could cost $110, but the government has yet to pin down the price. Kyle Warner, spokesperson for Primary and Preventative Health Minister Adriana LaGrange, said details are forthcoming. "The fall immunization plan is being finalized, and details — including the updated vaccination schedule, eligible conditions, exact locations and administrative fee for COVID-19 vaccines — will be available soon," he said in a statement. Warner also said Albertans who don't pre-order by the Sept. 30 deadline can still book a vaccine appointment once doses become available. He said online pre-ordering helps determine future vaccine needs, minimize waste, manage delivery and prevent double bookings, since the influenza vaccine can be given at the same time. Those who pre-order are promised a reminder in October to book an appointment. The province said it has ordered 485,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccine for the fall and some of the estimated $49-million cost would be covered through those who have to pay. The government didn't respond to questions about whether it has a contingency plan to order more doses if needed, whether out-of-province costs might be reimbursed, and what informed its decision to order 250,000 fewer doses than last year. It also didn't clarify whether flu shots, which remain free, would be available in pharmacies. The province's interim chief medical officer of health, Dr. Sunil Sookram, wasn't made available for an interview. Talbot called withholding the specifics disrespectful. "It's bad enough that there's a list that says you're going to ration it, but then to have confusion about who's on the list — that just seems cruel," he said. The province has said an estimated one million COVID-19 vaccine doses, or just over half of Alberta's supply, weren't used during the 2023-24 respiratory virus season. Premier Danielle Smith has said that meant $135 million was "flushed down the drain." Facing heated questions about the policy at a public town hall in Edmonton on Thursday, Smith said her United Conservative Party government is trying not to waste public money. "There are lots of different types of vaccines that are paid for out of pocket right now ... because the federal government defunded it," she said, pointing to shots for yellow fever, which also need to be purchased. The latest provincial data says 394 Albertans with confirmed COVID-19 have died since last August. Talbot and labour leaders have also said the plan puts health workers in harm's way, and potentially forces those in an already strained system to take sick time off work to avoid infecting others. "You're going to be the only province in the country that says we care so little about these people that we're going to force them to pay for their own vaccine," said Talbot. "It seems inconceivable to me that a rational mind would think that was a good way to recruit and retain health-care professionals." Unions warned this week of potential fallout. In a Tuesday letter to the premier, Alberta Federation of Labour president Gil McGowan wrote it would be a violation of workplace health and safety laws not to include all health workers, education workers, transit operators and those in the service sector on its priority list. McGowan said he's also hearing frustration and confusion from front-line members. "It's not just incompetence. This is clearly not a vaccine rollout strategy. It's a vaccine suppression strategy," he said. The United Nurses of Alberta has said the plan limits the freedom of Albertans to choose vaccination by intentionally limiting supply and penalizing those who can't afford it.
National Post
6 hours ago
- National Post
Lawyer insists foreign adversary is behind Canadian diplomats' Havana Syndrome
Article content The Global Affairs report traces the various steps federal agencies have taken over the years in response to the illness complaints, including security, medical and environmental assessments. Article content A multi-agency Integrated National Security Enforcement Team, led by the RCMP, opened an investigation in June 2017. Article content Global Affairs and RCMP officials began travelling regularly to Cuba as part of the investigation to look at the possibility of malicious attacks, the report says. Canadian officials also shared information with foreign partners, including the United States. Article content In 2019, instruments designed to detect and capture evidence of acoustic and radiation surges, and to measure environmental effects — such as temperature, humidity, barometric pressure and ozone levels — were installed in the living quarters of Canadian staff in Havana. Article content 'The data collected from the instruments did not provide relevant and probative information to identify a cause for the symptoms,' the Global Affairs report says. 'As such, in 2022, the instruments were removed.' Article content Article content The integrated national security team concluded 'there was no criminality and no evidence attributing these health symptoms to a foreign actor,' the report adds. Article content 'In their conclusions, the RCMP and other domestic partner agencies assess that there is no known criminality, no known attribution for (unexplained health incidents) and no patterns related to symptoms, age, gender, location, or other variable.' Article content The U.S. intelligence community looked at possible evidence of a foreign adversary's involvement, the feasibility of tools that could cause the reported symptoms and whether medical analysis could help find answers. Article content A March 1, 2023, report from the U.S. National Intelligence Council said these lines of inquiry led most intelligence community agencies to conclude — with varying levels of confidence — that it was 'very unlikely' a foreign adversary was responsible for the health issues reported by American personnel. Article content Global Affairs, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the RCMP subsequently met to discuss the U.S. council's findings. Article content Article content The RCMP indicated that 'since no criminality was uncovered, its criminal investigation would be concluded,' and CSIS advised it also would be wrapping up its investigations for similar reasons, the Global Affairs report says. Article content Overall, the Canadian efforts 'have not uncovered a clear common cause of the symptoms experienced by government of Canada employees,' the report adds. 'Canada's findings are aligned with the conclusions of the United States on their various health studies and the security report published by the National Intelligence Council.' Article content Miller points to other research and testimony that challenge those findings. Article content Lawyer Mark Zaid, representing several U.S. personnel with symptoms, told a congressional hearing in May 2024 that there was intelligence, scientific and medical evidence substantiating the reports of anomalous health incidents, and that some were caused by a foreign adversary. Article content Zaid, who had authorized access to secret details, said he was convinced that 'the evidence that exists in the classified arena directly contradicts the public conclusions' provided by U.S. federal agencies about the cause of the health symptoms.
