Canadians are livid. Americans have no clue.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
It felt like the whole country was watching the series and yearning for Canada to stick it to America. Canadians were sick of being bullied and this was their chance to hit back on their turf (which is to say, ice). So when Connor McDavid scored the winning goal in overtime that night, there was a collective release. Justin Trudeau even took to social media, to say 'You can't take our country — and you can't take our game.'
Advertisement
It may not be apparent from this side of the border, but Trump's bellicose 51st state talk is downright terrifying for Canadians, many of whom are unironically comparing themselves to Ukrainians before the Russian invasion. The economic uncertainty caused by the tariffs has already cost jobs and investment in Canada, with Deloitte anticipating a 'modest recession' this year.
Canadians are in fight-or-flight mode.
Brady Tkachuk of Team USA and Devon Toews of Team Canada in the NHL 4 Nations Face-Off championship game at TD Garden in February.
Bruce Bennett/Getty
The writer Stephen Marche, my one-time professional collaborator and compatriot (all Canadians really
do
know each other, you see), described it this way in the
Over the last few months, I've been asked a question I never anticipated getting when we decided to move here:
How far are you going to let it go before you decide it's no longer safe?
My beloved aunt even warned me not to be 'the last to leave.' I recognize that this sounds insane to most Americans. And yet, I get the sense that they don't appreciate how thick the border has gotten in the Canadian psyche.
The first year after we moved here our pullout sofa was constantly occupied by visiting friends and family. But the visits have come to a halt since January. After the tariffs were announced, my brother-in-law and sister-in-law canceled their Martha's Vineyard booking for this summer. My mother-in-law was even reluctant to cross the border to see her grandkids because she's heard too many stories about border agents checking cellphones and detaining travelers. (In the end, she came and ran into no problems at the border.)
Advertisement
In late June, Maine Governor Janet Mills spent a few days in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia begging Canadian tourists to come back to her state. On CBC News, she argued the travel boycott wasn't hurting Donald Trump. 'You're only hurting your friends,' she chided. It was a bit tone deaf to Canadian ears. How are we supposed to feel for New England B&B owners, when our economy — our country — is under existential threat?
The fervor with which Canadians are rejecting America right now may be hurting innocent bystanders in relatively blue northern New England, but Canadians aren't really doing nuance right now. They just want someone —
anyone,
goddammit — in the United States to understand how angry they are.
A Liquor Control Board of Ontario employee removes American wine from shelves in a Toronto shop in March.
Laura Proctor/Associated Press
Many Canadians follow every twist and turn of American politics and they know you can't name a single one of our premiers. It can be exhilarating to observe with a sense of smug superiority, like watching Gilead from the safety of your couch. But now, America is coming for Canada and it's not just a game on CNN.
Canadians have had a longstanding subconscious fear about being on the other side of the world's longest undefended border, with so much fresh water, oil, and critical minerals on our side. Our military is a fraction of America's. Now the Arctic ice is melting and those resources are in the sights of so many nations.
I consume Canadian news every day, but the anger still shocked me when I was in Ottawa a couple months ago. Every single grocery store aisle touted Canadian products. Every newscast seemed to include a story about finding a wine to replace your favorite California red.
Advertisement
Canadians are desperately reaching for some sense of control as they watch the post World War II order they've invested in fall to pieces. And as long as they've got the Loonie, they won't spend a single one supporting the American economy.
My mother wouldn't even make her 'world-famous' Caesar salad when I was in town because the only romaine lettuce she could buy was imported from America. She tried to find some from Mexico or grown in a Canadian hothouse, but just couldn't. So she roasted carrots in maple syrup and Barefoot-Contessa-levels of butter from Canadian dairy farms. The revenge tasted sweet that night.
Understand, something has broken that will not easily be fixed or simply go away in four years. Even if there is a trade deal over the summer, there's a fundamental distrust now. Canadians have turned away from America.
Kristin Nelson can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cut 'Em Loose With No Government Props
(CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images) CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images The Trump Administration is seriously considering privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It's long past time that it did this. The business of these two giants is to bundle and sell mortgages to investors with a government guarantee. That is, investors are covered if there are losses because of homeowner defaults. Washington, via the Federal Housing Finance Agency, took control of both entities in 2008 because of their massive losses. The seizures were called 'conservatorships.' The takeover was supposed to be temporary, yet here we are nearly a generation later, and the conservatorships are still intact. Fannie and Freddie are the elephants in the housing market, backing some $7 trillion in mortgages. They have an eye-popping line of credit with the Treasury Department of $254 billion. They charge a so-called guarantee fee of around two-thirds of 1% on each mortgage. Fannie tends to work with larger financial institutions, while Freddie goes with smaller ones. It's a nice business. As President Trump noted, they are gushing cash. Trumpites estimate the market cap of these two monsters would be $330 billion, with the government's share coming to more than $250 billion. In these times of rivers of red ink in Washington, the prospect of getting that much cash without raising taxes should be irresistible. The two got into trouble because they went heavily into debt. Why not, they figured. The higher the leverage, the bigger the profits, which shareholders loved. They could borrow at rock-bottom interest rates because there was an implicit government guarantee. It wasn't written into law, but the markets figured Uncle Sam would come to the rescue if there were trouble. That ar-rived with the financial crisis that began in 2007, when the housing market was imploding. Washington stepped in. But shareholders were largely wiped out. What made the two particularly complacent was their extraordinary political muscle, especially Fannie Mae's. They made sure every member of Congress learned how important they were to constituents involved in local housing markets. And jobs were to be had for congressional relatives and friends. The challenges of pushing Fannie and Freddie out of the Washington nest are real, but that shouldn't deter the move. Critics say changing the status quo will raise mortgage rates, a particularly sensitive topic at a time when housing affordability is a big issue. If Fannie and Freddie are to be truly private companies, they'll need higher profits, which could lead to more expensive mortgages. Guarantee fees for mortgages would also likely go up. This is why the Trump Administration doesn't want to do away with guarantees, implicit or explicit. But this would put Fannie and Freddie back where they were when they got in trouble. If there are any guarantees, the two monsters should have to pay Uncle Sam realistic insurance fees, which would run into the tens of billions of dollars. Critics underestimate the power of competition. Instead, the two enterprises should be broken up. Competition works. As for mortgage rates, the problem is the Federal Reserve, whose ignorance of inflation is keeping the cost ofmoney unnecessarily high.
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Anti-corruption watchdogs at the center of protests against Zelensky
Ukraine's military spending is not tied to the flow of matériel donated by Western allies, and there have been no documented instances of fraud involving that weaponry. Advertisement On Tuesday, Zelensky signed into law a bill giving Ukraine's prosecutor general — who is approved by parliament, where Zelensky's party holds a majority — new power over the two agencies, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office. The two agencies were formed after the pro-Western political pivot in Ukraine following protests in 2014. They were given a mandate to investigate and prosecute cases of high-level corruption, and Western countries strongly backed their formation to crack down on theft of foreign aid. Advertisement The agencies had recently been investigating senior members of Zelensky's government, including a deputy prime minister, Oleksii Chernyshov, who was charged with corruption on June 23, accused of taking kickbacks in a real estate deal. Chernyshov has called the accusations against him a baseless smear campaign. On Wednesday, amid the protests, the prosecutor general, Ruslan Kravchenko, said he would not interfere in that inquiry. Also on Wednesday, the two agencies said they had completed and would send to court one aspect of an investigation into what could be the largest fraud in public finance in Ukraine in a decade. The case involves accusations of embezzlement from a lender, PrivatBank, that cost the country about $5 billion to bail out. An owner of the bank, Ihor Kolomoisky, had been a behind-the-scenes patron of Zelensky's presidential campaign in 2019, Ukrainian news media reported. Kolomoisky has said that he is innocent and that the authorities who brought the charges are trying to extort money from him. But no accusation of fraud is more infuriating to Ukrainians than one of theft from a military that is defending their homes and lives, shooting down missiles and exploding drones that terrorize cities nightly, and holding a roughly 700-mile defensive line in eastern Ukraine. Overall, Ukraine has over the past decade improved governance and tamped down graft, according to a measure by Transparency International. And corruption has not worsened during the war, according to the group. After Russia's invasion, government money started shifting from partly state-controlled energy, mining, and metallurgy companies — previously the trough from which corrupt officials fed — to military spending, analysts have said. Now, about half of Ukraine's national budget of about $98 billion is for defense. Advertisement The anti-corruption bureau has announced several investigations into that spending, accusing insiders of helping to skim about $675,000 from contracts for airplane wheels and about $18 million from a contract for food staples, including potatoes. Internal audits by the Defense Ministry have pointed to far larger instances of potential fraud or mismanagement, some stemming from an early, chaotic period in the war. After the 2022 invasion, US intelligence expected that Ukraine's military would buckle within three days and that Russia would capture Kyiv, the capital. Ministries emptied as employees fled. With just a skeleton staff and tremendous need, one audit showed, the government made multiple contracts for artillery shells, mortar bombs, and other weapons and ammunition at inflated prices from shadowy suppliers in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. After the war stabilized, the insider intermediaries who brokered these deals through 'special importing companies' retained a role in procurement, another audit, conducted last year, showed. That audit showed special importing companies received 45 percent of the total value of all contracts for arms and ammunition last year, even when the Defense Ministry could have worked directly with a supplier. According to the audit, about half of all contracts from the companies were either late or incomplete, depriving soldiers of weapons while leaving prepayments in the companies' accounts. Artem Sytnyk, a former director of the anti-corruption bureau and a former procurement official at the ministry, said in an interview that the agency was investigating those deals. Unless Zelensky's overhaul is reversed, those investigations will fall under the control of the prosecutor general. This article originally appeared in Advertisement
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Canada Talks Up Pension Funds' Financial Muscle as Lever in US Trade Talks
Canada's major pension funds could boost their investments in the US, a top Canadian cabinet minister said, as the country looks to negotiate a trade agreement with the Trump administration. Dominic LeBlanc, the minister responsible for US trade, is in Washington for talks with US lawmakers. He brought up Canada's pension funds when asked if President Donald Trump will seek a specific pledge for more investment into the US.
