logo
Nato leaders set to agree historic defence spending pledge, but hike won't apply to all

Nato leaders set to agree historic defence spending pledge, but hike won't apply to all

Time of India4 hours ago

AP image
THE HAGUE: Nato leaders are expected to agree this week that member countries should spend 5 percent of their gross domestic product on defence, except the new and much vaunted investment pledge will not apply to all of them.
Spain has reached a deal with Nato to be excluded from the 5 percent of GDP spending target, while President Donald Trump said the figure shouldn't apply to the United States, only its allies.
In announcing Spain's decision Sunday, Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said the spending pledge language in Nato's final summit communique - a one-page text of perhaps half a dozen paragraphs - would no longer refer to "all allies."
It raises questions about what demands could be insisted on from other members of the alliance like Belgium, Canada, France and Italy that also would struggle to hike security spending by billions of dollars.
On Friday, Trump insisted the US has carried its allies for years and now they must step up. "I don't think we should, but I think they should," he said. "Nato is going to have to deal with Spain."
Trump also branded Canada "a low payer."
Nato's new spending goals
The 5 percent goal is made up of two parts. The allies would agree to hike pure defence spending to 3.5 percent of GDP, up from the current target of at least 2 percent, which 22 of the 32 countries have achieved. Money spent to arm Ukraine also would count.
A further 1.5 percent would include upgrading roads, bridges, ports and airfields so armies can better deploy, establishing measures to counter cyber and hybrid attacks and preparing societies for future conflict.
The second spending basket is easy for most nations, including Spain. Much can be included. But the 3.5 percent on core spending is a massive challenge.
Last year, Spain spent 1.28 percent of GDP on its military budget, according to Nato estimates, making it the alliance's lowest spender. Sanchez said Spain would be able to respect its commitments to Nato by spending 2.1 percent of GDP on defence needs.
Spain also is among Europe's smallest suppliers of arms and ammunition to Ukraine, according to the Kiel Institute, which tracks such support.
It's estimated to have sent about 800,000 euros ($920,000) worth of military aid since Russia invaded in 2022.
Beyond Spain's economic challenges, Sanchez has other problems. He relies on small parties to govern and corruption scandals have ensnared his inner circle and family members. He is under growing pressure to call an early election.
Why the spending increase is needed
There are solid reasons for ramping up spending.
The Europeans believe Russia's war on Ukraine poses an existential threat to them. Moscow has been blamed for a major rise in sabotage, cyberattacks and GPS jamming incidents. European leaders are girding their citizens for the possibility of more.
The alliance's plans for defending Europe and North America against a Russian attack require investments of at least 3 percent, Nato experts have said. All 32 allies have endorsed these.
Each country has been assigned "capability targets" to play its part.
Spanish Foreign Minister Jose Albares said Monday that "the debate must be not a raw percentage but around capabilities." He said Spain "can reach the capabilities that have been fixed by the organisation with 2.1 percent."
Countries much closer to Russia, Belarus and Ukraine all have agreed to reach the target, as well as nearby Germany, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands, which is hosting the two-day summit starting Tuesday.
The Netherlands estimates Nato's defence plans would force it to dedicate at least 3.5 percent to core defence spending. That means finding an additional 16 billion to 19 billion euros ($18 billion to $22 billion).
Setting a deadline
It's not enough to agree to spend more money. Many allies haven't yet hit an earlier 2 percent target that they agreed in 2014 after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula. So an incentive is required.
The date of 2032 has been floated as a deadline. That is far shorter than previous Nato targets, but military planners estimate Russian forces could be capable of launching an attack on an ally within five to 10 years.
The US insists it cannot be an open-ended pledge and a decade is too long. Still, Italy says it wants 10 years to hit the 5 percent target.
The possibility of stretching that period to 2035 also has been on the table for debate among Nato envoys. An official review of progress could also be conducted in 2029, Nato diplomats have said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran's retaliation against US strikes could come in next 48 hours: Report
Iran's retaliation against US strikes could come in next 48 hours: Report

India Today

time26 minutes ago

  • India Today

Iran's retaliation against US strikes could come in next 48 hours: Report

Iran could launch retaliatory attacks against US forces in the Middle East within the next 48 hours, further escalating the conflict in the region following US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities over the the Trump administration is continuing diplomatic efforts to prevent further conflict, two US officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to news agency Reuters, said intelligence assessments point to a heightened threat window in the next day or has vowed to defend itself after the US struck multiple targets, including components of its nuclear infrastructure, in what Washington described as a preemptive move to prevent an "unacceptable escalation" in the region. The strikes have prompted fears of a broader military conflict between the long-time President Donald Trump, who authorised the mission dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, warned that any Iranian retaliation would be met with "a force far greater than that used in the weekend US attacks".In preemptive moves, General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the US military has heightened protection measures for its troops in the region, including those stationed in Iraq and US maintains around 40,000 troops across the Middle East, many of whom operate high-value assets including air defence systems, fighter aircraft, and warships—all of which could be vulnerable in the event of a coordinated Iranian week, the Pentagon began repositioning some of those assets to reduce exposure. Among the moves was the moving out of aircraft from the sprawling Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, which houses around 10,000 US personnel and serves as a strategic hub for operations across the its vows to retaliate, Tehran has so far refrained from attacking US positions or attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway through which roughly a quarter of the world's oil shipments al-Rahim Mousavi, Chief of Staff of the Iranian Armed Forces, said the country will respond appropriately to the American aggression."Regardless of the damage caused to the three nuclear facilities, we will respond against the US simply because it attacked our country," Mousavi said.- EndsMust Watch

Israel vs Iran conflict escalates, Vladimir Putin calls attack on Iran 'unprovoked aggression'
Israel vs Iran conflict escalates, Vladimir Putin calls attack on Iran 'unprovoked aggression'

India Today

time26 minutes ago

  • India Today

Israel vs Iran conflict escalates, Vladimir Putin calls attack on Iran 'unprovoked aggression'

The conflict between Israel and Iran has escalated with heavy missile fire exchanged between the two nations. Israel has struck six Iranian airports, while Iran has launched a missile barrage on Israel. Russian President Vladimir Putin has condemned the attacks on Iran and called it 'unprovoked aggression'. He pledged aid to Iran. Civilian areas in Israel, including Tel Aviv and Haifa, have been severely affected, with significant damage to infrastructure and numerous casualties reported. The IAEA has expressed concerns about potential radiation leaks and emphasised the need for diplomacy.

Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote With Holdouts Threatening Delay
Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote With Holdouts Threatening Delay

Mint

time28 minutes ago

  • Mint

Senate Readies Tax Bill for Vote With Holdouts Threatening Delay

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending agenda is nearing a climactic vote in the Senate this week in the wake of air strikes on Iran, which risk embroiling the US in a prolonged Middle East conflict. Trump's $4.2 trillion tax-cut package, partially offset by social safety-net reductions, does not yet have the support it needs to pass the Senate. Fiscal hawks seeking to lower the bill's total price tag are at odds with Republicans worried about cuts to Medicaid health coverage for their constituents and phase-outs to green energy incentives that support jobs in their states. Finessing a deal to line up the votes will require focus — and a bit of arm-twisting — from Trump, who is juggling both a pivotal week for his domestic agenda alongside a highly uncertain situation in Iran following the US strikes. Trump on Sunday, as US officials and foreign leaders were still digesting what the attacks on Iranian nuclear sites will mean for Middle East stability, urged members of his party to swiftly pass the tax bill. 'Great unity in the Republican Party, perhaps unity like we have never seen before. Now let's get the Great, Big, Beautiful Bill done. Our Country is doing GREAT,' Trump said on social media. Senate Republicans plan to begin the multi-step process to vote on Trump's tax and spending cut bill mid-week, setting up final passage in the latter half of the week or over the weekend. That timeline would allow the House to vote on the latest version next week and meet Trump's goal of enacting his signature bill by July 4. Meeting that ambitious deadline will require senators to quickly negotiate resolutions to a series of thorny policy issues that have divided Republicans for weeks. Senate Majority Leader John Thune must balance demands by fiscal conservatives for deeper spending cuts with qualms from moderate Republicans concerned the bill goes too far in making people ineligible for Medicaid and cutting funding for rural hospitals. Renewable energy incentives continue to divide the party as well, with some conservatives pushing for a faster phase-out of tax breaks for wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal and hydrogen. Other senators are angling to keep the breaks in place for projects that have already begun. Senators will also find themselves in talks with some of their House counterparts over the state and local tax, or SALT, deduction. The Senate bill would keep the current $10,000 cap in place, while the House-passed version would raise it to $40,000. Several House members from high-tax states, including New York, New Jersey and California, have threatened to block the bill if it doesn't include a $40,000 SALT cap. The Senate has some negotiating room to increase the SALT cap. The bill, per Senate rules, can lose up to $1.5 trillion over a decade. But a new estimate from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation, found the legislation only costs $441 billion over ten years — after deploying a budget gimmick that assumes the $3.8 trillion cost of extending Trump's first-term tax cuts cost nothing. Democrats are locked out of the deal-making, with Trump able to pass his agenda on Republican votes alone. But they have been able to use arcane Senate rules to successfully challenge and strike some provisions from the bill if the Senate parliamentarian declares the measures aren't sufficiently related to taxes, spending or the budget. The parliamentarian blocked a provision that would make it harder for judges to hold Trump administration officials in contempt for failing to abide by rulings. Democrats were able to eliminate measures that would curb some Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. Provisions to strip funding from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and cut Federal Reserve employee salaries were also tossed out. Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough permitted Republicans to use the bill to pressure states not to regulate artificial intelligence by denying them funding for broadband Internet projects. That's a watered-down version of a House proposal that would have blocked states from issuing AI regulations. That plan drew bipartisan criticism for overstepping states' authority. Democrats are also seeking to remove the Section 899 'revenge tax' on companies domiciled in countries with 'unfair' tax regimes. That provision has stoked fears on Wall Street of capital flight from the US. That parliamentarian ruling could be released as soon as Monday. The tax bill is the core of Trump's economic agenda combined into a 'big, beautiful bill.' The Senate version makes permanent individual and business tax breaks enacted in 2017, while adding new breaks for tipped and overtime workers, seniors and car-buyers. The bill would allow hundreds of billions of dollars in new spending for the military, border patrol and immigration enforcement. To partly pay for the revenue losses, the bill imposes new work and cost-sharing requirements for Medicaid and food stamps while cutting aid to students. The measure would also avert a US payment default as soon as August by raising the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. More stories like this are available on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store