logo
Tariffs Hit Home: Why US Consumers Are Paying More Under Trump's Trade Gamble

Tariffs Hit Home: Why US Consumers Are Paying More Under Trump's Trade Gamble

News182 days ago
Last Updated:
Trump's sweeping tariffs are adding to rising prices, slowing job growth, and prompting warnings of stagflation, with Americans bearing the cost
US consumer prices are on the rise again, and a large part of the reason lies in President Donald Trump's sweeping trade policies. The latest inflation figures, combined with sharply slower job growth, show that the costs of Trump's tariff war are no longer just a matter for trade negotiators or Wall Street. They are now hitting the wallets of ordinary Americans.
Prices Climb Despite Early Dips
According to official data cited by The Guardian, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), a measure of the average prices paid by consumers for a fixed basket of goods and services, rose 2.7 per cent in July compared with a year earlier. While this is lower than the peaks seen during the pandemic period, it marks an uptick from the levels seen in spring.
Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, rose by 3.1 per cent over the last month, a faster pace than in June. Price increases were especially sharp in dining out and restaurant meals (up 3.9 per cent year-on-year), housing, medical care, and used cars.
Energy prices fell by 1.6 per cent over the year, which helped prevent an even sharper rise in the CPI. But the overall trend is clear: everyday costs for American households are rising again.
A central driver of the recent price surge, according to The Guardian, is President Trump's 10 per cent 'universal tariff", a blanket import duty applied to all goods entering the United States since spring 2025. This measure is coupled with higher duties on certain sectors, such as steel and aluminium.
Just last week, Trump announced tariffs ranging from 15 to 50 per cent on 90 countries. Economists say this latest move pushes America's average effective tariff rate to 18 per cent, the highest since the infamous Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which is widely blamed for worsening the Great Depression by stifling global trade.
Some tariffs, such as those targeting China, have been temporarily delayed by 90 days while negotiations continue. But, as The Guardian notes, many US retailers had stocked up earlier this year to absorb the immediate impact. Those inventories are now running low, prompting companies to pass on the higher import costs to customers — a scenario that executives at Walmart, Nike and Macy's had warned about months ago.
The Household Cost: $2,400 A Year
The Yale Budget Lab estimates that the higher prices caused by Trump's tariffs will cost the typical US household $2,400 (roughly Rs 2 lakh) in 2025. For an average American family, this is comparable to an entire month's rent in many cities or a year's worth of grocery bills for a small household.
Within that projected increase, clothing costs alone are expected to rise by 37 per cent, while shoe prices could jump 39 per cent. These spikes matter because apparel and footwear are staple purchases, meaning the higher costs are unavoidable.
Economists such as Ben May of Oxford Economics warn that these tariffs are 'squeezing household incomes" by raising prices across a wide range of goods, from daily essentials to big-ticket items, effectively reducing consumers' purchasing power even if their nominal incomes stay the same.
Labour Market Weakens As Tariffs Bite
The impact of Trump's tariffs is not limited to rising prices; the US labour market is also showing strain. According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), employment figures released earlier this month were sharply revised downwards. What was initially reported as 291,000 jobs created in May and June combined has now been corrected to just 33,000.
American Journalist Steven Greenhouse, in an op-ed in The Guardian, notes that job growth has plunged by more than 70 per cent in the three months since Trump's April 'liberation day" tariffs, a reference to the large package of trade duties unveiled on 2 April. The uncertainty and higher costs from these measures, he writes, have made corporate executives hesitant to invest or expand, slowing hiring across industries.
Manufacturing output has also weakened. Motorcycle maker Harley-Davidson has cut production due to tariff-related uncertainty and higher expenses, while carmaker Ford reported an $800 million drop in quarterly profits linked to increased input costs.
Stagflation Fears Resurface
Several economists now warn of a possible return to stagflation, the toxic mix of high inflation and stagnant growth last experienced in the US in the 1970s. Stagflation is particularly hard to tackle because the usual tools to fight inflation (like raising interest rates) can make growth even slower, while measures to stimulate growth risk fuelling further inflation.
BMO Economics (the research and analysis arm of the Bank of Montreal, one of Canada's largest financial institutions) told The Guardian that 'economic activity and job growth are sputtering under the weight of higher tariffs, increasing inflation and rising economic policy and trade uncertainty."
Such conditions, BMO warns, could push the US economy towards a slowdown even as household costs continue to climb, creating a scenario where both consumers and businesses are squeezed simultaneously.
Political And Institutional Fallout
Trump's economic policies are also fuelling political tension with US institutions. He has repeatedly pressed the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, arguing it would spur growth. However, higher inflation makes rate cuts less likely, as the Fed's dual mandate is to balance price stability with maximum employment.
The President has attacked the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) over job data, firing Commissioner Erika McEntarfer shortly after the weak July report and nominating EJ Antoni, a long-time critic of the agency, to the post.
He has also targeted Fed Chair Jerome Powell, even threatening to sue him over what he called mismanagement of building renovations, a highly unusual move for a sitting president.
The 'Trade War' Reality Check
Trump has repeatedly described his tariffs as a 'historic trade win," claiming they bring 'massive amounts of cash" into the US Treasury. While it is true that tariffs generate revenue for the government, economists stress that this money ultimately comes from US importers and consumers in the form of higher prices.
Trump's stated goal has been to bring manufacturing back to the US. There have been some headline-grabbing announcements in that direction, such as Apple's $100 billion pledge to invest in advanced manufacturing domestically, and General Motors' decision to increase production of certain truck models in Indiana while reducing output in Canada.
However, experts note that these examples are limited in scale and may not represent a sustained manufacturing revival. One key reason: business uncertainty.
Corporate planners are reluctant to commit billions to new factories when tariff rates can change with little notice, depending on shifting political calculations. Greenhouse, in his op-ed, argues that Trump's frequent threats and sudden changes in trade policy risk deterring the very investment he seeks to attract.
This unpredictability raises questions about whether the 'trade wins" are truly lasting gains, or short-term deals that come at a broader economic cost.
Why It Matters
top videos
View all
The United States is the world's largest consumer market, and changes in its economic conditions ripple globally. For American households, tariffs are no longer an abstract policy tool, they are a tax on everyday consumption, pushing up the cost of living at a time when job growth is slowing.
For Trump, the tariffs are a signature political and economic strategy. But for millions of Americans, the trade gamble is already translating into higher bills, reduced purchasing power, and an economy that may be inching closer to stagflation.
About the Author
Karishma Jain
Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at News18.com, writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @kar...Read More
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
donald trump tariffs us economy
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 13, 2025, 11:52 IST
News explainers Tariffs Hit Home: Why US Consumers Are Paying More Under Trump's Trade Gamble
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump, China, and the future of the rules-based international order
Trump, China, and the future of the rules-based international order

Hindustan Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump, China, and the future of the rules-based international order

The United Nations (UN) was formed in 1945, to avoid wars of the scale of the two World Wars, which caused widespread, death, destruction and miseries. However, neither were the two World Wars the first wars, nor have they been the last ones. The Thirty Years War, and the Eighty Years Wars in Europe were previous wars and were more protracted in nature, running over decades, causing more destruction. The queer part is that all these wars were in Europe, albeit Asia witnessed its own share of miseries, as an imperial Japan unleashed death and destruction in its hunger for power and territories, in the years leading up to World War II. China became one of the first to bear the onslaught. Donald Trump (Bloomberg) The odd part about the 21st century is that there again is an ongoing war in Europe, economies are again feeling the heat, people are again dying, and there is an unfolding conflict in Asia as well just like it was preceding World War II. The only difference this time is that China is not at the receiving end, but others ranging from India to Taiwan, to the Philippines are at the receiving end of China's hunger for power and territories! The UN continues to exist, even though the numbers of conflicts and wars has only increased since 1945, in addition to the formats they are fought in having undergone severe changes. The UN also was not the only such organisation that was created to prevent wars; it was preceded by the League of Nations, which failed to prevent World War II. The US was not a member of the League of Nations, as it chose not to be part of it. Similar to the bygone era, today, another important country is not a part of the UN or of other important international organisations- namely Taiwan. While the US had chosen to stay out of the League of Nations, Taiwan is not part of the UN because China claims it as part of its territory. What is clear from the bygone era and today is that the desire for territory remains supreme in states. However, what has now emerged as a peculiarity of the 21st century is the role played by the hegemon or the leading actor of the international system- the US. While the Soviet Union and the US after World War II fought a Cold War in desires of being the hegemon, the US which today is the hegemon, shows no signs of continuing with the responsibilities of the hegemon. Under Donald Trump's second term, what has now emerged is a strained rules-based international order, wherein the US acts as a revisionist State. While China, as the second largest power of the international system has been understood so far as the revisionist actor, which wants the international system modelled as per its power perceptions, under Trump 2.0, it appears that the U.S. itself no longer wants a rules-based international order to remain- which it has deep stakes in to begin with. The rules-based international order is centred on not just the UN, but also on international law, but this now faces challenges from both China and Trump led US China's actions such as rejecting the rulings of the Hague Tribunal on the South China Sea, bullying Taiwan militarily, and asserting regional dominance and unleashing military aggression against India or the Philippines, all undermine the global norms of sovereignty and legal accountability. Trump's so-called America First policies, including withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement, imposing tariffs without a logical basis, destabilise the legal basis of institutions like the World Trade Organization. The thin line between malicious trade and economic policies from China and the U.S. now stands blurred. Additionally, Trump's reduced UN funding, his alignment with Russia against resolutions all weaken the UN's authority. In 2025 for example, the US sided twice with Russia in votes at the UN to mark the third anniversary of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Similarly, China's push for alternative governance models, emphasising state sovereignty over universal human rights, also erode the UN's rights framework. While there already has been no accountability for the Covid-19 pandemic that originated in Wuhan in China, Trump's dismissive stance on the World Health Organization signals a retreat from a cooperative global framework. As witnessed in 2025, both- the US and China take a might makes right approach. China's military and economic coercion and Trump's unilateralism challenge the very basis of the UN's principles. This dual pressure risks fragmenting the international order and pushing it to further chaos. Collectively, the actions of the U.S. and China threaten the post-World War II framework, leading it to power-driven geopolitics. Trump's policies signal an intent to form a G-2 with China, and examples included Trump's rollback of the previous US policies to restrict chips export to China, Trump's withholding the imminent ban of TikTok, his pause of the tariffs that were to take effect against China, his targeting of India as the second largest importer of Russian oil, while staying silent on China, while the US continues its humungous purchases of fertilisers from Russia- all signal the US intent to destroy the rules-based world order. However, a cursory glance at history also shows that paradigm shifts take place only in times of duress. The extreme strain that the international order now faces will either lead it to crumble and newer and worse wars will emerge, or a third actor, which has the credibility which both the US and China now lack, will emerge, or a new type of multipolarity and power configuration will emerge. History does repeat itself, and learning from it and tweaking it to current conditions will be the mantra forward. This article is authored by Sriparna Pathak, professor, China Studies and International Relations, Jindal School of International Affairs, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat.

Trump tariffs: Small businesses in America need to pay an extra $202 billion a year
Trump tariffs: Small businesses in America need to pay an extra $202 billion a year

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump tariffs: Small businesses in America need to pay an extra $202 billion a year

Bloomberg Live Events Bloomberg The economic policies passed in the first six months of President Donald Trump 's term may yet bring a Golden Age, but so far they haven't for small farms and businesses. According to an estimate by the right-leaning US Chamber of Commerce, Trump's levies mean that small businesses will have to pay an extra $202 billion a year on tariffs, which works out to about $856,000 per company on optimism soared on Trump's victory and plunged when he announced tariffs; the right-leaning NFIB Small Business Optimism Index has recovered somewhat since 'Liberation Day' but has yet to reach the heights of Trump's first term in office, and response rates to the survey have fallen, suggesting some business owners may be too busy struggling to remain solvent to complete surveys. The Purdue University-CME Group Ag Economy Barometer index has declined for two months in a with large companies, smaller enterprises are struggling to wait out the vicissitudes of Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs. Democratic Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear told me recently that he is already seeing the impact across his state on small businesses, small farms and consumers alike. 'We're all paying a hidden tax in the form of widespread tariffs,' he said. 'Look, it's not just me saying this. If Andy Beshear, [former GOP Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell and [GOP Senator] Rand Paul are all saying this is a bad idea, it's because it's a really bad idea.'Companies with fewer than 500 employees contribute 43.5% of the nation's gross domestic product. Small family farms still constitute 86% of all farms, according to federal data. But they lack the leverage and resources of larger enterprises and can find themselves at the mercy of forces over which they have little influence.'They're what economists call 'price-takers,'' Louis Johnston, an economist and professor at St. John's University in Minnesota told me. 'It means you accept the world as it is. You don't have enough power to affect prices and you don't have much wiggle room on wages. You're stuck.' Big businesses, he said, are price-makers. 'They can eat some costs , pass some to consumers, reduce stockholder dividends or shave a bit off wages,' he said. 'If you're small, all you can do is take the hit.'Investors agree, and publicly traded small companies have seen their stocks become less attractive since Trump unveiled his tariff agenda on 'Liberation Day' in in Congress seem unwilling to place the slightest restraint on a president convinced of his infallibility on companies are finding themselves in the uncomfortable position of absorbing the increased costs of tariffs, according to Scott Lincicome, director of general economics and trade studies at the Cato Institute. That's not sustainable, especially for smaller businesses, and Lincicome is projecting higher consumer prices this fall. Even before its most recent estimate of tariff costs, the Chamber of Commerce had rung the alarm in a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that warned 'small businesses could suffer irreparable harm' from tariffs. 'The Chamber is hearing from small-business owners every day who are seeing their ability to survive endangered by the recent increase in tariff rates.'The GOP tax bill does grant some benefits to small businesses, such as a permanent extension on deductions. Doug Loon, president of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, told me that those benefits may become a lifeline. 'It would have put a lot of small businesses out of business if those provisions had not happened,' he a longtime Republican, remembers when his party saw free enterprise as an article of faith. He also recalls that the free-trade era carried its own challenges, particularly for smaller businesses that 'didn't always get a fair shake.' Loon believes that targeted tariffs, skillfully applied, 'can be incredibly beneficial.' Trump's broad-based approach 'has created great uncertainty among our businesses. And that is where disparities can occur.'Trump portrays tariffs as free money paid by countries that have 'ripped off' America . His new levies have already begun sending billions to the US Treasury. But the reality is that tariffs are a hidden tax mostly borne by US companies and consumers. According to Goldman Sachs data, US consumers have paid 22% of the cost of Trump's tariffs. Only 14% of the cost has been borne by foreign other 64%? Eaten by American businesses Trump has reset the table on trade. Unfortunately, in his hands, tariffs are a blunt instrument used to punish enemies, reward friends and bully other nations. He substitutes threats and intimidation for negotiations and diplomacy. The deals, such as they are, remain vague, with details often disputed by trading was just seven months ago that the International Monetary Fund declared the US economy would continue to lead the world in 2025. IMF officials said the US was growing at a faster clip than its economic competitors, with more productive workers and a more welcoming business environment, leaving Trump and the GOP well positioned to capitalize politically on those economic several key economic indicators are pointing in the wrong direction — a scenario largely of Trump's own making. Businesses are struggling to adapt to his ever-shifting landscape of tariffs. Farmers are getting clobbered by higher inputs and they've lost markets thanks to an administration that ended foreign food aid and cut nutrition the president brags about the revenue tariffs are bringing, as if everyone didn't already know who is really footing the bill.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store