Shares in UK packaging firm plunge as US tariffs spark sales warning
The London-listed packaging automation company told shareholders US trade tariffs and subdued consumer confidence has driven customers to reduce spending and defer capital investments.
It said original equipment orders in its core business had 'slowed materially' during the second quarter.
MPAC expects its order book will total £118.5million at the end of June, compared to about £90million in December last year, with the Americas region being especially affected.
As order intake in the second quarter drives much of second-half sales flow, Mpac now believes its full-year revenue will 'fall significantly below the board's previous expectations'.
The AIM-listed company's shares plummeted 26.2 per cent to 317.5p in early trading.
In early April, US President Donald Trump imposed a baseline 10 per cent tariff on most imported goods and a 25 per cent levy on many cars and vehicle parts.
The tariffs have led to many businesses warning of cost increases or lower demand, while others are making redundancies or cutting back capital spending.
Due to weaker market conditions in the US, Mpac intends to close its facility in Cleveland, Ohio, and transfer production to its base in Boston, Massachusetts.
Mpac also intends to scale back capacity at its site in Mississauga, Canada.
The Yorkshire-based firm states expects the restructuring to result in approximately £11.5million in non-cash impairment charges.
Adam Holland, chief executive of Mpac Group, said: 'During the later part of the first half of 2025, we have seen the impact of US trade tariffs, falling consumer confidence, and growing economic uncertainty.
'The actions we take today to simplify our business in response to challenging conditions sets a direction of travel that will position the group for future growth when markets recover.'
Despite the problems resulting from tariffs, Mpac said its first-half revenue was in line with the board's forecasts.
It credited this to a bumper January order book and short-cycle service business, as well as a strong performance from companies acquired last year.
Mpac further revealed that it had agreed to a 'buy-in' transaction for its UK-defined benefit pension scheme with Aviva, which will acquire a bulk annuity insurance policy for £249million.
Bulk purchase annuities are a form of pension de-risking strategy whereby firms transfer their pension obligations to insurers.
Analysts at Equity Development said: 'Despite the current difficulties in industrial markets evident in this external setback, it is worth noting Mpac's transformational change in recent times.
'With a broadened and innovative product offering, specialist engineering expertise, and a firm focus on operational excellence and increasing market share, Mpac remains well placed to drive future growth.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
23 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump's tariff pause is set to expire, threatening a trade war flare-up
President Donald Trump's trade war risks reigniting next week when a temporary pause on sweeping tariffs is set to expire, potentially driving up costs for businesses and raising prices for consumers. While Trump and administration officials recently indicated the deadline might be pushed back, the president told reporters Tuesday that he wasn't planning an extension and is informing countries of their new tariff rates. He said it has been harder than planned to make trade deals with a number of foreign governments because they are 'spoiled from having ripped us off for 30, 40 years.' 'We're going to determine a number just very simply, write them a nice letter,' Trump said aboard Air Force One. 'Probably one page or a page and a half at the most, and it's going to be essentially, 'Congratulations. It's going to be an honor to allow you to go and do business in the United States of America,' because it really is an honor to be able to do that.' Trump said Wednesday that he had reached a trade agreement with Vietnam in which U.S.-based companies will have to pay a 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods and a 40% tariff on goods routed through Vietnam from other countries. Vietnam agreed to not to charge any tariffs on U.S. goods. 'Liberation' delayed The tariffs, announced with great fanfare during an April event the White House dubbed 'Liberation Day,' imposed levies on dozens of countries. They included a tariff of 24% on Japanese imports and a 20% tariff on products from the European Union. At the time, Trump said the duties would end decades of the U.S. being 'looted, pillaged, raped and plundered ' by trading partners. The move caused stocks to tumble, erasing as much as $5 trillion in value from the S&P 500, while global investors began to flee U.S. assets, increasing government borrowing costs. Just a week later, Trump said he was pausing most of those tariffs to give his administration time to broker new trade deals with as many as 75 trading partners in 90 days. White House officials framed the announcement and subsequent pause as a negotiating tactic and the 'art of the deal' in action. But the $80 billion that customs officials estimate the U.S. has collected in additional tariff revenue during Trump's first six months pales beside the multitrillion-dollar gyration markets have undergone in that time. And nearly three months later, no trade agreements have been finalized. Talks continue with the U.S.' closest trading partners, and a framework for one agreement with the U.K. was reached, though details still need to be hammered out. Now, with the July 9 deadline approaching, U.S. businesses again face the threat of paying hefty levies on goods bought from overseas. Tariffs are taxes paid to the federal government by U.S.-based companies importing products or parts. Companies can then either absorb those fees, taking lower profits or cutting costs elsewhere, or pass those costs along to customers in the form of higher prices. 'Tariff fatigue' The imposition of more tariffs could reignite the stock market volatility that the initial announcement caused — just as the S&P 500 recently recouped all of its losses since Trump returned to the White House. Investors largely expect him to extend the July 9 deadline for most trading partners and aren't anticipating a major spike in tariff costs for companies in the coming days. 'Despite evidence of a 'tariff fatigue' among investors, trade policy concerns persist,' Hussein Malik, head of global research at JPMorgan, wrote in a note to clients last week. 'We believe that the upcoming July tariff deadline will be less critical,' he said, but noted that 'volatility may continue until a final decision is reached this summer. The ability of corporations and consumers to absorb the tariff shocks will be critical in determining the macro consequences.' Some tariffs have remained in place throughout the pause —including a blanket 10% tariff on all imports and higher rates on steel, aluminum and autos. The United States and China announced a 90-day pause in May on most of their recent tariffs on each other, with the U.S. cutting its effective rate on Chinese imports to 30%, from 145%. So far, those tariffs haven't appeared to greatly disrupt the economy, but Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said Tuesday that more effects could emerge soon. Tariff uncertainty has caused the Fed to delay further interest rate cuts, he said, especially as inflation remains slightly above its preferred 2% target. And while many companies stocked up on inventory in the spring to prepare for tariffs, executives have warned that consumers could see higher prices this summer and fall as those supplies dwindle. Vietnam deal framework White House officials have said they are in regular talks with 18 of the U.S.' top trading partners, including the E.U., Japan and India, to negotiate trade deals. In touting the trade agreement Trump said the U.S. reached with Vietnam, Trump suggested that it could open up the Vietnamese market to American-made SUVs. Vietnam has been a growing trading parter for the U.S., but the buying power for most Vietnamese is limited with the average wage around $600 a month. 'We will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff,' Trump wrote in a post on social media. 'It is my opinion that the SUV or, as it is sometimes referred to, Large Engine Vehicle, which does so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam.' Trump didn't disclose any further details of the agreement. U.S. imports from Vietnam increased nearly 20% last year to $136.6 billion as more companies, like Nike, have been shifting production there from China to avoid paying the tariffs imposed on China during Trump's first term. Trump suggested Tuesday that a trade deal with India was also close, though administration officials have been suggesting that for weeks. Earlier, Trump had threatened India with a 26% tariff. 'It's going to be a deal where we're able to go in and compete,' he told reporters. 'Right now, India doesn't accept anybody in. I think India is going to do that, and if they do that, we're going to have a deal for much less tariffs.' Talks with Japan and the E.U. drag on Trump said Tuesday that a deal with Japan was unlikely because the country wasn't willing to agree to buy enough U.S. rice, a move that could hurt Japanese farmers. Japan is already facing a 25% tariff on cars shipped to the U.S. and a reciprocal tariff of 24% if the tariff pause expires. The European Union's top trade negotiator was scheduled to come to Washington on Wednesday to continue talks. The E.U. has threatened to retaliate if there is no deal by July 9, with at least $100 billion worth of retaliatory tariffs on standby and plans to limit shipments to the U.S. of scrap steel and certain chemical products. White House officials have indicated they haven't had time to initiate serious trade talks with smaller trading partners, creating uncertainty around what would happen if the pause expires. While some of those countries sell a relatively small amount of goods to the U.S., they can dominate the supply of items in certain areas. Madagascar, for example, faces a 47% tariff once the pause expires and is the U.S.' main supplier of vanilla used in baking.
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The world's richest (homeless) man could be driven to an idyllic safe haven... but it'll ignite a huge firestorm
He's the richest man in the world with unlimited funds and an army of supporters who have his back. But Elon Musk may be scrambling to come up with a contingency plan as his former best friend - who is the President of the United States - has threatened to deport him.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Republican voters on Trump's sweeping tax-and-spend legislation: ‘This bill is a no-brainer!'
So confident is Donald Trump in the sweeping tax and spending legislation that Republicans are trying to push through Congress by the slimmest of margins that he refers to it as his 'big, beautiful bill'. The measure, which the House of Representatives could pass on Wednesday, is centered on making permanent tax cuts created during his first term, creating new exemptions for tips, overtime and car loan interest, and funding mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. To lower its price tag, Republicans have proposed the largest cuts ever to Medicaid, which provides healthcare to poor and disabled Americans, and to the food assistance program known as Snap. They have also included provisions to phase out tax incentives meant to encourage the expansion of clean energy technologies that were created under Joe Biden. Does that sound beautiful to the president's supporters? The Guardian asked, and here's what they told us. Kyle Hanson, a 41-year-old IT professional in Wisconsin, said the measure would bring 'absolutely beautiful, critical, important, and responsible fiscal changes that our overly bloated bureaucracy of a government is way overdue for, and in desperate need of'. 'The disgusting career politicians have been extremely fiscally irresponsible for many decades, and all the US citizens will pay the price for it. This needed to be addressed a long time ago, and finally there is a politician willing to be ridiculed for doing what is needed. It may not be what everyone thinks will be nice, fuzzy, and warm feeling, but it is the responsible thing to do,' he continued. According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the bill would increase the deficit by $3.3tn through 2034. In New York, 60-year-old grandmother Dee said: 'I believe this will greatly help heavily taxed middle class and lower class and lift us out of the debt we have been inundated with by the Biden administration!' 'This bill is a no-brainer! Americans first!' she added. A Montana Republican, William King, described the bill as 'great', particularly the tens of billions of dollars it dedicates to stepping up deportations. Others who backed Trump last November said the bill was not what they voted for. 'It's very bad,' said Teddy Johnson, 40, of Phoenix. He objected to the cuts to Medicaid and 'hard workers', saying: 'they need to tax the wealthy.' A 39-year-old in Pennsylvania who asked to remain anonymous said: 'I think [it] is a scam to the American people. We cut all the programs for poverty-stricken kids and raise the national debt anyway. Where is all the money going?' Their recipe for making the bill better. 'Remove cuts to Snap and Medicaid, cut the defense budget, and cut all these handouts to the rich.' There was more skepticism to be found among voters who usually back the GOP, but did not support Trump's re-election. An Oklahoman who voted for the Libertarian party's candidate called the bill 'a nightmare for now and future generations', and said it should be rewritten to raise taxes on the rich and corporations, and lower them for poor and middle-class tax payers, without increasing the national debt. Texas resident Steven K said: 'I think the bill is a slap in the face to all of us that have been paying into these systems all our lives. 'Trump's lies that he campaigned on to lower the deficit and [make America great again] was all a smokescreen to get the country's vote so he wouldn't go to prison,' he continued. M, a 65-year-old Detroit Republican who declined to share their full name and voted for the Democratic candidate Kamala Harris, said the bill was 'a fiscally irresponsible, mean, mess. It increases our deficit, undermines the health and safety of this nation, reduces states' rights, and harms those who most need help so they can continue to contribute to this great nation. This is a filthy giveaway to ultra-rich people who are not paying their fare share.' North Carolina resident James Walker, 63, said the measure should be renamed 'the big bankruptcy bill'. 'The world's biggest Ponzi scheme, otherwise known as the economy of the United States of America, comes closer to the point of no return. No politician is going to make the necessary cuts required to pay down the debt.' The bill would be better, he said, if it focused on paying down the country's debt, improving the Department of Veterans Affairs and allocating money meant for research and development of military technology towards improving housing for soldiers and their families. 'How many times over DO we need to destroy the world?' Walker asked.
