EXCLUSIVE Labour's Electric Car Grant will be a drain on taxpayers and cause 'rampant EV depreciation', experts warn
But while taxpayer-funded discounts of almost £4,000 should make shiny new battery cars a little more appealing to drivers, it threatens to further compound 'rampant EV depreciation', industry insiders have warned.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander on Monday unveiled Labour's £650million Electric Car Grant (ECG), coming three years after the previous Tory regime scrapped its own plug-in car grant.
The Department for Transport confirms only fully electric models below £37,000 - and that are sustainably produced - are eligible for subsidies from £1,500 to £3,750, with funding in place until 2028-29.
But as the dust settles on the reaction to the announcement - which has largely been positive, especially from car makers who smell a spike in sales without taking a hit on profits - some industry experts claim it will only prove to be a major drain on public spending that will cause used EV prices to plummet.
According to recent cap hpi data shared exclusively with This is Money, the average electric car in 2025 is losing 43 per cent of its original value after just one year.
In monetary terms, this translates to an average financial loss of £25,900 on the recommended retail price when new.
As such, residual values for battery cars are already far worse than other fuel types; in comparison, petrol and diesel cars typically lose around 31 per cent of their initial price over the same period.
And for some electric models, depreciation can be catastrophic.
The exclusive analysis revealed that a DS3 E-Tense typically depreciates at a rate of 66.7 per cent in the first 12 months, shedding almost £26,000 of its original £39,000 price.
Cap hpi told us the biggest trigger of widescale EV depreciation in the last two years has been the level of discounting on new electric cars in showrooms.
With manufacturers under intense pressure to meet the Government's Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate - the annually-increasing EV sales targets set out for the next decade - they have been slashing prices of battery models to make them more attractive to buyers.
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Trader (SMMT) claims car makers swallowed £4billion in losses associated to EV discounting alone.
And the introduction of the Electric Car Grant will further compound this issue, a number of experts have told us.
As such, buyers of new EVs taking advantage of Labour's grant will later be hit by a financial hammer-blow when they realise the value of their motors have crashed after a matter of months.
Philip Nothard, insight director at analysts Cox Automotive told us: 'Heavy discounts on new EVs have already dampened demand for nearly new models available in the used car market.
'While driving down the cost of new vehicles will undoubtedly increase the EV adoption in the new market, these incentives fail to recognise the impact they will have on the used market.'
Nothard says the grant now threatens to increase depreciation of electric cars up to two years old.
'The used market is a crucial source of profitability for the automotive sector, so the strength and consistency of the industry is crucial to the success of the government's net zero ambitions,' he said.
'To ensure this, the government needs to consider more support for the used EV sector to put the brakes on the rapid pace of depreciation.'
British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association (BVRLA) chief executive Toby Poston also warned that further stimulating new EV registrations without supporting the used market 'risks creating an even greater supply-and-demand imbalance, putting even more pressure on fast deflating second-hand values'.
His concerns follow major warning flags raised about plunging second-hand EV values creating a 'car leasing crisis', which has businesses in the sector on the verge of collapse having already lost 'hundreds of millions of pounds' when customer contracts end and companies are left with low-value EVs to move on.
Poston told This is Money that the grants 'overlook potentially serious repercussions for the used market'.
He went on: 'Rampant depreciation already has red warning lights flashing.
'The resulting losses from the ECG will erode confidence and result in higher finance costs for new EVs, eliminating much of the benefit from the original grant.'
Industry analysts have blamed huge depreciation of electric cars on the fact that manufacturers have in recent months been dramatically discounting showroom prices
Ginny Buckley, a TV presenter and massive EV ambassador in her role as chief executive at website Electrifying.com, said the grants will cause a sudden drop in EV prices that will ultimately ripple into the used market.
'Depreciation [in the second-hand market] has already played havoc with consumer confidence,' she explained to us.
'In our November 2024 survey of over 11,000 UK drivers, nearly four in ten said concerns about the resale value of EVs were holding them back from making the switch to electric.
'While the return of the government grant is a welcome kickstart for the new car market, I'd have liked to see a more balanced approach that also supports used buyers.
'A subsidised used car loan, similar to the scheme already available in Scotland, could help more people go electric and build long-term trust in the market.'
EV grants 'a waste of public spending'
James Buxton, chief commercial officer at used EV platform car360, says the grants will be an unnecessary drain on taxpayer funds.
Speaking to This is Money, he said: 'In reality, manufacturers are going to reduce their incentives and discounts, replacing it instead with government subsidies: a winner for the automotive lobby.
'This means very little in way of meaningful reductions in transactional prices for consumers, and a huge waste of public money.
'Used EV's represent fantastic value for money, and I don't see them depreciating much further than their current levels.
'However, the uncertainty and confusion the ECG announcement has caused will almost certainly lead to another period of volatility, just when we when we were seeing some real traction in the used car market.'
Stuart Masson, editorial direction at consumer-facing website The Car Expert, also questioned whether the subsidy will genuinely lower prices.
'History suggests otherwise,' he told us.
'As seen with past EV grants, solar panel incentives and even stamp duty cuts, manufacturers and dealers often adjust prices upwards when grants are available – reducing or even eliminating the benefit for consumers.
'This, therefore, risks becoming just another subsidy absorbed into the industry's bottom line.'
What is the Electric Car Grant?
The Electric Car Grant (ECG) is the Government's new big hope to drive sales of EVs in the run-up to the end of the decade as it continues to steer towards outlawing the availability of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030.
It arrives three years after the previous Tory administration prematurely scrapped its Plug-in Car Grant (PiCG).
Only cars up to £37,000 qualify for the grant, which rules out premium models, including every Tesla on sale. No Audi, BMW or Mercedes EV will be eligible either.
Some 50 existing models are technically eligible for the grants solely based on their starting price. We've listed these below.
Manufacturers must apply to be eligible for the scheme with their sub-£37,000 cars on a 'first come, first served' basis.
This means that motorists will not need to fill in any additional paperwork to receive the grant, with all administration handled by the car maker, dealership, and the Government.
But because manufacturers must apply for the scheme, it may take weeks for discounted EVs to begin appearing in showrooms, experts say.
Nissan's all-new Leaf EV (pictured) is also likely to qualify for the ECG, which will be welcome news to the Sunderland factory where it is being produced
The new scheme uses a two-tier system based on 'sustainability criteria' to determine the size of the subsidy provided.
Only the greenest models - considered 'band one' - receiving the full £3,750 amount. Band two cars with a lower eco rating will be eligible for a reduced amount as low as £1,500.
Bands are determined by each maker's Science-Based Target (SBT) - an industry-wide scheme, with manufacturers needing to meet carbon scores below a specific criterion to achieve the highest green standard. Volkswagen and Renault Group have both confirmed they are signed up with the SBT scheme.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the grant will allow people to 'keep more of their hard-earned money' when buying EVs
ECG bands - which could later expand beyond two tiers - will be determined by how much CO2 is emitted in an EV's production, assessing the energy used during assembly as well as battery manufacturing.
An overall SBT score is weighted 70 per cent for the CO2 produced during battery manufacturing and 30 per cent for vehicle assembly emissions.
Threshold levels to achieve the full £3,750 discount or the lower banded £1,500 have yet to be made public. However, vehicles that don't meet a minimum level will not receive a grant at all.
This could be bad news for Chinese EV makers, which currently offer some of the most competitive prices but could fall foul of the emissions-based rules.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed the ECG's availability on Monday night, saying: 'The EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money - it'll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century.'
Every EV on sale under £37k that could be eligible for new Electric Car Grant
Abarth 500e: £29,985
Abarth 600e: £36,985
Alfa Romeo Junior Elettrica: £33,906
Alpine A290: £33,500
BYD Dolphin: £30,205
BYD Dolphin Surf: £18,650
Citroen e-Berlingo: £31,240
Citroen e-C3: £22,095
Citroen e-C3 Aircross: £23,095
Citroen e-C4: £27,650
Citroen e-C4 X: £28,715
Cupra Born: £35,690
Dacia Spring: £14,995
Fiat 500e: £25,035
Fiat 600e: £30,035
Fiat Grande Panda: £21,035
Ford Puma Gen-E: £29,995
GWM Ora 03: £24,995
Hyundai Inster: £23,005
Hyundai Kona Electric: £34,500
Jeep Avenger: £29,999
KGM Torres EV: £36,995
Kia EV3: £33,005
Leapmotor C10: £36,500
Leapmotor T03: £15,995
MG4: £26,995
MG4 XPower: £36,495
MG5 EV: £28,495
Mini Aceman: £28,905
Mini Cooper Electric: £26,905
Mini Countryman Electric: £33,005
Nissan Leaf: circa £30,000
Nissan Micra: circa £23,500
Omoda E5: £33,065
Peugeot e-2008: £35,400
Peugeot e-208: £30,150
Peugeot e-Rifter: £32,250
Renault 4: £26,995
Renault 5: £22,995
Renault Megane E-Tech: £32,495
Skywell BE11: £36,995
Smart #1: £29,960
Smart #3: £33,960
Suzuki e-Vitara: £29,999
Toyota Proace City Verso EV: £31,995
Vauxhall Astra Electric: £34,130
Vauxhall Corsa Electric: £26,780
Vauxhall Frontera Electric: £23,995
Vauxhall Grandland Electric: £36,455
Vauxhall Mokka Electric: £32,430
Volkswagen ID.3: £30,860
Volvo EX30: £33,060
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
What is a wealth tax – and would it work in the UK?
Pressure is growing on Rachel Reeves to find new ways to boost the ailing economy after government borrowing reached the second-highest June figure since 1993 last month. Many now predict the chancellor will have little choice but to tweak taxes to find more funds for the Treasury following dramatic changes to government policy over cutting welfare spending and stripping back the winter fuel payment. At the same time, calls are also growing to axe the two-child benefit cap – a Tory-era policy which experts say keeps 400,000 children in poverty and runs contrary to Labour 's missions. These policy decisions, paired with a difficult economic backdrop, will require funds from somewhere. The chancellor has so far stuck to Labour's manifesto commitment not to raise taxes for working people, meaning tweaks to national insurance, income tax, and VAT are off the table. This means more creative tweaks may be under consideration for her next autumn budget, building on changes already made to levies like inheritance tax and employers' national insurance. One option an increasing number of campaigners are pointing to is a ' wealth tax', an economic policy adopted by very few countries which focuses on the ultra-rich. Here's everything you need to know about the idea and what the experts say about it: What is a wealth tax? A wealth tax is a direct levy on an individual's total net assets – things like property, investments, cash, and other possessions. Unlike most regular taxes, the idea is to target accumulated wealth, rather than only income earned that year. Alongside being a new way to raise revenue for the exchequer, the policy is also designed to redistribute wealth to reduce economic inequality. The UK already has some taxes that focus on assets, such as inheritance tax, capital gains tax, and council tax. Tweaking any of these may also be on the table for the chancellor later this year. Capital gains tax is most similar to a wealth tax in that it sees a levy charged on the sale of an asset. However, most models of a wealth tax would see an annual charge based on the value of assets held, even if they are not sold. The idea of a wealth tax has proven divisive among economic experts, with debates ongoing around its fairness, revenue-raising potential, and economic impact. Could a wealth tax work in the UK? Campaigners say a wealth tax could generate significant sums for the Treasury, whilst only affecting a small number of individuals who are less likely to feel the sting of higher receipts. Tax Justice UK is calling for a two per cent levy on individuals who own assets worth more than £10 million. They say this would affect 0.04 per cent of the population, while raising £24 billion a year. The calls come at a time when the wealth of the ultra-rich in the UK has increased massively in recent decades, while living standards have dropped for those on low- to middle-incomes. The Sunday Times rich list recorded 171 UK billionaires in 2023 – up from 15 in 1990. At the same time, there are now record numbers of children living in poverty in the UK, and in precarious living conditions like temporary accommodation. A wealth tax should be seriously considered by the chancellor, said author and host of the Macrodose podcast, James Meadway: 'It starts to chip away at the idea that we're just going to allow wealth to pile up in a very few hands forevermore.' Responding to criticism that a wealth tax would threaten investment in the UK, the economist said: 'Investment has fallen off a cliff between Brexit and the financial crisis. Sixty per cent of wealth in Britain is inherited. It's not something that's been built up by somebody going off and setting up a new business. 'If these people were any good, our economy would be better. It isn't better, so they're not that good, so it doesn't matter that much.' He added: 'It's not going to solve every single economic problem, but 24 billion is not a number to be sniffed at if you're the government right now looking at how you're going to continue to fund the NHS, how you're going to pay for not imposing massive benefit cuts, how you're going to get rid of the two child benefit cap. 'There's a whole stack of things that we could do with that money that isn't being done at the minute because it's just sitting in the hands of very, very wealthy people.' What are the issues with a wealth tax? One of the most difficult factors in calculating the benefits of any wealth tax is predicting what the behavioural response will be. While a wealth tax would raise fairly large sums in any scenario, this uncertainty means it is hard to model. A common concern put forward is the risk of 'capital flight,' where wealthy individuals – who tend to be more globally mobile – simply leave the UK, or at least move some of their assets. Wealth can also be held in a diverse range of assets, anything from cars to art, meaning it may be hard for tax authorities to know exactly how to enforce the levy. Dan Neidle, founder of Tax Policy Associates, said it is highly uncertain how much could be raised by implementing a wealth tax. While it is difficult to estimate exactly how many wealthy individuals would leave the UK should the measure come into force, the tax expert points out that just ten leaving could reduce the revenue by billions. This is because 15 per cent of the projected yield would come from just ten ultra-wealthy individuals, while 80 per cent would come from less than 5,000. Alongside the risk of capital flight, Mr Neidle argues that the economic damage of a wealth tax to the UK would be massive. He explained: 'If you tax something, you get less of it – always. All taxes are a trade-off; you need to just be clear about what they are. With a wealth tax, you're taxing savings and investment, so you get less savings and investment.' The tax expert points to modelling of wealth tax in the US and Germany, which found the long-term effect was a two per cent and five per cent reduction in GDP respectively. This would be damaging for the economy and hit employment hard. 'We need to respond not to what we want policies to do, but what they actually do,' Mr Neidle added. 'There are lots of ways you can reform tax and tax the wealthy fairly in a way that doesn't damage the rest of us.' These could include reforming land tax, capital gains tax, and inheritance tax. Any of these is probably a more likely option for Labour than introducing a wealth tax. But as autumn approaches, calls for some form of more redistributive measure will likely only grow louder.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Former SNP Westminster deputy leader Mhairi Black quits party
Former SNP Westminster deputy leader Mhairi Black is reported to have quit the SNP, with the ex MP citing the party's 'capitulation' on trans rights as part of the reason for her decision. Ms Black said while she still supported Scottish independence there had been 'too many times' when she did not agree with decisions made by the party. She told The Herald newspaper: 'Basically, for a long time, I've not agreed with quite a few decisions that have been made. 'There have just been too many times when I've thought, 'I don't agree with what you've done there' or the decision or strategy that has been arrived at.' Ms Black said she was 'still just as pro independence, absolutely' but claimed the party's 'capitulation on LGBT rights, trans rights in particular' had been an issue for her. She added: 'I thought the party could be doing better about Palestine as well.' The former MP said: 'If anything, I'm probably a bit more left wing than I have been. I don't think I have changed all that much. I feel like the party needs to change a lot more.' Ms Black was catapulted into the political limelight when she was elected to Westminster at the age of just 20 and became the youngest MP since 1832. She was elected as the MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South, ousting the former Labour cabinet secretary, Douglas Alexander, with her victory there coming as the SNP captured all but three of the seats in Scotland in the 2015 general election – the first since the independence vote in 2014. She later became her party's deputy leader in the House of Commons when Stephen Flynn took over as group leader, but stepped down at the 2024 general election, blaming the 'toxic' environment at Westminster. She was also diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during her time at Westminster, saying previously that the condition was picked up after she became unwell with 'burn-out' during her time as an MP. An SNP spokesperson said: 'The SNP is the largest political party in Scotland, united under John Swinney's vision of creating a better, fairer Scotland for everyone. 'After a year of disappointment and let-downs from the UK Labour Government, it's clear that real change will never come from Westminster and that independence is essential for a better future.'
.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26auto%3Dwebp%26quality%3D75%26trim%3D221%2C0%2C2219%2C0%26crop%3D&w=3840&q=100)
Scotsman
22 minutes ago
- Scotsman
How premium logistics can power Scotland's exports
Mark Rosenberg | Supplied Ask a Scot to name their finest food and drink export and you're likely to spark a fierce debate, says Mark Rosenberg, Chief Commercial Officer, Ports & Terminals, at DP World Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Whatever their preference, everyone can agree that the sector is a phenomenal global success story. The numbers speak for themselves. Last year, Scotland's food and drink exports were valued at £7.1 billion. That's up from £4.9bn in 2014, an increase of roughly 46 per cent over the past decade. This is driven by a strong appetite for its premium produce, such as Scottish salmon which had shipments topping £844 million in 2024. More than a key contributor to the UK economy, Scotland's food and drink industry has become a global benchmark for excellence. However, despite extraordinary market growth, exporters are not immune from trade challenges. Post-Brexit border friction, fluctuating global tariffs and shifting consumer expectations have all made the operating environment increasingly volatile in recent years. The good news is that new trade opportunities are opening routes to growth at a critical moment. Most notably, the UK-India Free Trade Agreement, which was signed yesterday (24 July). By cutting levies on 90 per cent of the produce from Scottish exporters - and those elsewhere in the UK - the landmark deal will transform the presence of the UK's exports in India. This is especially promising for food products like Scottish salmon, which have faced prohibitive 33 per cent tariffs. Once they are lifted, exporters will have access to the world's third-largest fish market and a middle class that is expected to grow to a quarter of a billion by 2050. Understandably, many are preparing for significant long-term expansion into the market. Logistics to power exports | Supplied Premium produce requires premium logistics While the potential for growth in both nearby and distant markets is clear, capturing these opportunities depends on the essential but less glamourous matter of logistics. Ageing infrastructure can increase costs and add complexity. Scotland has felt these constraints acutely. However, the challenges also present opportunities for strategic partnerships that can deliver far greater efficiencies across the supply chain. At DP World, we're not shy of the challenge and have invested to ensure UK exporters can seize the trade opportunities of the day. Our deep sea container ports connect exporters across the whole of the UK with overseas markets. In 2013, we opened London Gateway - the UK's first deep-water container port for more than 20 years - and have committed to its growth ever since. Just a few months ago we began work on a £1 billion expansion of its port facilities and rail infrastructure and announced a further £60 million investment in the Port of Southampton. Both will boost handling capacity and improve direct rail services, offering Scottish exporters fast, low-carbon routes to global shipping networks. As exporters hurry to capitalise on the new opportunities, undoubtedly there will be many pitfalls to navigate, whether that's complex regulatory challenges, untested consumer appetites and cultural nuance. That's where the right logistics infrastructure becomes a critical enabler. Labelling and packaging requirements, for example, vary by market and can create bottlenecks if not handled with care - something DP World supports through advanced, market-specific compliance services. Untested consumer appetites also mean shipments need to be agile, fresh and first-class. In this case facilities like The Chill Hub, our temperature-controlled warehouse at London Gateway, are indispensable for high-value perishable goods like Scottish salmon. Alongside connectivity and adaptability, exporters need flexibility. With rail or barge connectivity at 95 per cent of our 20 European sites, Scottish producers have the necessary options to move goods effectively and on schedule should congestion occur. This is an area we continue to invest in, helping to build the resilience that traders will need for the decades ahead. Scotland's food and drink exporters have a long and proud history, but with new trade agreements opening doors to major, high-growth markets like India, this feels like the start of an exciting new chapter. By strengthening the logistics networks and alliances that move goods from A to B, we can help the blue-and-white 'Made in Scotland' label find new admirers around the world. That's an opportunity we can all raise a glass to.
