EXCLUSIVE Labour's Electric Car Grant will be a drain on taxpayers and cause 'rampant EV depreciation', experts warn
But while taxpayer-funded discounts of almost £4,000 should make shiny new battery cars a little more appealing to drivers, it threatens to further compound 'rampant EV depreciation', industry insiders have warned.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander on Monday unveiled Labour's £650million Electric Car Grant (ECG), coming three years after the previous Tory regime scrapped its own plug-in car grant.
The Department for Transport confirms only fully electric models below £37,000 - and that are sustainably produced - are eligible for subsidies from £1,500 to £3,750, with funding in place until 2028-29.
But as the dust settles on the reaction to the announcement - which has largely been positive, especially from car makers who smell a spike in sales without taking a hit on profits - some industry experts claim it will only prove to be a major drain on public spending that will cause used EV prices to plummet.
According to recent cap hpi data shared exclusively with This is Money, the average electric car in 2025 is losing 43 per cent of its original value after just one year.
In monetary terms, this translates to an average financial loss of £25,900 on the recommended retail price when new.
As such, residual values for battery cars are already far worse than other fuel types; in comparison, petrol and diesel cars typically lose around 31 per cent of their initial price over the same period.
And for some electric models, depreciation can be catastrophic.
The exclusive analysis revealed that a DS3 E-Tense typically depreciates at a rate of 66.7 per cent in the first 12 months, shedding almost £26,000 of its original £39,000 price.
Cap hpi told us the biggest trigger of widescale EV depreciation in the last two years has been the level of discounting on new electric cars in showrooms.
With manufacturers under intense pressure to meet the Government's Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) mandate - the annually-increasing EV sales targets set out for the next decade - they have been slashing prices of battery models to make them more attractive to buyers.
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Trader (SMMT) claims car makers swallowed £4billion in losses associated to EV discounting alone.
And the introduction of the Electric Car Grant will further compound this issue, a number of experts have told us.
As such, buyers of new EVs taking advantage of Labour's grant will later be hit by a financial hammer-blow when they realise the value of their motors have crashed after a matter of months.
Philip Nothard, insight director at analysts Cox Automotive told us: 'Heavy discounts on new EVs have already dampened demand for nearly new models available in the used car market.
'While driving down the cost of new vehicles will undoubtedly increase the EV adoption in the new market, these incentives fail to recognise the impact they will have on the used market.'
Nothard says the grant now threatens to increase depreciation of electric cars up to two years old.
'The used market is a crucial source of profitability for the automotive sector, so the strength and consistency of the industry is crucial to the success of the government's net zero ambitions,' he said.
'To ensure this, the government needs to consider more support for the used EV sector to put the brakes on the rapid pace of depreciation.'
British Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association (BVRLA) chief executive Toby Poston also warned that further stimulating new EV registrations without supporting the used market 'risks creating an even greater supply-and-demand imbalance, putting even more pressure on fast deflating second-hand values'.
His concerns follow major warning flags raised about plunging second-hand EV values creating a 'car leasing crisis', which has businesses in the sector on the verge of collapse having already lost 'hundreds of millions of pounds' when customer contracts end and companies are left with low-value EVs to move on.
Poston told This is Money that the grants 'overlook potentially serious repercussions for the used market'.
He went on: 'Rampant depreciation already has red warning lights flashing.
'The resulting losses from the ECG will erode confidence and result in higher finance costs for new EVs, eliminating much of the benefit from the original grant.'
Industry analysts have blamed huge depreciation of electric cars on the fact that manufacturers have in recent months been dramatically discounting showroom prices
Ginny Buckley, a TV presenter and massive EV ambassador in her role as chief executive at website Electrifying.com, said the grants will cause a sudden drop in EV prices that will ultimately ripple into the used market.
'Depreciation [in the second-hand market] has already played havoc with consumer confidence,' she explained to us.
'In our November 2024 survey of over 11,000 UK drivers, nearly four in ten said concerns about the resale value of EVs were holding them back from making the switch to electric.
'While the return of the government grant is a welcome kickstart for the new car market, I'd have liked to see a more balanced approach that also supports used buyers.
'A subsidised used car loan, similar to the scheme already available in Scotland, could help more people go electric and build long-term trust in the market.'
EV grants 'a waste of public spending'
James Buxton, chief commercial officer at used EV platform car360, says the grants will be an unnecessary drain on taxpayer funds.
Speaking to This is Money, he said: 'In reality, manufacturers are going to reduce their incentives and discounts, replacing it instead with government subsidies: a winner for the automotive lobby.
'This means very little in way of meaningful reductions in transactional prices for consumers, and a huge waste of public money.
'Used EV's represent fantastic value for money, and I don't see them depreciating much further than their current levels.
'However, the uncertainty and confusion the ECG announcement has caused will almost certainly lead to another period of volatility, just when we when we were seeing some real traction in the used car market.'
Stuart Masson, editorial direction at consumer-facing website The Car Expert, also questioned whether the subsidy will genuinely lower prices.
'History suggests otherwise,' he told us.
'As seen with past EV grants, solar panel incentives and even stamp duty cuts, manufacturers and dealers often adjust prices upwards when grants are available – reducing or even eliminating the benefit for consumers.
'This, therefore, risks becoming just another subsidy absorbed into the industry's bottom line.'
What is the Electric Car Grant?
The Electric Car Grant (ECG) is the Government's new big hope to drive sales of EVs in the run-up to the end of the decade as it continues to steer towards outlawing the availability of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030.
It arrives three years after the previous Tory administration prematurely scrapped its Plug-in Car Grant (PiCG).
Only cars up to £37,000 qualify for the grant, which rules out premium models, including every Tesla on sale. No Audi, BMW or Mercedes EV will be eligible either.
Some 50 existing models are technically eligible for the grants solely based on their starting price. We've listed these below.
Manufacturers must apply to be eligible for the scheme with their sub-£37,000 cars on a 'first come, first served' basis.
This means that motorists will not need to fill in any additional paperwork to receive the grant, with all administration handled by the car maker, dealership, and the Government.
But because manufacturers must apply for the scheme, it may take weeks for discounted EVs to begin appearing in showrooms, experts say.
Nissan's all-new Leaf EV (pictured) is also likely to qualify for the ECG, which will be welcome news to the Sunderland factory where it is being produced
The new scheme uses a two-tier system based on 'sustainability criteria' to determine the size of the subsidy provided.
Only the greenest models - considered 'band one' - receiving the full £3,750 amount. Band two cars with a lower eco rating will be eligible for a reduced amount as low as £1,500.
Bands are determined by each maker's Science-Based Target (SBT) - an industry-wide scheme, with manufacturers needing to meet carbon scores below a specific criterion to achieve the highest green standard. Volkswagen and Renault Group have both confirmed they are signed up with the SBT scheme.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the grant will allow people to 'keep more of their hard-earned money' when buying EVs
ECG bands - which could later expand beyond two tiers - will be determined by how much CO2 is emitted in an EV's production, assessing the energy used during assembly as well as battery manufacturing.
An overall SBT score is weighted 70 per cent for the CO2 produced during battery manufacturing and 30 per cent for vehicle assembly emissions.
Threshold levels to achieve the full £3,750 discount or the lower banded £1,500 have yet to be made public. However, vehicles that don't meet a minimum level will not receive a grant at all.
This could be bad news for Chinese EV makers, which currently offer some of the most competitive prices but could fall foul of the emissions-based rules.
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed the ECG's availability on Monday night, saying: 'The EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money - it'll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century.'
Every EV on sale under £37k that could be eligible for new Electric Car Grant
Abarth 500e: £29,985
Abarth 600e: £36,985
Alfa Romeo Junior Elettrica: £33,906
Alpine A290: £33,500
BYD Dolphin: £30,205
BYD Dolphin Surf: £18,650
Citroen e-Berlingo: £31,240
Citroen e-C3: £22,095
Citroen e-C3 Aircross: £23,095
Citroen e-C4: £27,650
Citroen e-C4 X: £28,715
Cupra Born: £35,690
Dacia Spring: £14,995
Fiat 500e: £25,035
Fiat 600e: £30,035
Fiat Grande Panda: £21,035
Ford Puma Gen-E: £29,995
GWM Ora 03: £24,995
Hyundai Inster: £23,005
Hyundai Kona Electric: £34,500
Jeep Avenger: £29,999
KGM Torres EV: £36,995
Kia EV3: £33,005
Leapmotor C10: £36,500
Leapmotor T03: £15,995
MG4: £26,995
MG4 XPower: £36,495
MG5 EV: £28,495
Mini Aceman: £28,905
Mini Cooper Electric: £26,905
Mini Countryman Electric: £33,005
Nissan Leaf: circa £30,000
Nissan Micra: circa £23,500
Omoda E5: £33,065
Peugeot e-2008: £35,400
Peugeot e-208: £30,150
Peugeot e-Rifter: £32,250
Renault 4: £26,995
Renault 5: £22,995
Renault Megane E-Tech: £32,495
Skywell BE11: £36,995
Smart #1: £29,960
Smart #3: £33,960
Suzuki e-Vitara: £29,999
Toyota Proace City Verso EV: £31,995
Vauxhall Astra Electric: £34,130
Vauxhall Corsa Electric: £26,780
Vauxhall Frontera Electric: £23,995
Vauxhall Grandland Electric: £36,455
Vauxhall Mokka Electric: £32,430
Volkswagen ID.3: £30,860
Volvo EX30: £33,060
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Defiant salon owner vows to fight 'aggressive' trademark battle with beauty giant L'Oreal over her nkd brand
A defiant salon owner has vowed to fight an 'aggressive' trademark battle with beauty giant L'Oréal, which she claims forced her to close her shop. Rebecca Dowdeswell, 49, has been locked in a legal dispute with the global cosmetics firm and says she has already spent more than £30,000 defending her position. The mother-of-two, from Nottingham, runs the waxing salon 'nkd', a business she first trademarked in 2009; however, the protection expired after ten years, requiring renewal. Under current rules, companies have a six-month window to reapply for a lapsed trademark, but if they miss the deadline, they must start a new application from scratch. Ms Dowdeswell admitted she had put the renewal 'on the list' but said it wasn't 'at the top', calling the decision 'naive'. Her business was forced to shut during the Covid-19 pandemic, with the following two years proving 'so hard' for those in the beauty sector. By the time she reapplied for the trademark in 2022, she was met with a formal objection from L'Oréal. The French company argued that her brand name 'nkd' could cause 'consumer confusion' with its own 'Naked' eyeshadow range. Rebecca Dowdeswell, 49, has been locked in a legal dispute with the global cosmetics firm and says she has already spent more than £30,000 defending her position But rather than back down, Ms Dowdeswell has launched a counterclaim and is now taking on the £233billion firm herself. An Intellectual Property Office (IPO) hearing has now been scheduled to take place later this year, after the unyielding business owner demanded that L'Oréal withdraw several of its own trademark applications. She said: 'I don't feel like I should have been put in this situation in the first place. 'People typically don't challenge them; I've stuck it out. 'We sort of turned the tables and filed actions against them to rescind some of the trademark. We're spelt differently and pronounced differently, which is a huge part of my frustration. 'The UK beauty market as a whole is a massive market. We're not Naked, we're nkd. We're very tied to just waxing and hair removal products. They can get away with it because they're L'Oréal - this is sheer corporate bullying.' She said she had no choice but to fight for her company, which she has invested so much time in. 'It's a trend that you see - they know they have little chance of winning, but they know their pockets are so much deeper than my own. 'You would probably get 90 per cent of companies walking away. I was put in an impossible situation really. I could either walk away from the brand I spent the last 13 years building up or I could defend this and fight this, and it's cost me a lot. 'It has been a huge drain on the financial side but also the impact on myself and my family has been enormous.' Companies have a six-month window to reapply for their trademark after it runs out, or else they have to submit an entirely new application. She said the pandemic delayed her reinstating the trademark, and she was then left frustrated when her application was objected. She added: 'It cannot be fair or right that small companies such as mine are put in this position. 'And if the huge corporations didn't routinely exploit their power and abuse the rules of the UK IPO, knowing that they will likely get away with it due to their sheer size and domination of the market, then this situation wouldn't arise.' L'Oréal claims the nkd branding infringes on their line of Naked eyeshadows, despite the two being pronounced differently. The giant trademarked the Naked name in 2004 but left it unused until they launched their Urban Decay brand in 2010. Ms Dowdeswell added: 'The Naked name is for a wide range of goods which they aren't using. 'We've said this is against the rules of the UK IPO, companies shouldn't trademark against goods they don't use. 'We applied to remove the trademark on goods they aren't using. Like cotton wool, shower gel, deodorants and shaving foams. 'All they apply it against is a subset of makeup - just eye shadow pallets. 'They don't need the trademark on such a wide range of products, it's like a monopoly. 'They have no intention of using it, that's where the abuse of the rules comes in. 'Just because they're a massive company, no one ever stands up to them. 'They first applied for the Naked trademark in 2004. That's 20 years they've had some of these goods trademarked. 'We're nkd and we launched in 2009 - L'Oréal then launched the Urban Decay brand, which has the Naked line in 2010.' A L'Oréal spokesperson said previously: 'We are wholly committed to resolving any misunderstanding there might have been with Rebecca Dowdeswell. 'From the beginning of our exchanges with her lawyers in 2022, we have communicated an offer that supports her business aspirations whilst respecting our longstanding trademark rights.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
MG IM5 review: The closest rival yet to the Tesla Model 3
MG thought long and hard about how it should badge its new IM models. At one time, they were headed for their own premium brand alongside MG. But the decision was made to confuse everyone by calling them MG IMs, yet not put MG badges on them. It's bonkers! And a shame as people will see the IM5 (and its SUV twin, the IM6), really like it and have no idea what it is due to the weird combination of dots and lines for a badge. The IM5, in particular, is worthy of your attention. It's a spacious five door hatchback with proportions, pricing, range and tech specs that are very much in line with the Tesla Model 3. Is it overall as good as the Tesla Model 3? No, not quite. But it gets much closer than any other rival, so if Tesla – for whatever reason – isn't your thing, one of MG's 115 dealers will be very happy to let you play in an IM model. You'll have fun, too. It's good to drive, easily as spacious as a Model 3, but with even better build quality. The kit count is impressive, as is the tech – although the usability (and spelling) of the touchscreen operations needs to be updated. We're told it will be. The IM5 will be an easy, efficient and enjoyable EV to live with – I like it very much. How we test I spent an entire morning driving the IM5 around the lanes, towns and motorways of Kent, Sussex and Surrey to get a good feel for the car and its tech. I assessed the self-driving, self-parking and even the car's ability to retrace its steps by reversing 100 metres. I also checked on rear seat comfort and boot space to give you a verdict you can trust. Independent rating: 9/10 MG IM5 specs Price range £39,450 to £48,495 Battery size 75 & 100kWh Maximum claimed range 441 miles Miles per kWh 3.8 Maximum charging rate 396kW Battery, range, charging, performance and drive Although there are two battery offerings, there's a clear sweet spot in the IM5 range – and it's the car I drove. The 100 Long Range, as the name suggests, uses a 100kWh battery to give it a Tesla-beating range of 441 miles. You'll pay a fiver more for the rear-drive IM5 Long Range than you will a Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive Long Range, but I can't believe an MG dealer wouldn't do something about that for you – you won't get a penny off the Tesla. The entry-level car undercuts the entry-level Model 3 by £440 but doesn't go as far on a full charge. The 75 Standard Range IM5 has a maximum claimed range of 304 miles versus the Rear-Wheel Drive Model 3's 323 miles. At the top of the IM5 range currently is a 100 Performance model, which gets all-wheel drive, the same 100kWh battery as the Long Range IM5, but all-wheel drive, a 0-62mph time of 3.2 seconds and a maximum claimed range of 357 miles – all for £48,495. A Model 3 performance is quicker (0-60mph in 2.9 seconds), but will only go 328 miles on a full charge and, crucially, costs a whopping £59,990. Not that the Long Range IM5 I drove was sluggish, getting from 0-62mph in 4.9 seconds. But whatever IM5 you drive it'll feel quick with the usual swift acceleration when you need it. Where MGs will outperform Teslas is on charging speeds with the 800-volt tech in the 100kWh cars enabling the IM5 to charge at a maximum of 396kW, meaning the typical 10 to 80 per cent charge would take just 17 minutes – if you can find a fast-enough charger. The Standard Range car makes do with 400-volt tech so charges slower at a maximum of 153kW so the same 10 to 80 per cent charge will take 26 minutes. As with many EVs, the heavy battery takes a toll on ride comfort and the IM5 rides quite firmly. It's not uncomfortable, though, and the low centre of gravity means the car corners confidently, although the steering doesn't feel especially meaty. There are various drive modes you can cycle through that beef up the steering and accelerator response or ease the throttle off for eco driving. It's a shame the brakes didn't feel slightly sharper and linear in their response – they felt slightly dead and needed a bit more of a shove at the end of the brake travel. What you'll really notice and enjoy, though, is the four-wheel steering, which not only gives the sizeable IM5 a smaller turning circle than an MG4 – making it really easy to manoeuvre around car parks (which I did extensively on my test route) – but also benefits at faster speeds with greater surety through corners. One feature that's missing, though, is one-pedal driving, which many EV drivers love. There are only three levels of brake regen available – I'd like more. Hopefully one-pedal driving can be added before the cars go on sale in September. Interior, practicality and boot space Whichever model of IM5 you go for, you'll get the same feature-packed interior – and the same high quality. I'm obsessive about stitching lining up, and the stitching across the dashboard lined up perfectly with that on the doors, showing a real attention to detail when it comes to quality. The materials inside all feel very plush, the design is attractive and there's plenty of space. Sitting in the back you get the full benefit of the full-length glass roof, comfy rear seats and good leg and head space, while in the front the seats are just as comfy and come with heating or cooling. A tiny rear-view mirror hints at what's behind – the tiniest of rear windows. I'm surprised MG hasn't done a Polestar and just made do with a digital rear-view mirror and cameras. However, MG's approach is to have a display from a rear-facing camera on the infotainment screen that's activated by a single roll upwards of the right hand scroll wheel on the steering wheel. That's a neat solution, but I'd rather just have a bigger rear window. At least the side mirrors are a decent size, though. Unlike the four-door Tesla Model 3, the IM5 comes with a rear hatch, making it much more practical. There's a reasonable if not enormous 457 litres of space, plus an additional 18 litres under the bonnet at the front. The inside isn't exactly flush with cubbies – it would be nice to have a few more spaces to put things and slightly wider and deeper door bins. Technology, stereo and infotainment The MG IM5 is a tech tour-de-force with everything you expect and a few things you don't. Here's one… If you've ever driven down a narrow country lane and met something coming at you from the other direction and have to reverse, it can be quite tricky. The IM5 will do it for you. Somewhat spookily, the car logs precisely where it has driven over the past 100 metres and will reverse for that full distance going back precisely through its wheel tracks. I tried it and it reversed back through a curved road, through a car park, around a couple of corners and eventually stopped where it first started, 100 metres beforehand. Clever and surprisingly useful. The self-parking system works brilliantly and very quickly – unlike many – while the car will also get closer to the curb for you if your own parking efforts aren't up to scratch. On top of all that there's the usual adaptive cruise – which uses the paddles behind the steering wheel to adjust speed and distance to the car in front – plus the expected suite of driver safety and assistance systems. As with many Model 3 rivals, you must use screens for everything, but in the IM5 there are two of them. One super-wide 26-inch display on top of the dash for driver info and infotainment, with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, and a 10-inch screen in the centre console for other controls including the clever parking tech, system set-up and climate control – although there was a slightly odd Ramdon setting for the air con that we hope is a spelling mistake that will be easily fixed. MG made great play of the 20-speaker audio system with its Sky Speakers in the roof, but it really didn't live up to the promise. With my well-used test playlist, it lacked real punch from the bass and a lack of detail to the sound. I couldn't get the 'hello IM' (why not MG?) voice function to work, either, in spite of it being selected on the display. Although the wireless mobile phone charger is ventilated to stop your smartphone overheating while charging, there's only one of them when many rivals allow you to charge up two phones at a time. What I did like was how, when you indicate, you get a digital view from the mirrors displayed on the appropriate side of the 26-inch display, cleverly shoving my Apple CarPlay display over sideways rather than covering up the maps. And why it has taken car makers so long to be able to make the indicator clicks come out of the left or right speakers is beyond me – I like that in the IM5, too. There's no sign yet of any low-rate finance offers, although first deliveries of the IM5 won't be until mid-September 2025. But the pricing is pretty much spot on against the Tesla Model 3: slightly cheaper on the Standard car, slightly more expensive on the Long Range one. The Performance IM5 does look like good value. What I would expect, though, is for MG's 115 dealers selling the IM models to have a bit of leeway to give the IM5 a bit more of an advantage over Tesla Model 3s if you haggle. Tesla dealers won't give you a penny off. My test showed impressive efficiency, meaning a range of well over 400 miles should be easily achievable, too. MG IM5 rivals Tesla Model 3 Mercedes CLA Hyundai Ioniq 6 FAQs How long does it take to charge? The 100kWh IM5 uses 800-volt tech for charging up to 396kW, allowing a 10–80 per cent charge in just 17 minutes with a sufficiently fast charger. The Standard Range's 400-volt system charges at up to 153kW, taking 26 minutes for the same charge range. How much does it cost - is it worth it? Prices start at £39,450 for the Standard Range car going up to £48,495 for the Performance model. The sweet spot of the range is the £44,995 Long Range IM5, which costs a fiver more than the equivalent Tesla Model 3, but will go a bit further on a full charge. Does MG replace batteries for free? As with all EVs, the IM5's battery is covered for eight years and 100,000 miles, while MG offers a standard seven-year warranty on the rest of the car. Why trust us Our team of motoring experts have decades of experience driving, reviewing and reporting on the latest EV cars, and our verdicts are reached with every kind of driver in mind. We thoroughly test drive every car we recommend, so you can be sure our verdicts are honest, unbiased and authentic. The verdict: MG IM5 Not everyone wants a Tesla, and there's now more choice than ever if you want a different sort of EV. I really enjoyed the MG IM5 – I love the tech, the quality of the car and the drive. There's loads of space inside, a decent range and fast charging. If only MG would just stick an MG badge on the front and back, that would make the car more appealing and easier to understand.
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Admissions jump at Everyman cinema chain despite ‘challenging' backdrop
Cinema chain Everyman has revealed that sales surged by more than a fifth over the past year following a jump in admissions and higher ticket prices. Boss Alex Scrimgeour hailed the performance over the first half of 2025, saying it reflected the 'successful execution' of Everyman's growth strategy. Shares in the company rose in early trading on Monday morning as a result. The company said it is trading in line with its forecasts for the full year, despite a 'challenging economic environment'. It told shareholders on Monday that group revenues rose by 21% to £56.5 million for the half-year to July 3, compared with a year earlier. This was supported by a 15% jump in admissions to 2.2 million for the half-year. It was among cinema groups to have been boosted by major new releases over the period including Thunderbolts, A Minecraft Movie and Mission Impossible: Final Reckoning. The chain said the average price paid for a ticket rose 6% to £12.46, while there was also a 5.9% increase on the amount spent by customers on food and drinks. Everyman currently runs 48 cinemas across the UK, after growing further with the opening of its latest venue in Brentford in March. It plans one further opening this year at The Whiteley in Bayswater next month. The UK's fourth biggest cinema operator said it will open two more venues next year and highlighted a 'strong pipeline' of future developments as it continues with expansion efforts. Mr Scrimgeour, the former Cote restaurant boss, said: 'Our performance in the first half reflects the successful execution of our strategy, with growth across all key metrics and ongoing delivery of our measured expansion programme. 'This is driven by Everyman's unique brand of high-quality, experience-led cinema. 'We look forward to building on this momentum in the second half of the year.' Shares in the company were 6.6% higher in early trading.
