Belgium takes bronze in global work-life balance survey
The index – conducted by HR platform Remote – weighs factors such as minimum sick days, paid maternity leave, minimum and average wage, and overall happiness and is based on fresh data from April this year. Remote started compiling an annual work-life index since 2023.
Globally, work-life balance now ranks alongside job security as the most important factor for workers considering current jobs and future employment, surpassing pay, according to a survey from Dutch HR consulting firm Ranstad.
'Cementing its place in the top three (...) life-work balance is becoming just as much a hallmark of Belgian culture as chocolate, waffles and beer – and not just because it has one of the highest minimum wages in Europe (topped only by the United Kingdom and Germany),' Remote said.
Based on a 38-hour work week, the current minimum wage in Belgium stands at €12.82, one of the highest in the European Union. Since 2023, private sector employers in Belgium with 20 or more workers must implement the right to disconnect – the ability of workers to disconnect from work related communications and activities outside their normal working hours.
While New Zealand took Remote's top spot this year, seven European countries made it to the Top 10. Ireland led Belgium in second, and Germany, Norway and Denmark took fourth, fifth, and sixth place respectively. Spain and Finland tailed in ninth and tenth. The US rank 59 out of 60, Nigeria took the bottom spot.
(vib)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
8 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU pauses tariff response to US, Indonesia trade breakthrough announced
BRUSSELS – European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on Sunday afternoon that the EU would extend the suspension of retaliation against the US until early August. She also unveiled a political agreement for a trade deal with Indonesia. "We will use the time that we have until the 1st of August," said von der Leyen at a press conference in Brussels alongside Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto. The bloc will keep working on countermeasures to the 30% tariffs announced by the US, which will start 1 August. But Brussels is "not there yet" and will continue negotiations as the end of the month approaches. EU ambassadors were called to discuss the response to Donald Trump's tariff escalation on Sunday at 15:30. Brussels has repeatedly delayed retaliatory action in hopes of reaching a negotiated solution – despite the EU already facing a blanket 10% tariff since April, alongside duties of 50% on steel and aluminium and 25% on cars and car parts. Several diplomatic sources consulted by Euractiv on Sunday suggested that most member countries support the Commission's stance and will not push for retaliation before the 1 August deadline. Indonesia trade progress During the same press conference, von der Leyen said a "political agreement" had been reached on Sunday to advance towards an "ambitious" free trade deal with Indonesia. This follows ten years of negotiations. Acknowledging the growing geopolitical volatility and economic uncertainty, von der Leyen emphasised the need for partners to "come closer together". The agreement "comes at the right time," she added. Under her second mandate, von der Leyen has been pushing to diversify trade ties and seal ambitious agreements this year with partners including Indonesia, India, and Malaysia, as well as ratifying the finalised deals with Mercosur and Mexico. Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto, who repeatedly apologised for visiting Brussels "on a Sunday", described the move as a breakthrough. "We would like to see more European presence and more European participation in our economy," he added, stressing that the EU is seen as "a leader" and a key actor in providing global stability. "Many of us wouldn't like to admit it openly (...) but I am here and I admit it: I would like to see a stronger Europe," said Prawobo.
Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
‘A slap in the face': EU leaders, industry reel from Trump's tariff shock
Donald Trump's announcement on Saturday of 30% tariffs on EU products has major implications for European economies, triggering a flurry of responses from national leaders and industries. The tariffs, which are a significant jump from the 10% baseline levy that is currently in place, are due to be effective from 1 August. Whilst the EU had previously indicated that it might be prepared to accept terms similar to those secured by the UK in May, the current "deal" has led stakeholders to reassess their stance. EU ambassadors will hold an emergency meeting on Sunday afternoon to discuss the response. But even on Saturday, reactions called for unity and stressed the bloc's trade strength – while urging Brussels to respond firmly to Washington's move. The US is the EU's top trading partner, with goods trade totalling €867 billion in 2024. Trump's letter is "impertinent and a slap in the face," said socialist MEP Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's trade committee, adding that the EU had been negotiating intensely "for more than three weeks." He added that EU countermeasures "should come into force as planned on Monday, quickly followed by the second list." France shared a "very strong disapproval" of the announcement of 30% tariffs on EU exports, French President Emmanuel Macron said, adding that Brussels should adopt countermeasures if no agreement is reached by 1 August. "It is more than ever up to the Commission to assert the Union's determination to defend European interests resolutely," he added. Brussels has repeatedly delayed retaliatory action in hopes of reaching a negotiated solution – despite the EU already facing a blanket 10% tariff since April, alongside duties of 50% on steel and aluminium and 25% on cars and car parts. Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said the EU should use its collective single market strength to achieve a 'fair deal'. Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni – one of the few EU leaders to enjoy cordial relations with the Trump administration – said she still trusted the "goodwill of all players" to reach an agreement. "It would make no sense to trigger a trade clash between the two sides of the Atlantic," she said. Hungary, expectedly, lashed out at the European Commission for not having secured a deal yet. "EU tariffs on the US should've been lowered after Trump took office," Hungary's Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto said. Industry warns of severe losses German industry, which accounts for the largest share of EU exports to the US, was quick to react. "President Trump's announcement is a wake-up call for industry on both sides of the Atlantic," said the Federation of German Industries (BDI), in a statement quoted by AFP. The federation urged Berlin, the European Commission, and the US administration to "very quickly find solutions and avoid an escalation." Ongoing tariff threats have already driven German exports to the US down to their lowest level since March 2022, according to government data released last week. The EU's food and drink sector would also be among the hardest hit by a 30% tariff. Italy's wine association, UIV, said on Saturday that Trump's letter had written 'the darkest page in relations between the two historic allies.' The US is the largest export market for EU wines, accounting for 27% of export value and 21% of volume. If implemented, a 30% duty on wine would amount to an embargo on 80% of Italian wine exports, the group said. "At this point, the fate of us and of hundreds of thousands of jobs is tied to additional time, which will be crucial, because it is unthinkable to place these volumes of wine elsewhere in the short term," said UIV President Lamberto Frescobaldi. Alexandra Brzozowski contributed reporting. (ow)
Euractiv
2 days ago
- Euractiv
What's wrong with a weak euro?
The meek, Jesus famously assured us, shall inherit the Earth. European policymakers' recent pronouncements, however, suggest they profoundly disagree with the Messiah. Barely a single speech by EU leaders or officials these days fails to emphasise Europe's underlying strength , resilience , or solidity . Policymakers also routinely stress the importance of Europe's robust institutions, firm decisions, and the ( latent ) power of its single market. The EU's rhetorical muscle was on full display this week, when Danish premier Mette Frederiksen mentioned the word 'strong' or 'strength' eight times in a speech to MEPs unveiling her country's EU Council presidency programme. Tellingly, Denmark's official slogan for its six-month chairmanship is: 'A strong Europe in a changing world'. Paschal Donohoe , Eurogroup president, similarly called for a 'stronger and more competitive euro area' to 'further enhance our resilience' and 'reinforce the international role of the euro' shortly after his re-election as chair of the (genuinely) powerful forum on Monday. Claims of Europe's actual or potential strength are, clearly, justified in many areas. Europe does , after all, have resilient institutions; and it should harness the economic and financial power of its citizens and companies. However, such assertions are much more controversial – and potentially disastrous – when applied to the euro itself. Many of the problems associated with a stronger currency are already visible. The euro's value has surged in recent months, rising more than 13% against the dollar and more than 11% against the Chinese yuan since the start of the year. The increase is, in part, a show of confidence in the currency. Investors, concerned at US President Donald Trump's erratic policymaking, have sought to diversify their holdings away from dollar-dominated assets. For many, Europe seems a far safer place to park their money. Unfortunately, these exchange-rate fluctuations are also causing growing headaches for European businesses and policymakers. First, by raising the 'price' of European exports relative to their American and Chinese competitors, a stronger euro has exacerbated EU exporters' woes at a time when Trump's sweeping tariffs and fierce Chinese competition are inflicting serious economic pain. Second, and relatedly, a stronger currency has rendered imports into Europe considerably cheaper, thus incentivising consumers to purchase foreign products instead of domestic goods. This latter effect is, naturally, good for ordinary citizens. But it is also disastrous for businesses, especially in export-oriented industries such as automotive and pharmaceutical manufacturing. For policymakers, it also means that inflation, which has only recently been tamed after three years of painfully high prices, now risks undershooting the European Central Bank's 2% target. Exorbitant privilege – or execrable burden? Unfortunately, these issues would likely only become even more severe if the euro eventually displaced the dollar to earn the 'exorbitant privilege' of being the world's reserve currency. For while the dollar's dominance has allowed the US to borrow at exceedingly low rates (owing to the massive global demand for dollar-denominated assets), it has also harmed US businesses and, arguably, contributed to America's decades-long industrial decline. The Janus-faced nature of the US's exorbitant privilege is explicitly recognised by many US officials. As US Vice-President JD Vance said last year: 'I think in some ways you can argue that the reserve currency status is a massive subsidy to American consumers but a massive tax on American producers.' Of course, no one expects the euro to displace the dollar anytime soon. Despite declining in recent years, the greenback still accounts for 58% percent of global foreign exchange reserves. The euro's share, by contrast, is just 20% – down from around 25% a decade ago. In addition, just under half of all cross-border banking and international bonds are denominated in dollars, as is roughly four-fifths of international trade. In a sign that investors' faith in Europe may be limited, gold also recently surpassed the euro to become the world's second-largest reserve asset. Whence the dollar's continued dominance? There are many reasons, but they include Europe's fragmented capital markets , its incomplete banking union, and, perhaps most critical of all, an insufficient number of 'safe assets', or risk-free investment products. For instance, the total value of German bunds, the eurozone benchmark, is around €2.5 trillion. By contrast, the US Treasury market is worth a whopping $30 trillion. Berlin's recent pledge to splurge €1 trillion on infrastructure and defence looks, in relative terms, like pocket change. A historic warning A much more serious and realistic danger, however, is that the euro, and perhaps other currencies like the yuan, gradually erode the dollar's pre-eminence, thus eventually leading to the formation of a ' multipolar financial system ' in which no single currency dominates. ECB President Christine Lagarde, who recently called on Europe to 'seize' this ' global euro moment ', has also predicted that the world is heading in this direction. For many – although not for Trump – a multipolar financial system seems like a good idea, given that it would make the world less dependent upon the whims of an increasingly capricious US. While this is partly true, the development of such a multipolar system also comes with significant risks. After all, the last time a single currency failed to dominate the world's financial system was during last century's interwar period, when the dollar gradually displaced the British pound – an episode which culminated in the moral abyss of the Second World War. While the connection between the pound's overthrow and the outbreak of the war is a matter of scholarly dispute, many economists believe that the presence of multiple competing currencies is a potential recipe for economic disaster. In a remarkably prescient 2009 paper, the World Bank warned that 'a multiple-reserve-currency setting' could trigger 'credibility problems', in which 'holders of one major currency can easily shift to another, exposing the disfavoured currency to quick, sharp depreciation and the favoured currency to rapid appreciation'. Such a dynamic could potentially threaten global financial stability 'with consequences for economic activity and development in all countries', they added. Other studies – including by the ECB itself – have reached broadly similar conclusions. How can one address this problem? For the World Bank, the volatility of such a multiple-reserve currency system can only be tamed by a 'managed international system' in which competing financial blocs coordinate their respective monetary policies. However, they also warned that Washington is unlikely to willingly accede to the loss of its exorbitant privilege. 'In order to mitigate an abrupt loss of power, the United States is likely to be selective in its support for multilateral institutions, and will concentrate instead on the bilateral relationships in which it can best project and maintain its economic power,' they noted. The parallels with today's world – defined by US trade wars and Trump's deep-seated scepticism of multinational bodies like the World Trade Organization – are eerie. Jesus, of course, may have been wrong that the meek would inherit the Earth – he was (partly) human, after all. Unfortunately, it's looking increasingly likely that, meek or not, there won't be much of a world for Europe to inherit. Economy News Roundup EU braces for Trump's tariffs. The US president said on Tuesday that the bloc will "probably" receive a letter setting its new US tariff rate on Thursday. "I just want you to know a letter means a deal,' he said. (EU officials were still waiting for the letter to arrive on Friday morning.) The comments come amid growing efforts by the EU to avoid sweeping 'reciprocal tariffs' on its US exports, which had previously been set to enter into force on Wednesday, but have since been pushed back to 1 August. Trump has already imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium , 25% duties on cars and car parts , and a 10% levy on most other goods since his return to the White House in January. On Thursday, he announced that a new 50% levy on copper would enter into force on 1 August. Read more. The EU must accelerate efforts to 'de-risk' from China, says Ursula von der Leyen. The European Commission president said Beijing's recent export restrictions on so-called rare earths – used to manufacture smartphones, electric vehicles, and other advanced technologies – show that her flagship policy of 'de-risking but not de-coupling' from the world's second-largest economy must 'speed up'. '[W]e have learnt the lesson about the extent to which dependencies are vulnerabilities,' von der Leyen said in an address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg. 'And how tech, trade and security are inherently linked. De-risking is simply a matter of European independence.' Read more. Paschal Donohoe re-elected Eurogroup president. The Irishman received unanimous support from his fellow eurozone finance ministers just hours after Spain's Carlos Cuerpo and Lithuania's Rimantas Šadžius pulled out of the race to lead the powerful forum. In a statement, Donohoe pledged to be "a genuine and honest broker" who will ensure that "all voices and positions are taken into account". "It will be my task to further strengthen our common currency area and facilitate tangible progress on our key work streams during this next mandate – from budgetary coordination to the Capital Markets Union, and from the digital euro to the Banking Union," he added. Read more. EU's push to boost military expenditure could undermine the bloc's financial stability, says Denmark. Stephanie Lose, Copenhagen's economy minister, told Euractiv that Europe must ramp up defence spending 'very quickly' to deter Russia's growing military threat, but warned this outlay may pose an additional 'risk' to the bloc's economy, which is already reeling from the twin impact of US tariffs and fierce Chinese competition. 'At the same time as there is this unrest in the economies across the world, [we] need to boost defence spending very quickly,' said Lose, whose country took over the rotating Council presidency from Poland earlier this month. 'That is a risk factor for our economies, because if we don't combine that with wise decisions on ways to a more sustainable path for public finances, then I guess it will be a problem in terms of increased debt levels and unsustainable finances." Read more.
