logo
Water worries grow amid lax flood mitigation

Water worries grow amid lax flood mitigation

South Dunedin is not the only area in the city with water worries. Mary Williams talks to residents in a North Dunedin suburb facing the threat of a catastrophic flood.
In March 1929, a grid of short, flat North East Valley streets, squeezed between North Rd and the Lindsay Creek, flooded up to a metre deep and one resident picked a trout out their garden, according to The Otago Witness.
For nearly 60 years, Roy and June Robertson have lived here. At the end of their Northumberland St garden, a concrete flood protection wall drops 4m to murky waters below.
It is hard to imagine a flood topping the wall, and the Robertsons don't worry about it, but flooding is a serious risk here.
A recent Otago Regional Council (ORC) report flags that the creek's Mt Cargill source can be a "mountain torrent". A flood with major consequences is "almost certain" and one with catastrophic consequences is "likely".
The risk is higher than tolerated elsewhere in New Zealand, the report says, yet flood protection proposals have, for decades, languished in council files.
Mr and Mrs Robertson are more concerned about river health. They saw a woman upending a bag of rubbish into the creek and Mrs Robertson chased her down the street.
A water quality monitoring site a little further downstream, where the the creek loops under North Rd at the bottom of Craigleith St, has been recording levels of E.coli among the worst in the country.
About 300m further downstream, the Dunedin City Council (DCC) has been adding to the pollutants — with ORC permission. DCC is allowed to discharge untreated wastewater, including the valley's sewage, into the Lindsay when the ageing pipe system overflows.
"That's shocking — disgraceful," Mr Robertson says.
It's one of six city locations where the council has been allowed to do it for eight years but increasing failure of council monitoring equipment has made it impossible to know how much pollution has been caused.
One thing is certain here: the 1929 flood was deemed a once-in-a-hundred-years event. It's about time for a repeat and the water will not be clean.
Serious flood risk
There are many water calamities that have happened, and could happen, across the city, most obviously in South Dunedin where the regional and city councils are engaging the community about flood risk due to rising sea levels.
Overflowing wastewater cannot be missed here; it travels in old pipes from the Kaikorai Valley then pours on to Surrey St sometimes — where an overflow pipe routed to the harbour fails to catch it all.
A resident-led action group is fighting to stop the outrage.
In Mosgiel, residents found they were living on an engineered spillway and banded together to fight for their property rights and for the Silver Stream to be dredged to give it more capacity.
The dredging has been promised.
However, in North East Valley, often called NEV, residents spoken to by the Otago Daily Times seemed variably worried and in the dark. Anna Samuel, who has three young children, says she moved into her Felix St home because she was told it would flood once in a hundred years and that didn't sound too bad, but after moving in she had water lapping at her steps.
"I now worry every time we get a rain warning. I would love to know there is a plan."
Jenny Wagner-Gorton, biodiversity co-ordinator at NEV's community organisation The Valley Project, said her group was organising an event about flood risk but would support council-led engagement that gave people "information needed ... everyone should have a basic expectation of a safe home".
The information is serious. The recent ORC report says that, in a rain storm, the creek's steep, upper reaches can suffer bank erosion, causing debris in the water. As the stream travels, and becomes confined by buildings, the debris — including any from landslips on the true right of the stream — can cause blockages and then flooding.
There is a pinch point, between Watts Rd and Felix St, where the old Palmers Quarry slopes to the creek and there is a capacity flow of about 30cum per second. The ORC estimates that this flow has a 79% probability of happening in a 10-year period and a 95% probability in a 20-year period.
Once exceeded, the stream will overtop its left bank and, depending on volume, inundate the small valley floor from Felix St to Allen St, possibly within two hours of rain starting.
The speed of a flood, combined with water depth and velocity, makes an emergency response plan challenging, the report says, creating "unsafe" conditions for people and rescue vehicles.
Planning and replanning
Work to prevent flooding in NEV has been limited and bank protection is controlled by various owners, including the DCC and private landowners.
In the 1970s, there was a plan to build concrete walls on either side of the creek between Selwyn St and Allen St. The wall on the true left was built, including the section at the end of the Robertsons' garden, but the wall on the right was not.
Decades passed. Then, between 2005 and 2011, the ORC developed a "concept design" for a $21.4m flood mitigation scheme for the Lindsay and the Leith. Various methods would be used, including raised banks and walls, and wider and deeper channels, and land was needed, which brings the story back to the Robertsons.
They have kept letters, sent by the ORC from 2005, indicating that their garden could be required and previous flood mitigation plans would not protect them. Their land was valued and while other land was bought by ORC, the Robertsons did not sell.
They say that living on a flood plain — previously an area of market gardens — means they can grow vegetables and they were loathe to relinquish land that delivered great garlic.
By 2011, the Leith flood protection was under way but the Lindsay work deferred. Cost and community opinion were cited.
In 2013, a cheaper proposal, deemed less effective, was tabled. Flood water would be held upstream in a storage area, to be built in Chingford Park. The plan was also rejected for funding reasons.
Meanwhile, there has been patchy flooding and sandbag handouts, residents say, and the big one has got close. Since recording started in 1979, the stream reached its capacity in summer 1991, autumn 2006, and winter 2015.
Roll on to 2025, and there is a new, stretched out, plan for flood mitigation.
ORC's Infrastructure Strategy says options will be identified by 2027 with implementation of a $60m plan from 2028. Less than 6% of this — $3.5m — is allocated to be spent by 2035 with a promise to spend the rest after that and by 2054.
That is half a century after ORC started proposing solutions to the Robertsons and not the only council water headache in NEV.
Six overflow locations
The DCC's overflows of untreated wastewater into the Lindsay happens at a spot near Dunedin North Intermediate School (DNI) and is one of six locations where Dunedin City Council holds ORC consents to do this; three into streams and three into the harbour.
The other stream locations are along Kaikorai Stream: at Kaikorai Common, where locals love to stroll; and just above Kaikorai Valley College (KVC), known for its students' studies of the stream's limited ecology.
The harbour locations are at the mouth of the Waters of Leith near the yacht club and at Sawyers Bay. The DCC has said it informs shellfish company Southern Clams when wastewater is being discharged "so harvesting can cease".
The DCC also discharges overflowing untreated wastewater from the Portobello Rd pump station in South Dunedin.
Excepting the Portobello Rd consent, the other five consents were issued for the first time in January 2017, variably expiring in the 2030s and 2040s, requiring DCC to record and report overflow data and requiring an overflow stakeholders' meeting at a remarkably infrequent rate; once every five years.
An inaugural meeting, regarding the five consents, happened on November 16, 2021, only two months before DCC's deadline to hold it.
It is a perplexing fact that all five consents require KVC to be a stakeholder. None mention DNI. Neither school attended the 2021 meeting and it is unclear if they were invited.
KVC's science teacher Dr Simon McMillan said the college has been warned by the DCC about some overflow events but expressed surprise at being a stakeholder in overflow consents across the city. He thought the role was possibly "sleeping".
DNI's principal Heidi Hayward said the consents and their requirements were news to her.
Data difficulties
The 2021 meeting's minutes reveal that the DCC explained the problem but gave little data.
Overflows happen because rainwater infiltrates older wastewater pipes. The Kaikorai overflow aimed to "mitigate against wastewater flooding downstream".
As Surrey St residents in South Dunedin can attest, that still happens four years on.
The council also said it had been monitoring overflows since 2012 and overflows into the Lindsay Creek and Kaikorai Stream happened "more frequently" than at other locations which overflowed "around twice a year". No overflow frequency or volumes were provided.
The council then flagged that there were "often" monitoring failures due to ageing data loggers.
The ODT asked the DCC for more recent data about overflows. DCC's Three Waters group manager John McAndrew said the council couldn't answer by deadline.
The ODT then asked the ORC, which handed over data for a two-year period, ending July 2024. The DCC had reported 52 overflows across the five consented locations, releasing about 40,000cum of wastewater.
More than half, 30, were into Kaikorai Stream at the location near KVC and 13 went into the Lindsay. The worst overflows were at these locations, each more than 7000cum in a day.
ORC general manager for environmental delivery Joanna Gilroy said any overflow "can pose human health risks due to the presence of bacteria, viruses and other pathogens" and life in the river could also be lost.
The ODT circled back to the DCC, which then handed over a report listing 13 overflows in the year ending July 2024, releasing 3246cum of wastewater.
However, it explained there were now massive data gaps — due to the "deteriorated" loggers.
Data for overflows into the Lindsay Creek and at Kaikorai Common was lost or unreliable for most of the year and replacement loggers were planned.
DCC's Mr McAndrew said there was also "extensive" pipe renewal happening in North East Valley and Kaikorai Valley as part of the nine-year plan to spend $180m on wastewater network renewals, which should reduce overflows.
A DCC web page about overflows had been updated.
The page — if you know to look for it — talks about overflowing wastewater being "highly diluted" by stormwater and the waterways, and released in largely "inaccessible" locations.
It also links to a decade-old consultancy report that concludes, in desultory terms, that there is a "paucity of data" about overflow pollution but 'no doubt" that water suffers. Generally, the ecological value of Dunedin's waterways is "not particularly high".
Otago Fish & Game communications officer Bruce Quirey said there are still trout — University of Otago surveys show about 70 — in the Lindsay Creek's upper reaches at Bethunes Gully. It is an important spawning area.
Lower down, around Chingford Park, numbers are halved and, further down, where a man once found a trout in his garden, Mr Robertson says he doesn't see them.
Mr Quirey says an improved habitat would mean more fish. It "shouldn't come as a surprise" that the further streams flow through the city, and the more manipulated they are, the less healthy they are.
mary.williams@odt.co.nz
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Water Quality Results Confirmed In Nelson Tasman Waters, Rāhui Lifted
Water Quality Results Confirmed In Nelson Tasman Waters, Rāhui Lifted

Scoop

time02-08-2025

  • Scoop

Water Quality Results Confirmed In Nelson Tasman Waters, Rāhui Lifted

Post-flood sample testing of water quality at 22 sites across the top of the south has returned a blanket set of good results (see table below), enabling the current rāhui to be lifted from 1pm on Saturday August 2, 2025. This also provides confidence for those looking to enter or use the water once again. Concerns were initially raised around the effect of floodwaters on the coastal and marine environment in the aftermath of the weather events in late June and mid-July. A rāhui was implemented from Saturday 28 June, covering the area from Te Parinui o Whiti (the White Bluffs) in the east, west to Kahurangi Point, including Aorere and Tai Tapu. It covered all coastlines, river mouths, and floodwaters, and asked for people to respectfully refrain from the gathering of seafood and kai in these areas as well as swimming and entering the water. The consistency of results across the entire Tasman and Golden Bay areas has given sufficient confidence that the water quality is back to pre-flood condition and our coastal waters are now safe for swimming. However, the quality of the water in the immediate vicinity of the Motueka wastewater treatment plant still presents risk to swimmers, gatherers of kaimoana and a separate rāhui will remain in place for this area. Rāhui are a voluntary measure and non-enforceable, but are another way of trying to keep people safe, especially when considering the impacts on the environment and potential contaminants in the waterways. As part of ongoing monitoring measures, water samples have been collected by Nelson City and Tasman District Councils at coastal beaches and river mouth sites over the last two weeks. Sample results from five locations in Golden Bay, 11 locations across the Tasman Bay coastline and six locations with the NCC-administered side of Tasman Bay showed particularly low levels of Enterococci and The national guidelines for safe limits in New Zealand are 280 enterococci/100ml for our coastal sites and 540 for our river sites. Without exception, all sites returned results well under these limits in multiple tests, with only five sites showing more than 10 parts per 100ml at any stage. The maximum reading was 74 Enterococci / 100ml, recorded at Riwaka Port on July 25. The effects of heavy rainfall on July 29 only caused a very short-term increase to these concentrations. Our data from the last few decades shows that the water returns to a swimmable quality within 48 hours of a rainfall event. In this case the water would be deemed safe for re-entry by Friday 1 August 2025. However, there may still be risks for shellfish gathering for another fortnight.

Water worries grow amid lax flood mitigation
Water worries grow amid lax flood mitigation

Otago Daily Times

time01-08-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

Water worries grow amid lax flood mitigation

South Dunedin is not the only area in the city with water worries. Mary Williams talks to residents in a North Dunedin suburb facing the threat of a catastrophic flood. In March 1929, a grid of short, flat North East Valley streets, squeezed between North Rd and the Lindsay Creek, flooded up to a metre deep and one resident picked a trout out their garden, according to The Otago Witness. For nearly 60 years, Roy and June Robertson have lived here. At the end of their Northumberland St garden, a concrete flood protection wall drops 4m to murky waters below. It is hard to imagine a flood topping the wall, and the Robertsons don't worry about it, but flooding is a serious risk here. A recent Otago Regional Council (ORC) report flags that the creek's Mt Cargill source can be a "mountain torrent". A flood with major consequences is "almost certain" and one with catastrophic consequences is "likely". The risk is higher than tolerated elsewhere in New Zealand, the report says, yet flood protection proposals have, for decades, languished in council files. Mr and Mrs Robertson are more concerned about river health. They saw a woman upending a bag of rubbish into the creek and Mrs Robertson chased her down the street. A water quality monitoring site a little further downstream, where the the creek loops under North Rd at the bottom of Craigleith St, has been recording levels of among the worst in the country. About 300m further downstream, the Dunedin City Council (DCC) has been adding to the pollutants — with ORC permission. DCC is allowed to discharge untreated wastewater, including the valley's sewage, into the Lindsay when the ageing pipe system overflows. "That's shocking — disgraceful," Mr Robertson says. It's one of six city locations where the council has been allowed to do it for eight years but increasing failure of council monitoring equipment has made it impossible to know how much pollution has been caused. One thing is certain here: the 1929 flood was deemed a once-in-a-hundred-years event. It's about time for a repeat and the water will not be clean. Serious flood risk There are many water calamities that have happened, and could happen, across the city, most obviously in South Dunedin where the regional and city councils are engaging the community about flood risk due to rising sea levels. Overflowing wastewater cannot be missed here; it travels in old pipes from the Kaikorai Valley then pours on to Surrey St sometimes — where an overflow pipe routed to the harbour fails to catch it all. A resident-led action group is fighting to stop the outrage. In Mosgiel, residents found they were living on an engineered spillway and banded together to fight for their property rights and for the Silver Stream to be dredged to give it more capacity. The dredging has been promised. However, in North East Valley, often called NEV, residents spoken to by the Otago Daily Times seemed variably worried and in the dark. Anna Samuel, who has three young children, says she moved into her Felix St home because she was told it would flood once in a hundred years and that didn't sound too bad, but after moving in she had water lapping at her steps. "I now worry every time we get a rain warning. I would love to know there is a plan." Jenny Wagner-Gorton, biodiversity co-ordinator at NEV's community organisation The Valley Project, said her group was organising an event about flood risk but would support council-led engagement that gave people "information needed ... everyone should have a basic expectation of a safe home". The information is serious. The recent ORC report says that, in a rain storm, the creek's steep, upper reaches can suffer bank erosion, causing debris in the water. As the stream travels, and becomes confined by buildings, the debris — including any from landslips on the true right of the stream — can cause blockages and then flooding. There is a pinch point, between Watts Rd and Felix St, where the old Palmers Quarry slopes to the creek and there is a capacity flow of about 30cum per second. The ORC estimates that this flow has a 79% probability of happening in a 10-year period and a 95% probability in a 20-year period. Once exceeded, the stream will overtop its left bank and, depending on volume, inundate the small valley floor from Felix St to Allen St, possibly within two hours of rain starting. The speed of a flood, combined with water depth and velocity, makes an emergency response plan challenging, the report says, creating "unsafe" conditions for people and rescue vehicles. Planning and replanning Work to prevent flooding in NEV has been limited and bank protection is controlled by various owners, including the DCC and private landowners. In the 1970s, there was a plan to build concrete walls on either side of the creek between Selwyn St and Allen St. The wall on the true left was built, including the section at the end of the Robertsons' garden, but the wall on the right was not. Decades passed. Then, between 2005 and 2011, the ORC developed a "concept design" for a $21.4m flood mitigation scheme for the Lindsay and the Leith. Various methods would be used, including raised banks and walls, and wider and deeper channels, and land was needed, which brings the story back to the Robertsons. They have kept letters, sent by the ORC from 2005, indicating that their garden could be required and previous flood mitigation plans would not protect them. Their land was valued and while other land was bought by ORC, the Robertsons did not sell. They say that living on a flood plain — previously an area of market gardens — means they can grow vegetables and they were loathe to relinquish land that delivered great garlic. By 2011, the Leith flood protection was under way but the Lindsay work deferred. Cost and community opinion were cited. In 2013, a cheaper proposal, deemed less effective, was tabled. Flood water would be held upstream in a storage area, to be built in Chingford Park. The plan was also rejected for funding reasons. Meanwhile, there has been patchy flooding and sandbag handouts, residents say, and the big one has got close. Since recording started in 1979, the stream reached its capacity in summer 1991, autumn 2006, and winter 2015. Roll on to 2025, and there is a new, stretched out, plan for flood mitigation. ORC's Infrastructure Strategy says options will be identified by 2027 with implementation of a $60m plan from 2028. Less than 6% of this — $3.5m — is allocated to be spent by 2035 with a promise to spend the rest after that and by 2054. That is half a century after ORC started proposing solutions to the Robertsons and not the only council water headache in NEV. Six overflow locations The DCC's overflows of untreated wastewater into the Lindsay happens at a spot near Dunedin North Intermediate School (DNI) and is one of six locations where Dunedin City Council holds ORC consents to do this; three into streams and three into the harbour. The other stream locations are along Kaikorai Stream: at Kaikorai Common, where locals love to stroll; and just above Kaikorai Valley College (KVC), known for its students' studies of the stream's limited ecology. The harbour locations are at the mouth of the Waters of Leith near the yacht club and at Sawyers Bay. The DCC has said it informs shellfish company Southern Clams when wastewater is being discharged "so harvesting can cease". The DCC also discharges overflowing untreated wastewater from the Portobello Rd pump station in South Dunedin. Excepting the Portobello Rd consent, the other five consents were issued for the first time in January 2017, variably expiring in the 2030s and 2040s, requiring DCC to record and report overflow data and requiring an overflow stakeholders' meeting at a remarkably infrequent rate; once every five years. An inaugural meeting, regarding the five consents, happened on November 16, 2021, only two months before DCC's deadline to hold it. It is a perplexing fact that all five consents require KVC to be a stakeholder. None mention DNI. Neither school attended the 2021 meeting and it is unclear if they were invited. KVC's science teacher Dr Simon McMillan said the college has been warned by the DCC about some overflow events but expressed surprise at being a stakeholder in overflow consents across the city. He thought the role was possibly "sleeping". DNI's principal Heidi Hayward said the consents and their requirements were news to her. Data difficulties The 2021 meeting's minutes reveal that the DCC explained the problem but gave little data. Overflows happen because rainwater infiltrates older wastewater pipes. The Kaikorai overflow aimed to "mitigate against wastewater flooding downstream". As Surrey St residents in South Dunedin can attest, that still happens four years on. The council also said it had been monitoring overflows since 2012 and overflows into the Lindsay Creek and Kaikorai Stream happened "more frequently" than at other locations which overflowed "around twice a year". No overflow frequency or volumes were provided. The council then flagged that there were "often" monitoring failures due to ageing data loggers. The ODT asked the DCC for more recent data about overflows. DCC's Three Waters group manager John McAndrew said the council couldn't answer by deadline. The ODT then asked the ORC, which handed over data for a two-year period, ending July 2024. The DCC had reported 52 overflows across the five consented locations, releasing about 40,000cum of wastewater. More than half, 30, were into Kaikorai Stream at the location near KVC and 13 went into the Lindsay. The worst overflows were at these locations, each more than 7000cum in a day. ORC general manager for environmental delivery Joanna Gilroy said any overflow "can pose human health risks due to the presence of bacteria, viruses and other pathogens" and life in the river could also be lost. The ODT circled back to the DCC, which then handed over a report listing 13 overflows in the year ending July 2024, releasing 3246cum of wastewater. However, it explained there were now massive data gaps — due to the "deteriorated" loggers. Data for overflows into the Lindsay Creek and at Kaikorai Common was lost or unreliable for most of the year and replacement loggers were planned. DCC's Mr McAndrew said there was also "extensive" pipe renewal happening in North East Valley and Kaikorai Valley as part of the nine-year plan to spend $180m on wastewater network renewals, which should reduce overflows. A DCC web page about overflows had been updated. The page — if you know to look for it — talks about overflowing wastewater being "highly diluted" by stormwater and the waterways, and released in largely "inaccessible" locations. It also links to a decade-old consultancy report that concludes, in desultory terms, that there is a "paucity of data" about overflow pollution but 'no doubt" that water suffers. Generally, the ecological value of Dunedin's waterways is "not particularly high". Otago Fish & Game communications officer Bruce Quirey said there are still trout — University of Otago surveys show about 70 — in the Lindsay Creek's upper reaches at Bethunes Gully. It is an important spawning area. Lower down, around Chingford Park, numbers are halved and, further down, where a man once found a trout in his garden, Mr Robertson says he doesn't see them. Mr Quirey says an improved habitat would mean more fish. It "shouldn't come as a surprise" that the further streams flow through the city, and the more manipulated they are, the less healthy they are.

Debris on river a flood threat, council hears
Debris on river a flood threat, council hears

Otago Daily Times

time23-07-2025

  • Otago Daily Times

Debris on river a flood threat, council hears

Debris piled high enough to cover cattle in the Waihemo River is an imminent flood threat to the area, the Otago Regional Council has been told. Waihemo farmer Jim Thomson's property is spilt by the Waihemo/Shag River. Mr Thomson is the Waihemo ward representative on the Waitaki District Council and an approved RMA hearings commissioner. He said he was speaking as a concerned ORC ratepayer. At the ORC meeting in Oamaru yesterday, he told the council he has seen the river deteriorate "badly" over the past five years. "There's been no maintenance, no spraying for weeds and in actual fact, now seeing the results of previous spraying which was excessive, large willow trees are now dead and falling over and will, I suggest, end up in the river during the next large flood. "The lack of that maintenance, as I say, is going to affect future flood events. I know historically the floods in the Waihemo peaked at 440 cubics and during my 12 years there it was at 298 and that was scary enough." Mr Thomson suggested the issue could be traced back to the "travesty" of the Otago Regional Plan Change 7, which implemented the same irrigation rules for all Otago, with no recognition of the different weather between central and eastern Otago. "However, 75 years of rainfall records in my district show an 800mm variation, in that rainfall. As low as during the 1998 drought of 286mm but as high as 1100mm in the last two years. "I haven't turned the irrigation pump on because Mother Nature has done it for us but in actual fact, that will show as a non-use and will result in the reduction of water allocated to me." He suggested a solution to prevent trees being an issue in floods was to, at the Maheno area, remove the debris and the alluvial deposits between the rail and road bridges in the Kakanui and allow the water to flow where it wants to. Failing to do so would mean ratepayers would face more flood events in the future, he said. "I would challenge some members around this table as to whether they have served the whole community or been caught up in spheres of specific local interest. "Local and regional government would have more effect if we engaged with the practical people in our communities. Let's be proactive rather than reactive. "I would like to urge the council to continue to engage with practical people dealing daily with issues in our community for far better outcomes in the long term. Let's engage, educate and empower our communities to achieve outcomes, rather to try and impose and enforce upon them." Moeraki representative Cr Kevin Malcolm asked what would prevent the issue from being an imminent threat. "Well, the first thing is the clogging of the river with lupins, gorse brush," Mr Thomson said. "When I arrived, I sprayed up from the river banks. I also farm in a way that the areas that are flood plain will have temporary feeds in and I normally set back 10 to 15 metres to make sure that stock don't have access to the river. "But over time, with the neglect last year, I actually sent Cr Malcolm a photo of where I shifted the fence up and put two year old cattle in to try and break down that debris and you couldn't actually see the cattle in amongst it."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store