Jharkhand renames Atal Mohalla Clinic after Mother Teresa, BJP calls move political appeasement
The Jharkhand cabinet's decision to rename the Atal Mohalla Clinic as the Mother Teresa Advance Health Clinic has ignited a political controversy. The BJP criticizes the move as an insult to former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee and accuses the ruling JMM-led alliance of trying to appease Christian voters. JMM defends the renaming, emphasizing Mother Teresa's dedication to serving the poor.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Jharkhand cabinet on Thursday approved the renaming of the Atal Mohalla Clinic as the Mother Teresa Advance Health Clinic.The mohalla clinic was originally launched on August 16, 2019, by the then NDA government on the death anniversary of former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee.The move has sparked a political slugfest between the ruling JMM-led alliance and the opposition BJP."Atal ji's unwavering resolve secured the rights of Jharkhand's people and gave tribal pride a distinct identity. But the Hemant government, stooping to the lowest level of politics, has ignored his contribution. Can it clarify how this decision will improve healthcare?" Jharkhand BJP president Babulal Marandi told ET.He added, "If the government truly wanted to honour Mother Teresa, it could have launched a new scheme in her name to serve patients, which was her life's mission. Instead, it has chosen to serve its political interests."The BJP alleged the move was aimed at wooing the state's Christian voters, seen as supporters of the JMM-led coalition.Rejecting the charge, JMM leader Supriyo Bhattacharya said, "Mother Teresa is an angelic figure for the poor. Naming a health clinic for the poor in her honour is most appropriate."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Hubballi-Dharwad Mayor Jyoti Patil promises clean, pro-people governance
Newly-elected Mayor Jyoti Patil has emphasised that she will work towards providing clean and pro-people governance by taking everyone into confidence and also taking steps to mobilise additional resources for facilitating more development works in the twin cities. She was making her maiden speech in the monthly council meeting of Hubballi-Dharwad Municipal Corporation amid sloganeering by the opposition Congress members on Wednesday. Ms. Patil was encouraged by the ruling party members to continue her speech amid sloganeering by the Congress members who were subsequently removed out of the council hall by marshals. 'My priority is to take up time-bound programmes and deliver governance on the doorsteps of the people,' she said. Ms. Patil said that her first project will be to complete the installation of LED lamps for the 64,000 electricity poles in the twin cities under the PPP project. The measure will save 47% power bill of the corporation, she said. The Mayor said that the corporation will take up the project of raising Miyawaki Forest in the land to be cleared by biomining in the dumping yards of the twin cities. The GIS survey being initiated by the corporation will be expedited to bring more property under the tax net. Land bank The Mayor said that she will work towards expediting the process of re-auction of the corporation's stalls that have been leased out and utilise the funds mobilised through sale of land that has been leased out to create a land bank on the outskirts of the twin cities. The Mayor listed out the other works, including the implementation of waterless urinals project, enhancing green cover by developing 728 parks in the twin cities through public participation, afforestation projects, holding e-Swattu camps, development of storm-water drains, people-friendly zonal offices, housing for pourakarmikas, development of villages under the municipal limits and others. She also proposed instituting awards for the best councillors and officers who contribute towards development of the corporation and sought the cooperation of the members and officials in executing her plans. Several BJP councillors, including floor leader Iresh Anchatageri, Thippanna Majjagi, Viranna Savadi, Ramanna Badiger, Rajanna Koravi, Shivu Menasinakai, Radhabai Safare, and others spoke in reply to her speech along with AIMIM members Nazeer Ahmed Honyal and Waheda Rehman Kittur.
Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
North Korean assembly chief claims US, South Korea preparing to 'actualise' nuclear war
Geneva: The head of North Korea's legislative body on Wednesday accused the United States and South Korea of preparing to "actualise" a nuclear war, insisting that its nuclear development is a self-defence measure vital to ensuring its security against such threats. Pak In-chol, Chairman of the Supreme People's Assembly, made such a claim during a United Nations-led gathering of top legislators around the world in Switzerland, blaming the US and other Western countries for causing "instability and chaos" to maintain their "hegemonic position". "The advanced preparations of the United States and the ROK to actualise a nuclear war have entered the gravity stage," Pak said through an interpreter at the sixth World Conference of Speakers of Parliament. "This impels the DPRK to take every necessary measure in response to such a geopolitical crisis. Possessing capabilities to cope proactively with various security threats ... is an issue of vital importance to our state for defending its sovereignty, security threats and territorial integrity," he said, Yonhap news agency reported. The ROK is short for South Korea's official name, the Republic of Korea. The DPRK stands for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, the North's official name. Pak said that North Korea will never tolerate the "high-handedness, arbitrariness of the US and its following forces," and will "fully discharge its responsibility" to defend international justice. He also claimed that his country is carrying out various activities under its development road map for the "prosperity and happiness" of its people, including long-term construction plans and other measures to improve education, health care and science. "Our people are achieving miraculous successes in their struggle for overall development," Pak said. South Korea's National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik attended the meeting and delivered a speech calling for communication channels between the two Koreas to be kept open even as inter-Korean relations remain frayed. No encounter between Woo and Pak took place at the meeting.
Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
At the heart of Maharashtra's Marathi push back is a debate over Indian identity
In recent weeks, Maharashtra has found itself at the centre of a growing controversy over the National Education Policy 2020. At the heart of the debate is a clause that reaffirms the ' three-language formula ' in schools: children must learn three languages from the first year of school. Typically, these would be the regional language, English and one additional Indian language. Although the policy formally allows any Indian language to serve as the third, Hindi, especially given its dominant presence in central administration, popular media, and national examinations, tends to fill that role by default. In Maharashtra, the issue returned to the headlines after an order by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led state government to introduce Hindi as the compulsory third language from classes 1-4 in Marathi and English medium schools. This privileging of Hindi has sparked concerns in non-Hindi-speaking regions and reignited an old debate: is the NEP merely encouraging multilingualism, or is it reinforcing a creeping centralisation under a 'Hindi-Indian' identity? The dominant regional language of Maharashtra, Marathi, is closely tied to the state's cultural and political identity. The move to introduce Hindi as the mandatory third language by the government was immediately cast by the opposition Shiv Sena faction led by former Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray as an attempted imposition of a linguistic-cultural hierarchy by the Centre and a needless burden on young students. Language has long been a fault line in Mumbai politics. The Shiv Sena, a party originally formed to champion Marathi interests, rose to prominence by demanding job quotas and cultural primacy for local speakers in the 1960s and 70s. Although it later adopted a broader Hindu nationalist agenda, its linguistic roots continue to shape Maharashtra's political landscape. Looming elections The debate is especially charged in light of the upcoming, long-overdue municipal elections in Mumbai. The term of the elected corporators ended in March 2022, after which the civic body has been run by an unelected administrator. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, which governs India's wealthiest civic body, is a high-stakes prize. Control over the BMC means influence over infrastructure, education, and symbolic aspects of urban life such as language on public signage and in school curricula. Opposition parties, including factions of the Shiv Sena and regional allies, have seized on the NEP as evidence of the nationally dominant BJP's insensitivity to Maharashtra's linguistic and cultural identity. The BJP thus finds itself walking a tightrope. As the national architect of the NEP and the main proponent of Hindi as a unifying national language, the party is under pressure to defend its policy. Yet in Maharashtra, it risks alienating regional allies and voters if it appears to be undermining Marathi. Recent statements from BJP leaders suggest a softening of tone, offering reassurances of consultation and phased implementation. Whether this reflects genuine reconsideration or electoral strategy remains to be seen. Beyond the corridors of government, the three-language policy has stirred tensions at the grassroots. Parties from the fringes of electoral politics like the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena, an offshoot of the Shiv Sena, have revived their campaign against Hindi-speaking migrants, particularly from states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Their tactics – ranging from vandalising non-Marathi signage to public calls, under threat of violence, for linguistic loyalty – have drawn criticism but also found resonance among some voters who feel culturally sidelined. Southern concerns The implications extend beyond Maharashtra. Southern states, particularly Tamil Nadu, have long resisted the imposition of Hindi. In the 1960s, anti-Hindi agitations in the state evolved into a powerful movement for Dravidian identity and regional autonomy. Tamil Nadu has since maintained a two-language policy: Tamil and English. This defiance is not merely about language; it is a broader stand against the perceived cultural and political centralisation from New Delhi. States such as Kerala and Andhra Pradesh have adopted more flexible approaches, but they too resist the notion that Hindi should become the de facto national language. Their concern is that a truly multilingual India must operate on the principle of symmetry: no region should be expected to accommodate others without reciprocity. At the core of this resistance is a sense that Hindi's growing dominance – fostered by media, government policy, and migration of Hindi-speakers to other parts of the country – is less the result of organic cultural exchange and more a product of institutional power. Critics argue that the NEP's language policy, while cloaked in the language of inclusion, reinforces existing hierarchies rather than dismantling them. The debate is unfolding against the backdrop of broader demographic and political shifts. After 2026, parliamentary representation in India is expected to be redrawn based on population. Southern states, which have successfully curbed population growth and achieved stronger human development indicators, could lose seats in Parliament while populous and economically weaker northern states gain seats. This risks deepening feelings of marginalisation, turning language and education into flashpoints for larger questions of federalism and fairness. Language vs dialect Interestingly, even within the so-called Hindi heartland, the notion of a unified linguistic identity is tenuous. The Census of India, 2011 (the latest available) recorded more than 50 'mother tongues ' under the heading of Hindi. This includes Bhojpuri, Awadhi, Magahi and Brajbhasha, all of which have ancient and vibrant literary traditions and significant speaker bases. Yet, they are accorded the status of dialects rather than languages and folded into the generic category of 'Hindi' along with Haryanvi, Rajasthani, Garhwali and Kangri, among others. If Maharashtra and the southern states succeed in defending regional languages, it may inspire similar assertions in the North demanding formal recognition for these often-overlooked tongues. Such movements could challenge the notion of Hindi as India's unifying linguistic thread. Its current dominance is partly the result of its administrative status and cultural projection, not necessarily broad consensus. The resurgence of linguistic identities across India could upend the assumption that a single language can bind a country as diverse as India. Ultimately, the Maharashtra language row underscores that India's celebrated linguistic diversity is also under constant negotiation. The three-language formula, once intended to bridge divides, now reveals them. Maharashtra's resistance is part of a wider conversation about how India defines unity: through imposed sameness or sustained plurality. As more states reconsider their place within the federal system, language could become both a tool for political mobilisation and a test of the Indian republic's democratic character.
