logo
Rangers boss Russell Martin labelled ‘cocky' by Southampton owner – but explains why he was UNLUCKY to be sacked by him

Rangers boss Russell Martin labelled ‘cocky' by Southampton owner – but explains why he was UNLUCKY to be sacked by him

Scottish Sun5 hours ago

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
RUSSELL MARTIN will begin work with his new Rangers squad next week.
But Southampton's owner reckons the Gers boss is unlucky not to still be in his previous post - despite being the man who sacked him.
Sign up for the Rangers newsletter
Sign up
3
Russell Martin has taken over at Rangers
Credit: PA
3
Southampton owner Dragan Solak has been discussing Russell Martin
Credit: Richard Pelham / The Sun
3
Martin was dismissed by Southampton last December
Credit: Getty
Martin, 39, was appointed Rangers head coach on a three-year contract a couple of weeks ago.
A former Light Blues defender, he'll get down to work with his players when they return for pre-season training at the beginning of next week.
Martin will have just a month to get the squad ready for action with the Gers' first competitive fixture of the new campaign just weeks away.
The Light Blues will take on Greek giants Panathinaikos in a crucial Champions League qualifier, with the first leg at Ibrox on July 22 or 23.
Martin's appointment at Rangers saw him return to football after a six-month asbence.
Formerly manager of MK Dons and Swansea, he was most recently in charge of Southampton.
Appointed by the Saints in the summer of 2023, Martin led the club to an immediate return to the Premier League after winning the Championship play-offs.
Things didn't go so well in the top division, however, with Martin dismissed as boss after a run of just one league win from 16 matches.
His sacking came in December last year, just five months after he'd signed a new long-term contract.
Southampton are owned by Serbian businessman Dragan Solak, and he's been speaking about Martin's time in charge at the club.
Russell Martin says he can win trophies NOW as he's unveiled as new Rangers manager
Despite being the man who ultimately fired Martin, Solak reckons the new Gers boss was in fact UNLUCKY to lose his job.
That's because he pins a lot of the blame on Southampton's woes last season on VAR and insists that Martin WOULD have seen out the season as Saints manager had they not been cost so many points.
Since becoming a manager, Martin's teams have been known for having a strong identity and style of play.
And Solak admits that the new Rangers gaffer was perhaps a 'bit cocky' with his approach to taking on the Premier League.
Expressing his regret at sporting director Jason Wilcox's exit, Solak told the Daily Echo: "Unfortunately, we didn't replace Jason. Him leaving was a huge blow, he was the guy who started building this environment.
"Then the bloody Man U came in and stole him from us, and we didn't replace him quickly enough. That was a big mistake, and I take my part in it.
"We went into the Premier League a bit unprepared. We had a very smart manager, Russell Martin, and I still believe he will have a great career.
"But maybe he was a little bit cocky and he came in with his vision, and he wanted to sell it to the Premier League, and that was a risky approach.
"We lost some games to stupid mistakes, and then if I could speak in Serbian about the VAR last season, that would be some speech.
"In Serbian, we have very colourful language, and we go very deep when we explain things, so I'll stick to English. We were super unlucky on VAR.
"That, in my opinion, cost us about eight points that we actually deserved, and then instead of being comfortable, you start feeling the pressure.
"You start to innovate and try things that sometimes can work, but in our case, it didn't. When we started changing, it actually went for worse."
In a separate interview with the BBC, Solak expanded on his VAR frustrations.
And he insisted that had VAR not cost - in his opinion - Southampton so many points early in the season, then Martin would DEFINITELY remained in charge.
Solak added: "I really believe he (Martin) was absolutely, fundamentally behind his idea of football and that is not easy in an environment like the Premier League that is so competitive.
"But to give him credit we were quite unlucky, I don't even know how to characterise some of the VAR decisions that we had - but in my opinion VAR took eight points off Russell's team.
"If he had those eight points more in December I think he would probably manage the team through the whole season.
"I'm not saying we would stay in the league but we would have (had) a much more competitive run and Russell would definitely still be leading the team."
Keep up to date with ALL the latest news and transfers at the Scottish Sun football page

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hamilton Accies confirm move to Broadwood Stadium
Hamilton Accies confirm move to Broadwood Stadium

The National

time8 minutes ago

  • The National

Hamilton Accies confirm move to Broadwood Stadium

The embattled Lanarkshire club – relegated from the Scottish Premiership in 2021 – have been mired in financial and ownership difficulties, and were demoted from the Championship last month after incurring a 15-point deduction for breaching multiple Scottish Professional Football League rules. Amid the turbulence, Accies opted to leave New Douglas Park – their home since 2001 – due to a dispute over stadium ownership. Their request to play their home games at Broadwood in Cumbernauld was passed by the SPFL on Thursday, with a two-year lease – and the option of a third year if necessary – agreed with North Lanarkshire Council. Hamilton stated that their 'long-term ambition remains to return to the Hamilton area at the earliest opportunity' once they are 'stronger, more stable, and better equipped to serve the club and its community'. 'This relocation has not been undertaken lightly,' read a statement confirming the move. 'As part of our agreement, the club was required to commit to paying a full year of rental, operational, and security costs upfront, a significant financial obligation that has had immediate consequences for our liquidity. 'Compounding this challenge, since May we have been unable to sell season tickets, generate commercial income, or secure a shirt sponsor while awaiting formal confirmation of our league participation for the upcoming campaign. 'Despite these clear disadvantages, we remain undeterred. This move marks a turning point. A rebirth for Hamilton Academical Football Club. Our time away will be used strategically: to rebuild the club's financial strength, establish proper governance, and put in place a modern, accountable Board of Directors that will uphold the highest standards of compliance, professionalism, and ambition. 'We are committed to becoming a club of integrity, purpose, and innovation. 'We understand the emotional impact this temporary move may have. We apologise to our loyal supporters for the inconvenience, but we promise this: we will fight for our future, and when we return to Hamilton, it will be with a club that is revitalised and stronger in every sense. 'This is not the end of our story, it is the beginning of a bold new chapter.' Accies previously played outside of Hamilton – at Firhill and Cliftonhill – for seven years after selling former ground Douglas Park to a supermarket in 1994.

WE'RE WATCHING YOU: Rangers warn SFA they will monitor rival clubs' TV broadcasts after accusing them of making stronger comments than John Brown's 'corrupt' jibe
WE'RE WATCHING YOU: Rangers warn SFA they will monitor rival clubs' TV broadcasts after accusing them of making stronger comments than John Brown's 'corrupt' jibe

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

WE'RE WATCHING YOU: Rangers warn SFA they will monitor rival clubs' TV broadcasts after accusing them of making stronger comments than John Brown's 'corrupt' jibe

Rangers have warned the SFA they will be monitoring the club TV broadcasts of rival teams after they were fined £3,000 for a remark made by former Ibrox player John Brown. A co-commentator at Easter Road on May 17, Brown was incensed when Rangers were denied a seemingly legitimate goal after Hibs defender Rocky Bushiri scrambled to clear Nico Raskin's net-bound effort. With Rangers' interim boss Barry Ferguson adamant the ball had crossed the line, Hibs went up the park and equalised in a match which ended 2-2. Neither referee Nick Walsh, his assistants or VAR Andrew Dallas were able to conclude if the Belgian's effort should have stood, and Brown said on air: 'I would say it is corrupt.' Commentator Tom Miller said: 'Well, I'm not sure we can actually say that.' But Brown replied: 'Well, I am saying it'. Rangers were yesterday hit with a financial penalty for Brown's words, but claimed other clubs had made 'stronger comments on offical platforms without consequence' and accused the SFA of being selective with their punishments. Found to be in breach of Disciplinary Rule 38 by a judicial panel, the Ibrox club have vowed to monitor all such broadcasts going forward. A strongly worded statement read: 'We feel it is necessary to highlight the broader concerns this outcome raises and the wider implications this has for clarity and confidence in their (the SFA's) regulatory processes. 'John Brown spoke emotionally and spontaneously as someone who cares deeply about the club. 'His words were not scripted and they were not an official club comment. 'The ruling, however, sets a precedent where even spontaneous, corrected remarks made during live coverage of a clear refereeing error are enough to trigger a formal sanction. 'That is neither proportionate nor consistent, especially when other clubs have made stronger comments on official platforms without consequence. 'As part of our defence today, we flagged numerous examples of similar incidents on club channels. 'These incidents raise legitimate questions about Scottish FA rules and how consistently they are enforced. To our knowledge, none of these cases appear to have resulted in charges against the respective clubs. 'The lack of consistency with the Scottish FA's policing of similar incidents leaves more questions than answers. 'That is why we will be contacting the Scottish FA chief executive and president to seek clarity on what policies and processes the compliance officer has in place, if any, to ensure a consistent and proportionate approach to enforcement and the equal treatment of member clubs. 'We shall also be asking the Scottish FA whether they accept that a rule that cannot be applied consistently across all clubs and all platforms risks losing credibility as a fair and enforceable regulation. 'Our aim here is to understand the rationale behind the differing outcomes. A lack of consistency, or the perception of it, undermines confidence in the disciplinary process and exposes all member clubs to uncertainty about what is and is not allowed. 'There remains no clear guidance on how clubs are expected to manage live broadcast content, though we note the panel acknowledged that the club's internal editorial guidelines may serve as a constructive step for others going forward. 'To be clear, we referenced these other examples not to suggest they should have resulted in sanctions, but to highlight the clear inconsistency in how similar incidents have been handled. 'Club media channels are, by nature, passionate and partisan. Informal, tongue-in-cheek and emotional commentary comes with the territory, especially in live settings. 'But, in choosing to pursue this case, the Scottish FA has opened the door to closer scrutiny of how similar situations are handled going forward. If this is now the standard, they will be watched closely to ensure it is applied across the board, consistently, without exception and without favour.' Rangers had denied any breach of the SFA's rules and had claimed the verdict of the Key Match Incident Panel highlighted the injustice of no goal being awarded. By way of defence, Collum pointed to a disallowed goal for Celtic against Hibs which had also led to criticism of officials Four out of five KMI panel members - individuals with experience from across the game - retrospectively felt a goal should have been awarded to the visitors. Despite that, Hampden head of referees Willie Collum backed the match officials. Speaking on his VAR Review Show, he pointed to criticism of officials after they ruled out a Daizen Maeda against Hibs earlier in the season, when the ball was judged to have gone out of play before Alistair Johnston crossed to set up Maeda's 'goal'. 'Let's go back to two incidents this season first - Hibs vs Celtic, possible ball over the line, and Dundee United vs Hibs, possible handball before it goes into the goal,' said Collum. 'We were criticised for both of those decisions, and rightly so, because ultimately there was no conclusive evidence. 'I know people who would look at this decision and say: 'That camera angle, for me, is conclusive'. But the reality is, that camera angle is at an angle looking in the way, there's nothing directly in line there. 'I've quoted before, in a World Cup match, there was a similar angle shown in a Japan game (against Spain in 2022) where, if you'd used that angle, you would say the ball was over the line. 'Then when you line it up directly in line, it only needs a slight part of the ball to be touching that line. 'Can the VAR and the AVAR there categorically, 100 per cent, say the ball was over the line? Not for us. 'Do I think it crossed the line? I think there's a good chance it did. 'But can I be absolutely certain of that? No. 'We've been criticised previously, we've now moved to say we'll only give a decision like that if we've got 100 per cent conclusive evidence, so the VAR and AVAR are correct to say there that they don't have that evidence.'

Liverpool pick out next transfer after Wirtz and Kerkez as £34m deal advanced
Liverpool pick out next transfer after Wirtz and Kerkez as £34m deal advanced

Daily Mirror

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Liverpool pick out next transfer after Wirtz and Kerkez as £34m deal advanced

Arne Slot's Liverpool have already enjoyed a lucrative summer window and they have another big-money swoop in mind should one of their pending deals go through as expected Liverpool will make a move for Crystal Palace star Marc Guehi as a replacement for Jarell Quansah - who is primed for Bayer Leverkusen. Erik ten Hag is a big fan of the Reds' academy graduate. The former Manchester United manager sees him as an ideal replacement for Jonathan Tah, with the German defender set to join Bayern Munich this summer. Liverpool are reluctant to sell Quansah this summer but it is thought that a bid of around 40m (£34m) could be enough to convince them to cash-in. ‌ And should they do that, Liverpool chiefs have already picked out his ideal replacement. The Merseysiders are long-term admirers of Crystal Palace captain Marc Guehi. ‌ Liverpool have been monitoring developments over the England star's future with just one year remaining on his Selhurst Park deal. They could however face competition from Newcastle who have also been chasing Guehi over recent seasons. "I think the most important thing is just always doing the best that I can for this football club," the defender said about his future last year. "I come in every day and I try to be the same. "I try to work hard. And you know, this football club has given me a lot. I'm still under contract at this football club, so my focus is always at this football club. So, you know, for me, the most important is just doing the best I can and seeing where the future holds." Meanwhile, both chairman Steve Parish and manager Oliver Glasner have confirmed that Guehi is not actively looking to leave. Speaking in January, the latter said: 'If one is coming and says they want to leave and both clubs find an agreement, I think it will happen. But as long as a player doesn't come — and Marc didn't come — I am really not concerned he will leave. On Newcastle's failed pursuit last summer, Parish said: "Nobody has got to the valuation yet. If you want a superstar player you need to pay superstar money. ‌ "It's not near the point where we have to make a decision. We love having him and would love to keep him. If someone else wants to have him they need to make it really difficult for us. He's a generational talent." Guehi, 24, has been with Palace since his 2021 arrival from Chelsea. He has gone on to play 155 games for the club and played a crucial role as the Eagles won the FA Cup last season. Should Liverpool make a move, he would become the latest big-money addition to the squad this summer. Jeremie Frimpong has already been signed from Bayer Leverkusen, while Florian Wirtz is on the verge of joining him. Bournemouth defender Milos Kerkez also looks likely to join the Premier League champions over the coming weeks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store