What the Online Safety Act is - and how to keep children safe online
What is the Online Safety Act and how will it protect children?
The Online Safety Act's central aim is to make the internet safer for people in the UK, especially children.It is a set of laws and duties that online platforms must follow, being implemented and enforced by Ofcom, the media regulator.Under its Children's Codes, platforms must prevent young people from encountering harmful content relating to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography from 25 July.This will see some services, notably porn sites, start checking the age of UK users.Ofcom's rules are also designed to protect children from misogynistic, violent, hateful or abusive material, online bullying and dangerous challenges.Firms which wish to continue operating in the UK must adopt measures including:changing the algorithms which determine what is shown in children's feeds to filter out harmful contentimplementing age verification methods to check whether a user is under 18removing identified harmful material quickly and supporting children who have been exposed to itidentifying a named person who is "accountable for children's safety", and annually review how they are managing risk to children on their platformsFailure to comply could result in businesses being fined £18m or 10% of their global revenues - whichever is higher - or their executives being jailed. In very serious cases Ofcom says it can apply for a court order to prevent the site or app from being available in the UK.Which sites are introducing UK age checks - and will they be effective?
What else is in the Online Safety Act?
The bill also requires firms to show they are committed to removing illegal content, including:child sexual abusecontrolling or coercive behaviourextreme sexual violencepromoting suicide or self-harmselling illegal drugs or weaponsterrorismThe Act has also created new offences, such as:cyber-flashing - sending unsolicited sexual imagery onlinesharing "deepfake" pornography, where artificial intelligence is used to insert someone's likeness into pornographic content
Why has it been criticised?
A number of campaigners want to see even stricter rules for tech firms, and some want under-16s banned from social media completely.Ian Russell, chairman of the Molly Rose Foundation - which was set up in memory of his daughter who took her own life aged 14 - said he was "dismayed by the lack of ambition" in Ofcom's codes.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have also called for stronger protection from the dangers of social media, saying "enough is not being done".They unveiled a temporary memorial in New York City dedicated to children who have died due to the harms of the internet. "We want to make sure that things are changed so that... no more kids are lost to social media," Prince Harry told BBC Breakfast.How will UK age verification for porn work, and what about privacy?The NSPCC children's charity argues that the law still doesn't provide enough protection around private messaging apps. It says that the end-to-end encrypted services which they offer "continue to pose an unacceptable, major risk to children".On the other side, privacy campaigners complain the new rules threaten users' freedom.Some also argue age verification methods are invasive without being effective enough.Digital age checks can lead to "security breaches, privacy intrusion, errors, digital exclusion and censorship," according to Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch.
How much time do UK children spend online?
Children aged eight to 17 spend between two and five hours online per day, according to Ofcom research.It found that nearly every child over 12 has a mobile phone and almost all of them watch videos on platforms such as YouTube or TikTok.About half of children over 12 think being online is good for their mental health, according to Ofcom.However, the Children's Commissioner said that half of the 13-year-olds her team surveyed reported seeing "hardcore, misogynistic" pornographic material on social media sites. Children also said material about suicide self-harm and eating disorders was "prolific" and that violent content was "unavoidable".
What online parental controls are available?
The NSPCC says it's vital that parents talk to their children about internet safety and take an interest in what they do online.Two-thirds of parents say they use controls to limit what their children see online, according to Internet Matters, a safety organisation set up by some of the big UK-based internet companies.It has a list of parental controls available and step-by-step guides, external on how to use them.These include advice on how to manage teen or child accounts on social media, video platforms such as YouTube, and gaming platforms such as Roblox or Fortnite.However Ofcom data suggests that about one in five children are able to disable parental controls.Instagram has already introduced "teen accounts" which turn on many privacy settings by default - although some researchers have claimed they were able to circumvent the promised protections.Ofcom: Guide for parentsKeep kids off Roblox if you're worried, its CEO tells parents
What controls are there on mobile phones and gaming consoles?
Phone and broadband networks may block some explicit websites until a user has demonstrated they are over 18.Some also have parental controls that can limit the websites children can visit on their phones.Android and Apple devices also offer options for parents to block or limit access to specific apps, restrict explicit content, prevent purchases and monitor browsing.Game console controls also let parents ensure age-appropriate gaming and control in-game purchases.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
Walsall property partially shut by police over drugs and disorder
Resident's concerns over drug use and disorder at a house in Walsall has led to a ban for Midlands Police said they applied for a partial closure order at the property in Montgomery Road, Bentley, after getting reports from the public of persistent anti-social order makes it a criminal offence for anyone, other than those specified, to enter the Tom Cross, from the Walsall Serious Organised Crime and Exploitation Team said: "This property was causing real upset for a lot of people in the community." The force said it had worked with a local housing association to take action and the order was granted on 5 August at Walsall Magistrates' Cross added: "We just hope this order will now improve the quality of life for residents in the community who had been so badly affected by anti-social behaviour which was originating from the property."Sarah Clarke, director of housing and customer service at housing association whg, said their community safety team had worked closely with the police."This is a positive outcome for the residents of Montgomery Road, bringing an end to the persistent anti-social behaviour that has impacted this community," she added. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Champions Liverpool armed with new weapons but repeat act will be tough
LONDON, Aug 9 (Reuters) - Armed with around 260 million pounds ($348.56 million) worth of new signings, Liverpool have spared no expense in trying to ensure last season's Premier League title marked the dawn of a new age of domination in English football. The post-Juergen Klopp era began with Dutchman Arne Slot's side wrestling control from Manchester City and turning the title race into a procession as their rivals imploded. Winning back-to-back titles for the first time since 1984 is likely to prove a rather more arduous challenge. Premier League clubs have already splurged in excess of two billion pounds with the likes of Arsenal, City and Chelsea all flexing their muscles with statement signings. Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur will surely improve drastically on woeful domestic campaigns last season while the likes of Aston Villa and Newcastle United will again be making themselves heard at the top table. While Liverpool won't care, last season's Premier League campaign was not a vintage edition, with the title sewn up early, the relegation victims all too predictable and the main interest being the jostle for European qualification. Hopes are high that the new season will offer more intrigue. It will be a sombre occasion as Liverpool and Bournemouth kick off a 380-match Premier League slog on Friday with the Anfield faithful remembering Diogo Jota, the club's Portugal forward who died alongside his brother in a car crash in July. While Jota will forever have a place in the hearts of the Kop, new heroes are ready to emerge, none more so than German midfielder Florian Wirtz and French forward Hugo Ekitike. Liverpool smashed their transfer record when they paid Bayer Leverkusen an initial 100 million pounds to sign the 22-year-old Germany international, who scored 57 goals and provided 65 assists in 197 appearances for the Bundesliga club. Allied with the pace and power of 23-year-old Ekitike, signed from Eintracht Frankfurt for an initial 69 million pounds, Liverpool will have more cutting edge this season. They have also upgraded in defence with highly-rated left back Milos Kerkez set to challenge Andy Robertson and Jeremie Frimpong to fill the hole left by the departure of Trent Alexander-Arnold to Real Madrid. "I think there's always room for improvement in every department," Slot said after Liverpool beat Athletic Bilbao 3-2 in a pre-season friendly. "We've added a few extra weapons." The Dutchman was also quick to point out that Liverpool's rivals have not "stood still", especially Arsenal and City. Under Mikel Arteta, Arsenal have been agonisingly close to a first Premier League title since 2004, twice pushing Manchester City hard and last season emerging as Liverpool's sole rivals before falling away. Fans have long-lamented the lack of a genuine goal poacher but their prayers may have been answered with the signing of Sweden's Viktor Gyokeres from Sporting as part of a near 200 million pounds outlay in the close season. The 27-year-old scored 54 goals in all competitions last season and should he come anywhere near the level of club record scorer Thierry Henry, whose number 14 shirt he will wear, the 63.5 million euros ($73.93 million) fee will seem a bargain. Defensive midfielder Martin Zubimendi arrived from Real Sociedad while Noni Madueke made the short trip across London from Chelsea to offer attacking support to Bukayo Saka. While Arsenal, who visit Manchester United in their opener next Sunday, trailed in 10 points behind Liverpool last term, City were 13 adrift as their stranglehold ended. Pep Guardiola's rebuilding job began last season and with talisman Kevin de Bruyne gone, that has accelerated with the signings of Dutch midfielder Tijjani Reijnders, Wolverhampton Wanderers left back Rayan Ait-Nouri and winger Rayan Cherki. City visit Wolves in the late game next Saturday. Fresh from winning the Club World Cup, Chelsea will also be expected to mount a challenge with striker Joao Pedro their standout signing of another busy transfer window. The Blues start their season at home to Crystal Palace next Sunday. Former Brentford manager Thomas Frank takes charge of a Spurs team that finished 17th but won the Europa League under Ange Postecoglou and are back in the Champions League without talisman Son Heung-min who ended his 10-year stint this week. Quite what the Dane will make of the jigsaw puzzle he has inherited from the sacked Postecoglou is anyone's guess, but fans will expect to see a vast domestic improvement as they get under way at home to promoted Burnley next Saturday. Likewise at Manchester United where Ruben Amorim begins his first full season in charge with the pain of their worst league campaign since 1974 still painfully fresh. For Daniel Farke, Scott Parker and Regis Le Bris -- managers of promoted trio Leeds United, Burnley and Sunderland -- the brief is simple - survival. The omens are not good with the last six teams to gain promotion to the top flight going straight back down. Leeds open their campaign at home to Everton two days after Sunderland welcome West Ham United next Saturday. ($1 = 0.7459 pounds) ($1 = 0.8589 euros)
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘British Gas wants to charge my elderly mother £3,000'
Has a company treated you unfairly? Our Consumer Champion is available to help. For how to contact her click here. Dear Katie, My 84-year-old mother, who lives alone, has recently developed Alzheimer's disease. Luckily my brother and I gained lasting power of attorney before she started to lose capacity in January this year. As we started to pay close attention to her financial situation, we quickly realised that she was being taken advantage of by many companies. For example, a major telephone provider sold her a contract that provided her with 100GB of broadband for £120 a month, even though she doesn't have a single computer in the house and her TV is 23 years old. A major retailer has also stitched her up with product insurance for a gas hob for the price of £35 per month. She also had boiler insurance costing more than £40 per month. I could not believe the amount of disgusting behaviour from supposedly reputable companies. My brother and I quickly sorted all this out by demanding refunds, and we managed to cut her outgoings by up to 70pc. However, a major stumbling block has been her gas supplier, British Gas. According to British Gas my mother's estimated gas usage this year will be in excess of £3,000. She lives alone in a three-bed semi-detached house and uses gas only for domestic hot water and heating (which she is now reluctant to use). I estimate that her actual gas usage should come to less than £700 per year. The issue is with the smart meter, which isn't configured correctly. The consumption is based on inaccurate readings. There's an issue with the power supply to the meter, too. The simple solution to this is to send someone out every quarter to read the meter or get it working properly. My mum is incapable of reading the meter herself, and my brother and I live quite a distance from her. British Gas is aware of all of this and provided a refund of over £500 last autumn. Since then it has continued to charge her £159 per month and it has now sent her a letter saying that her bill will go up to £359 per month. This has caused her a massive amount of distress. My mother's income is modest: a state pension of £200 per week and a private pension of £300 per month, so about £14,000 a year in total. As things stand, the amount that British Gas will charge her this year will account for over 23pc of her net income, which is outrageous. I've had endless chats with customer service AI bots and further conversations with real humans, which have yielded nothing. Dear AP, I was so sorry to hear about the appalling treatment your mother has received since her memory has gone downhill. Some reading this may feel shocked that some of Britain's biggest companies would behave in this way, but sadly I see older folk being taken advantage of all too often when running this column. It really is a complete disgrace that they don't do more to protect our most vulnerable society members from being ripped off. When I got in touch with British Gas about your case it came back grovelling with sincere apologies for the circumstances that led you to have to contact it. It investigated and found that in December 2024 it identified that it had not updated a meter exchange that took place around four years ago. It turns out that in September 2021 your mother's old imperial gas meter was replaced with a new meter. However, in December 2024 British Gas identified that the exchange hadn't been recorded on the industry database. This meant that your mother had continued to be billed using imperial measures on her current meter rather than metric measures. This was updated and in January 2025 it billed accurately, based on a meter reading you provided. This left a credit balance on your mother's account of £576.09, and this was sent out as a refund. Unfortunately, in January the agent that was looking after your case did not identify that the annual gas figure British Gas had showing on your mother's account was far too high. This was causing the estimated reads to be too high, as well as the increased direct debit amount. Therefore, the statements issued in April 2025 and July 2025 showing a debit balance of £753.32 and £771.84, were incorrect. You had provided a further reading on June 30, and this put the account into a credit balance of £598.03. I'm pleased to say that this refund was finally issued on July 28. British Gas has now more accurately estimated her future usage (which is less than the average household of around £80 a month), so her future bills will be drastically lower than in recent months. It is reducing her monthly direct debit to reflect her actual usage, and to address the failings in customer service it has offered her £150 as a goodwill gesture. That it took my involvement to get this fully fixed is utterly ridiculous, and British Gas needs to take a long, hard look in the mirror at the way its customer services team is set up to deal with cases like yours. Katie
