Judge blocks EPA from canceling $20 billion in Biden era grants
The decision by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan stopped the EPA from canceling the distribution of $20 billion that it had deposited in a Citibank account for nonprofits, including Climate United, Coalition for Green Capital and Power Forward Communities.
Chutkan wrote that the EPA grant termination letters only "vaguely reference 'multiple ongoing investigations' into 'programmatic waste, fraud, and abuse and conflicts of interest' but offer no specific information about such investigations, factual support for the decision, or an individualized explanation," and that "this is insufficient."
The grants were issued under the Inflation Reduction Act, which passed Congress and was signed into law in 2022. The Act authorized the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which made grants available to eligible climate projects.
Among the grantees were nonprofits Climate United, Coalition for Green Capital and Power Forward Communities, who are the plaintiffs in Chutkan's decision. The three nonprofits were granted an approximate total of $14 billion, and that money is held by Citibank; five other nonprofit groups were the recipients of the remainder of the $20 billion total.
The EPA issued a letter to the plaintiffs on March 11 that terminated the grants, leading them to move for temporary restraining orders to prevent Citibank from not "violating its legal and contractual obligations to disburse grant money owed" to the plaintiffs and stop the EPA from terminating the grants.
However, Chutkan's court order also states that as this is a temporary order.
"The court merely orders the parties to preserve the status quo -- that is, for Citibank to maintain the grant funds in Plaintiffs' respective accounts," it said.
This means that while the grant money has not been given back to the government, maintaining the "status quo" will also keep the grants from being withdrawn for use by the nonprofits.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin posted a statement to X Tuesday that confirmed the grants are "frozen by court order."
Zeldin also said that the EPA under the Biden presidency was "riddled with self-dealing and wasteful spending," and that he "will not rest" until the grant money has been returned to the U.S. Treasury.
Meanwhile, as the grants remain locked to all parties involved, Climate United could end up "furloughing or laying off staff," among other "imminent harms" the company declared in the suit could happen without the expected grant funding. In a press release, Climate United stated Tuesday it "will continue its legal process to fully restore its program."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
18 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump administration weighs 10% stake in Intel via Chip Act grants, making government top shareholder
The Trump administration is discussing taking a 10% stake in Intel, according to a Bloomberg report on Tuesday, in a deal that could see the U.S. government become the chipmaker's largest stakeholder. As part of a potential deal, the government is also considering converting some or all of Intel's grants from the 2022 U.S. CHIPS and Science Act into equity in the company, the report said, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter. At the embattled chipmaker's current market value, a 10% stake would be worth roughly $10.4 billion. Meanwhile, Intel has been awarded about $10.9 billion in Chips Act grants, including $7.9 billion for commercial manufacturing and $3 billion for national security projects. The report noted, however, that it remains unclear if the idea has gained traction broadly within the administration or whether officials have broached the possibility with affected companies. It added that the exact size of the stake remains in flux, and it remains unclear whether the White House will actually proceed with the plan. Intel and the White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's queries regarding the report. Intel, once a dominant force in the U.S. chip industry, has fallen behind global competitors in advanced chip manufacturing. Reviving the former U.S. chip champion has become a national priority in Washington, with reports about a potential government stake in the company first circulating last week. The company has been the largest recipient of the 2022 Chips Act, passed with bipartisan support under the Biden administration, as part of efforts by Washington to revitalize U.S. leadership in semiconductor manufacturing. The bill allocated $39 billion in grants for American semiconductor manufacturing projects, with funding committed to many of the world's chipmakers such as TSMC and Samsung, as well as American chip companies such as Nvidia, Micron and GlobalFoundries. U.S. President Donald Trump, though supporting the general goals of the Chips Act, has been a vocal critic of the bill and even called for its repeal earlier this year. While republican lawmakers in Washington have been reluctant to act on that call, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in June that the administration was renegotiating some of the bill's grants. If Intel's Chip Act funds were to be converted into a potential government stake in the company, it could decrease the total amount of capital infused into the company as part of any deal by Washington. However, it would serve as the latest example of the Trump administration's interest in building government-backed national champions in strategic industries. Intel has struggled to gain an advantage in the artificial intelligence boom and has yet to capture a significant customer for its manufacturing business despite spending heavily on it. Some analysts have argued that government intervention is essential for the struggling chipmaker and for the sake of U.S. national security. Others contend that Intel's problems are deeper than funding, and it is not clear how the government can help with that. Analysts have also noted that Trump may be able to sway companies to buy Intel chips or assist indirectly, through tariffs and regulation. On Tuesday, it was announced that SoftBank was investing $2 billion in Intel. According to LSEG, the investment is worth about 2% of Intel, making SoftBank the fifth-biggest shareholder. Masayoshi Son, Chairman & CEO of SoftBank Group, said: "This strategic investment reflects our belief that advanced semiconductor manufacturing and supply will further expand in the United States, with Intel playing a critical role." Intel investors had initially welcomed news of the government investment, which resulted in a share rally of nearly 9% on Aug. 14. Shares of Intel fell over 3% on Monday on the Bloomberg report, but rebounded by more than 5% in overnight trading on the trading platform Robinhood following news of a Softbank investment. Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who was appointed in March 2025, met with Trump at the White House last week, after the U.S. president had called for his ousting due to his past ties to China. After the meeting, Trump had changed his tune on the Intel chief, saying he had "an amazing story." It's unclear if a potential government stake in the company had been discussed at the time. Read the full Bloomberg story here.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Burchett: Putin realizes we can ‘shut him down with our energy capabilities'
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) said Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin realizes the United States can 'shut him down with our energy capabilities' amid a push from the Trump administration for an end to the war in Ukraine. 'I think Putin realizes too we could shut him down with our energy capabilities,' Burchett told NewsNation's Blake Burman on 'The Hill,' adding later that 'under this new EPA we've got, I think — I think you're going to see more — more production, and that we can fluctuate those markets.' 'And I think Putin completely realizes that he cannot do without oil. And so, I think there's a lot behind the scenes going on,' he added. On Monday, President Trump said he spoke with Putin in the wake of meetings at the White House with key European leaders and started arranging a potential bilateral meeting involving the Russian leader and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The president said the meeting between Putin and Zelensky would happen at a time and location not yet figured out. It would be the first time the two leaders had a face-to-face meeting since the start of the war in February 2022. 'After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'Again, this was a very good, early step for a War that has been going on for almost four years.' Within the last week, Trump has met with both Putin and Zelensky on U.S. soil, and Trump and Zelensky had a much more even-tempered Oval Office meeting in front of TV cameras Monday than they did in February.
CBS News
5 hours ago
- CBS News
EPA's Lee Zeldin makes battery safety pitch as New York environmentalists criticize his record
Lee Zeldin, President Trump's Environmental Protection Agency administrator, returned to New York's Long Island on Monday to focus on the safety of battery storage plants. The EPA leader's appearance in his home state came just weeks after the agency dealt another major blow to the fight against global warming. Back home on Long Island, Zeldin announced the EPA's first national guidance on controversial battery energy storage systems. The agency takes no stance on BESS plants, but he called for local control over their approvals. "There are toxic emissions. There are water quality impacts. It's the people in this room who are going to have to answer that call to put it out," the former New York congressman and Republican nominee for governor said. After two recent destructive fires in California, firefighters and residents are alarmed in Hauppauge and Holtsville, where battery storage facilities are proposed. "It's unreasonable to expect our volunteer firefighters who have families and jobs to handle a disaster of this magnitude," Hauppauge Fire Department Commissioner Scott Monroe said. "We cannot have these battery storage facilities in our neighborhoods," New York State Sen. Mario Mattera said. Zeldin suggested government can "railroad" or "steamroll" over local opposition, but a spokesperson for Gov. Kathy Hochul said that's categorically false and battery storage is already a local decision. Environmental leaders said it's disingenuous for Zeldin to talk about safety as he dismantles climate regulations. "We have seen major environmental initiatives get rolled back under this administration, in a way we never dreamed would happen," Adrienne Esposito, with Citizens Campaign for the Environment, said. According to Hochul's energy advisor, New York currently has among "the most stringent battery energy storage regulations in the country," which are praised by New York City fire safety experts. But Zeldin blasted the state's green energy policies, which he says are costing the state federal funding. "We have chosen to protect the environment and grow the economy. We do not accept that it's a binary choice," Zeldin said. Most Long Island towns already have moratoriums on battery storage facilities while safety is under review. But the concern of many residents in these communities is that the state will try to supersede local rule. Around three dozen additional proposals for battery storage facilities on Long Island are currently under review in a state list of potential sites.
