USTR starts Section 301 probe into Brazil's 'unfair' trading practices
The Section 301 investigation was launched into Brazil's 'attacks on American social media companies as well as other unfair trading practices that harm American companies, workers, farmers, and technology innovators,' said USTR Jamieson Greer.
The USTR has begun a probe to find out whether Brazil's policies and practices in digital trade and e-payment; 'unfair', preferential tariffs; anti-corruption 'interference'; IP protection; ethanol market access; and 'illegal' deforestation burden or restrict US commerce. “Brazil's tariff and non-tariff barriers merit a thorough investigation, and potentially, responsive action,†said USTR Jamieson Greer.
'USTR has detailed Brazil's unfair trade practices that restrict the ability of US exporters to access its market for decades in the annual National Trade Estimate (NTE) Report. After consulting with other government agencies, cleared advisers, and Congress, I have determined that Brazil's tariff and non-tariff barriers merit a thorough investigation, and potentially, responsive action," he was quoted as saying in an official release.
Brazil may undermine the competitiveness of US companies engaged in digital trade and electronic payment services, for example, by retaliating against them for failing to censor political speech or restricting their ability to provide services in the country, the release noted.
Brazil accords lower, preferential tariff rates to the exports of certain globally competitive trade partners, thereby disadvantaging US exports, it noted.
Brazil's failure to enforce anti-corruption and transparency measures raises concerns in relation to norms relating to fighting bribery and corruption, it said.
Brazil apparently denies adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights, harming American workers whose livelihoods are tied to America's innovation- and creativity-driven sectors, the release added.
Brazil has walked away from its willingness to provide virtually duty-free treatment for US ethanol, and instead, now applies a substantially higher tariff on US ethanol exports.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Tata Motors-owned Jaguar Land Rover to cut several managerial roles in UK
The UK-based car manufacturer welcomed the recent trade deal that eases some pressure on its automotive exports to the American market Press Trust of India London Tata Motors-owned Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) on Thursday confirmed plans to cut hundreds of managerial roles as part of a "limited" voluntary redundancy programme, which it says is aimed at better aligning its leadership workforce with the luxury car brand's business strategy. The UK-based car manufacturer, which has been under pressure from US President Donald Trump's tariff wars, welcomed the recent trade deal that eases some pressure on its automotive exports to the American market. However, the latest figures released last week had revealed a drop in sales in the April to June quarter which had witnessed a temporary pause in shipments to the US amid high tariffs of 25 per cent on cars. "JLR regularly offers eligible employees voluntary redundancy (VR) programmes, a JLR spokesperson said. "Through this limited UK VR programme for managers, JLR is aligning its leadership workforce for the business's current and future needs. We are grateful to the government for delivering at speed the new UK-US trade deal, which gives us the confidence to invest GBP 3.5 bn per annum to realise our strategy which is delivering," the spokesperson said. The number of jobs set to be hit is estimated at around 500 amid high American tariffs which were cut to 10 per cent under the US-UK trade agreement, a rate only covering cars made in the UK. The trade deal terms also cap total annual car exports to the US at 100,000 models, with the higher rate applying to any vehicles crossing that mark. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer had chosen the UK headquarters of JLR in the West Midlands region to deliver a key speech back in May to reassure staff amid the US trade wars. As news of the job cuts emerged, Downing Street said JLR was "responding to challenging global conditions". It comes as JLR ceased production of most Jaguar models ahead of a complete relaunch expected next year. In November 2024, the carmaker unveiled a bold rebrand featuring a pink concept car and replacing its big cat logo with a capital J. Meanwhile, the company revealed on Thursday that it is collaborating with smart electric vehicle (EV) charging software platform to support efforts to make charging more sustainable and affordable. JLR said it is running a pilot scheme in the UK to test the integration of software using 10 electric Jaguar I-PACE models. Together, we are designing and deploying a smart charging solution that will meet our luxury clients' expectations. It will support the transition to electrification through the efficient use of energy, with a view to reducing pressure on the grid and lowering costs for users, said Swarna Ramanathan, JLR Chief Strategy Officer. It forms part of a wider Reimagine' strategy which aims to transform the business to become carbon net zero across supply chain, products, and operations by 2039. Electrification is central to this strategy which will see all brands have a pure electric model and Jaguar entirely electric before the end of the decade.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
AAIB chief slams 'premature' foreign media reports on Air India crash
Speculation in sections of the foreign media regarding the cause of the Air India flight AI171 crash is "unfounded" and "premature", GVG Yugandhar, Director General of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), said on Thursday evening. This is the first public statement by Yugandhar since the June 12 crash of Air India's Boeing 787-8 aircraft (registration VT-ANB), which killed 241 of the 242 people onboard. Titled 'Appeal', his statement came hours after The Wall Street Journal published a report that pointed to the captain, Sumeet Sabharwal, turning off fuel switches moments before the crash. Citing people familiar with the U.S. side of the investigation, WSJ said cockpit voice recordings indicate Sabharwal moved the fuel control switches to the "cutoff" position after take-off — triggering a surprised and panicked response from the first officer, Clive Kunder. The WSJ report said the U.S. assessment was based on black box data and speculated on whether Sabharwal's actions were deliberate or accidental. It added that such details could lead U.S. authorities to examine potential criminal liability, had the crash occurred on American soil. Yugandhar on Thursday evening said: 'It is essential to respect the sensitivity of the loss faced by family members of deceased passengers, crew of the aircraft and other deceased persons on ground.' 'It has come to our attention that certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting. Such actions are irresponsible, especially while the investigation remains ongoing,' he stated. The AAIB had released its preliminary report on July 12, which revealed that fuel supply to both engines was cut off shortly after take-off. The two fuel control switches were moved to the 'cutoff' position in quick succession, and although they were turned back on about 10 seconds later, the engines had already flamed out. The report stated that one pilot asked the other why he moved the switches, and the other responded by denying it. The report did not identify who said what. The AAIB report did not rule out technical faults, and said aviation medicine and psychology experts were involved in the ongoing probe. 'The purpose of the AAIB's investigation and preliminary report is to provide information about what happened. At this stage, it is too early to reach any definite conclusions,' Yugandhar said on Thursday, urging the public and media to refrain from 'spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process.' He stressed that the AAIB was investigating the crash 'in a rigorous and most professional manner' under the Aircraft (Investigation of Accidents and Incidents) Rules, 2017, which govern India's obligations under international aviation protocols, notably ICAO's Annex 13. These rules lay down procedures for impartial, non-criminal investigations focused on safety improvement rather than blame. Yugandhar also underlined AAIB's track record, noting that it had investigated 92 accidents and 111 serious incidents since its inception in 2012. He called the AI171 crash 'the most devastating accident in recent aviation history' and said it had 'understandably drawn public attention and shock,' but this was not the time 'to create public anxiety or angst towards safety of the Indian aviation industry, particularly on the basis of unfounded facts.' He stated: 'AAIB appeals to all concerned to await publication of the Final Investigation Report after completion of the investigation. AAIB will also publish updates as and when required which have technical and public interest.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
34 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Why is China losing its shipbuilding dominance: Trump or global slowdown?
The longstanding dominance of China in the global shipbuilding industry has weakened sharply in the first half of 2025. Latest industry data, as cited by the South China Morning Post, shows that Chinese shipyards — which traditionally account for the largest share of new ship orders globally — have recorded a steep fall in new business this year. According to Clarksons Research, new ship orders for Chinese shipyards plunged 68 per cent year-on-year to 26.3 million deadweight tonnes (dwt) in the first six months of 2025. This marks one of the steepest declines in recent years. In contrast, South Korea — world's second-largest shipbuilding nation — saw a relatively modest drop of 7 per cent over the same period, receiving new orders totalling 14.2 million dwt, the report said. Who is replacing China's shipbuilding dominance? Although South Korea also experienced a drop in orders, it narrowed the gap to China in relative terms. China's share of global new ship orders in the first half of 2025 fell from 75 per cent to 56 per cent year-on-year. South Korea's share rose from 14 per cent to 30 per cent over the same period. Although China still remains the largest volume player, this represents a substantial rebalancing of the global shipbuilding market. Experts included in the report suggested that Korean and Japanese shipyards have benefited from shipowners' decisions to build boats outside of China based on increased geopolitical tension. South Korea's major players, including Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI) and Hanwha Ocean, have also increased their presence in the US market. Both companies have been bidding for contracts related to the maintenance and overhaul of US Navy vessels since 2024. In April this year, HHI signed an agreement to share technology and cooperate with Huntington Ingalls Industries, the largest military shipbuilder in the US. Are Trump's tariffs hurting Chinese shipyards? The report pointed to a combination of factors behind China's falling market share. One of the clearest drivers has been the series of measures by the Donald Trump-led US administration targeting China's shipbuilding sector. In April this year, the US imposed steep fees on ships owned, operated or built by Chinese companies entering American ports. Additional tariffs on Chinese-made equipment used in shipbuilding, including ship-to-shore cranes, have further strained Chinese shipyards' competitiveness. While these restrictions have met with resistance from industry groups, market data suggests they are beginning to have an effect. Beyond ship construction, Chinese shipyards are also losing ground in repair and maintenance services. Data shows China's share of repair work for very large crude carriers (VLCCs) fell from an average of 70 per cent between 2021 and 2024 to around 50 per cent in the first half of 2025. Is weakening global demand affecting Chinese shipbuilding? The US restrictions alone do not fully explain the shift. Analysts cited by South China Morning Post note that a cyclical decline in global shipbuilding demand is also impacting Chinese yards disproportionately. During the demand boom between 2021 and 2024, excess orders typically spilled over from capacity-limited Korean and Japanese yards to China's more flexible shipbuilders. However, with global new orders slowing in 2025, that spillover effect has diminished. Shipowners reportedly prefer Korean or Japanese-built vessels as they fetch higher resale values on the second-hand market, further compounding the downturn for Chinese shipyards. Despite the current slump, larger Chinese shipyards are expected to remain resilient. However, the outlook is less certain for smaller, private yards with weaker order books.
