
Report On TFFF Exposes Flaws, Urges Real Forest Protection
TFFF expected to be launched at COP30 in Brazil
UTRECHT/LA PAZ, 24 APRIL 2025 –NGOs including forest people's rights groups are raising deep concerns about a new $125 billion market mechanism called the Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF) that has been proposed to incentivise the preservation of tropical forests and is expected to launch at this year's UN Climate Conference (COP30) in Belém. It is being spearheaded by the governments of Brazil, Indonesia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), which contain more than half of the world's rainforests.
A new report from the Global Forest Coalition (GFC) and Fundación Solón explains what is known so far about the TFFF and highlights many questions that are cause for alarm. These include whether allocating just $4 per hectare of jungle could solve the 'market failure' that TFFF proponents claim is behind deforestation, and why the future of tropical forests should have to rely on private investment while public funding increasingly goes to high-emission sectors such as the military.
'Forests are not commodities to be traded on financial markets,' said Mary Louise Malig, GFC policy director and co-author of the report. 'They are complex living ecosystems with intrinsic value, essential to the livelihoods of countless communities and the health of our planet. The TFFF reduces their worth to a mere dollar-per-hectare figure, which is not only wholly inadequate but fundamentally misguided.'
'The climate emergency is not a market failure but a failure of governance and responsibility. We need to confront the structural drivers of deforestation and invest in real solutions that empower local communities,' added Pablo Solón, director of Fundación Solón and co-author of the report. 'Climate finance has long-since been co-opted by corporate interests, and the TFFF is no different — the alarm bells should be ringing for us all. The TFFF is a shiny new tool for greenwashing, designed to attract investment rather than tackle the systemic drivers of deforestation.'
Market mechanisms like carbon trading and offsets have proven to be a flawed way of helping frontline communities and instead allow polluters to continue business as usual. This is why they are known among civil society as false solutions; they ignore the root causes of the climate and biodiversity crisis.
'By sidelining Indigenous voices and decision-making power, particularly women, the TFFF perpetuates the same systems of governance that have historically oppressed these communities,' explained Kwami Kpondzo, a campaign coordinator at GFC. 'Forest conservation mechanisms must take into consideration Indigenous traditional knowledge and prioritise the rights and needs of Indigenous Peoples, local communities, Afro-descendant peoples, women, and youth who manage over half of the world's remaining intact forests.'
The new report on the TFFF also champions the establishment of an alternative non-market finance mechanism that provides sustainable funding levels directly to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities. 'The climate crisis cannot be solved by mechanisms that perpetuate inequality,' said Satrio Manggala of GFC member organisation WALHI Indonesia. 'We need solutions that give direct power to Indigenous Peoples and women, who are the true stewards of our forests, rather than sidelining them in favour of market-driven approaches.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
UN Experts Urge Brazil To Halt Serious Regression On Environmental Licensing
UN human rights experts* today expressed grave concern over Brazil's General Environmental Licensing Bill approved by the Chamber of Deputies on 17 July and by the Senate last May. The law is pending presidential enactment. 'The bill introduces significant regressions to Brazil's environmental licensing system and threatens the human rights to life, health, an adequate standard of living, and a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment,' the experts said. The approved licensing bill PL No. 2159/2021 includes measures such as simplified environmental licensing through developers' self-declarations and automatic renewal of permits. Several activities would also be exempt from licensing despite potentially severe environmental and human rights impacts, including industrial agriculture and energy-related infrastructure. 'These changes risk exacerbating the planetary crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, toxic pollution, and worsening inequalities. They would also weaken the rights to access to information, public participation, and access to justice, particularly for marginalised peoples and groups,' the experts said. They stressed that the licensing amendments would disproportionately affect Indigenous Peoples, and Quilombola Afro-descendant communities, who are already severely impacted by environmental and climate harms, violating Brazil's obligations of non-discrimination. 'While procedural efficiency in environmental licensing is important, it must not be achieved at the expense of effective regulations, controls and monitoring, and accountability, and human rights and environmental protections,' the experts said. They noted that Brazil's obligations to prevent significant environmental harm by public and private actors, including to prevent transboundary environmental harm, encompasses conducting comprehensive and integral environmental, social and human rights impact assessments before authorising any activity that threatens human rights or the environment. 'This legislative rollback contradicts Brazil's international legal obligations,' the experts said. 'It is paradoxical that this law might be enacted shortly after historic Advisory Opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which clarified States' obligations to adopt all necessary measures to respond to the climate emergency and prevent harm by all actors, including effective regulation and supervision relating to fossil fuels, agriculture and deforestation.' The experts reaffirmed that the principle of non-regression is fundamental to international human rights and environmental law, requiring States to refrain from weakening existing legal protections. 'As the ICJ and the IACtHR underscored, States have an enhanced due diligence obligation to protect the climate system and the environment on which all human rights depend, and must prevent irreversible harm to the climate and life-supporting systems,' they said. The experts warned that the bill would undermine Brazil's credibility as the host of the upcoming COP30, the 2025 UN Climate Change Conference in Belém. As a global climate leader, Brazil must ensure that its domestic legislation is aligned with its international commitments, including under the Paris Agreement. We call on President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to veto parts of the licensing bill that contradict Brazil's constitutional and international obligations. Protecting the environment is essential to safeguarding the rights and dignity of present and future generations. * Experts: Astrid Puentes Riaño, the Special Rapporteur on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment; Pedro Arrojo-Agudo, the Special Rapporteur on the human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation ; Elisa Morgera, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights in the context of climate change; Bina D'Costa, the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent; Albert K. Barume, the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; Pichamon Yeophantong, the Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises


Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Pacific Scholars Applaud International Ruling On Climate Change
Press Release – Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that countries can be held legally accountable for greenhouse gas emissions has been welcomed by Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa – Centre for Pacific and Global Health. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling welcomed by Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa – Centre for Pacific and Global Health. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that countries can be held legally accountable for greenhouse gas emissions has been welcomed by Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa – Centre for Pacific and Global Health. Co-Director Li'amanaia Dr Roannie Ng Shiu commended Pacific youth and Pacific communities for their leadership and perseverance over six years of advocacy. She says their leadership demonstrated the power of young Pacific voices to shape international systems and call the world to account. 'We extend our congratulations to the Pacific youth, student leaders and our Pacific communities in the region whose courageous advocacy and strategic vision led to this moment.' 'Their tireless efforts – supported by a coalition of Pacific governments, civil society, and legal experts – have resulted in a global legal affirmation that states have clear obligations to act on climate change.' The legal campaign, led by Vanuatu, was initiated by the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC). Its president, Cynthia Houniuhi, visited the University of Auckland's Fale Pasifika two years ago as a guest panelist for Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa's Pacific Transnational Leadership Panel, where she joined regional leaders in discussing the future of Pacific cooperation. Dr Ng Shiu praised the leadership of Houniuhi and the cultural integrity of the campaign. 'This opinion stems from a journey led by Pacific students and communities, speaking from lived experience – rising sea levels, disrupted ecosystems, and the health and social impacts already affecting their families.' That journey has now yielded a decision that will influence global climate action for years to come, says Ng Shiu. 'As a young Pacific female and student, she epitomizes what it means to make the impossible possible and to redefine leadership. She's quiet and humble, but when she speaks, it's deeply impactful. In a world that often celebrates loud and assertive voices, Cynthia's thoughtful approach stands out. 'Her leadership, and the way the ICJ campaign was conducted, reflects not just climate justice but also cultural ethics. The integration of storytelling and community engagement ensures that people hear, understand, and embrace the message. This is promising for Indigenous and Pacific peoples – our ways of knowing and being are being valued by institutions like the ICJ. 'This ruling is not just about empowerment, but also accountability. It sends a message to powerful nations that passing the buck is no longer acceptable.' Speaking from the Netherlands following the ICJ's advisory opinion, Cynthia Houniuhi responded with heartfelt emotion and pride, saying it marked a significant milestone in a youth-led campaign that began in the Pacific. 'This journey has been tough but deeply rewarding,' says Houniuhi. 'It's the relationships we've built along the way that have carried us. This victory belongs to all of us – especially those in rural communities who supported this work but couldn't be here to witness it.' Houniuhi emphasized the importance of communicating the technical decision in ways that resonate with local communities. 'We're committed to going back and speaking with our people – to show them that their hope was not misplaced.' Despite challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the campaign adapted through digital platforms, maintaining momentum and building resilience. Houniuhi highlighted the courage and unity of Pacific youth and governments, and the importance of inclusive, community-driven advocacy. 'Our campaign has always been about collective effort. We walk toward a community goal, not individual recognition. That's our strength.' Emphasizing a collective approach over an individual focus, saw the campaign maintain ancestral storytelling traditions. 'In our advocacy, we used different aspects of our traditions as well as culture, even appearing in the courtroom using the power of wearing our own traditional attire.' She says they had to obtain permission from their chiefs in order to share their sacred stories in court submissions, ensuring cultural protocols were respected. Looking ahead, Houniuhi is seeking greater Pacific representation in international spaces such as COP and the UN General Assembly, and urges more Pacific lawyers, academics, and advocates to engage with the ICJ opinion. 'We need more Pacific voices telling our stories – not others speaking on our behalf. This is our advice, our opinion, and our future.' As the movement enters its next phase, Houniuhi's own journey continues – she hopes to pursue PhD studies at the University of Auckland, further strengthening the Pacific voice in global climate discourse. 'Barriers have already been broken. Round two – let's go.'


Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Pacific Scholars Applaud International Ruling On Climate Change
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling welcomed by Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa - Centre for Pacific and Global Health. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that countries can be held legally accountable for greenhouse gas emissions has been welcomed by Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa - Centre for Pacific and Global Health. Co-Director Li'amanaia Dr Roannie Ng Shiu commended Pacific youth and Pacific communities for their leadership and perseverance over six years of advocacy. She says their leadership demonstrated the power of young Pacific voices to shape international systems and call the world to account. 'We extend our congratulations to the Pacific youth, student leaders and our Pacific communities in the region whose courageous advocacy and strategic vision led to this moment.' 'Their tireless efforts - supported by a coalition of Pacific governments, civil society, and legal experts - have resulted in a global legal affirmation that states have clear obligations to act on climate change." The legal campaign, led by Vanuatu, was initiated by the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change (PISFCC). Its president, Cynthia Houniuhi, visited the University of Auckland's Fale Pasifika two years ago as a guest panelist for Te Poutoko Ora a Kiwa's Pacific Transnational Leadership Panel, where she joined regional leaders in discussing the future of Pacific cooperation. Dr Ng Shiu praised the leadership of Houniuhi and the cultural integrity of the campaign. 'This opinion stems from a journey led by Pacific students and communities, speaking from lived experience - rising sea levels, disrupted ecosystems, and the health and social impacts already affecting their families." That journey has now yielded a decision that will influence global climate action for years to come, says Ng Shiu. "As a young Pacific female and student, she epitomizes what it means to make the impossible possible and to redefine leadership. She's quiet and humble, but when she speaks, it's deeply impactful. In a world that often celebrates loud and assertive voices, Cynthia's thoughtful approach stands out. 'Her leadership, and the way the ICJ campaign was conducted, reflects not just climate justice but also cultural ethics. The integration of storytelling and community engagement ensures that people hear, understand, and embrace the message. This is promising for Indigenous and Pacific peoples - our ways of knowing and being are being valued by institutions like the ICJ. 'This ruling is not just about empowerment, but also accountability. It sends a message to powerful nations that passing the buck is no longer acceptable." Speaking from the Netherlands following the ICJ's advisory opinion, Cynthia Houniuhi responded with heartfelt emotion and pride, saying it marked a significant milestone in a youth-led campaign that began in the Pacific. 'This journey has been tough but deeply rewarding,' says Houniuhi. 'It's the relationships we've built along the way that have carried us. This victory belongs to all of us - especially those in rural communities who supported this work but couldn't be here to witness it.' Houniuhi emphasized the importance of communicating the technical decision in ways that resonate with local communities. 'We're committed to going back and speaking with our people - to show them that their hope was not misplaced.' Despite challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the campaign adapted through digital platforms, maintaining momentum and building resilience. Houniuhi highlighted the courage and unity of Pacific youth and governments, and the importance of inclusive, community-driven advocacy. 'Our campaign has always been about collective effort. We walk toward a community goal, not individual recognition. That's our strength.' Emphasizing a collective approach over an individual focus, saw the campaign maintain ancestral storytelling traditions. 'In our advocacy, we used different aspects of our traditions as well as culture, even appearing in the courtroom using the power of wearing our own traditional attire.' She says they had to obtain permission from their chiefs in order to share their sacred stories in court submissions, ensuring cultural protocols were respected. Looking ahead, Houniuhi is seeking greater Pacific representation in international spaces such as COP and the UN General Assembly, and urges more Pacific lawyers, academics, and advocates to engage with the ICJ opinion. 'We need more Pacific voices telling our stories - not others speaking on our behalf. This is our advice, our opinion, and our future.' As the movement enters its next phase, Houniuhi's own journey continues - she hopes to pursue PhD studies at the University of Auckland, further strengthening the Pacific voice in global climate discourse. 'Barriers have already been broken. Round two - let's go.'