Oil rises as tight market supports despite big OPEC+ hike
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, a group known as OPEC+, agreed on Saturday to raise production by 548,000 barrels per day in August, more than the 411,000 bpd hikes they made for the earlier three months.
Brent crude futures fell as low as $67.22 a barrel but by 1320 GMT were up 88 cents, or 1.3 per cent, to $69.18. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $67.60, up 60 cents, or 0.9 per cent, and up from an earlier low of $65.40.
"For now, the oil market remains tight, suggesting it can absorb additional barrels," said UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo.
The OPEC+ decision will bring nearly 80 per cent of the 2.2 million bpd voluntary cuts from eight OPEC producers back into the market, RBC Capital analysts, led by Helima Croft, said in a note.
However, the actual output increase has been smaller than planned so far and most of the supply has been from Saudi Arabia, they added.
In a show of confidence about oil demand, Saudi Arabia on Sunday raised the August price for its flagship Arab Light crude to a four-month high for Asia.
Goldman analysts expect OPEC+ to announce a final 550,000 bpd increase for September at the next meeting on August 3.
Oil had also come under pressure as U.S. officials flagged a delay on when tariffs would begin but failed to provide details on changes to the rates that will be imposed. Investors are worried higher tariffs could slow economic activity and oil demand.
"Concerns over Trump's tariffs continue to be the broad theme in the second half of 2025, with dollar weakness the only support for oil for now," said Priyanka Sachdeva, a senior market analyst at Phillip Nova.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
12 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
20 y/o Singaporean says older generations' idea of job security — committing to a 9-6 full-time job — is outdated for Gen Zs like him in the age of AI
SINGAPORE: In a world where artificial intelligence writes your emails, edits your videos, and even analyses your spreadsheets, is a traditional full-time job still worth committing to? According to 20-year-old Amos Lau, a Gen Z Singaporean, that question haunts many of his peers. In a candid Letter to the Editor published by The Business Times , Amos doesn't mince words: 'I'll admit it: I'm afraid to commit to a traditional full-time job.' It's not fear of hard work or lack of ambition. It's the creeping anxiety that comes from watching artificial intelligence (AI) evolve faster than you can update your resume, and Amos isn't alone… AI is here – and it's moving fast 'McKinsey's report that 92% of companies will increase their AI investment over the next three years says everything,' Amos writes. 'The AI wave is no longer on the horizon — it's here,' he warned. And Amos would know. As a marketing student, he's already well-acquainted with the AI arsenal: ChatGPT for writing and copy ideas Invideo AI for automating video creation Excel GPTs for data processing and spreadsheet automation These are the very tools that promise to make work easier, but for Amos and many in Gen Z, they also present a silent threat: If AI can do what I'm training to do — and do it faster — why would a company hire me at all? The great Gen Z career dilemma Older generations often preach the gospel of the 9-to-6: climb the ladder, stash away Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings, chase that 'dream job' title. However, to Amos and his peers, that formula seems increasingly detached from reality. See also Robert Downey Jr talks about leaving MCU 'As a 20-something in Singapore, I often hear older generations talk about job security, retirement savings, or climbing the corporate ladder,' he says. 'But for many in my generation, those ideas feel increasingly outdated — if not completely out of reach.' Amos raises some serious questions that strike a nerve for many young adults: 'If AI can write, design, and even strategise at scale, where does my human value lie?' 'Is it worth specialising in something today if AI could automate it tomorrow?' 'Should I take a full-time job when the skills I'm hired for may be obsolete before I get promoted?' These aren't abstract musings. They're daily roadblocks for Gen Z workers stepping into an unpredictable world of work. The rise of the portfolio generation Instead of betting everything on one job or one title, Amos says many of his peers are opting for what some have dubbed 'portfolio careers.' That means: Freelancing across industries Picking up short-term micro-skills Switching fields as needed Learning fast, pivoting faster On the surface, it sounds like a dream: freedom, flexibility, and creative control, but beneath the surface? Exhaustion, instability, and an identity crisis. 'This agility comes with its own cost,' Amos admits. 'Instability, burnout, and the fear of never becoming truly 'expert' at anything,' he fears. Why skilling isn't the same as stability Everyone's talking about 'upskilling' or 'reskilling' — government grants, SkillsFuture credits, and corporate training sessions galore. However, Amos believes these aren't always enough. AI is accelerating faster than these programmes can keep pace. And no certificate, no matter how shiny, guarantees long-term employability anymore. See also Concerns over fraud protection grow among Singapore bank customers 'We need not just skilling pathways,' he writes, 'but also realistic conversations about what long-term employability looks like in an age where technology evolves faster than training programmes can keep up.' This call for honesty — not just hype — might be the most important thing Gen Z is asking for right now. Commitment issues or conscious caution? Amos isn't rejecting the idea of work. He's rejecting the outdated blueprint of what work should look like. 'Until we bridge that gap,' he warns, 'don't be surprised if more Gen Zs like myself hesitate to sign on to the traditional 9-to-6 contract – not out of disinterest, but out of deep uncertainty.' In other words, Gen Z isn't lazy. They're calculating — and not without reason. If a 9-to-6 job no longer offers stability, financial security, or even the promise of professional growth, then why sign the dotted line? Are we witnessing the slow death of the traditional career? For decades, a full-time job has been the cornerstone of adulthood, but Amos Lau's letter is a sign that this cornerstone may be cracking under the weight of modern uncertainty. His generation is growing up with: Economic unpredictability (hello, inflation and housing prices) AI-powered disruption (from blue-collar to white-collar jobs) Social media-fuelled career comparisons (the 'LinkedIn hustle culture' effect) Put all that together, and it's no wonder Gen Z is having second thoughts. What needs to change? Amos isn't asking for pity. He's asking for change, and maybe, the ball is now in the court of employers, educators, and policymakers to: Redefine job roles to emphasise irreplaceable human traits (like emotional intelligence and ethical judgment) Design adaptable, modular career paths Prioritise psychological safety and flexibility over rigid KPIs And most importantly, listen to what young workers are actually saying See also Tech Titans Collaborating To Shape The Future Of Ai Because if Amos' letter proves anything, it's that Gen Z isn't afraid of hard work — they're just afraid of becoming obsolete in a system that refuses to adapt. AI might be the elephant in every boardroom today, but for Gen Z, it's the shadow that follows them from school into the job market. If we want to future-proof the workforce, we need more than just tech tools and training manuals — we need radical honesty, bold reinvention, and mutual empathy across generations. And it starts by listening to voices like Amos Lau's. In other news, just like Amos' peers who are opting for 'portfolio careers,' another Gen Z, Kevin Quah, a Singaporean young millionaire, peeled back the hood on what it actually takes to build a million-dollar business. 'I'm not a stock market expert,' he said, adding that what financially worked for him most was building something useful and meaningful, such as connecting AI with real-world, everyday needs, including empowering senior citizens, people with disabilities, and underprivileged communities. You can read his full story here: 'You don't need to be a stock market expert to get rich' — Young Singaporean millionaire reveals how solving problems of others with AI led to his first million
Independent Singapore
13 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
RHB: SGX securities daily average value to increase 9% YoY in FY2026, with growth continuing into 2027
Photo: Depositphotos/tang90246 SINGAPORE: The Singapore Exchange (SGX) is on track for further growth in securities trading activity, with its securities daily average value (SDAV) forecasted to jump 9% year-on-year (YoY) in FY2026 and 4% in FY2027, Singapore Business Review reported, citing a report by RHB. In FY2025, the SDAV surged 27% to reach S$1.3 billion. In a report published on Thursday (July 10), RHB analyst Shekhar Jaiswal stated that the growth momentum is expected to continue, backed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)-led initiatives to broaden equity participation beyond Straits Times Index (STI) stocks. Mr Jaiswal said SGX will likely benefit from elevated near-term market volatility, with higher securities turnover supported by MAS-led equity market initiatives. SGX's operating revenue for the year is projected at S$616 million, while profit after tax and minority interests (PATMI) is expected to hit S$308 million. While the FY2026 yield remains 'unappealing,' even with a possible increase in payout ratio, Mr Jaiswal said there are 'upside risks to distributions.' /TISG Read also: S$701M exits Singapore banks in April as institutions turn to telecommunications and industrial stocks Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only) () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Independent Singapore
19 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Singapore HDB flats dubbed most 'attainable' homes among APAC's capital cities, but netizen says 'must compare until it's affordable'
Photo: Depositphotos/tang90246 Featured News Property Singapore News SINGAPORE: Singapore's Housing & Development Board (HDB) flats have been named the 'most attainable homes' among Asia Pacific's (APAC's) capital cities, according to the 2025 Urban Land Institute (ULI) Asia Pacific Home Attainability Index. While it sounds like good news, many locals questioned what 'attainable' really means in Singapore, with one netizen remarking, 'Must compare to other countries until it's affordable.' Singapore Business Review reported that ULI defined 'attainable' housing as homes costing no more than five times the median annual household income, which is consistently met by HDB flats. Notably, among 51 urban housing markets surveyed, only seven were found to offer attainable home ownership, and Singapore's HDB system was the only one in a national capital. Despite rising urban costs across the region, the report found that the city-state's public housing system, which houses 80% of the population, remains within reach for median-income Singaporean households, compared to those in Hong Kong, Tokyo, or Sydney. See also Speaker of Parliament Tan Chuan-Jin's family adopts stray kitten Still, some Singaporeans online said the housing prices in the city-state continue to rise. One said HDB flats are 'public housing, yet prices are so high.' Another wrote, 'Our HDB flats are getting so costly. I worry for the future generations. They will be slaves to the flat for the rest of their lives.' One commenter also pointed to the shrinking sizes of homes in the city-state, saying, 'Look at the new flat sizes. It is not liveable at all. Look up at the windows of the nice new flats. So many clothes [are] hanging there because [there is] no proper laundry space!' The ULI report explained, pointing to Singapore's HDB system, that 'Operating a similar scheme is more difficult in countries where the government has less control of freehold land.' While many cities in APAC face rising prices, limited land, and speculative demand, Singapore's centrally planned and subsidised housing has helped keep home ownership within reach for citizens, although access remains limited for non-citizens due to the 60% Additional Buyer's Stamp Duty on foreign buyers. /TISG Read also: 'Why Indonesia?': Singaporean couple share 5 reasons why they moved after their HDB MOP Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only) () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
