Gemini Pro Review: My Go-To AI Chatbot Costs $20 Per Month
9.0
/ 10
SCORE Google Gemini Pro Review
Pros Higher-quality responses
Accurate, with greatly reduced hallucinations
Connection to internet and to other Google services
Fast image generation
2TB cloud storage Cons Can still make logical errors
Coding assist can make repeated mistakes
Failed certain obscure requests
Google Gemini Pro Review
9/10/10 CNET Score
If the Gemini twins in Greek mythology are meant to guide sailors, then the name Google gave to its AI chatbot finally matches its demigodly ambitions. Compared to when I tested it last year, Gemini has seen tremendous improvements in accuracy and usefulness.
While the free version of Gemini is highly capable and is good for most use cases, the paid version I'm reviewing here brings a more powerful AI model that can handle requests of higher complexity with greater "reasoning" abilities. I've found responses to be more informative, with greater nuance. Where 2.5 Flash aims to be a light model that can output answers quickly at little cost, 2.5 Pro takes the extra processing time to give better outputs.
At $20 per month, Gemini Pro is worth the upgrade for people looking to accomplish more-complex research and coding tasks, or who want a deeper AI model to communicate with. Considering that a Gemini Pro subscription also comes with 2TB of cloud storage, along with some video generation tools, it could easily become a justifiable expense for some people.
At the same time, Gemini isn't all-knowing. It still can make some logical mistakes, because AI chatbots don't truly understand the world around them. They're highly complex autocomplete tools and, as a result, can get information wrong because they don't experience the world like we do.
Compared with ChatGPT Plus, Gemini Pro can still lag behind in some scenarios, despite its numerous improvements and further integrations with other Google services, such as Search and Maps.
What Google ultimately delivers is a highly capable AI chatbot that can handle a wide host of challenges. From coding to research, Gemini can handle pretty much anything thrown at it. Both ChatGPT Plus, specifically the "reasoning" o3 model, and Gemini Pro offer tremendous functionality, and differentiating between the two comes down to very specific use cases.
How CNET reviews AI models
Last year, I treated my reviews of AI chatbots as if I were reviewing any other tech product at CNET, running a series of comparison tests to see which came out on top. Though that's a handy way to test camera quality between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, it's a little less useful when reviewing AI chatbots.
Because AI chatbots are machines that can do practically anything, performing side-by-side A-B testing isn't indicative of how most people interact with AI. Imagine if I were reviewing Google Search and Bing. In this scenario, it would make sense to do comparative searches and record my results. But AI chatbots don't work like traditional online search, which indexes sites to pull up the most relevant results. AIs give novel answers to every question asked, even if it's the same question. It makes standard comparative testing less of a reflection of real-world use.
This year, I'm opting for a more experiential approach. It's less scientific, sure, but I feel it gives a better sense of the vibe each AI chatbot brings. And considering that Google, OpenAI, Anthropic and others want to give their AI chatbots a bit of a personality, unpacking that vibe is core to evaluating the AI experience.
Research and accuracy
Compared with 2024, Gemini Pro is leagues more accurate this year. It seldom makes up facts or links to nonexistent YouTube videos, as the previous version did during my tests last year. Google has also done a much better job of integrating information gathered via Search to pull up the most relevant sourcing.
To test how Gemini could help me research current events, I asked the chatbot to analyze talking points from the recent New York mayoral primary. It did an excellent job of pulling together facts with proper sourcing, including Radio Free Europe, PBS, official government sources and, in some instances, YouTube videos from major news channels. Because Google owns YouTube, Gemini can link directly to any of the site's vast trove of videos. That gives Google an edge over the companies behind other AI engines. YouTube, by default, blocks creators from allowing their videos to be used for AI training. Other AI companies have crawled YouTube to train their models, a practice that violated YouTube's terms of service.
Something I've found particularly handy is using Gemini as a sounding board for some of my crazier ideas. I own a wide selection of video game consoles, all plugged into my television with multiple HDMI switches and power strips. I asked Gemini if it would be possible to make a superlong HDMI switch that could fit more than 20 devices. Gemini explained that creating a circuit board that could handle 4K, HDR and high refresh rates across multiple inputs would be extremely challenging and beyond the scope of a DIY project.
When I asked Gemini to create a schematic of what this project might look like, it attempted to do so with ASCII characters but ultimately failed.
Google Gemini Pro fails at making a schematic for a 24-port HDMI switch.
Imad Khan/CNET
At least Gemini is real with me.
Despite Gemini's accuracy, it doesn't understand the world around it. I've recently been trying to cut more sugar out of my diet, (apologies to my local bubble tea shop). I've been wanting to make a basic milk tea using monkfruit sweetener and nondairy creamer. I asked Gemini to create me a healthy milk tea recipe, but it didn't work out so well.
Gemini suggested I make a tea base with one cup of water and two bags of black tea. For sweetness, Gemini said to add only 1 tablespoon of monkfruit sweetener. That, plus three-quarters of a cup of milk and 1 to 2 tablespoons of creamer would create that ideal low-calorie milk tea.
The result was a chunky mess. After I used these exact measurements, I found that the drink wasn't anywhere sweet enough and that the creamer-to-liquid ratio was all off, leading to clumps in the final product. Gemini has never sipped bubble tea before, so it makes sense that it doesn't understand what 2 tablespoons of nondairy creamer would do in only 14 ounces of liquid.
Gemini's 'vibe coding' blew me away
I'm not a coder. Back in college, I took an introductory Python course and after much struggle managed to get a C. But with AI chatbots, you don't need to be a coding wiz, or even know how to display "Hello World" at all. With Gemini Pro, I was able to make a fully functioning Chrome extension with virtually no experience (I didn't test coding with Gemini Free).
Vibe coding is a term that essentially means to code by talking it out. You express to an AI what you're hoping to accomplish, and through your back-and-forth conversation, the AI will generate the code and help you get a program up and running.
I vibe coded with Gemini, and not only was the experience fascinating and a lot of fun, I also found it to be just as impactful as when I used ChatGPT for the first time in late 2023.
(Gemini isn't the only AI chatbot with coding assistance. All the other major AI chatbots tout their coding capabilities. But Gemini Pro is the first I've meaningfully tested for that purpose.)
I asked Gemini to build me a tool that could scan my articles and add appropriate links to other CNET articles. In my conversation with Gemini to build and test the tool, I explained in plain language any issues, and Gemini would come up with a solution and fix the code.
It wasn't a perfect experience, though. There were instances when Gemini would generate an updated piece of code only to leave out a feature that was in the prior version. I'd then ask Gemini where that feature went, and it would apologize and fix the code.
Interestingly, when we'd hit roadblocks and I'd suggest that maybe the feature I was envisioning was simply too difficult to implement, Gemini would push back. It would say the feature was still totally doable and would generate revised code. This back-and-forth would go on until Gemini got it right.
The larger computer science job market is currently going through an upheaval as Big Tech executives continue laying off thousands of workers while boasting about how much coding AI is doing. After using Gemini to code, I understand why students are worried.
Regardless, coding with Gemini has changed my understanding of the power of AI chatbots, and I plan to vibe code more as part of the testing I do for reviews.
Gemini Pro is (surprisingly) worse than ChatGPT for shopping
Searching for any product on Google Search leads to an obnoxious mix of product carousels and sponsored listings, drowning out all other reviews and articles (including CNET's). Considering how much Google invests in monetizing online shopping, it's surprising how quaint the product research is on Gemini by comparison. ChatGPT has a far more robust shopping experience.
Gemini is an excellent tool for basic product research. When I asked it to compare various models of Panasonic micro four-thirds cameras, for example, Gemini could pull up models that met my specifications and could tabulate their features in a handy list when asked. It could add more products to that list as I continued to fall down the DSLR rabbit hole.
At the same time, unlike ChatGPT, it doesn't provide links to stores and it doesn't incorporate images. Product research on Gemini required me to have a separate Google Search window open just so I could see current pricing and what various camera models looked like, side by side. Gemini can also sometimes get product details wrong. But ChatGPT would also link to incorrect products.
Shopping is one of those instances where Gemini needs to act less like an AI chatbot and more like Google Search. I looked for a piece of furniture to hold my record player and store my vinyl, and Gemini gave me a guide to what to look for when shopping but didn't actually recommend any products. Jumping over to ChatGPT, it was an entirely different experience. There, it was like I was working with a sales associate at a furniture store, going through the various options to find something that fit my needs.
Image generation: At least it's better than Gemini Free
I didn't extensively test image generation with Gemini Pro, but I found it more than adequate for basic tasks. (CNET will have a separate hands-on of Google's various image and video generation tools.) At the very least, when compared with Gemini Free, Gemini Pro did a better job of following my intent when creating images.
Like with my Gemini Free review, I wanted to create a nostalgic image that evoked the feeling of playing a Game Boy on a late night drive in the back seat of a car. Gemini Pro got it on the first go.
Google Gemini Pro generates an image of a boy playing his Game Boy in the backseat of a car at night.
Imad Khan/CNET
My prompt that generated the image above: "I want to create an image. One that evokes a feeling of nostalgia. The image is that of a boy playing his Game Boy in the back of his parents' car on a long road trip at night. Because the screen isn't backlit, he's sitting near the window, trying to catch whatever passing light he can to see where to go. This image should use cool colors accented by the warmth of the light entering in. Feature anime-style artwork with a slight Western design. Should feel hand-drawn with intricately detailed linework. Analog VHS distortion. '90s cartoon aesthetic."
My experience with Gemini Free image generation was much more frustrating. The model simply didn't understand world logic and would often place the boy in the front seat facing backward, or with surrounding vehicles driving in the wrong direction. Eventually, I gave up.
Redemption
Google's done it. After Bard's dismal launch and a bumpy rebrand as Gemini, the latest build of the company's AI chatbot can compete with the best from OpenAI. This time around, Gemini brings with it greater accuracy, collaborative capability, coding power and image generation to make an overall compelling product.
The Gemini 2.5 Pro model is simply better than the free Gemini Flash model. Answers have more nuance and density, and features like the image generator work considerably better. It's a tad annoying when Gemini will default to the Flash model even for Pro subscribers. I suspect it does so when traffic is high and Google is trying to lessen the load. It's easy enough to switch back, but you have to notice the switch to do so.
Compared with ChatGPT's o3 model, in particular, Gemini 2.5 Pro is faster while maintaining comparable answer quality. Google also says it has a 1 million token context window, which would dwarf what's been reported regarding ChatGPT. Being able to pull in data from other Google services gives Gemini another edge.
Gemini isn't perfect, however. It can still stumble with some types of queries, and using it for shopping is lackluster. Despite my qualms, I found myself increasingly reliant on Gemini, moving myself further away from Google Search.
AI is slowly moving Google away from being a search company to an answer company. Last year, Gemini's answers were too often wrong to be worth recommending. This time, I have much more confidence in Gemini's answers. Of course, if I ever publish anything incorrect, the responsibility will fall on me.
Ultimately, Gemini Pro acts as a professional and handy know-it-all assistant. It doesn't have the attitude of Claude or the controversy of Grok. Instead, it's there to help even if you find yourself giving up. It's that assertiveness that makes Gemini Pro a standout AI product.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
From Krispy Kreme to GoPro, has meme-stock trading frenzy returned?
Shares in struggling retailers and ageing consumer brands surged, as amateur traders cast aside Wall Street's skepticism and mobilized online. It's like 2021 all over again. But the latest meme-stock rally could be even bigger than its predecessor four years ago, when investors piled into recognizable but unloved stocks, such as the video games retailer GameStop and the movie theatre chain AMC, according to the founder of the Reddit forum that helped whip up the frenzy. Retailer Kohl's, camera firm GoPro, fast-food chain Wendy's and doughnut chain Krispy Kreme each staged rapid rallies this week, driven by abrupt surges in trading volume reminiscent of the the meme-stock craze of 2021, when social media memes boosted a collection of struggling stocks, triggering extraordinary and volatile leaps in value. Actress Sydney Sweeney helped bring clothing retailer American Eagle Outfitters into the mania after it was announced the Euphoria and White Lotus star would front the brand's latest marketing campaign. The company's shares surged about 10% in trading on Thursday. Meme stocks are 'about to leap-frog in size and scope and scale, so that retail traders are going to redefine what matters', according to Jaime Rogozinski, founder of the wallstreetbets Reddit forum behind many of the volatile rallies. 'The world of finance is clearly changing, with blockchain technologies encroaching, and AI agents that trade on their own,' he said. 'And the collective of retail traders is adapting along with it.' Rogozinski founded wallstreetbets in 2012, but said Reddit ousted him as a moderator in 2020. His bid to sue the social media company for trademark infringement was dismissed by the US court of appeals for the ninth circuit last month. The forum's users home in on stocks and share their own research. 'It's a decentralization of power of who can be financial analyst,' said Noor Al, a moderator on wallstreetbets. 'Great ideas can now come from anyone, anywhere. 'We're seeing the power of retail push stocks, sometimes to the tune of billions of dollars, through the power of ideas, the power of community and the power of the people,' he added. The meme-stock craze of 2021, which produced stars such as Roaring Kitty, was a product of the Covid era, when many amateur traders were stuck at home and flush with pandemic stimulus cash. Whether this latest frenzy produces similar winners is not yet clear. Kohl's finished the week up 32%, GoPro was up 66% and Krispy Kreme was up 41%. The rallies show some investors are willing to take on more risk, as stocks scale record highs and the market, dominated by big tech, becomes harder to beat. Often, meme-stock bets are unbound from economic fundamentals, as investors move to support a brand for romantic or ideological reasons. Donald Trump's Trump Media & Technology Group, home to Truth Social, is valued at more than $5bn on quarterly revenue of about $1m. The wallstreetbets ethos 'has always to some extent been about flaunting and exploiting the ironies, relevance or irrelevance' of the stock market, said Rogozinski, who pointed to Wendy's, the hamburger chain, as a good example. 'Wendy's has always been a meme that goes back a decade. It brings a smile to my face, because on Reddit there's always been this thing where they say: 'Sir, this is a Wendy's.' 'It's an inside joke, and I don't even get where it started. It's just a meme,' he added. The stock's fleeting rise – it rallied 10% in two days, but finished the week broadly flat – shows some retail investors do not necessarily care about the typical factors that drive the market, such as tariffs and war in the Middle East. 'It's this ability for us to almost make fun of the financial system.' Long-term institutional players will always get the last laugh, Rogozinski conceded, because prices will return to normal valuations. 'But in the short term there's lot of money to be had with this volatility, and the fact that stocks are able to move up and down with such ease is but a mere showcase for how the financial system needs a facelift in relevancy.' Related: Bed Bath & Beyond sees 'meme-stock' surge – but is it too little, too late? While current market conditions do not replicate the low interest rates and retail investor buoyancy of the Covid era, market records and a robust economy have made meme stocks attractive once again for some. 'You see all these indications where this is full-blown meme mania,' Brent Kochuba, founder of derivatives-data firm SpotGamma, told Bloomberg. 'The macro economic environment really favors the retail and speculative plays,' agreed Al. 'I think were only going to see more speculation and excitement. It's a good time to tune in, because retail players can react and provide insight faster.' Days traders are not necessarily bothered by a company's financial performance, said Rogozinski. 'You have this activist, elective investor who is saying, 'I don't care what the financial statements look like, I don't care what the discounted cashflow is, I like the food, I like the video-game store, I like the meme. So dude, you can go back to Excel spreadsheets if you want, but I really like the chicken tenders,'' he said. There is now a 'third component' to investment, beyond supply and demand, he claimed, 'which is, 'dude, I don't care if you think it's going to go up or not, or if they have assets or liabilities. I care about this company and I'm going to help it out. I'm going to go buy my jeans from American Eagle.'' Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Astronomer Hired Gwyneth Paltrow To Answer Questions After The CEO Was Allegedly Caught Cheating At A Coldplay Concert
Today in "News You Didn't See Coming," Gwyneth Paltrow was hired at Astronomer — yes, the same company that recently went viral after two of its employees were caught "having an affair" at a Coldplay concert. Related: As seen in now-infamous video, Coldplay singer and (Gwyneth's ex) Chris Martin was highlighting fans on the jumbotron at a recent concert when the camera cut to two people getting cozy in the audience. Realizing they were on camera, the two immediately panicked and hid, leading Chris to joke that they were "having an affair." As it turned out, they seemingly were. The man in the video was later identified as Astronomer CEO Andy Byron, who is reported to be married with two kids, while the woman, later identified as CPO Kristin Cabot, reportedly got a divorce in 2022. After widespread jokes and commentary about the video, an internal investigation was launched. Andy ultimately resigned from his role last week, while Kristin's departure was announced on Thursday. @instaagraace / Via Related: Then, in the plot twist of all plot twists, Gwyneth was announced as a "temporary spokesperson" for the tech company. She shared the news herself yesterday in a video statement posted to Astronomer's X account. "Thank you for your interest in Astronomer," Gwyneth began. "Hi, I'm Gwyneth Paltrow. I've been hired on a very temporary basis to speak on behalf of the 300-plus employees at Astronomer." She said, "Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days. And they wanted me to answer the most common ones." Related: Text then popped up on the screen, asking, "OMG what the actual f," which Gwyneth completely ignored to respond to a different question. "Yes, Astronomer is the best place to run Apace Airflow," she answered. "Unifying the experience of running data, ML, and AI pipelines at scale. We've been thrilled so many people have a newfound interest in data automation." She also said, "As for the other questions we've received — yes! There's still room available at our Beyond Analytics event in September. We will now be returning to what we do best, delivering game-changing results for our customers. Thank you for your interest in Astronomer." @astronomerio / Via Twitter: @astronomerio Viewers reacted to the video in the comments, with many calling it a "genius" and "brilliant" way to capitalize on all the publicity. "Turning an internet dragging of their CEO into a full-blown PR moment by bringing in Chris Martin's ex as a spokesperson? That's not marketing, that's wizardry," one tweet with over 4,000 likes read. "Guys this is a PR masterclass," another agreed, garnering over 12,000 likes. "You take the most viral moment of July 2025 and, instead of disaster control, make light of the situation and create the ultimate brand awareness. Bravo." Related: Someone else said it was "one of the best crisis responses" they've ever seen. "You hired the Coldplay singer's ex-wife. Extraordinary," said another. "Honestly, well done to the marketing team, this is incredible haha," one viewer wrote on Reddit, as others called it both a "brilliant" and "hilarious" move by the company. "This is so unserious, I love it," said one person, as another said it was "well-played." "Their social media and PR team all deserve a nice vacation far away from any upcoming Coldplay concerts," one more shared. Honestly, yes. Hopefully, Chris responds to this — I'm dying to know what he thinks! Until then, share your thoughts on all of this in the comments. Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI Could Replace Millions of Jobs: Robert Kiyosaki Shares How To Stay Safe
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance, it will have a significant impact on the workforce as we know it. According to a recent McKinsey report, 30% of hours currently worked across the U.S. economy could be automated by 2030, and a National University report found that 300 million jobs could be lost to AI globally. Check Out: Read Next: 'Rich Dad Poor Dad' author Robert Kiyosaki views this as a major cause for concern, especially for those who are just entering the workforce. 'AI will cause many 'smart students' to lose their jobs,' he shared on X. 'AI will cause massive unemployment. Many still have student loan debt.' However, all hope is not lost, as Kiyosaki offered his advice on how to prevent AI from eliminating your income. Robert Kiyosaki: AI Can't Take a Job That You Don't Have Kiyosaki isn't personally worried that AI advances will affect his cash flow. 'AI cannot fire me because I do not have a job,' he wrote. Kiyosaki bucked a traditional path to wealth and instead relies on his own business and investments for his income. 'Years ago, rather than listen to my poor dad's advice of 'Go to school, get good grades, get a job, pay taxes, get out of debt, save money, and invest in a well-diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds and mutual funds,' I followed my rich dad's advice,' he said. 'I became an entrepreneur, investing in real estate using debt, and instead of saving fake money, I have been saving real gold, silver and, today, bitcoin.' Learn More: Kiyosaki's Advice for AI-Proofing Your Wealth To avoid losing your income to AI, Kiyosaki advised workers to take action now to diversify their income sources. This means meandering off the typical path to wealth and focusing on earning money through entrepreneurship and investments rather than being reliant on an employer. 'Please take proactive action,' he wrote. 'Please do not be a victim of this time in history. Please take care, invest in your self and think for yourself. These are not ordinary times.' More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on AI Could Replace Millions of Jobs: Robert Kiyosaki Shares How To Stay Safe
