Schools' merger may endanger education in rural areas: SP Maurya
'There are plans to close primary and upper primary schools with less than 50 students. The government is calling it 'school merger', but the ground reality is something else. Such decisions can endanger the future of education in rural areas, especially for the children of poor, Dalit, tribal and backward classes,' he said speaking at a press conference at his residence here.
The former minister said the decision would deprive thousands of children of education. 'Moreover, it will have a huge impact on girls who may drop out by 90% in rural areas while 50% of the boys may drop out after this merger,' added Maurya.
'Farmers, labourers, Dalits, tribals and backward class people, who do not have resources, send their children to village schools. If these schools are closed, where will these children go...what will happen to the mid-day meal scheme? This decision is not only against Article 21A and 46 of the Constitution, but also anti-poor and anti-people,' he said.
The AJP chief requested the government to reconsider this decision in the interest of poor kids, saying: 'According to the Constitution, it is the government's responsibility to provide free and compulsory education to children between 6 and 14 years of age. This is covered under Article 21A and the Right to Education Act (RTE Act, 2009). In such a situation, closing schools is a direct violation of the Constitution.'
Maurya also asked the government not to engage teachers in other irrelevant works apart from teaching and urged chief minister Yogi Adityanath to review his decision. 'It seems this is a deliberate attempt to privatise the education system and prove that our teachers are ineffective,' alleged Maurya.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Internal quota: Various parameters of backwardness of each caste to be given weightage
The commission headed by retired judge H.N. Nagamohan Das, which is looking at internal reservation among the 101 Scheduled Castes (SCs) in Karnataka, is expected to recommend classifications taking into consideration the social, economic, educational, and employment backwardness of each caste, and not see them just as broad political groupings as Dalit 'left' (Madiga and allied castes) and Dalit 'right' (Holeya and allied castes). This will be beside giving due weightage to population size and representation. Currently, a similar method has been adopted in the classification of backward classes with castes grouped together as most backward, more backward, and backward categories based on the development indicators of the castes. The commission headed by Mr. Das has been asked to recommend an internal reservation to slice up the 17% reservation (enhanced from the earlier 15%) available for the SCs. Earlier slicing formula Incidentally, when the BJP government in 2022 announced internal reservation ahead of the 2023 Assembly elections, it had provided separate quota for Dalit 'left' and 'right' communities besides Korma, Koracha, and Lambani communities while providing 1% reservation for nomadic communities under the 'others' category based on population. 'Castes that can compete among equal castes in terms of backwardness are expected to be clubbed together. For example, nomadic and semi-nomadic communities, most of which fall in the most backward category, cannot be brought with castes that have moved up the ladder. Backwardness will be the prime mover, though the population size of the communities will also play a major factor. The Supreme Court in its order last year also placed backwardness and adequate representation as the basis for providing internal reservation,' sources in the commission said. 'Telangana, which recently came up with an internal reservation, has also classified castes into three categories based on backwardness. Also, the Constitution does not recognise the Dalit 'left' and Dalit 'right' groupings.' Sources said that of the 101 SCs in Karnataka, 88 castes, including 45 nomadic castes, are classified as micro-communities whose population, according to the 2011 Census, do not even constitute 10% of the total population. 'Their development indicators when compared with major SCs are lower.' The survey work to identify the population and their status in terms of employment, education, ownership of land and houses, political representation and other development indicators that started on May 5 is still under way. After the fourth extension, a new deadline of July 6 has been fixed to end the survey. Classification dilemma Sources said the dilemma over the classification of Adi Karnataka, Adi Andhra, and Adi Dravida is likely to continue despite the commission seeking the original caste names from those being surveyed. 'Many have continued to be associated with these colonial-era nomenclatures, which is currently the reason for confusion. A large number of households continue to hold these certificates, also because they do not know their original caste names,' said a source in the commission. Report by end of July The H.N. Nagamohan Das commission is expected to submit its report and recommendation on internal reservation before the end of July. Sources said the commission is expected to get the final figures of population data by July 7. 'Analysis work on various parameters is already under way, and by July third week the report is likely to be ready for submission. The data on the government employees to ascertain representation has also been received as well as from the State-run educational institutions,' said the source in the commission. Of the 1.16 crore projected population of SCs in the State, the survey has identified 1.07 crore or about 92%. Though the survey has progressed well across the State, it is lagging in Bengaluru where just about 52% or about 7.04 lakh population of the projected population of 13.62 lakh has been covered to far.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Modi ji, where are you?': Kharge slams PM's foreign policy, says 'India surrounded by enemies on all corners'
NEW DELHI: Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP-led NDA government, alleging that India's foreign policy under PM Modi is flawed and has led to deteriorating ties with neighbouring countries. Speaking at the 'Samajika Nyaya Samara Bheri' event in Hyderabad, Kharge said, 'His foreign policy is not good, because of which we have enemies from all corners. On one side, there is China and on the other, Pakistan. Today, Nepal is also distancing itself from us. Everybody is moving away from us.' The Congress chief said that despite visiting 42 countries, PM Modi has not visited Manipur, where ethnic violence has led to loss of life. 'He has travelled to 42 countries in the world, but so far he has not visited Manipur, where people are dying,' Kharge said. He accused PM Modi of neglecting domestic issues in favour of international appearances. 'Modi ji, where are you? He is visiting eight countries, but he's not looking towards his country's people. He is not looking at the farmers of this country,' he added. Kharge also alleged that the government under PM Modi has harmed the Indian economy over the last 11 years and undermined the Constitution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo 'He has ruined the country's economy and destroyed the Constitution,' he said. He further mocked the prime minister, saying, 'If someone gives Modi a cap or a medal he will wear it and go around,' urging that the focus should instead be on the welfare of farmers and the common people. Additionally, in a sharp attack on the RSS and BJP, Kharge referred to recent comments attributed to an RSS functionary suggesting the removal of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Constitution. 'I challenge them – be it him, their BJP, PM Modi or Amit Shah – no one can remove those words,' Kharge said. During his address in Hindi, he said: 'I heard that an RSS leader from Shimoga said that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' should be removed from the Constitution. I challenge all of them – BJP, PM Modi, Amit Shah – no one can do it.' Reading from the BJP's own organisational constitution, Kharge pointed out that the party's own document states allegiance to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy. 'If you hate secularism and socialism so much, why have you written it in your party's Constitution?' he asked. 'Your own party constitution says the BJP shall bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of India and to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy. Then why are you trying to remove these values now?' Kharge also cited past Indo-Pak conflicts while criticising the current government's posture. He said: 'You talk big about Pakistan. We helped them in the past. Then why did you back away? You say you ended the war between India and Pakistan. You say you calmed things down. Then why are you silent now, Prime Minister? Speak up. There is no need for Trump in India. We are strong, and we are ready to fight – just as Indira Gandhi once split Pakistan and created Bangladesh.' He urged PM Modi to stop misleading the people and to act decisively if the country's interests are at stake. 'If you had to act, you were in power, you could have. Don't mislead the country. Don't confuse the people,' he said.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
HC completes hearing, reserves verdict in school merger case
LUCKNOW The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on Friday reserved its judgement in the merger of schools case after a detailed hearing for two days, in which the petitioner sought stay on the government order for merger of primary schools and the state government justified its decision. Fifty-one students from Sitapur – 50 from a primary school and one from the upper primary section – approached the high court challenging the June 16 order of the state government for the merger of primary schools across UP. They moved the court through their guardian. (File Photo) A single-judge bench of Justice Pankaj Bhatia reserved the order on Friday evening after the state government presented its viewpoint, justifying the merger of schools. Hearing in the case began on Thursday. Additional advocate general (AAG) Anuj Kudesia and chief standing counsel (CSC) Shailendra Kumar Singh presented the state government's view in court. The government counsel apprised the court about such primary schools that have zero students. They also informed the court about primary schools where the strength of students was less than 15. Defending the merger of primary schools, the government counsel pointed out that the merger of schools was in the larger interest of students. They pointed out that there will be more social activity and scope for development for a student who is relocated from a school having a few students to a school having 300 students. Senior advocate LP Mishra and advocate Gaurav Melhotra represented the petitioners in court. Mishra argued that the state government's June 16 order for the merger of primary schools violates Article 21A of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to free and compulsory education for children between the ages of 6 and 14 years and a school within one km for a village having a population of 300. 'It makes primary education a fundamental right and makes the state duty-bound to provide free and compulsory education to all eligible children, and this right cannot be waived,' he added. 'The government is duty-bound to create resources for schools within these parameters,' Mishra argued in court. Fifty-one students from Sitapur – 50 from a primary school and one from the upper primary section – approached the high court challenging the June 16 order of the state government for the merger of primary schools across UP. They moved the court through their guardian. They opposed the merger, stating that it will cause difficulties for children who will have to travel farther to reach their new schools, affecting their right to free and compulsory education.
