Emir of Kano Muhammadu Sanusi: Nigerian police withdraw summons after outcry
Nigerian police have withdrawn a summons issued to one of the country's most respected traditional leaders after it was widely condemned.The emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi, is engaged in a tussle for the crown with his cousin Aminu Ado Bayero, who is said to enjoy the support of the national government.Prior to the recent Eid al-Fitr celebration, police in Kano banned the annual horse parade, or durbar, fearing trouble between supporters of the rival claimants.However, Sanusi chose to ride on horseback after Eid prayers, accompanied by local vigilantes.
This led to clashes between rivals groups which saw one man stabbed to death, prompting the police to order Sanusi to appear at the national police headquarters in the capital, Abuja.However, this prompted an outcry with many Nigerians saying it showed a lack of respect to the emirate, which is one of the oldest institutions in the country.Traditional leaders in Nigeria hold few constitutional powers but are able to exert significant influence as they are seen as custodians of both religion and tradition.In response to the strong reaction against the summons and following the intervention of "respected stakeholders", Nigeria's police chief said that officers would instead go to Kano to obtain Sanusi's statement.Sanusi returned to the Kano throne last year after he was ousted in 2020 for "insubordination'' to the then Kano state government under Abdullahi Ganduje.Sanusi, a former head of Nigeria's central bank, was reappointed by Kano's current Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf last May, and Bayero was sacked after four years as emir.However, some of Bayero's supporters have gone to court, maintaining he is the rightful emir.While Sanusi is living in the emir's official residence, Bayero is residing in one of the emirate's smaller palaces.
More Nigeria stories from the BBC:
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Gerry Adams to donate 100,000 euros to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams to donate 100,000 euros to Irish language and Palestinian charities Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement Gerry Adams (Image: Brian Lawless/PA ) Gerry Adams said he will donate the 100,000 euros (£84,000) he is to receive in damages from the BBC to charities that help children in Gaza, the homeless in Ireland and Irish language groups. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing "arrogance" when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Article continues below Mr Adams said: "As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. "These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast." He added: "When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. "They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. "The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. "They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. "Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. "They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. "In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. "On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson." He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. "They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? "Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. "In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. "Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid." Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying "slan agus tog go bog e", which means goodbye and take it easy. Article continues below Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain losing influence as Russian and Chinese media outspend BBC
Britain is losing influence to Russia and China as the hostile states' spending on media eclipses the BBC. Foreign Office officials have privately warned that the UK is at 'high risk' of losing global influence 'without harder-edged approaches'. They said: 'The UK still retains top rankings for strong influence within G20 countries, based on trustworthiness and independence of institutions – critical prerequisites for achieving hard goals of investment and security cooperation – but is losing influence in the Global South and emerging powers to Russia and China.' The comments, which were made in a presentation to the Government's soft power council (a body designed to help boost UK growth and security) earlier this year, were obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by soft power research agency CreativePower. The soft power council was launched in January with the aim of boosting Britain's global influence. It is chaired by Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, while members also include former ITV chairman Sir Peter Bazalgette, V&A boss Tristram Hunt and PR executive and former Remain campaigner Roland Rudd. While the officials did not explicitly mention the BBC, a separate report by CreativePower found that cuts to the BBC's World Service were opening the door to Russian and Chinese propaganda. Russia and China are believed to be spending as much as £8bn a year on growing media audiences, primarily in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. The BBC has significant reach in those regions, but the amounts being spent by hostile states dwarf the budget of the World Service, which stood at £366m last year. The report said the heavy media spending 'demonstrates the value foreign states place on controlling global narratives', adding that they were ready to move in as soon as the BBC cedes ground. The research warned the World Service was facing a 'perfect storm of competition, demand and decline'. It added that the service was 'at a crossroads' and faced a choice 'to either pursue sustained growth or accept managed decline'. In January, the BBC said it would cut 130 jobs from the World Service as part of a plan to strip out £6m of costs. While the Government this year increased its funding of the World Service from £104m to £137m, this was still £20m below the BBC's demands. Mr Lammy is now looking to slash the budget further as part of the spending review and has reportedly asked BBC bosses to find savings of up to £70m. The CreativePower report argued that the World Service should not be funded by the licence fee but should instead receive 'long-term, stable funding' primarily from the Government. It added that ministers and the BBC should draw up a strategy for growth for the World Service, including pursuing audiences on YouTube, Instagram and TikTok and developing a more coherent strategy for international TV news. The BBC combined its UK and international news channels in a cost-cutting measure in 2023. However, the move has proved controversial, and Lord Sedwill, the former cabinet secretary and national security adviser, said the BBC was 'making a mistake with its TV news channel'. It came as Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the culture select committee, wrote to the Government asking for reassurances over the future funding of the World Service and urging ministers not to overlook the role it plays in national security. She said: 'Through its foreign language services, it is on the frontline of the global fight against mis- and disinformation, but unless it is properly funded, we risk handing the microphone away and giving free reign to media backed by hostile states to become the dominant voice around the world. 'Ministers have told us that the World Service bolsters UK security. Cutting its funding now would undoubtedly make us all less safe.'
South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
‘Vast Majority' of new homes will have solar panels, says Miliband
It comes a month after Downing Street confirmed the panels should be installed on as many new properties as possible amid speculation that ministers will make them a mandatory requirement on new builds by 2027. Speaking to the BBC, Mr Miliband described the proposed policy as 'just common sense' and said the panels should be 'almost universal' on English homes. Changes to regulations will be laid out in the Future Homes Standard, due to be published later this year. The previous Conservative Government considered a proposal that would have mandated rooftop solar panels to cover 40% of a building's ground area or equivalent. Ed Miliband says solar panels should be 'almost universal' on English homes. 'The problem about the previous system was that it said you would had to have a certain percentage of coverage of solar panels, but if you couldn't achieve that percentage, you didn't have to do anything at all,' Mr Miliband said. 'Under our plans, we are not going to say that. We are going to say even if you can't hit 40% you will still have to have some solar panels, except in rare, exceptional cases.' He added that the number of homes fitted with solar panels needed to be 'much higher'. The policy is estimated to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of construction, but to then save owners more than £1,000 on their annual energy bills, according to the Times, which first reported the change. Asked in May whether housebuilders would be legally required to fit the panels, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesman said: 'Of course we want to see solar panels on as many new homes as possible. 'The Future Homes Standard, which will be published in the coming months, will include measures to drive this, we're working on the detail of that and will provide an update on that in due course. 'But it's good news for householders who want lower energy bills.' Under the Government's new proposals, 80% of new builds would reportedly be required to have solar panels covering 40% of their ground area, while 19% would have slightly fewer because of exemptions, including roof pitch and overshading. Ministers last year rejected a private members' Bill aiming to force housebuilders to install solar panels on the roof of every new home, saying the proposals would potentially slow down construction and add to building costs. Labour's manifesto included a pledge to build 1.5 million new homes over the course of the Parliament.
