Badenoch: Rush to meet net zero is pushing up holiday costs
Opening a new domestic arrivals building at London Stansted Airport on Friday, the leader of the Conservative Party criticised Labour's plans to reach net zero by 2050, a target she previously dismissed as impossible to meet, and said they would hit holidaymakers.
She said: 'Labour's ideological rush to net zero 2050 is not only bankrupting our country and leaving us dangerously reliant on China, it's also making holidays more expensive, just as the cost-of-living crisis for working people gets worse.
'Under my leadership, the Conservative Party are going to make things easier for the makers, the people who work hard to provide for their families, and not force up the cost of their summer holidays.'
The Tory leader pointed to plans to raise air passenger duty and the Climate Change Committee's call for the cost of decarbonising aviation to be reflected in the cost of flights.
Speaking to airport staff during the visit, Mrs Badenoch told them how the pandemic showed how 'critical' Stansted was for the local economy.
'But I always tell the story of how when Covid hit and so many people lost their jobs, all of those people turned up in my surgeries,' she added.
'It really showed just how critical the airport was, how important it was for the local community and well beyond.'
The new arrivals building was part of a £1.1 billion transformation at Stansted, the UK's fourth-largest airport.
The work, expected to continue over the next three to four years, will also include a £600 million extension to the main terminal, increasing its size by 40 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nigeria's former president Muhammadu Buhari dies in London aged 82
The former president of Nigeria, Muhammadu Buhari, has died aged 82 in London, his press secretary said Sunday. He led Africa's most populous nation twice: first as a military head of state from 1983 to 1985, then as a democratically elected president from 2015-2023. Buhari had been receiving medical treatment in London in recent weeks, and had often travelled to London in the past for medical attention. He was the first president to defeat a sitting president when he was elected in 2015, overseeing the country's worst economic period and fight against insurgency. Married twice, Buhari had ten children.
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
King's Foundation ordered to provide home for bats in grounds of Dumfries House
The King's Foundation has been ordered to provide a new home for bats colonies in the grounds of His Majesty's Scottish stately home. The monarch unveiled plans to build a new wedding venue at Dumfries House near Cumnock, Ayrshire, in November 2024. But surveys of the area earmarked for redevelopment found evidence of potential roosting sites for bats. While no bats were identified emerging from the potential roosts, the creatures have been spotted flying over the area. East Ayrshire council granted planning permission for the wedding venue, but only on the condition that bats are protected. Bats are a protected species under UK law and it is illegal to kill, possess or handle them without a licence or to cause them harm or disturb their habitat in any way. The King's Foundation has now submitted a species protection plan that will see bat boxes installed in the grounds of the A-listed building, which the monarch helped save for the nation. Construction workers will also be given briefings on the importance of bat conservation during the building project. Planning officials said: 'The species protection plan in relation to the protection of bats has been submitted. 'The protection plan details the proposed species protection, inclusive of autumnal roost exclusion and toolbox talk to be given to construction workers. 'The proposed mitigation includes roost dependant mitigation measures and the installation of bat boxes. 'Overall, the details submitted are considered to be sufficient and acceptable and the relevant conditions can be discharged.' New era for Dumfries House The new wedding venue, consisting of one large room with the character of a ballroom, will form an extension to the eastern wing of Dumfries House and it will cater for up to 200 guests. The King helped save the derelict Dumfries House when he arranged a £45 million deal to buy the Palladian mansion and its collection of Chippendale furniture. He led a consortium of charities and the Scottish government to make the purchase in 2007, with his own charitable foundation contributing £20 million. It has become a significant visitor attraction and the various activities on the estate now employ more than 150 people. In spite of its size, Dumfries House has always lacked a large banqueting space. The larger reception rooms, such as the Tapestry Room and Rothesay Room, have occupancy limits that permit no more than 100 guests at an event. A temporary marquee was erected in 2011 to allow a larger programme of events to be accommodated. However, it was decided that the tented structure detracted from the character of the A-listed building. The planning documents state the new pavilion will be an architectural improvement over the marquee and will provide an income to support the continued conservation of Dumfries House and its estate.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Scandal of indefinite jail terms has left prisoners damaged by ‘state's failure', ex-justice secretary warns
The scandal of ' totalitarian' indefinite jail terms has left prisoners profoundly damaged by the 'state's failure' to rehabilitate them, a former Tory justice secretary has warned. Alex Chalk KC said Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) jail terms are 'overbearing' and 'unfair' as he urged his successor Shabana Mahmood to look carefully at fresh proposals to end the historic wrong. In a candid interview after leaving government a year ago, he described the abolished jail terms as a 'state overreach' which have left thousands languishing in prison for up to 22 times longer than their original tariff. He told The Independent and the podcast Trapped: The IPP Scandal: 'If you take the time to explain to people how the state has got things wrong and that this is a state overreach, and that ultimately it has acted in a way which is overbearing, unfair and almost totalitarian, then I think that offends against most British people's sense of justice.' More than 2,500 inmates are still trapped under the outlawed jail terms, which have been described by the UN as 'psychological torture'. They were abolished in 2012, but not retrospectively, leaving those already jailed incarcerated indefinitely. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include: Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for robbing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. Mr Chalk, 48, a barrister who first encountered the sentence when he was prosecuting cases in the criminal courts, said he tried to address the 'toxic legacy' of the jail terms when he ushered in changes by reducing the IPP licence period from 10 years to three. Almost 1,800 people have had their licence terminated in the community following his reforms, passed under the Victims and Prisoners Act before last year's general election. He said that although many had committed serious offences, whether you consider yourself a 'bleeding heart' or 'tough on crime', the jail term 'offends against people's sense of fairness in Britain'. 'There is not a single vote in taking that 10-year minimum period for an IPP down to three years,' he said. 'A, because most people don't understand it and B, insofar as they do understand it there is no sympathy for those individuals. 'But I did it because I thought it was right. I did it because I thought it was right and I'm absolutely sure it was the right thing to do.' However, while in Rishi Sunak's government, Mr Chalk stopped short of accepting recommendations from the justice committee that all IPP prisoners should be resentenced. The decision was branded 'not good enough' by campaigners after 94 IPP prisoners have taken their own lives as they lose hope of ever being released. He warned that Ms Mahmood has a tough problem to solve as she considers fresh proposals from the Howard League for Penal Reform and former top judge Lord John Thomas to end the injustice by giving prisoners a release date at their next review by the Parole Board within a two-year window. He admitted some prisoners who are automatically freed from regular, determinate jail terms would not pass the Parole Board's release test, but this is still demanded of all IPP prisoners. In some cases, he believes their long-term incarceration is what has made them too dangerous to pass this test. He said: 'So the injustice can be framed as follows: that you have people who were considered dangerous, but for whom there was hope for rehabilitation some 10, 15, 20 years ago, and yet the experience of being in custody, of having languished under these unfair orders, has for some turned them into extremely volatile and dangerous people. 'And so the exam question is, how do you right this historic wrong without leading innocent members of the public to pay the price for the state's failure?' He continued: 'The wickedness of it is, as I say, the state is very much part of why they are too dangerous. So what do you do? Well, I think that the proposal that the Howard League and Lord Thomas have come up with is certainly worthy of careful consideration.' Although he would be 'twitchy' about agreeing to a release date for remaining IPP prisoners within a two-year window, Mr Chalk 'wouldn't rule it out' if it came with additional safeguards such as tagging and enhanced monitoring. This would ensure prisoners were 'guided, as it were, not to a cliff edge from custody to freedom but much more of a glide path towards a rehabilitated future', he said. However he backed the Howard League's calls for fewer IPP prisoners to be recalled for minor breaches of licence conditions, agreeing that the threshold is currently 'too low'. 'Our duty as the state is to throw all the resources we can at making this person better to try to get them to stand on their own two feet to lead a law-abiding life, and that is our obligation,' he added. The Howard League's proposals were put together by a panel of Britain's top justice experts led by Lord Thomas, who served as lord chief justice from 2013 to 2017. The ex-judge, who is a member of the House of Lords, believes the 'practical solutions' could be the last chance to help those on the jail term, warning that without action some IPP prisoners will languish in jail until they die. Urging the state to take responsibility for its own mistakes, he insisted 'enough is enough', noting that if these prisoners had committed their crime a day after the sentence was abolished, they would have long been freed. 'It is time to address this problem in the way we have set out, which produces justice and minimises risk as much as possible,' added the judge, who last year backed The Independent 's campaign to review IPP sentences. The government has said ministers will 'carefully consider' the Howard League's recommendations. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'It is right that IPP sentences were abolished. IPP prisoners are considered for release by the independent Parole Board every two years and those who are deemed safe will be released. 'The government is supporting IPP prisoners to achieve their release but this must be done in a way that does not put the public at risk."
