'Bee sting' death of Prince William's polo pal triggers £2.7billion family feud
The death of Prince William's polo pal, killed by a bee sting, has sparked a bitter £2.7billion inheritance row as the family believes his death was 'highly suspicious'.
Sunjay Kapur, 53, collapsed and died of a heart attack on June 12 while playing polo in Surrey. Reports suggest he swallowed a bee moments before. The Delhi-born businessman was heir to Sona Comstar, an automotive components empire founded by his father.
A fixture in India's high society, Kapur was known for his connections to British royalty and the upper echelons of the polo world. His private life was as high-profile as his career. He was married three times - first to designer Nandita Mahani, then Bollywood star Karisma Kapoor, and finally to former model Priya Sachdev in 2017.
Following his death, his family's company has become the focus of an acrimonious succession battle. The fight pits his mother, Rani Kapur, against Sona Comstar's board of directors in a contest for control of the business. In a letter to the board dated 24 July, Mrs Kapur alleged that her son died in 'highly suspicious and unexplained circumstances.' The claim came just a month after the board unanimously appointed a new chairman on 23 June.
She accused company figures of exploiting the family's grief to 'wrest control and usurp the family legacy,' and claimed she was 'forced to sign documents behind locked doors' while in a state of emotional distress.
Her letter, also sent to India's market regulator, alleged she had been locked out of her bank accounts and had not approved any new representatives for the Kapur family. She further claimed that her late husband - Kapur's father, who died in 2015 - had named her sole beneficiary of his estate and made her the majority shareholder in the Sona Group.
The company disputed her claims in a regulatory filing, insisting Mrs Kapur had not been a shareholder since at least 2019, directly contradicting her assertion of majority ownership through her late husband's will.
Last week, Priya Sachdev's office released the official Surrey coroner's report, which confirmed that Kapur had died of natural causes. The findings stated that he suffered from ventricular hypertrophy and ischaemic heart disease, and the coroner closed the investigation.
The release came after Mrs Kapur had written to British authorities demanding an inquiry into her son's death. The coroner's conclusion directly contradicted her assertion that the circumstances were suspicious.
The family feud has widened to include Kapur's sister, Mandhira, who had been estranged from her brother for four years. In an Instagram post, she published a photograph with her mother and brother, pledging to 'protect what you would have wanted, and what Dad dreamed.'
Mrs Kapur maintains there is a coordinated effort to strip the founding family of control. 'It quite clearly reinforces what she's been saying, that her entire legacy is being usurped and no one is willing to look into the cause of death,' said senior advocate Vaibhav Gaggar, representing Mrs Kapur. 'It may all be very well interlinked and she has quite unequivocally said there is a conspiracy behind her son's death.'
Sona Comstar's shareholding is split between the public, which owns 72 per cent, and corporate promoter Aureus Investments Private Limited, which controls the remaining 28 per cent. The dispute comes against a backdrop of frequent succession crises in Indian family businesses. Around 90 per cent of listed companies in the country are family-controlled, but only 63 per cent have formal succession plans, according to PwC.
One of India's most infamous corporate feuds erupted in 2002 when Dhirubhai Ambani, founder of the Reliance empire, died without leaving a will. His sons Mukesh and Anil were plunged into a public and protracted battle for control of the business, with their mother, Kokilaben, eventually brokering a settlement.
For the Kapurs, the death of Sunjay has not only left a vacuum at the head of the business, but also exposed deep fractures in a family once united around one of India's most successful industrial legacies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Manchester United target Carlos Baleba valued at more than £100m by Brighton
Carlos Baleba, the Brighton and Hove Albion midfielder, is valued by his club at more than £100m, although Manchester United are currently unwilling to buy at that level. The two clubs have not spoken directly about the player at a level that would suggest a deal is imminent with Baleba, 21, currently priced above what United would be prepared to pay this summer. He is the midfielder that United's Ineos hierarchy would wish to sign were they not operating within tight profitability and sustainability lines already. Brighton have made no moves to sell the player, who was a key part of their Premier League team last season, but as a trading club they would have to listen to offers at the kind of level that would get close to the club-record £115m fee Chelsea paid for Moisés Caicedo. Tony Bloom, the owner, would, as ever, have the final say on acceptable price. For United, Baleba is a player of great interest and is entering a period in his career where his value could conceivably climb again with another successful season – potentially putting him out of range. The club need a midfielder of his profile but ultimately it was decided to put resources this summer into signing attacking players, culminating in the £73.7m deal to sign the Slovenian forward Benjamin Sesko. Brighton are in a strong position thanks to such progress by the player early into his five-year deal, giving them the option of turning down offers this summer. There is an argument that United would be better served looking in the same European market for a player of similar promise, although few have done that as well as Brighton. They also have a number of options for his potential successor. Baleba has missed much of Brighton's pre-season with a knee injury sustained in June, but it is expected that he will be match-fit in time for the first game of the season against Fulham, having returned to training. Baleba will at some point be the next major Brighton sale given the range of his ability and the impact he made last season. He was another astute pick uncovered in France by the club's data analytics in the 2022-23 season. He was signed on the basis of just 21 senior Ligue 1 appearances for Lille, as well as 13 games for Lille B in the French fifth tier – the sum total of his European football experience at that point having left Cameroon in January 2022. His great appeal is his ball-winning skills as well as the energy and guile that means he can break out of midfield. His adaptability across a number of positions, and his left-foot preference, also raises the premium on him. United must make sales as well, with both Liverpool and Chelsea having done so effectively this summer – and Manchester City in previous years. Currently, United and Chelsea are some distance apart on their valuation of Alejandro Garnacho, the Madrid-born Argentina international, one of those cast out by Ruben Amorim. The 21-year-old is valued at about £30m by Chelsea, with a lower bid from Bayer Leverkusen in the previous January window serving as a benchmark. There is also hope that Rasmus Hojlund might generate a fee, although the Italian market for him is currently offering loans.
Wales Online
41 minutes ago
- Wales Online
BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts
BBC presenter targeted by crazed stalker who also sent her sister bizarre gifts The presenter was caused 'serious harm and distress' after being bombarded by Facebook messages Broady was caused 'serious harm and distress' BBC tennis presenter Naomi Broady was indundated with Facebook messages from a crazed stalker who also targeted her sister with a series of bizarre gifts, it has been revealed. The former player - who works as a commentator on BBC Radio 5Live and was part of the broadcaster's coverage of Wimbledon earlier this summer - was bombarded with messages from David Richardson during a terrifying 11-month campaign between January and December 2023. It came after Richardson, 39, stalked Broady's sister Emma over a three-year period. Richardson, of Stockport, Greater Manchester, appeared at Manchester Magistrates Court last month, where he pleaded guilty to the harassment of 35-year-old Naomi - who is also the brother of British No.5 Liam Broady - as well as the stalking of Emma, the Mirror reports. According to court documents, he "sent multiple unwanted images and messages via Facebook and [sent] unwanted gifts, cards and paintings," while he also caused the presenter "serious harm and distress". The court papers detail how Richardson "between 13/9/2020 and 4/12/2023 at Stockport, pursued a course of conduct, by sending multiple unwanted images and messages via Facebook and sending unwanted gifts, cards and paintings, which amounted to stalking causing Emma Broady serious alarm or distress, which had a substantial adverse effect on her usual day-to-day activities when you knew or ought to have known that your course of conduct would cause alarm or distress." They add: "Between 18/1/2023 and 4/12/2023 at Stockport, [Richardson] pursued a course of conduct which amounted to the harassment of Naomi Broady, and which you knew or ought to have known amounted to the harassment of her in that you sent various unwanted messages on Facebook." Article continues below Richardson has now been banned from contacting the sisters or visiting their homes ahead of being sentenced at Manchester Crown Court on August 18. When approached by the Mirror at his home in Stockport, Richardson confirmed he had entered guilty pleas, before explaining that he had tried to strike up a relationship with 37-year-old Emma, only for her to rebuff him and for him to start targeting Naomi instead. "I wanted to try to win her over," he said. "I wanted to ask her out.. I was a bit out of practice with the girls... I've not been in a relationship. So I just bought her a Selfridges voucher and some flowers for her birthday. And then I didn't ask her out. "But then Valentine's Day came along, so I bought her another Selfridges voucher and flowers, and then Christmas came along. You know, I sent it to her again, but she thanked me and said it really cheered her up." As a player, Naomi won one WTA Tour doubles title, as well as nine singles titles and 20 doubles titles on the ITF Women's Circuit, before retiring in 2021. It comes after fellow British tennis stars Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter were made victims of stalking campaigns, with the former left in tears on court at a tournament in Dubai earlier this year after seeing a man who had followed her to competitions in the stands. The man, who was removed from the match and later given a restraining order by Dubai police, had given the 22-year-old a letter and asked for a photo with her in a coffee shop the previous day. Raducanu had previously been the victim of a stalker who walked 23 miles to her home and stole a shoe from her porch, with the obsessive man - 35-year-old Amrit Magar - later given a five-year restraining order and made to wear an electronic tag. Boulter, meanwhile, revealed that she has been followed by fans after tournaments, while she had received threats of violence from fans who were on site at competitions. Article continues below 'One time in Nottingham, I had someone messaging me on social media saying: 'I'm outside. I'm going to hurt you if you come outside'," she explained. "I alerted the WTA, and they found the guy, who was actually on site. 'Things like this happen all the time. Obviously we are very well protected, which makes you feel safe. The WTA does a great job of being there for you with that. I do feel like we are protected as much as possible, which at least puts your mind at ease a little bit.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Police chiefs must learn to use their common sense
Britain's top cop club has released new guidance to forces in England and Wales on when and how to describe the suspects of serious crimes. It's a day late and a dollar short. The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC), stirred from their deckchairs by nationwide riots of only twelve months ago, are now advising constabularies that it's probably a good thing in most circumstances if people's ethnicity and immigration status are disclosed at the point of charge. If you're wondering why it takes this body in conjunction with the College of Policing to tell chiefs they are allowed to use common sense, you're in good company. But let's apply this new dispensation to a real-life example to see if it flies. Say, the one where police obfuscation over the identity of a suspect contributed to the worst public order breakdown for over a decade. Alex Rudukabana, the Southport child murderer, was arrested on 29 July last year. Police gave the first information about him to the public later that same evening, which did nothing to contradict misinformation already halfway round the world. Its selectivity only fuelled public anger. After arrest for multiple murders, the police had 96 hours to charge or release him under legislation. By the time police announced he had been charged on the morning of 1 August, serious disorder had broken out in five locations with dozens of officers injured and a violent contagion was released across the UK. It's fair to say that this anaemic intervention should at least stop huge inconsistencies that exist across the country. Chief officers are clearly befuddled by what they perceive to be legal or community tension obstacles to doing the right thing at the right time. Merseyside police, perhaps stung by their mishandling of the Southport massacre comms, swung into action when a car-ramming horror happened on the streets of Liverpool in May. The ethnicity of the alleged assailant – 'a white British man' – was released two hours after his arrest and long before Paul Doyle was charged with multiple counts of GBH. Contrast this with the arrant idiocy of Warwickshire police, whose extreme reluctance to confirm the immigration status and ethnicity of two reported asylum seekers suspected of the rape of a 12 year old girl in Nuneaton recently was based not on any legislative obstacle but on the lack of guidance to tell them they could. The precise status of the alleged attackers Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir is still shrouded in mystery. While they are entitled to the presumption of innocence and due process, I can't see anything that would preclude those facts from being released. Beyond, of course, the cack-eyed fealty to 'community cohesion', which seems to eternally ignore the fact that this social contract relies on the majority in the country believing in it. There is no substitute for the fullest information being disclosed accurately and fast. Where there might be a legal impediment, for example age, that is relied upon to stop any early disclosure, this must be changed. The National Police Chiefs Council ought to be an anachronism these days. We introduced local democratic accountability years ago in the form of policing and crime commissioners (PCCs). But they are too often incompetent duds and political retreads far behind the curve of public opinion that elected them. If this architecture must exist along with the insatiable bureaucracy of the College of Policing, it ought to spend more time ensuring that police chiefs and their guidance are both fit for purpose. Otherwise we will continue to see people like Essex Chief Ben-Julian Harrington well over his head when it comes to policing protests, such as those tinderbox concerns over illegal migration, despite being the NPCC lead for public order. His misunderstanding of the Human Rights Act and the convention it is built on meant that masked antifa protestors from outside the community were given a police escort into and away from a then peaceful demonstration by townspeople outside a hotel for migrants in Epping. This had disastrous results both in terms of disorder and public confidence. One thing PCCs can do is hire chief officers who are able and willing to do the thing public trust relies on – police without fear or favour – and fire those who can't. Perhaps it is not too late for them to step up.
