Supreme Court voids impeachment case vs VP Sara, cites one-year bar
In its ruling, the High Court emphasized that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the case due to the procedural safeguard enshrined in the Constitution. 'Therefore, the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment complaint,' SC spokesperson Camille Ting announced in a press briefing.
Ting clarified, however, that the decision does not amount to clearing the vice president of all allegations. She explained that the ruling is limited to procedural grounds and does not delve into the merits of the accusations raised in the dismissed complaint.
According to the Court's decision, a fresh impeachment case against Duterte may be filed once the one-year period lapses, specifically starting February 6, 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
a day ago
- Filipino Times
Palace: Respect Supreme Court ruling on VP Duterte impeachment
Malacañang urged the public to respect the Supreme Court's decision declaring the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional. Presidential Communications Office Press Officer Undersecretary Claire Castro said the Palace has not yet fully reviewed the ruling but emphasized the importance of upholding the judiciary's independence. 'The impeachment process is a matter handled by the legislative and judicial branches, and we recognize their independence in carrying out their constitutional mandates,' she added. The Supreme Court earlier ruled unanimously that the Articles of Impeachment against Duterte violated the one-year bar rule unde Article XI Section 3 paragraph 5 of the Constitution and infringed on her right to due process. The decision, penned by Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen, stated that the high court could not acquire jurisdiction over the proceedings due to the constitutional prohibition. Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin Caguioa inhibited from the case, while Associate Justice Maria Filomena Singh was on leave. The case stemmed from the consolidated petition filed by Duterte, her counsel Atty. Israelito Torreon, and several others seeking to nullify the impeachment complaint filed by the House of Representatives. Supreme Court spokesperson Atty. Camille Ting clarified that while the high tribunal nullified the complaint, it is not clearing Duterte of the charges but added that 'any subsequent impeachment complaint' may only be filed starting February 6, 2026.
Filipino Times
2 days ago
- Filipino Times
Supreme Court voids impeachment case vs VP Sara, cites one-year bar
The Supreme Court has declared the impeachment complaint filed against Vice President Sara Duterte as unconstitutional, citing the one-year prohibition on filing successive impeachment cases. In its ruling, the High Court emphasized that the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the case due to the procedural safeguard enshrined in the Constitution. 'Therefore, the Senate did not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment complaint,' SC spokesperson Camille Ting announced in a press briefing. Ting clarified, however, that the decision does not amount to clearing the vice president of all allegations. She explained that the ruling is limited to procedural grounds and does not delve into the merits of the accusations raised in the dismissed complaint. According to the Court's decision, a fresh impeachment case against Duterte may be filed once the one-year period lapses, specifically starting February 6, 2026.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
US Senate panel narrowly approves Mike Waltz's nomination for UN ambassador
The US Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday narrowly approved Mike Waltz, President Donald Trump's nominee for United Nations envoy, advancing his confirmation to the full Senate. The committee voted 12-10 in favour of Mr Waltz, who served as Mr Trump's national security adviser before being ousted in May during a scandal involving a Signal group chat between top aides and a journalist. There was no immediate word on when the full 100-member Senate might vote on the nomination. In a recent post on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump urged senators to remain in Washington over the summer to vote on his nominees. Last week during his hearing, Mr Waltz pledged to pursue sweeping reforms at the United Nations, vowing to ' make the UN great again ' echoing one of Mr Trump's signature slogans. During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Mr Waltz criticised the global body for what he called a bloated bureaucracy, anti-American bias, and a record of inefficiencies in conflict prevention. He vowed to target 'waste, fraud, and abuse endemic to the UN system.' Mr Waltz, a retired Army Green Beret and former Republican congressman from Florida, is among the last of Trump's high-profile nominees awaiting likely Senate confirmation.
