logo
Unpacking ‘Good Quests,' Christianity, and Caviar Bumps

Unpacking ‘Good Quests,' Christianity, and Caviar Bumps

WIRED27-03-2025

Photo-Illustration:If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
The mission of Silicon Valley's entrepreneurs has long been to change the world. But, how do you know whether a pursuit is good or bad? ACTS17 collective, a Christian faith-based group of tech entrepreneurs, says a strong relationship with God is the answer. Today on the show, we talk about the people promoting a faith-based approach to tech, we learn what a 'good quest' is, and we ask what impact religion will have on the type of ventures the valley pursues in the future.
You can follow Michael Calore on Bluesky at @snackfight, Lauren Goode on Bluesky at @laurengoode, and Zoë Schiffer on Bluesky at @zoeschiffer. Write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com. How to Listen
You can always listen to this week's podcast through the audio player on this page, but if you want to subscribe for free to get every episode, here's how:
If you're on an iPhone or iPad, open the app called Podcasts, or just tap this link. You can also download an app like Overcast or Pocket Casts and search for 'uncanny valley.' We're on Spotify too. Transcript
Note: This is an automated transcript, which may contain errors.
Michael Calore: Question for the group. When was the last time you went to church?
Zoë Schiffer: That's a big question. I'm Jewish, so I think we go to a temple, not church. And I went pretty recently, for the High Holidays. Lauren?
Michael Calore: Very nice.
Lauren Goode: Lovely. I think I went when I was on vacation. I like popping into churches when I'm traveling to different places.
Michael Calore: Nice. Light a little candle?
Lauren Goode: Yeah, just look at the architecture.
Zoë Schiffer: That's cool. What about you, Mike?
Lauren Goode: Yeah. What about you?
Michael Calore: I swear I was listening to what you were both saying, but while you were talking, while also listening, I was also racking my brain to try and remember the last time that I was in a church, and I cannot remember the last time. I really just do not know.
Zoë Schiffer: That's totally fair.
Michael Calore: Well, Silicon Valley has its own relationship with God, and that is what we're going to be talking about this week. Is everybody ready?
Zoë Schiffer: I'm very ready.
Lauren Goode: I'm ready for confession time.
Michael Calore: This is WIRED's Uncanny Valley, a show about the people power and influence of Silicon Valley. I'm Michael Calore, Director of Consumer Tech and Culture here at WIRED.
Lauren Goode: I'm Lauren Goode. I'm a senior writer at WIRED.
Zoë Schiffer: And I'm Zoe Schiffer WIRED's, Director of Business and Industry.
Michael Calore: Power, money and Influence. This has long been part of the allure for many in the tech world, but for a growing group in the Valley, there's a new path to success, God. Today, we're talking about the Silicon Valley Christians who are promoting a faith-based approach to innovation. We'll drop in on a San Francisco party where tech bigwigs and influential figures talk business and the Bible, we'll learn about, quote, unquote, "Good quests," and we'll ask the big question, what impact will religion have on the type of ventures the Valley pursues in the future? So Lauren, tell us about this party you went to.
Lauren Goode: Which one? I go to so many parties.
Michael Calore: Well, let's start with the party in New Mexico.
Lauren Goode: Yes. Okay. That one. To be totally clear, I was not at this party. It's been written about, and I've heard about it directly from one of the hosts. This was a three-day birthday party held in New Mexico in November of 2023. And the theme of it was The Roast, the Toast and the Holy Ghost.
Zoë Schiffer: Oh my gosh. Say what you will about tech people, but they know how to make a party theme.
Lauren Goode: So this party was for the 40th birthday of someone named Trae Stephens, who is a well-known venture capitalist and entrepreneur. WIRED his written about him before. Our colleague, Steven Levy, did a big interview with Trae last year. And this party, according to Trae's wife, Michelle, was designed to be a playoff of Kanye West's Sunday Service. They booked a DJ who remixes worship songs, but also it was like a party, right? They said they served caviar bumps, there was breakfast pizza, there was mimosas. A good time was to be had. But what really kind of stood out from this party is that one of Trae's business partners, Peter Thiel, gave a fire side chat that had all of the attendees talking.
Michael Calore: Okay.
Zoë Schiffer: I honestly did not know that Peter Thiel was religious at all until I started talking to you about this.
Michael Calore: And we should back up and say a little bit about Peter Thiel, and about who he is and why he's important.
Lauren Goode: Yeah, for the uninitiated, Peter Thiel is another well-known venture capitalist, and he's known for many reasons. He's one of the original founders of PayPal, the so-called PayPal Mafia. He's an early investor in Facebook, so he's incredibly wealthy. In media circles, he's infamous for having backed the lawsuit that put Gawker Media out of business. In politics, he's been a very vocal supporter of Donald Trump, and Peter Thiel's network of right-wing allies has been infiltrating the Trump administration. And to your point, Zoe, he's also religious. This sermon that he gave at Trae Stephens's birthday party has been described as, "A fire side chat on miracles and forgiveness." And it was after this fire side chat that he gave, that" according to Michelle Stephens, the wife of Trae, people were coming up to her and saying, I didn't know Peter was a Christian. How can you be gay and a billionaire and be Christian?" And even something like, "I didn't know you could be smart in a Christian, "Michelle says that people said to her.
Michael Calore: Oh, no.
Lauren Goode: And then they started asking, "And where do you go to church in San Francisco?"
Michael Calore: So where do they go to church in San Francisco?
Zoë Schiffer: They are not talking about doing yoga at Grace Cathedral.
Lauren Goode: They go to a church that's called Epic Church, which has been around for several years in San Francisco. But according to the pastor there, it has grown in attendance in recent years. But in addition to the Stephens's being members at this church, and other people in the tech community, Michelle Stephens, who is an entrepreneur, was entrepreneurial and decided to start a non-profit that hosts gatherings where people come and give talks, kind of like the one that Peter Thiel gave at that birthday party. And I ended up going to one of their events recently. It was really interesting. They call this group the ACTS, that's A-C-T-S 17 Collective, and it's an acronym, it stands for Acknowledging Christ in Technology and Society.
Michael Calore: And these are ticketed talks?
Lauren Goode: They're ticketed talks.
Michael Calore: Okay.
Lauren Goode: Fifty bucks and you have a direct line to God. He's on your speed dial.
Zoë Schiffer: Do they feel more like parties or more like church?
Lauren Goode: Well, this is a great question, because the event that I went to recently in San Francisco is in a private home that is a converted church. It was in this room... You're nodding 'cause I think you know exactly where it is. Right?
Michael Calore: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Zoë Schiffer: Is it the one by Dolores?
Lauren Goode: Yes.
Zoë Schiffer: It is? Oh my gosh, I've always been so curious about that space.
Lauren Goode: It's beautiful. There's a big cavernous room that has a large arched window in the back on an exposed brick wall, and high ceilings and soundproofing along the walls, wood paneling. So when you are in it, you're like, "I feel like I'm in a church," except that it was low-key party vibes. The DJ was spinning some light beats, ambient music. There were bartenders, there's food.
Zoë Schiffer: Caviar or no caviar?
Lauren Goode: There were name badges. There were no caviar bumps.
Zoë Schiffer: Bummer.
Lauren Goode: Such a bummer. Yeah.
Michael Calore: And what was the talk?
Lauren Goode: So this talk actually featured Trae Stephens himself. The ACTS 17 Collective has done a few previous talks with other people, but this one was Trae being interviewed by a fellow venture capitalist, who appropriately, was named Christian. And they were talking about this concept of good quests, which is something that Trae has written about before. He and a co-writer published an article in 2022 about the idea of good quests. Good quests is a framework for thinking about the work that you do. And let's just assume you're a techie, you're an entrepreneur, you're a venture capitalist, you're a startup person, and you're trying to find meaning through your work. And good quests is a way to find and do work that feels purposeful or meaningful in some way. And that means you are on a good quest. It also means that there are bad quests.
Michael Calore: I see.
Lauren Goode: Which is a lot of what they talked about.
Michael Calore: So, the good quests and bad quests thing sounds like a big topic that we should talk about, but I want to put a pin in it for the moment because I want to talk about the business connections that happen at these meetings. I'm assuming that these meetings are not just for people to get together and listen to conversations about God, but they're probably meetings where people network. And is there a hope that Peter Thiel will show up at these meetings?
Lauren Goode: Sorry, I shouldn't laugh.
Zoë Schiffer: It was certainly Lauren's hope.
Lauren Goode: Yeah. Well, I have a couple questions for him. He has spoken at these events before, so sure, networking is definitely a part of it. And one of the things that Act 17 has said is that they're not only inviting Christians to these events, they're inviting people of all denominations. And even if you're an atheist, you can join. They want to get the conversation started. Some people are there because they genuinely want to find their faith again or be able to express it freely. And I think other people are there for the hang and for the networking, and to rub elbows with people like Trae Stephens or someone like Garry Tan from Y Combinator, who was at this recent event. And I actually think that they're okay with that, because at events like these, the themes of religion and work are commingled so much that sometimes it's indistinguishable to fully understand what it is they're talking about.
Michael Calore: Yeah. And Peter Thiel's Faith was such a big catalyst for this movement that the Stephens's have started. And I just wonder if you can get into a little bit about what connection with Peter Thiel is with this group and this couple?
Lauren Goode: Yeah, so it's actually quite a big network of Peter Thiel-related companies and investments. So, Peter Thiel runs a venture capital firm called Founders Fund, and Trae Stephens is a partner there. Trae also co-founded Anduril, which is a defense tech company that builds weapons like autonomous drones and underwater vessels. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund is a big investor in Anduril. Trae Stephens was also an early employee at Palantir. Palantir is a data intelligence company that Peter Thiel co-founded with someone named Alex Karp. I mentioned Garry Tan earlier. He was also an early employee at Palantir. Now, he has his own venture capital firm and he runs Y Combinator, but he has been involved in Act 17 events. So this non-profit and their event series was partly inspired by Peter Thiel and just the talk that he gave, but also it's a pretty tight network of really high-profile techies who also happen to be linked to these tech firms that make defense tech for the government who are involved in these talks.
Michael Calore: It is such an interesting juxtaposition that these folks who are coming together to talk about their faith, and to talk about Christian values and promoting them in technology, are also building systems that support more.
Zoë Schiffer: They don't see those things as in conflict, I don't think, from what I've read. Alex Karp has talked about similar themes. He has a new book out, and he said specifically that the fact that so many smart people are working on social media apps when they could be working on, he doesn't say the word good quests, but it definitely has that flavor, is in his mind a big problem.
Lauren Goode: Say more about that, Zoe, because Trae talked a lot about this, too. The consultants at McKinsey and people who are making photo sharing apps are getting a really bad rap these days amongst this crowd. And I want to hear more about what Karp has been saying about that.
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah. He talks a lot about how the idea that all societies are equal in his mind is simply not true. That we should think of the United States as unique and worthy of protecting and preserving in terms of our culture. And so, if you believe that working on national defense is a really important vocation, a calling even. Just while we're talking about these big name people and their relationship with religion, he was doing a Q & A with Barry Weiss at a university recently, and one of the students asked, "What could we do to help the working class?" And he answered with a bunch of different suggestions, but he said his number one suggestion was introducing them to religion, which I thought was quite interesting.
Lauren Goode: It's almost like is there a tension here? Which is I what you're getting at Mike?
Michael Calore: Yeah.
Lauren Goode: In espousing your beliefs and your religion, but also using it as an interesting framework, where in some cases you're casting a moral judgment upon the jobs that people do in their day-to-day lives or to support their families, to live, basically, right? And it's particularly interesting when it's coming from these powerful figures in technology who happen to build tools and services and apps that are used by the federal government and defense, right? Because you might hold up one and say, "Well, that seems incongruous with doing good things for society." And what's interesting now is that these figures are expressing these ideological and religious beliefs and infusing the Silicon Valley hustle culture with them.
Michael Calore: And we'll have to talk more about that culture, but first we need to take a break. So let's do that and come right back. Welcome back to Uncanny Valley. So Lauren, when you spoke to Michelle Stephens for your story, she mentioned that she had felt tokenized as a Christian in Silicon Valley. And Christianity was sort of a dirty word in the Valley for a long time. Right?
Lauren Goode: I don't know if I would describe it so much as a dirty word as I would that I've heard from people that they maybe have felt uncomfortable before in the highly agnostic Silicon Valley, talking openly in professional settings about their faith. I spoke to one entrepreneur and venture capitalist at the event who said he's been working in the Valley since 2005, and he's always been Christian, but he never really felt like he could wear it on his sleeve before. And more recently, and he specifically said since the pandemic, he's been a little bit more open about it. And through that, has been pleasantly surprised to see other people say, "Oh, hey, I'm a Christian too." But I think Silicon Valley in general, you're right, has long been perceived as agnostic and even atheistic. Some of the data, however, shows that people are actually more rooted in religion that you would think, because Silicon like a big geographical place. It's not just the tech industry.
Michael Calore: So, you're saying that this large contingent of humanity is not a monolith?
Lauren Goode: Right, exactly. They're all wearing hoodies and Apple watches, but they're not all the same.
Michael Calore: Is there any data about what the breakdown of Christians and non-Christians are in Silicon Valley?
Lauren Goode: Yeah, that's a good question. And we have to zoom out a little bit, because the most recent data we have from Pew Research looks at religion in California and religion in the San Francisco metro area, but not, quote, unquote, "Silicon Valley specifically." In the San Francisco metro area, 46% of adults identify as Christian, and that's only down slightly from a decade ago. But an increasing number of people say they are religiously unaffiliated. That's at 42% compared with 35% a decade ago. And then in California, broadly, the number of people who identify with other religions, like Judaism and Islam, has largely remained the same over the past decade. So, in short, there are a fair number of Christians in the San Francisco metro area, but I would say the biggest sort of counterforce to that is agnosticism. And Zoe, I want to hear your thoughts on this too, because I know we've had some conversations about the alternative things that people do for self-discovery in Silicon Valley, this idea of like, "Well, I have a practice, like a meditation practice," or, "I have certain rituals that I do." And they find community in different places, but they're not necessarily rooted in religion with a capital R.
Zoë Schiffer: Right. Yeah. I do think the kind of psychedelic experimentation, the Burning Man of it all can serve a similar function, giving people a sense of belonging, something outside of themselves that they're engaged with, and all of those things can be really meaningful.
Michael Calore: And how do folks like the Stephens and the ACTS 17 crowd feel about these spiritual pursuits that are non-Christian, non-Western spiritual pursuits?
Lauren Goode: The sense that I get is that these things are not mutually exclusive. You could go on your shroom trips or your workshops at Esalen, or I don't know, whatever other sort of-
Michael Calore: Oh, yeah. Yeah, I know. Yeah.
Lauren Goode: Yeah, we're all going, "Yes. Yes, yes." All of the agnostic practices. And that doesn't exclude you from having a religious practice that is rooted in historical texts or some sort of established God, or has an official church, I think. They're saying, at least initially, "Our arms are open. Anyone can come to these events." I'm willing to bet that of the 200 plus people who were there at the event that I went to, that some of them have probably dabbled in other rituals.
Zoë Schiffer: Extracurricular activities.
Lauren Goode: That's right.
Michael Calore: They've been to the psytrance rave and taken the molly, and talked about their app.
Lauren Goode: Sure. And talked about their app. Yeah, exactly. They're still talking about their apps. And I don't even think that the two should necessarily be conflated. It's just that those kinds of hobbies or practices tend to define a certain aspect of Silicon Valley culture, maybe more so than religion has.
Zoë Schiffer: I think that that makes sense. There's a saying that I heard a lot in chatting with people who engage in more of the drug-type pursuits, that these substances will get you in the room, but they won't let you stay. So maybe religion lets you stay.
Lauren Goode: Oh, that's kind of interesting. So it's like you do a guided ketamine trip and then you tumble down the block to the church in Dolores Park?
Zoë Schiffer: Yes, and?
Lauren Goode: Yes, and?
Michael Calore: Yes, and?
Lauren Goode: ACTS 17 doesn't seem to be pushing that away. What Michelle Stephens has said is that she feels like the industry just has too much emphasis on money and power and wealth, and these are my words, that those in a sense are the more powerful drugs, and the more concerning drugs. And that religion provides a different kind of avenue to success, and that success is that relationship you have with God.
Zoë Schiffer: Alex Karp also mentioned something similar. He has said that, "You just need enough money to not have to think about money, and that the other pursuits are more important."
Lauren Goode: Ah, right. So I'm assuming that means Alex Karp just has just enough money and he gave the rest of it away?
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah, for sure. For sure.
Michael Calore: Yeah, probably. Didn't ACTS 17 member, Garry Tan, Tweet about this?
Lauren Goode: Yeah, he did last year, and he linked to the article that was written in The San Francisco Standard. He said, "LSD and shrooms won't fill the God-shaped hole in your heart. Guess what might?" I'm guessing the answer is God, right? Do I get an ice cream cone for guessing correctly? Right. Do people still do LSD?
Michael Calore: Yes, people still do it.
Zoë Schiffer: Yep.
Lauren Goode: This is this how uncool I am, Uncanny Valley listeners.
Michael Calore: There's nothing cool about drugs, Lauren.
Lauren Goode: Okay. That's right, we were raised in the D.A.R.E. era.
Michael Calore: Let's take another break and we'll come right back. Welcome back to Uncanny Valley. We talked earlier about the good quest versus the bad quest. It sounds like a sitcom, but it's central to the philosophy of how the Christians that we're talking about in Silicon Valley approach the work that they do. What is a good quest?
Lauren Goode: Yeah, and this borrows from gaming culture too. When I think about a good quest, I think about playing Legends of Zelda or something.
Michael Calore: Is it like a side quest is a bad quest?
Lauren Goode: Yeah, right, exactly. You can get sidetracked by a side quest, I think is the idea. But Trae Stephens had written an article, along with an entrepreneur named Markie Wagner. It was published in 2022, and it created this framework for thinking about what you do for a living and whether or not it falls, and where it falls on the matrix. Is it a good quest? Is it a bad quest? Is it something that feels good but is really easy to do and isn't solving a big problem? Is it something that's hard but feels bad? Or is it something's hard to do but feels good because you're fixing big problems? And the way that Trae has described it, and also some of the peers in his network who we've talked about on this show, is that if you're just making another photo app, you're a brilliant engineer, but you're using your mind space and your talents to build a photo app, it's probably not a good quest. For whatever reason, he also took aim a few times at McKinsey Consultants during the event I went to. He just said, "They just sort of show up on your college campus and they pick some of the best and brightest minds and say, 'Go be a management consultant.'" And he considers that not to be a good quest. So Trae said during the ACTS 17 talk that I went to, "I'm literally an arms dealer." And when he said that, the crowd sort of laughed, and I think people were surprised by how candid he was about that, but that's what his company makes. They make weapons. And he said, "It's an unusual calling. It's not a calling for everyone, but it is my calling." And so he was sort of applying the language or the vernacular of a vocation to what he does for a living, and then sort of putting that on the good quest part of the matrix, because it's a hard thing to do and he's solving a hard problem. But he is also mentioned things like manufacturing and advances in medicine, and that there are other things that you can use your talents for that are considered good quests.
Michael Calore: Right. If we boil down the idea of a good quest to something that is good for humanity and something that promotes Christian values, I think it's difficult for a lot of people to square the fact that you're doing good in the world with the fact that you're building systems of killing people. Right?
Zoë Schiffer: But I think that's why the nationalism part is so important to this, because they're not saying, "We should be doing good for humanity." It seems like a lot of these people are saying, "We should be doing good for the United States of America."
Lauren Goode: Right. My understanding, based on reading Alex Carp's very long essay in The Atlantic, is that he really believes we should be building up America as a technological republic. And I think that's what you're saying, Zoe.
Zoë Schiffer: Yeah. Which again, to Mike's point, it might seem like these things aren't in conflict unless you have that nationalistic angle woven in.
Lauren Goode: It's interesting, because when you think about the teachings of the Bible, you think about helping those less fortunate than you, helping the poor, welcoming people in, being of service. So you don't necessarily think about weapons. It may seem like it's incongruous with being of service. And I think that that is a very valid point to raise. My understanding of it, which is not a justification or an explanation for it, is in listening to Trae Steven's talk at the Act 17 event, it seemed like his interpretation of building God's kingdom on Earth was pretty literal. It was, "What has God asked us to do? Thy kingdom come, thy will be done. We will build the kingdom." And that means literally building. It makes me think of the Silicon Valley ethos around, "It's time to build. Build, build, build. Make stuff."
Michael Calore: Yeah. And for a lot of people who are not religious, what is central to that ethos is that, "We're doing good in the world." And maybe for a Christian with that ethos, it's centered around, "We're doing God's will by building these things, by making this our society." So, in other words, you can justify a lot of things by saying, "Well, it's okay because we have God on our side," to paraphrase Bob Dylan. That sounds like a slippery slope to me.
Lauren Goode: I think you are absolutely right. And Trae Stephens himself said, "I think people can convince themselves that anything is a good quest." He was referring to someone who came up to him and was pitching an NFT marketplace. That, to him, was not a good quest. But yeah, I think that's the thing. You can convince yourself that what you're doing is good, even if you're harming people in some way. And just to pull it back even further, what is one of the things we've heard from Silicon Valley entrepreneurs for decades now? What are they going to do with the thing they're building? They're going to, what, change the world?
Michael Calore: Change the world.
Lauren Goode: Right. And they have, they continue to. It's not always in a good way, but who makes the moral judgment of what's good?
Michael Calore: Justice has to play into it. People can feel like if they're delivering justice in the world, then that's a good thing. And maybe that's why weapons systems feel like a good quest, because it's like, "Well, there's good guys and there's bad guys, and it's pretty cut and dry. And if we can help eradicate the bad guys, then that's a good quest." So that, in a sense, is making the world a better place for people of that mindset. But then again, who is to decide who is the good guy, who is the bad guy? Also, I will just point out at this moment that I think Jesus Christ taught us that the best way to solve conflict is through nonviolent means. So, if Jesus was a pacifist, how would he feel about all of this? I don't know. I'm not Jesus.
Lauren Goode: Sounds like you're ready to go back to church, Mike.
Michael Calore: Maybe. I have a lot of questions. Maybe that's what church is all about. It's about answering these questions.
Lauren Goode: Zoe, how does this stand out to you when you consider this in the context of your faith?
Zoë Schiffer: I think it's really interesting. I don't know how. I'm still thinking through the Alex Karp arguments on all of this, but I think just from a basic standpoint, that having religion as one component of a larger kind of life can be really beneficial for people. And I think there is a problem with a lot of people feeling like their lives are meaningless, and so to the extent that this can help imbue their lives with meaning. Or prompt them to stop doing a job that feels soul-sucking and find something that is more of a good quest, something that's more meaningful, I think that's great. All of these things can be used in negative or positive ways, although that's clearly a judgment call, but I think there's potential for good.
Lauren Goode: It'll be interesting to see whether or not this is something that really takes root in Silicon Valley, aside from hearing directly from pastors or people in the community, "Oh, it seems like there's growing interest, attendance is rising." Those are all certainly strong signs. But Silicon Valley has been going through this big shift over the past few years, politically, ideologically, artificially, if you want to throw artificial intelligence into that too. And I'm just so curious to see where religion dovetails with that.
Michael Calore: Yeah. Yeah, and building God's kingdom, what that looks like-
Lauren Goode: What that looks like.
Michael Calore: ... for here.
Lauren Goode: Is that AI? I mean, really.
Michael Calore: Is our next God AI?
Lauren Goode: I don't think she is.
Zoë Schiffer: I see what you did there. I liked it.
Lauren Goode: Thank you.
Michael Calore: Thanks for listening to Uncanny Valley. If you like what you heard today, make sure to follow our show and rate it on your podcast app of choice. If you'd like to get in touch with us about any questions, comments, show suggestions, or suggestions for which churches we should attend, write to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com. Today's show is produced by Kyana Moghadam, Amar Lal at Macrosound mixed this episode. Paige Oamek fact checked this episode. Jordan Bell is our Executive Producer, Katie Drummond is WIRED's Global Editorial Director, and Chris Bannon is the Head of Global Audio.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I tested Apple's 11th-gen iPad for a week, and it's still the best tablet
I tested Apple's 11th-gen iPad for a week, and it's still the best tablet

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

I tested Apple's 11th-gen iPad for a week, and it's still the best tablet

Apple put so little effort into revealing the new 11th-generation iPad this past spring that I'd bet most don't know that there's a new basic iPad for 2025. Announced within the press release for the new iPad Air M3, the new entry-level iPad is both massively important and admittedly boring. That's what we expect, though, when Apple continues to make small tweaks that don't rock the boat on its most-accessible iPad. Still, this latest iteration ensures that Apple's most affordable tablet is still the best iPad for most people and likely the top tablet as well. But is this update one that demands purchase right now, or can you wait until you need it? Let's find out. Apple iPad (11th Gen) The 2025 iteration of Apple's basic tablet is faster than before, but the biggest difference comes with a starting storage upgrade that makes it easier to download and use a bunch of apps. The iPad is still the de facto tablet for most people For a while, the regular iPad had the same boring design and the same dark and flat colors you get on its pricier laptops. Then, in 2022, Apple introduced the 10th-generation iPad with flat sides that match the rest of its tablet hardware. This iPad is the first update to that model, and it is physically identical, sharing all the same dimensions and weight. The iPad's 11-inch screen is surrounded by bezels that aren't especially chunky and give you a fair amount of room to grip the tablet without activating the display accidentally. While the iPad Mini is arguably better for reading books and for smaller spaces like an airplane's seat-back tray table, this screen is pretty great for most activities, including multitasking in split-screen mode. While the iPad's screen is a bit too glossy (more on that below), it's still otherwise great for everything I watched and played this week. From the bright yellow plane in the trailer for 'Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning' to the lush greens of the grass in Genshin Impact, just about all my content looked pretty good. It looked good enough, in fact, that I was wishing there were a larger, 13-inch version of this iPad, a size that's currently reserved for the iPad Pro. The iPad draws power from the USB-C port on the bottom, and it's got a three-dot Smart Connector for connecting various keyboard accessories. It's sold in blue, pink, silver and yellow, a bold set of colors that I wish were available throughout Apple's lineup and not just for the iMac M4. You also get some of the same standards as before, such as the rear 12-megapixel camera that can record 4K video. The 10th-generation iPad had this same camera, which was an upgrade from the 8-megapixel camera with 1080p video in the 9th-generation iPad. I'm not sure who needs that resolution in a tablet, but it's nice to know it's there. Additionally, you get a 12-megapixel front camera that supports Apple's Center Stage feature that keeps you properly framed on the screen by zooming in and out on video calls. When I dialed up my colleague Mike Andronico on Slack for a video call, he said I sounded and looked 'normal,' which is basically a ringing endorsement because I primarily use a 4K webcam (which Slack compresses). Apple's A16 chip delivers a performance boost This iPad has proved a stellar part of my days and nights during this past week. While I've been at work, I've kept it open next to me with Messages, Mail and one other app (sometimes Todoist for my productivity, other times Safari for my social media) open at the same time. I was able to juggle those, along with Apple's Photos and Notes apps, without a smidge of a hiccup or stutter. Gaming on the 11th-generation iPad also worked well, at least for mobile titles. The modestly demanding but massively addictive Balatro card game ran super smoothly, and the iPad also did a fine job with the 3D adventure game Genshin Impact. Everything looked correct as my characters ran around the woods and I switched between sword and bow-and-arrow attacks. Just don't expect the big AAA games that have been announced for iPads and Macs to run on this basic iPad: the recent Resident Evil and Death Stranding ports require an M-series chip, so they're exclusive to the iPad Air and iPad Pro. The A16 chip also delivered great scores on the Geekbench 6 benchmark tests, beating pricier tablets such as the Google Pixel Tablet, Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ and Microsoft Surface Pro 2024. Interestingly, though, the 11th-generation iPad's single-core score on that test — which measures performance in less-demanding, everyday apps — is basically within the margin of error of what we saw from the iPad Air M2. Sure, Apple's already updated that model with faster internals with the iPad Air M3, but it's great to see an A-series chip hold its own in any way against Apple's brawny M-series silicon. Decent battery life Expect decent battery life from the new iPad. When I ran our battery test on the 11th-generation iPad, draining it of a full charge by playing a looping 4K video at 50% brightness with Airplane mode on), it got a perfectly reputable score that was just north of 11 hours. That iPad time compares very well against similar slates: 1.5 hours longer than the Google Pixel Tablet and nearly an hour longer than the latest iPad Air. The current iPad Mini only lasted 24 minutes longer, which is basically within the margin of error. The Galaxy Tab S10 FE+ lasted more than three hours longer, but that's to be expected when it's a larger tablet that has more room for battery. Anecdotally, I'd say you can get two days of serious use out of this iPad before it needs to charge. I was down to only 54% after eight hours of use that consisted of work, gaming and three hours of streaming video. Twice as much storage as before There's one other specs boost under the hood, as the 11th-generation iPad now starts at 128GB of storage. This is an overdue doubling of its previous 64GB minimum, especially when Apple's marketing continues to promote games like Genshin Impact that take up well over 30GB of space. On top of that, just logging into my iCloud account meant my Photos library would sync up, and that alone took up more than 32GB. That's all the argument I need to make for why it's good Apple's moved to 128GB by default. No longer will you have to pay a higher price merely to avoid a flurry of 'Storage Almost Full' alerts. Apple's entry-level iPad is still pricey compared to the field While the $349 iPad is the least-expensive Apple tablet, you don't have to spend much time to find similarly sized tablets that cost notably less. Amazon's Fire Max 11 is $230, Lenovo's 10.1-inch Tab is $200 and Samsung's Galaxy Tab A9+ is $220. The price gaps grow far greater if you look at smaller tablets, such as the $60 Amazon Fire 7. This isn't to say I want Apple to make a tablet like the Fire 7, which is much slower and of lower build quality. I merely want to see iPadOS get out from under the hefty $349 minimum barrier of entry. This iPad is not meant for the sun or the bright lights Aside from price, my biggest frustration with the 11th-generation iPad is that it can be a bit too glossy depending on your situations. That's because its screen still doesn't have the anti-reflective coating Apple uses in all its other (more expensive) iPads. I saw this flaw for myself while enjoying AMC's macabre drama 'Interview with the Vampire,' which has a suitably dark color palette. This meant I had to raise the iPad's brightness and keep it pointed away from nearby lights to get the optimal visibility. If you buy the iPad with cellular 5G capabilities (and not just Wi-Fi) to use it out and about, you might find yourself running from your reflection and looking for some shade. That's exactly what happened to me when I brought the iPad out on a sunny day in Manhattan's High Line park, where my reflection nearly obscured the showtimes of movies playing at my local theater. Apple Pencil support is here, but other iPad features are absent Unfortunately, you still may need a decoder ring to figure out which Apple Pencil works with your iPad. The good news is that the 11th-generation iPad works with both the original Apple Pencil and the new Apple Pencil with USB-C, which are the historically cheaper options — just like this iPad. That said, I do wish the pricier Apple Pencil Pro and second-generation Apple Pencil also worked with this iPad. The annoying news, though, is that you can't charge an Apple Pencil when you magnetically snap it to one side of the tablet — which is how the iPad Mini, Air and Pro work. Instead, you plug in a charging cable (either USB-C or Lightning, depending on how old the stylus is). Another arguably big missing feature is Stage Manager, which enables a desktop-like interface where your apps exist as floating windows. Those trying to make their iPad double as a laptop might see this as a reason to upgrade to the iPad Air, which also works with Apple's Magic Keyboard. Want a smoother screen or facial recognition? You'll need an iPad Pro for those perks, though you do get some biometric security on the 11th-generation iPad with Touch ID fingerprint recognition. Oh, and you can't run the generative AI features found in Apple Intelligence on this iPad, though that makes me like it more. After a week letting the iPad take the wheel for a lot of what I'd normally do on my laptop or phone, I'm happy to say that even Apple's entry-level tablet offers a pretty good (if not great) experience. So, while I will argue that a more-affordable iPad should exist, there's nothing that bad about this one, as should be the case when we're talking about a $350 gadget that's either the second- or third-most-important screen in your living room. At the end of the day, I'd argue that the vast majority of those who want a tablet should probably get the basic iPad. Only those looking to sync text messages with an Android device or desire a windowed app experience really need to look elsewhere. What is the best way to pair an Apple Pencil to an iPad 11? What is the best way to pair an Apple Pencil to an iPad 11? You'll want to connect your Apple Pencil physically to the USB-C port at the bottom of your iPad. Either way, you'll need a USB-C cable (one came with your 11th-generation iPad), and those with a first-generation Apple Pencil (which has the shiny ring near the butt of the stylus) will need Apple's USB-C to Apple Pencil Adapter. Then, you slide down the cap on the end of the Apple Pencil to reveal the USB-C port on the newer Apple Pencil or the Lightning port on the end of the first Apple Pencil. If you have the older Apple Pencil, you plug the USB-C to Apple Pencil Adapter into the Lightning port. Now, connect the USB-C cable to both the Pencil and the iPad, and follow the on-screen prompts. How big is the screen of the iPad 11? How big is the screen of the iPad 11? The 11th-generation iPad's LED screen measures 11 inches diagonally, with a 2360-by-1640 resolution. Does the iPad 11 support wireless charging? Does the iPad 11 support wireless charging? No, the 11th-generation iPad doesn't support wireless charging. No iPads offer such a feature. CNN Underscored editors thoroughly test all the products in our testing guides, and we take tablets just as seriously as we do laptops and all other tech. We're made up of a skilled team of editors and writers who provide full transparency about our testing methodology for our product reviews. Electronics writer Henry T. Casey has been testing tablets for more than a decade, having tried everything from the chunkiest kids' tablet to the priciest iPad Pro. He's seen plenty of tablets turn into doorstops and paperweights over the years and wants to make sure you love the one you buy.

Amazon Is Selling 'Small and Amazing' 8TB Portable Solid State Drives for 43% Off
Amazon Is Selling 'Small and Amazing' 8TB Portable Solid State Drives for 43% Off

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon Is Selling 'Small and Amazing' 8TB Portable Solid State Drives for 43% Off

The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Amazon Is Selling 'Small and Amazing' 8TB Portable Solid State Drives for 43% Off originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Why rely on the cloud when you can have a Solid State Drive (SSD) that delivers "ultra-fast speeds" without the need for a monthly subscription? Amazon is selling 8TB Crucial X10 USB 3.2 Type C Portable Solid State Drives for only $440. The list price is $780, so buyers are saving a whopping 43%. This device features USB-C 3.2 Gen 2x2 and sequential read speeds up to 2100 MB/s. It's water-resistant, dust-resistant (IP65), and drop-resistant up to 9.8 inches. It comes with a USB-C cable and is compatible with the following: Android, iPad, Xbox, PlayStation, Windows, Mac, and Linux. "Fast, compact, and built like a tank," says a reviewer. "It's about the size of a credit card," adds another. The description says, "Designed for creators, students, and PC gamers, this matte blue external SSD delivers fast data access with up to 2,100MB/s read speeds. Unlike a hard drive, SSDs offer significantly faster performance ... Perfect for travel and all types of weather ... This portable drive is designed for durability and reliability wherever you go ... Store all your photos, videos, backups, and more with this compact external 8TB SSD. It's perfect for students, gamers, and everyday users needing secure and reliable storage for their files." Based on nine reviews, buyers have rated this Crucial SSD five stars out of five. "The Crucial X10 1TB SSD blew me away with its blazing-fast speeds ... Whether I'm editing video, moving game libraries, or backing up photos, it keeps up without a hitch. I love the sleek, compact design — it fits in my pocket and feels premium, not flimsy," says a reviewer. "Small and amazing! I didn't realize how small this hard drive would be when I ordered it. It's about the size of a credit card, and maybe half an half-inch thick. It's very portable. It comes with a short USB-C cable ... Overall, very happy with this hard drive. Five stars!" says another. Amazon offers free shipping on orders shipped by Amazon that are $35 or more. Amazon Prime members get free delivery on eligible items with no minimum order. Amazon Is Selling 'Small and Amazing' 8TB Portable Solid State Drives for 43% Off first appeared on Athlon Sports on Jun 2, 2025 This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Demis Hassabis On The Future of Work in the Age of AI
Demis Hassabis On The Future of Work in the Age of AI

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Demis Hassabis On The Future of Work in the Age of AI

WIRED Editor At Large Steven Levy sits down with Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis for a deep dive discussion on the emergence of AI, the path to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), and how Google is positioning itself to compete in the future of the workplace. Director: Justin Wolfson Director of Photography: Christopher Eusteche Editor: Cory Stevens Host: Steven Levy Guest: Demis Hassabis Line Producer: Jamie Rasmussen Associate Producer: Brandon White Production Manager: Peter Brunette Production Coordinator: Rhyan Lark Camera Operator: Lauren Pruitt Gaffer: Vincent Cota Sound Mixer: Lily van Leeuwen Production Assistant: Ryan Coppola Post Production Supervisor: Christian Olguin Post Production Coordinator: Stella Shortino Supervising Editor: Erica DeLeo Assistant Editor: Justin Symonds - It's a very intense time in the field. We obviously want all of the brilliant things these AI systems can do, come up with new cures for diseases, new energy sources, incredible things for humanity. That's the promise of AI. But also, there are worries if the first AI systems are built with the wrong value systems or they're built unsafely, that could be also very bad. - Wired sat down with Demis Hassabis, who's the CEO of Google DeepMind, which is the engine of the company's artificial intelligence. He's a Nobel Prize winner and also a knight. We discussed AGI, the future of work, and how Google plans to compete in the age of AI. This is "The Big Interview." [upbeat music] Well, welcome to "The Big Interview," Demis. - Thank you, thanks for having me. - So let's start talking about AGI a little here. Now, you founded DeepMind with the idea that you would solve intelligence and then use intelligence to solve everything else. And I think it was like a 20-year mission. We're like 15 years into it, and you're on track? - I feel like, yeah, we're pretty much dead on track, actually, is what would be our estimate. - That means five years away from what I guess people will call AGI. - Yeah, I think in the next five to 10 years, that would be maybe 50% chance that we'll have what we are defined as AGI, yes. - Well, some of your peers are saying, "Two years, three years," and others say a little more, but that's really close, that's really soon. How do we know that we're that close? - There's a bit of a debate going on in the moment in the field about definitions of AGI, and then obviously, of course, dependent on that. There's different predictions for when it will happen. We've been pretty consistent from the very beginning. And actually, Shane Legg, one of my co-founders and our chief scientist, you know, he helped define the term AGI back in, I think, early 2001 type of timeframe. And we've always thought about it as system that has the ability to exhibit, sort of all the cognitive capabilities we have as humans. And the reason that's important, the reference to the human mind, is the human mind is the only existence proof we have. Maybe in the universe, the general intelligence is possible. So if you want to claim sort of general intelligence, AGI, then you need to show that it generalizes to all these domains. - Is when everything's filled in, all the check marks are filled in, then we have it- - Yes, so I think there are missing capabilities right now. You know, that all of us who have used the latest sort of LLMs and chatbots, will know very well, like on reasoning, on planning, on memory. I don't think today's systems can invent, you know, do true invention, you know, true creativity, hypothesize new scientific theories. They're extremely useful, they're impressive, but they have holes. And actually, one of the main reasons I don't think we are at AGI yet is because of the consistency of responses. You know, in some domains, we have systems that can do International Math Olympiad, math problems to gold medal standard- - Sure. - With our AlphaFold system. But on the other hand, these systems sometimes still trip up on high school maths or even counting the number of letters in a word. - Yeah. - So that to me is not what you would expect. That level of sort of difference in performance across the board is not consistent enough, and therefore shows that these systems are not fully generalizing yet. - But when we get it, is it then like a phase shift that, you know, then all of a sudden things are different, all the check marks are checked? - Yeah. - You know, and we have a thing that can do everything. - Mm-hmm. - Are we then power in a new world? - I think, you know, that again, that is debated, and it's not clear to me whether it's gonna be more of a kind of incremental transition versus a step function. My guess is, it looks like it's gonna be more of an incremental shift. Even if you had a system like that, the physical world, still operates with the physical laws, you know, factories, robots, these other things. So it'll take a while for the effects of that, you know, this sort of digital intelligence, if you like, to really impact, I think, a lot of the real world things. Maybe another decade plus, but there's other theories on that too, where it could come faster. - Yeah, Eric Schmidt, who I think used to work at Google, has said that, "It's almost like a binary thing." He says, "If China, for instance, gets AGI, then we're cooked." Because if someone gets it like 10 minutes, before the next guy, then you can never catch up. You know, because then it'll maintain bigger, bigger leads there. You don't buy that, I guess. - I think it's an unknown. It's one of the many unknowns, which is that, you know, that's sometimes called the hard takeoff scenario, where the idea there is that these AGI systems, they're able to self-improve, maybe code themselves future versus themselves, that maybe they're extremely fast at doing that. So what would be a slight lead, let's say, you know, a few days, could suddenly become a chasm if that was true. But there are many other ways it could go too, where it's more incremental. Some of these self-improvement things are not able to kind of accelerate in that way, then being around the same time, would not make much difference. But it's important, I mean, these issues are the geopolitical issues. I think the systems that are being built, they'll have some imprint of the values and the kind of norms of the designers and the culture that they were embedded in. - [Steven] Mm-hmm. - So, you know, I think it is important, these kinds of international questions. - So when you build AI at Google, you know, you have that in mind. Do you feel competitive imperative to, in case that's true, "Oh my God, we better be first?" - It's a very intense time at the moment in the field as everyone knows. There's so many resources going into it, lots of pressures, lots of things that need to be researched. And there's sort of lots of different types of pressures going on. We obviously want all of the brilliant things that these AI systems can do. You know, I think eventually, we'll be able to advance medicine and science with it, like we've done with AlphaFold, come up with new cures for diseases, new energy sources, incredible things for humanity, that's the promise of AI. But also there are worries both in terms of, you know, if the first AI systems are built with the wrong value systems or they're built unsafely, that could be also very bad. And, you know, there are at least two risks that I worry a lot about. One is, bad actors in whether it's individuals or rogue nations repurposing general purpose AI technology for harmful lens. And then the second one is, obviously, the technical risk of AI itself. As it gets more and more powerful, more and more agentic, can we make sure the guardrails are safe around it? They can't be circumvented. And that interacts with this idea of, you know, what are the first systems that are built by humanity gonna be like? There's commercial imperative- - [Steven] Right. - There's national imperative, and there's a safety aspect to worry about who's in the lead and where those projects are. - A few years ago, the companies were saying, "Please, regulate us. We need regulation." - Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. - And now, in the US at least, the current administration seems less interested in putting regulations on AI than accelerating it so we can beat the Chinese. Are you still asking for regulation? Do you think that that's a miss on our part? - I think, you know, and I've been consistent in this, I think there are these other geopolitical sort of overlays that have to be taken into account, and the world's a very different place to how it was five years ago in many dimensions. But there's also, you know, I think the idea of smart regulation that makes sense around these increasingly powerful systems, I think is gonna be important. I continue to believe that. I think though, and I've been certain on this as well, it sort of needs to be international, which looks hard at the moment in the way the world is working, because these systems, you know, they're gonna affect everyone, and they're digital systems. - Yeah. - So, you know, if you sort of restrict it in one area, that doesn't really help in terms of the overall safety of these systems getting built for the world and as a society. - [Steven] Yeah. - So that's the bigger problem, I think, is some kind of international cooperation or collaboration, I think, is what's required. And then smart regulation, nimble regulation that moves as the knowledge about the research becomes better and better. - Would it ever reach a point for you where you would feel, "Man, we're not putting the guardrails in. You know, we're competing, that we really have to stop, or you can't get involved in that?" - I think a lot of the leaders of the main labs, at least the western labs, you know, there's a small number of them and we do all know each other and talk to each other regularly. And a lot of the lead researchers do. The problem is, is that it's not clear we have the right definitions to agree when that point is. Like, today's systems, although they're impressive as we discussed earlier, they're also very flawed. And I don't think today's systems, are posing any sort of existential risk. - Mm-hmm. - So it's still theoretical, but the problem is that a lot of unknowns, we don't know how fast those will come, and we don't know how risky they will be. But in my view, when there are so many unknowns, then I'm optimistic we'll overcome them. At least technically, I think the geopolitical questions could be actually, end up being trickier, given enough time and enough care and thoughtfulness, you know, sort of using the scientific method as we approach this AGI point. - That makes perfect sense. But on the other hand, if that timeframe is there, we just don't have much time, you know? - No, we don't. We don't have much time. I mean, we're increasingly putting resources into security and things like cyber, and also research into controllability and understanding of these systems, sometimes called mechanistic interpretability. You know, there's a lot of different sub-branches of AI. - Yeah, that's right. I wanna get to interpretability. - Yeah, that are being invested in, and I think even more needs to happen. And then at the same time, we need to also have societal debates more about institutional building. How do we want governance to work? How are we gonna get international agreement, at least on some basic principles, around how these systems are used and deployed and also built? - What about the effect on work on the marketplace? - Yeah. - You know, how much do you feel that AI is going to change people's jobs, you know, the way jobs are distributed in the workforce? - I don't think we've seen, my view is if you talk to economists, they feel like there's not much has changed yet. You know, people are finding these tools useful, certainly in certain domains- - [Steven] Yeah. - Like, things like AlphaFold, many, many scientists are using it to accelerate their work. So it seems to be additive at the moment. We'll see what happens over the next five, 10 years. I think there's gonna be a lot of change with the jobs world, but I think as in the past, what generally tends to happen is new jobs are created that are actually better, that utilize these tools or new technologies, what happened with the internet, what happened with mobile? We'll see if it's different this time. - Yeah. - Obviously everyone always thinks this new one, will be different. And it may be, it will be, but I think for the next few years, it's most likely to be, you know, we'll have these incredible tools that supercharge our productivity, make us really useful for creative tools, and actually almost make us a little bit superhuman in some ways in what we're able to produce individually. So I think there's gonna be a kind of golden era, over the next period of what we're able to do. - Well, if AGI can do everything humans can do, then it would seem that they could do the new jobs too. - That's the next question about like, what AGI brings. But, you know, even if you have those capabilities, there's a lot of things I think we won't want to do with a machine. You know, I sometimes give this example of doctors and nurses. You know, maybe a doctor and what the doctor does and the diagnosis, you know, one could imagine that being helped by AI tool or even having an AI kind of doctor. On the other hand, like nursing, you know, I don't think you'd want a robot to do that. I think there's something about the human empathy aspect of that and the care, and so on, that's particularly humanistic. I think there's lots of examples like that but it's gonna be a different world for sure. - If you would talk to a graduate now, what advice would you give to keep working- - Yeah. - Through the course of a lifetime- - Yeah. - You know, in the age of AGI? - My view is, currently, and of course, this is changing all the time with the technology developing. But right now, you know, if you think of the next five, 10 years as being, the most productive people might be 10X more productive if they are native with these tools. So I think kids today, students today, my encouragement would be immerse yourself in these new systems, understand them. So I think it's still important to study STEM and programming and other things, so that you understand how they're built, maybe you can modify them yourself on top of the models that are available. There's lots of great open source models and so on. And then become, you know, incredible at things like fine-tuning, system prompting, you know, system instructions, all of these additional things that anyone can do. And really know how to get the most out of those tools, and do it for your research work, programming, and things that you are doing on your course. And then come out of that being incredible at utilizing those new tools for whatever it is you're going to do. - Let's look a little beyond the five and 10-year range. Tell me what you envision when you look at our future in 20 years, in 30 years, if this comes about, what's the world like when AGI is everywhere? - Well, if everything goes well, then we should be in an era of what I like to call sort of radical abundance. So, you know, AGI solves some of these key, what I sometimes call root node problems in the world facing society. So a good one, examples would be curing diseases, much healthier, longer lifespans, finding new energy sources, you know, whether that's optimal batteries and better room temperature, superconductors, fusion. And then if that all happens, then we know it should be a kind of era of maximum human flourishing where we travel to the stars and colonize the galaxy. You know, I think the beginning of that will happen in the next 20, 30 years if the next period goes well. - I'm a little skeptical of that. I think we have an unbelievable abundance now, but we don't distribute it, you know, fairly. - Yeah. - I think that we kind of know how to fix climate change, right? We don't need a AGI to tell us how to do it, yet we're not doing it. - I agree with that. I think we being as a species, a society not good at collaborating, and I think climate is a good example. But I think we are still operating, humans are still operating in a zero-sum game mentality. Because actually, the earth is quite finite, relative to the amount of people there are now in our cities. And I mean, this is why our natural habitats, are being destroyed, and it's affecting wildlife and the climate and everything. - [Steven] Yeah. - And it's also partly 'cause people are not willing to accept, we do now to figure out climate. But it would require people to make sacrifices. - Yeah. - And people don't want to. But this radical abundance would be different. We would be in a finally, like, it would feel like a non-zero-sum game. - How will we get [indistinct] to that? Like, you talk about diseases- - Well, I gave you an example. - We have vaccines, and now some people think we shouldn't use it. - Let me give you a very simple example. - Sure. - Water access. This is gonna be a huge issue in the next 10, 20 years. It's already an issue. Countries in different, you know, poorer parts of the world, dryer parts of the world, also obviously compounded by climate change. - [Steven] Yeah. - We have a solution to water access. It's desalination, it's easy. There's plenty of sea water. - Yeah. - Almost all countries have a coastline. But the problem is, it's salty water, but desalination only very rich countries. Some countries do do that, use desalination as a solution to their fresh water problem, but it costs a lot of energy. - Mm-hmm. - But if energy was essentially zero, there was renewable free clean energy, right? Like fusion, suddenly, you solve the water access problem. Water is, who controls a river or what you do with that does not, it becomes much less important than it is today. I think things like water access, you know, if you run forward 20 years, and there isn't a solution like that, could lead to all sorts of conflicts, probably that's the way it's trending- - Mm-hmm, right. - Especially if you include further climate change. - So- - And there's many, many examples like that. You could create rocket fuel easily- - Mm-hmm. - Because you just separate that from seawater, hydrogen and oxygen. It's just energy again. - So you feel that these problems get solved by AGI, by AI, then we're going to, our outlook will change, and we will be- - That's what I hope. Yes, that's what I hope. But that's still a secondary part. So the AGI will give us the radical abundance capability, technically, like the water access. - Yeah. - I then hope, and this is where I think we need some great philosophers or social scientists to be involved. That should hopefully shift our mindset as a society to non-zero-sum. You know, there's still the issue of do you divide even the radical abundance fairly, right? Of course, that's what should happen. But I think there's much more likely, once people start feeling and understanding that there is this almost limitless supply of raw materials and energy and things like that. - Do you think that driving this innovation by profit-making companies is the right way to go? We're most likely to reach that optimistic high point through that? - I think it's the current capitalism or, you know, is the current or the western sort of democratic kind of systems, have so far been proven to be sort of the best drivers of progress. - Mm-hmm. - So I think that's true. My view is that once you get to that sort of stage of radical abundance and post-AGI, I think economics starts changing, even the notion of value and money. And so again, I think we need, I'm not sure why economists are not working harder on this if maybe they don't believe it's that close, right? But if they really did that, like the AGI scientists do, then I think there's a lot of economic new economic theory that's required. - You know, one final thing, I actually agree with you that this is so significant and is gonna have a huge impact. But when I write about it, I always get a lot of response from people who are really angry already about artificial intelligence and what's happening. Have you tasted that? Have you gotten that pushback and anger by a lot of people? It's almost like the industrial revolution people- - Yeah. - Fighting back. - I mean, I think that anytime there's, I haven't personally seen a lot of that, but obviously, I've read and heard a lot about, and it's very understandable. That's all that's happened many times. As you say, industrial revolution, when there's big change, a big revolution. - [Steven] Yeah. - And I think this will be at least as big as the industrial revolution, probably a lot bigger. That's surprising, there's unknowns, it's scary, things will change. But on the other hand, when I talk to people about the passion, the why I'm building AI- - Mm-hmm. - Which is to advance science and medicine- - Right. - And understanding of the world around us. And then I explain to people, you know, and I've demonstrated, it's not just talk. Here's AlphaFold, you know, Nobel Prize winning breakthrough, can help with medicine and drug discovery. Obviously, we're doing this with isomorphic now to extend it into drug discovery, and we can cure terrible diseases that might be afflicting your family. Suddenly, people are like, "Well, of course, we need that." - Right. - It'll be immoral not to have that if that's within our grasp. And the same with climate and energy. - Yeah. - You know, many of the big societal problems, it's not like you know, we know, we've talked about, there's many big challenges facing society today. And I often say I would be very worried about our future if I didn't know something as revolutionary as AI was coming down the line to help with those other challenges. Of course, it's also a challenge itself, right? But at least, it's one of these challenges that can actually help with the others if we get it right. - Well, I hope your optimism holds out and is justified. Thank you so much. - And I'll do my best. Thank you. [upbeat music]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store