South Africa declares national disaster as flooding death toll rises to 92
Speaking at the public memorial service, Zolile Williams, a member of the executive council, said the people of the coastal province had not been the same since the disaster hit, and many now faced the challenging task of rebuilding.
'Since June 9, this province has been hit hard by unprecedented, catastrophic and unimaginable disasters, where in the whole of the province, about 92 people have perished,' Mr Williams said.
'Since that day, the Eastern Cape has not been the same. It is the first time we have experienced so many dead bodies, some of whom have not yet been found.'
An extreme weather front brought heavy rain, strong winds and snow to parts of the province caused flooding in one of South Africa's poorest provinces last week, leaving dozens dead and roads, houses, schools and other infrastructure damaged.
At least two schoolchildren who were washed away in a bus are among the unverified number of missing persons according to local media reports, while thousands have since been displaced.
Authorities have appealed for residents to report missing people so rescuers could better understand how many people they were still looking for.
Religious leaders from different Christian religions were among the hundreds of mourners who attended the memorial ceremony, lighting candles as a symbolic expression of remembering the 92 people who died in the floods.
In a government notice on Wednesday, Elias Sithole, director of the National Disaster Management Centre, said severe weather had caused property damage and the disruption of vital services in the provinces of KwaZulu-Natal, the Eastern Cape, the Western Cape, and the Free State, which prompted South Africa to declare a national state of disaster.
The declaration allows the government to release funding for relief and rehabilitation and will remain in place until it lapses or until the conditions can no longer be categorised as such and is revoked by the head of the centre.
President Cyril Ramaphosa recently visited the town of Mthatha, in Eastern Cape province, where the floods hit hardest.
Many of the Eastern Cape flood victims lived on floodplains close to rivers. Government officials said poor neighbourhoods with informal dwellings were most severely impacted. Authorities have been criticised for the rescue response but also for the state of theinfrastructure in the area.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
3 days ago
- The National
Black and white thinking takes us closer to fascism
Both of those things are enough to remind me that while communication in black and white is possible, it quite often seeks to create contrast where none is appropriate or desirable. We do not, for example, live in a world where the people of Israel are wholly good or wholly bad. Likewise, we do not live in a world where the same could be said of Palestinians, or the US government, or even – and perhaps this is the most difficult to admit these days – the Parliamentary Labour Party. READ MORE: Trust selling Highland clan's land for £6.8m under investigation There are good and bad people in every one of the groups I have mentioned. The numbers of those who are good and those who are bad might vary within them but to pretend everything is a simple question of groups being good or evil, or right and wrong, is mistaken. The reality of human life is that such simplistic claims can never be justified. In every group, every society, among people of every ethnicity or race, and in every state, and every organisation, we have to recognise good and bad can coexist, and sometimes simultaneously even in the same people. I know this makes life much harder. But, if we succumb to the temptation to subscribe to generalisms about any group, anywhere, at any time, and believe blanket descriptions can apply to them without taking into account the diverse nature of humanity, then we succumb to something that is best called fascism. Fascists have one political goal, which is all too easily seen among some politicians in both the UK and the United States at present. They seek to describe some group in society as the 'other'. They then ascribe to that group a range of characteristics which can, in truth, be found in any group in any society, anywhere, but which they claim are commonplace or universal within the group they deem to be the 'other'. They then blame all the ills in a society upon that 'other'. The extermination of that group becomes their political focus, all the while disguising the fact that what they are really doing is pursuing an agenda that, almost without exception in the case of fascism, is intended to advance the interest of some (but not all) among the wealthiest in their society, at cost to everyone else. This is most easily seen in the US, where the support of some (but I stress, not all) within the tech community for the agenda pursued by Donald Trump and far-right think tanks is resulting in the 'othering' of those they describe as illegal immigrants. US president Donald Trump They are then indifferent to the suffering of all those who might share ethnicity with those they 'other'. All of this is being done to advance the interests of a white, male, evangelical Christian anti-feminist elite within that society over the interests of all others. In the UK, we see a similar exploitation of so-called illegal immigrants, even though no-one is an illegal immigrant in the UK until their application to be resident here has been formally declined. It is easy to identify far-right politicians from Reform UK and the Conservative Party who are undertaking this activity but, as Keir Starmer has reminded us, not least with his 'island of strangers' speech, this is something Labour are also all too keen to do. Division is now a political strategy when not so long ago our whole focus was upon the creation of integrated communities so that people might live in harmony. READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says she should have paused gender reform legislation The change has been dramatic and appears to have been quite sudden but in practice it can be fairly easily traced as having begun in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis. Then, it became apparent to many that our economy was being systemically structured to ensure some got all the advantages of the actions the state undertook as a consequence of the banking collapse. The majority, and most definitely those on median incomes or less, enjoyed no gain at all, and quite probably suffered losses. People were told there was growth, that there was no such thing as austerity, and that government services were being maintained by additional government spending. But what they experienced was something entirely different. They were not better off. Services were worse. The society in which they lived was very definitely suffering, and they were angry about that. Then, despite the fact that this was actually because of the exploitation created by some bankers and others in a wealthy elite (and again, I stress, this was not universal), some politicians, acting with the outright support of those who were benefiting the most, chose to blame those they call illegal migrants for the situation the majority of people found themselves in. The anger and disillusion people quite reasonably felt as a consequence of the deliberate failure of the Tories to meet need was redirected for the political advantage of the elite that was actually exploiting people and, in the process, something once described by the German historian and philosopher Hannah Arendt occurred. As she explained, the constant lying of our politicians is not intended to make people believe the lies that they are told. Instead, its goal is to ensure no-one believes anything any more. The intention is to ensure no-one can, with any degree of certainty, distinguish between truth and lies, and so between right and wrong. People deprived of that power are, in Arendt's opinion, also deprived of the power to think and judge and, as a consequence, are then unwittingly subject to the rule of lies. This then means politicians who wish to manipulate a population for their own advantage are free to do so. That is what happens when we give up on nuance. That is what happens when we give up on believing we have more in common with others than that which divides us. That is what happens when we forget there is right and wrong, but that there is no-one, or any group, that is at all times and in all places possessed of either quality on every occasion. That is, in effect, what happens when we give up on judgment. We become exposed to manipulation and so to abuse. And this is where we are. This is why politicians think they can lie to us, on Gaza, on the state of the UK, on Scottish independence, and on almost anything else. It's because they believe we have forgotten how to determine the truth in among the noise that those who wish to distract us deliberately create. It is our job to work out what is really happening and to form a judgment upon it. That is what politics and political economy demand of us. It's hard and it sometimes leaves us confused and feeling alienated, but that is the price we have to pay if we are to continue to believe in humanity and decency, and to believe there are things we must do because they are simply right.
The National
3 days ago
- The National
To attack Kate Forbes is to attack the roots of a faith-driven nation
Her principled stance and unapologetic Christian witness, particularly during the SNP leadership contest, shone as a beacon of integrity in a political landscape often clouded by compromise. Forbes's courage in articulating her faith, rooted in the Free Church of Scotland's historic convictions, was a testament to her character and a reminder of the vital role belief plays in public life. Yet, the criticism she faced for her deeply held values was not only unjust but a troubling assault on the principles of freedom and fairness that Scotland holds dear. The Equality Act 2010 explicitly protects the right to hold and express religious beliefs, provided they do not infringe on the rights of others. READ MORE: Kate Forbes opens up on decision to stand down at Holyrood election Those who vilified Forbes for her faith ignored this fundamental legal protection, seeking instead to silence a perspective that has shaped Scotland's moral and cultural fabric for centuries. Their attacks were not merely personal but an affront to the principle that diverse beliefs must coexist in a free society. To condemn Forbes for her convictions is to undermine the very pluralism her critics claim to champion. The Free Church of Scotland, to which Forbes belongs, has a storied legacy of standing for justice, particularly for the poor and marginalised. During the Highland Clearances, when landlords drove families from their homes for profit, the Free Church was a steadfast advocate for the oppressed, offering spiritual and practical support. Its ministers spoke out against the cruelties of dispossession, embodying a faith that demanded action for the downtrodden. To dismiss Forbes's affiliation with this tradition is to ignore its profound contributions to Scotland's social conscience. READ MORE: The indy dream hasn't died, but have we lost the map to get there? Moreover, Christianity, particularly through the lens of the Reformation, has been a cornerstone of Scotland's identity. The Reformation unleashed a wave of literacy, education, and civic responsibility, empowering ordinary Scots to engage with scripture and governance alike. The Covenanters, those fierce defenders of religious liberty, exemplified this legacy. Their resistance to the Treaty of Union in 1707 was not mere rebellion but a passionate stand for a Scotland where faith and freedom were intertwined. Their unyielding commitment to principle, even at the cost of their lives, remains a powerful rebuke to those who would mock or marginalise Christian conviction today. Forbes's detractors, in their rush to caricature her beliefs, fail to grasp the depth of this heritage. Her Calvinist faith, far from being a relic, reflects a worldview that values community, stewardship, and justice – principles that resonate with Scotland's enduring aspiration for a fairer society. READ MORE: Kate Forbes has perfect response to Scottish Tories' membership offer To attack her is to attack the very roots of a nation shaped by faith-driven reform and resilience. Kate Forbes's absence from the 2026 election is a loss not only for the SNP but for all who value conviction in public life. Her Christian witness, far from being a liability, was a gift – a reminder that faith can inspire leadership that is both compassionate and courageous. I urge your readers to reflect on the legacy of Scotland's Christian heritage and to reject the narrow intolerance that seeks to silence voices like hers. Let us honour the right to belief, celebrate the Free Church's historic fight for the poor, and recognise the Reformation and Covenanters' role in forging a Scotland that still inspires us today. Cllr Gordon Murray SNP Councillor, Stornoway North
Wales Online
3 days ago
- Wales Online
The staggering Whatsapp messages sent to the new Archbishop of Wales by her colleagues
The staggering Whatsapp messages sent to the new Archbishop of Wales by her colleagues When Cherry Vann was added to a Whatsapp chat, some of her more orthodox colleagues were 'dismayed and horrified' a gay bishop had been appointed to lead Church in Wales Cherry Vann has been chosen as the 15th Archbishop of Wales (Image: Church in Wales) One of the largest Anglican provinces in the world has severed its ties with its Welsh counterparts - all because the new Archbishop of Wales is gay. Cherry Vann, the Bishop of Monmouth for the past five years, was chosen as the 15th Archbishop of Wales at the end of July. Originally from Leicestershire, Archbishop Cherry Vann was elected as the the leader of the Church in Wales with a two-thirds majority and will be enthroned at Newport Cathedral in due course, she has pledged to bring "healing and reconciliation". Yet already, she has also come into conflict with colleagues from more orthodox countries. The day after she was elected, Vann was added to a WhatsApp group containing every Anglican chief in the an interview with The Sunday Times, she said two immediately criticised her appointment to their ranks. "They were dismayed and horrified," she says. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . The Church of Nigeria, one of the largest Anglican provinces in the world, said it would sever ties with the Church in Wales. Henry Ndukuba, the Archbishop of Nigeria, said: "We do not recognise the so-called Archbishop of Wales and cannot share communion with a church that has departed from the teachings of the Bible." The chairman of Gafcon, an influential conservative group of archbishops and bishops, called her election an 'act of apostasy'. Other Christian groups and publications have also criticised her appointments. She told the journalist interviewing her that on the morning they were meeting she received a letter through the post calling her "an abomination". But she said it didn't impact her faith, although it was "hurtful". "I just rest in the fact that a lot of people are rejoicing, and I know where God wants me to be". In the interview, the new Archbishop of Wales criticised the institution she is part of, a "number of times", the author says with Bishop Vann saying the institution is "full of human beings who are flawed and failing" "I think the church can so often get in the way of God," the 66-year-old said. She was ordained into the Church of England in 1994, and was one of the first female priests, before spending 11 years as Archdeacon of Rochdale in Manchester. But she said she knew because she was gay, she knew her career wouldn't last in England. The Church in Wales has different rules to the Church of England, gay clergy in England are permitted to enter into civil partnerships only if they remain celibate. So, for almost 30 years, she had kept her relationship with Wendy Diamond, a retired council employee, secret with her partner "hiding upstairs" when visitors came to see them. "It was an appalling state of affairs," says Vann. "It felt as though I was being dishonest but I didn't feel at the time that I had any choice. I was living in fear." When she became Bishop of Monmouth, she said she finally felt comfortable enough to be open about her sexuality. "When we first came to Wales we had a party," the new archbishop of Wales told The Times. "We invited guests to my home and for the first time Wendy was able to come to the front door with me and welcome people as my partner. That, for her and for me, signalled what a massive change it meant being here." She has taken over after the resignation of Bishop Andy John, in the wake of two reports, commissioned by the Church in Wales over concerns about the culture surrounding the Bangor Diocese. Bishop Vann said: "I don't think there's something rotten in the clergy themselves,' says Vann, "but the church has a culture of wanting to protect its own. It's a shocking thing to say but perpetrators have been protected and the survivors have been left to flounder". Article continues below
