
Thousands more families face inheritance tax investigations
Have you been the subject of an inheritance tax investigation? Get in touch: money@telegraph.co.uk
Thousands more grieving families are facing investigations into their inheritance tax (IHT) liabilities as the taxman clamps down on underpayments.
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) launched 3,961 investigations in the 12 months to April 5, an increase of 31pc on the previous tax year as it vowed to leave 'no stone unturned' on revenue.
The tax authority has opened nearly 10,000 investigations into families in the past three years. Of those, 2,606 are ongoing, data from a Freedom of Information request reveals.
It comes after HMRC figures revealed that it pocketed £8.2bn from death duties last year, the fourth record-breaking year in a row.
Sean McCann, of NFU Mutual, who submitted the information request, said: 'Where there is a suspicion that inheritance tax has been underpaid through error, omission, or undervaluing assets, HMRC has substantial investigatory powers and will check a range of sources to build a picture of the deceased individual's financial affairs.'
He added: 'HMRC leaves no stone unturned in these investigations. The interest rate you pay on overdue inheritance tax stands at 8.5pc which is the highest rate for 18 years, and can add a significant amount to the bill. This can compound what for many is already a challenging and distressing situation.'
In 2024 HMRC began 3,028 investigations into inheritance tax underpayments. In the year ending April 2023, it launched 3,163.
Between April and August last year, the tax authority earned more than £105m of inheritance tax through compliance checks, according to wealth manager Evelyn Partners. The main reason it chose to investigate was because of concerns around the valuations of assets in an estate.
Mike Warburton, The Telegraph's tax expert, said: 'HMRC clearly has a right to investigate deceased estates, but it is important that this is done with understanding of the emotional state of the family left behind.'
In the autumn Budget, Rachel Reeves announced that private pensions would be considered part of a person's estate, and therefore liable for inheritance tax from 2027. This will increase the number of estates liable for death duties by almost a quarter, according to analysis by Rathbones.
Campaigners criticised the Chancellor for the 'cruel' blow to bereaved families that will 'wreak havoc on finances'.
Wealth advisers have said there has been a rise in parents making six-figure gifts to get their children on the property ladder to escape the tax grab.
Executors can find it difficult to answer all the questions HMRC ask,s and it can take time to locate the necessary documents
Mr McCann added: 'IHT remains one of the most feared and least understood taxes, with unspent pensions falling within the inheritance tax net from 2027 and many farms and businesses from 2026, more and more families will find themselves dragged into paying inheritance tax.'
An HMRC spokesman said: 'The majority of people pay the correct amount of inheritance tax. In cases where it is suspected someone has not, investigations can be opened to address issues and ensure the system remains fair.'
Between 2014 and 2020, the number of cases closed for inheritance tax regularly reached 5,000.
How to cut your inheritance tax bill
There are various ways you can reduce your inheritance tax bill and shield your money from the taxman.
First, it helps to tie the knot. You can pass on assets of unlimited value to a spouse or civil partner without any inheritance tax liability.
Spouses can also inherit their partner's unused nil-rate band when they die. But this is not passed on automatically – you must make a formal claim to HMRC.
For many families a property will be their most valuable asset. Fortunately, homeowners get an additional £175,000 allowance – called the 'residence nil-rate band' if they pass their main property to family members. And because spouses and civil partners can combine their allowances, they can pass on a total of £1m wealth without incurring a tax bill.
But perhaps the simplest way to avoid an inheritance tax bill is to give away your assets during your lifetime. A highly tax-efficient method is to give money out of surplus income. This must be money you can give away regularly without significantly changing your lifestyle.
Finally, trusts are a powerful tool to help reduce the amount of inheritance tax your beneficiaries have to pay. Placing assets into a trust removes them from your estate, potentially avoiding any inheritance tax charges at the time of your death, depending on the structure of the trust.
It is important to remember that HMRC will open an investigation where it believes an incorrect tax return has been submitted.
It is the job of the executor to calculate the value of the estate and submit the relevant inheritance tax forms to HMRC. If they fail to pay the tax within six months of the death, then interest is charged on the late payment.
On top of this, executors also face penalties for submitting inaccurate information – of up to 100pc of the tax due.
The average inquiry will drag on for 558 days, during which time the executors are blocked from distributing the estate to the beneficiaries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'


The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chief executive John-Paul Marks has told MPs that he regrets any frustration over how information about a breach affecting around 100,000 taxpayers was disclosed. The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident. On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts. Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million. Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year. The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.' Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'. He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments. 'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money. 'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.' He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail. Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant. 'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.' Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts. 'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result. 'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible. 'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
UK economy shrinks by 0.3% as firms hit by higher taxes and Trump trade war
The UK economy contracted in April by 0.3% as businesses cut jobs and cancelled investment plans in response to higher taxes and the uncertainty created by Donald Trump's tariff war. Figures from the Office for National Statistics showed the economy went into reverse after growing by 0.2% in March and 0.5% in February. The figure overshot City economists' expectations of a 0.1% contraction, underscoring concerns that an increase in employer national insurance contributions and the impact of escalating US import tariffs on the global economic outlook would harm the UK's growth prospects. The latest jobs data from HMRC showed the number of workers on company payrolls fell by 109,000 in May – the largest monthly fall since the same period in 2020 during the first Covid lockdown. More than 250,000 jobs have been lost in Britain since Rachel Reeves's autumn budget. Coming only a day after the chancellor laid out plans to grow the economy in a three-year spending review, the data will disappoint ministers keen to show they have improved the UK's outlook. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion More details soon …