
NewsNation accuses Fox News of stealing their slogan for its Super Bowl ad
Calling out Fox News in a new TV promo, 'centrist' cable news upstart NewsNation accuses its much larger competitor of ripping off its slogan for a prominent ad the right-wing network ran during the Super Bowl this past Sunday.
The new on-air commercial, which NewsNation posted to its social media accounts on Tuesday night, points out that the Fox News promo boasts that it is a news channel 'For All America,' a slogan that is remarkably similar to the tagline that NewsNation first debuted in 2021 and slightly revised late last year.
'News for all Americans,' NewsNation anchor Chris Cuomo declares in the channel's ad alongside a graphic that blares 'A Tagline So Good.' Cuomo then points out that Fox News ended their widely seen commercial with the 'For All America' slogan emblazoned on the screen.
'Sound familiar?' Cuomo snarked. 'Of course it does. They took it from NewsNation!'
While additional graphics stated that 'it's easy to talk the talk, because only one network walks the walk,' Cuomo took a swipe at Fox News for not featuring any of its conservative opinion hosts — such as Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters or Greg Gutfeld — in the Super Bowl commercial.
'Why are none of the main players at Fox in the ad?' Cuomo wondered while footage of NewsNation anchors Elizabeth Vargas, Leland Vittert, Ashleigh Banfield and Cuomo played in the background. Incidentally, Vittert was once a Fox News correspondent and host before jumping to the Nexstar-owned station in 2021.
NewsNation first debuted its 'News for All America' tagline in a promotional campaign in August 2021, which was when the then-nascent network was first expanding to a full-time cable news channel. Following the 2024 presidential election it made a minor tweak to its slogan, changing it to 'News For All Americans' as the station hoped to continue to build on the growing viewership it has experienced over the past year.
Meanwhile, as media reporter Oliver Darcy noted in his Status newsletter on Monday, 'media organizations can't seem to get enough of the phrase 'For All America'' now that Donald Trump is in office. Besides Fox News' ad and NewsNation revising its slogan, The Washington Post has been testing out the new mission statement 'Riveting Storytelling For All of America.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Hunter Biden quietly drops ‘revenge porn' lawsuit against Fox over airing of explicit images
Hunter Biden has dropped his lawsuit against Fox News over the broadcasting of sexually explicit images as part of a 2022 series entitled The Trial of Hunter Biden. Biden initially threatened to sue Fox in April last year, leading to the streaming platform Fox Nation removing the program. Biden subsequently sued Fox in July 2024, but dropped the lawsuit after just a few weeks. He launched yet another lawsuit in October, which he dropped late last week. 'We are pleased to move on now that Hunter Biden has finally voluntarily withdrawn this meritless case, which proved to be nothing more than a politically motivated stunt,' Fox told media outlets in a statement. Biden's initial lawsuit argued that Fox had crossed the bounds of New York 's Civil Rights Law Sec 52-b, which handles what's known as 'revenge porn.' In late October 2022, the show hit the airwaves after being promoted as showing 'how a possible Hunter Biden trial might look.' While Biden's attorneys haven't stated why they dismissed the suit, they recently failed in an attempt to move it to New York state court from federal court. In Friday's court filing, his attorneys said he was dropping the case 'with prejudice' meaning that he can't file it another time. Biden's July filing stated, 'Far from reporting on a newsworthy event, Fox sought to commercialize Mr. Biden's personality through a form of treatment distinct from the dissemination of news or information. Indeed, the entire miniseries is fictionalized and based on a nonexistent criminal case.' 'This entirely politically motivated lawsuit is devoid of merit,' Fox told Mediaite at the time. 'The core complaint stems from a 2022 streaming program that Mr. Biden did not complain about until sending a letter in late April 2024.' 'The program was removed within days of the letter, in an abundance of caution, but Hunter Biden is a public figure who has been the subject of multiple investigations and is now a convicted felon,' the network added. 'Consistent with the First Amendment, FOX News has accurately covered the newsworthy events of Mr. Biden's own making, and we look forward to vindicating our rights in court.' The Fox program investigated Biden's business deals in Ukraine and China during his father's time as vice president. It also reviewed his struggles with alcoholism and drug abuse. The show included intimate images of Biden with a number of women, with the images seemingly coming from his laptop that he dropped off at a Delaware repair shop in April 2019. Last year, Biden was convicted on federal gun charges and pleaded guilty to tax violations connected to his business deals abroad. It was, however, never alleged that he attempted to unlawfully lobby the government on behalf of foreign clients, as the Fox series suggested. Before Biden was sentenced, his father, then-President Joe Biden, issued a full pardon even after repeatedly saying he wouldn't do so.


ITV News
3 hours ago
- ITV News
Government pledges £14bn towards Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk ahead of Spending Review
The government has confirmed a £14.2bn investment to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant - but still cannot confirm the project is fully funded. Ministers claim the reactor - the third to be built on the Suffolk coast - will create 10,000 jobs, 1,500 apprenticeships, and generate enough "clean" energy to power millions of homes. It will be part of a "golden age of clean energy abundance" which will pave the way for household bills and help tackle the climate crisis, according to Energy Secretary Ed Miliband. But the government has had to stop short of issuing a "Final Investment Decision", which can only be given once full investment has been secured. Opponents insist the government "will come to regret" this latest backing for Sizewell C, claiming the project "will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent", comparing it to Hinkley Point C, the nuclear plant under construction in Somerset. Sizewell, which sits just a few miles south of celebrity hotspot Southwold and borders the former Springwatch base at RSPB Minsmere, was first identified as a potential site for a new plant back in 2009. The project was granted development consent by the then-Conservative government in July 2022 and Sir Keir Starmer made a further £5.5bn available to the project last August. Preparatory work has already been started by French energy firm EDF and contracts worth around £330m have already been signed with local companies. The government said Tuesday's announcement would end "years of delay and uncertainty". "We will not accept the status quo of failing to invest in the future and energy insecurity for our country," said Mr Miliband. "We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis. "This is the government's clean energy mission in action - investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security." The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.'But with an estimated cost of at least £20bn - and some experts predicting it could exceed £40bn - EDF continues to seek investors in the project. The government said it expected to issue a Final Investment Decision in the summer. Alison Downes, from the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, said: "There still appears to be no Final Investment Decision for Sizewell C, but £14.2bn in taxpayers' funding, a decision we condemn and firmly believe the government will come to regret. "Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C? "Ministers have still not come clean about Sizewell C's cost and, given negotiations with private investors are incomplete, they have signed away all leverage and will be forced to offer generous deals that undermine value for money. Starmer and Reeves have just signed up to HS2 mark two." No new nuclear plant has opened in the UK since 1995, with all of the existing fleet - except Sizewell B - likely to be phased out by the early 2030s. The reactor at Hinkley Point in Somerset is thought to be five years behind its original target - with an estimated end date of 2031 - and many billions of pounds over budget.

ITV News
4 hours ago
- ITV News
Government's Sizewell C backing shows Putin he 'can't put his boot on our throat', says Keir Starmer
Sir Keir Starmer said his government's commitment to the Sizewell C showed there would be no more 'dithering' about backing nuclear power - and ensure Vladimir Putin "can't put his boot on our throat". The prime minister said the 'change of mindset' would help free the UK from reliance on international fossil fuel markets and prevent price spikes such as those in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Chancellor Rachel Reeves signed off on £14.2bn of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant in Suffolk, while Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build SMRs in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash. Speaking at a college in Ipswich, Sir Keir said successive governments had 'dithered and delayed' over nuclear power. He said: 'The last reactor was 1995, 30 years ago, and I think that was Sizewell B. 'So here, to put this down today, is really important. It's not just an important decision for the future, it's a change of mindset. 'No more dithering, no more delay, no more being unclear about what we're going to do, a real statement of intent as we go forward.' He added: 'Having our own energy in this country that we control, gives us security, gives us independence, so Putin can't put his boot on our throat. 'And it means that we can control the prices in a way that we haven't been able to in recent years, which has meant very high prices for businesses, for households and for families.' The chancellor confirmed the government would back the new nuclear plant on the Suffolk coast to the tune of £14.2bn - although it has been unable to confirm full financing for the project and issue a Final Investment Decision. Trade unions welcomed the Sizewell move, which the Treasury said would go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships. Nuclear plants are seen as increasingly important electricity sources as the government tries to decarbonise Britain's grid by 2030, replacing fossil fuels with green power. The joint managing directors of Sizewell C, Julia Pyke and Nigel Cann, said: 'Today marks the start of an exciting new chapter for Sizewell C, the UK's first British-owned nuclear power plant in over 30 years.' EDF has already signed £330m worth of contracts with local businesses. The plant, which will power the equivalent of six million homes, is planned to be operational in the 2030s. The GMB union said giving Sizewell C the go-ahead was 'momentous'. Regional secretary Warren Kenny said: 'Sizewell C will provide thousands of good, skilled, unionised jobs and we look forward to working closely with the government and Sizewell C to help secure a greener future for this country's energy sector.' But the head of a campaign group opposing the plant criticised the decision to commit the funding, saying it is still not clear what the total cost will be as the final investment decision has not yet been announced and the government is still seeking private investment. Alison Downes, of Stop Sizewell C, said ministers had not 'come clean' about the full cost of the project, which the group have previously estimated could exceed £40bn. The £14.2bn comes on top of £3.7bn already committed to the project. Ms Downes said: 'With the continued secrecy about Sizewell C's total cost, how can voters decide whether the £18bn pledged to Sizewell C is a good use of their money? 'There is no dispute the project will add to consumer bills during construction, and it is virtually guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C.' Officials hope SMRs will be cheaper and quicker to build than traditional power plants, and projects could be connected to the grid by the mid-2030s. Speaking at the GMB union's congress in Brighton, Ms Reeves said: 'The UK is back where it belongs, taking the lead in the technologies of tomorrow. 'This Labour government is investing in the biggest rollout of nuclear power in a generation.' The SMR project could support up to 3,000 new skilled jobs and power the equivalent of around three million homes, with a first site expected to be allocated later this year by state-owned Great British Energy – Nuclear.