India prepared to 'future-proof' trade deal as sweetener in US talks, sources say
FILE PHOTO: Cargo ship Beluga A loaded with sugar for export to Libya stands at the Deendayal Port in Kandla, in the western state of Gujarat, India, April 5, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave/File photo
NEW DELHI -New Delhi is prepared to include a sweetener in trade talks with Washington that would "future-proof" a deal by ensuring no other trade partners could have superior terms, as it pushes for a quick agreement with the Trump administration, Indian government officials said.
The "forward most-favoured-nation" clause, rarely granted by India in previous trade negotiations, would automatically apply to the U.S. any more-favourable tariff arrangements that might be agreed with other countries, two officials with direct knowledge of the matter told Reuters.
"This clause, in a sense, future-proofs the U.S. deal and is the only way to do so," one of the officials said.
The officials declined to be identified because of the private and sensitive nature of the negotiations.
India's trade ministry, which is leading talks, did not respond to an e-mailed request for comment.
India has already made a number of offers and pre-emptive concessions to the U.S. on trade, showing itself more eager than several other big U.S. trading partners including China, Canada and the European Union.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Monday that India could be one of the first to sign a trade deal with the U.S., possibly as soon as this week or next, although he gave no further details. Statements from the Trump administration have said the two sides already agreed on a roadmap for trade discussions.
India would be keen to avoid or at least lighten President Donald Trump's proposed 26% reciprocal tariff and other restrictions on India, said Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, a Delhi-based trade policy think tank, and a former trade negotiator.
Trump's team has said it wants to sign deals with India and other trading partners before a 90-day pause on the proposed reciprocal tariffs lapses in July, although some analysts and former officials say it will face steep challenges.
India is willing to offer the U.S. a significantly better deal than what it may offer to Britain or the European Union, said the second government official familiar with trade discussions.
New Delhi would, however, need assurances that it could become a major supplier to the U.S. market in areas vacated by the Chinese, the official added.
In talks earlier this year on an India-EU free trade agreement, the EU made a request for forward most-favoured nation status similar to what is now planned for the U.S., but New Delhi has not yet committed one way or the other, a third government official aware of the talks said.
India has rarely offered such status in previous negotiations, the first official said. According to the Global Trade Research Initiative's Srivastava, India offered a narrowly construed version for Australian wines under the India-Australia bilateral trade agreement concluded in 2022.
After weeks of talks with the U.S., the Indian government has shown it is willing to offer more and to include politically sensitive sectors such as agriculture. India said its chief negotiator last week met U.S. trade officials in Washington and made progress towards the first tranche of an agreement.
Out of 24 categories of goods traded between the two countries, 19 have been selected for fast-track discussions, a fourth government official said. The remaining five categories, mainly contentious farm products such as soybeans and corn, as well as military equipment, could be discussed in a second phase of talks.
India has proposed reducing duties to 0% to 5% on U.S. frozen meat and a variety of agricultural products, including fish, poultry and a number of fruits and juices, the official said. Those products are currently assessed at 30% to 100%.
"India is in a position to offer tariff concessions on nearly 90% of tariff lines immediately out of about 12,000 tariff lines," said the official, who like the others asked not to be named.
"Tariff concessions on remaining items could be offered in a phased manner," he said.
In return, New Delhi has asked for favourable tariff treatment for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, toys, leather goods, furniture, gems and jewellery, and automotive components, the official said.
New Delhi has also sought a long-term commitment from Washington on preferential treatment for pharmaceuticals and engineering goods such as industrial equipment and components, aiming to become a trusted partner in the supply chains of major U.S. companies. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing
[BEIJING] The price war engulfing China's electric vehicle (EV) industry has sent share prices tumbling and prompted an unusual level of intervention from Beijing. The shakeout may just be getting started. For all the Chinese government's efforts to prevent price cuts by market leader BYD from turning into a vicious spiral, analysts say a combination of weaker demand and extreme overcapacity will slice into profits at the strongest brands and force feebler competitors to fold. Even after the number of EV makers starting shrinking for the first time last year, the industry is still using less than half its production capacity. Chinese authorities are trying to minimise the fallout, chiding the sector for 'rat race competition' and summoning heads of major brands to Beijing last week. Yet previous attempts to intervene have had little success. For the short term at least, investors are betting few automakers will escape unscathed. BYD, arguably the biggest winner from industry consolidation, has lost US$21.5 billion in market value since its shares peaked in late May. 'What you are seeing in China is disturbing, because there's a lack of demand and extreme price cutting,' said John Murphy, a senior automotive analyst at Bank of America. Eventually, there will be 'massive consolidation' to soak up the excess capacity, Murphy said. For automakers, relentless discounting erodes profit margins, undermines brand value and forces even well-capitalised companies into unsustainable financial positions. Low-priced and low-quality products can seriously damage the international reputation of 'Made-in-China' cars, the People's Daily, an outlet controlled by the Communist Party, said. And that knock would come just as models from BYD to Geely, Zeekr and Xpeng start to collect accolades on the world stage. For consumers, price drops may seem beneficial but they mask deeper risks. Unpredictable pricing discourages long-term trust – already people are complaining on China's social media, wondering why they should buy a car now when it may be cheaper next week – while there's a chance automakers, as they cut costs to stay afloat, may reduce investment in quality, safety and after-sales service. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Auto CEOs were told last week they must 'self-regulate' and should not sell cars below cost or offer unreasonable price cuts, according to sources familiar with the matter. The issue of zero-mileage cars also came up – where vehicles with no distance on their odometers are sold by dealers into the second-hand market, seen widely as a way for automakers to artificially inflate sales and clear inventory. Chinese automakers have been discounting a lot more aggressively than their foreign counterparts. Murphy said US automakers should just get out. 'Tesla probably needs to be there to compete with those companies and understand what's going on, but there's a lot of risk there for them.' Others leave no room for doubt that BYD, China's No 1 selling car brand, is the culprit. 'It's obvious to everyone that the biggest player is doing this,' Jochen Siebert, managing director at auto consultancy JSC Automotive, said. 'They want a monopoly where everybody else gives up.' BYD's aggressive tactics are raising concerns over the potential dumping of cars, dealership management issues and 'squeezing out suppliers', he said. The pricing turmoil is also unfolding against a backdrop of significant overcapacity. The average production utilisation rate in China's automotive industry was a mere 49.5 per cent in 2024, data compiled by Shanghai-based Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute show. An April report by AlixPartners meanwhile highlights the intense competition that's starting to emerge among new energy vehicle (NEV) makers or companies that produce pure battery cars and plug-in hybrids. In 2024, the market saw its first ever consolidation among NEV-dedicated brands, with 16 exiting and 13 launching. 'The Chinese automotive market, despite its substantial scale, is growing at a slower speed. Automakers have to put top priority now on grabbing more market share,' Ron Zheng, a partner at global consultancy Roland Berger GmbH, said. Jiyue Auto shows how quickly things can change. A little over a year after launching its first car, the automaker jointly backed by big names Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and technology giant Baidu, began to scale down production and seek fresh funds. It's a dilemma for all carmakers, but especially smaller ones. 'If you don't follow suit once a leading company makes a price move, you might lose the chance to stay at the table,' AlixPartners consultant Zhang Yichao said. He added that China's low capacity utilisation rate, which is 'fundamentally fuelling' the competition, is now even under more pressure from export uncertainties. While the push to find an outlet for excess production is thrusting more Chinese brands to export, international markets can only offer some relief. 'The US market is completely closed and Japan and Korea may close very soon if they see an invasion of Chinese carmakers,' Siebert said. 'Russia, which was the biggest export market last year, is now becoming very difficult. I also don't see South-east Asia as an opportunity anymore.' The pressure of cost-cutting has also led analysts to express concern over supply chain finance risks. A price cut demand by BYD to one of its suppliers late last year attracted scrutiny around how the car giant may be using supply chain financing to mask its ballooning debt. A report by accounting consultancy GMT Research put BYD's true net debt at closer to 323 billion yuan (S$58 billion), compared with the 27.7 billion yuan officially on its books as at the end of June 2024. The pain is also bleeding into China's dealership network. Dealership groups in two provinces have gone out of business since April, both of them ones that were selling BYD cars. Beijing's meeting with automakers last week was not the first attempt at a ceasefire. Two years ago, in mid-2023, 16 major automakers, including Tesla, BYD and Geely signed a pact, witnessed by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), to avoid 'abnormal pricing'. Within days though, CAAM deleted one of the four commitments, saying that a reference to pricing in the pledge was inappropriate and in breach of a principle enshrined in the nation's antitrust laws. The discounting continued unabated. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles
The National Guard, police and protesters stand off outside of a downtown jail in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: AFP Los Angeles police officers arrest a person during protests near the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Protesters are blanketed in smoke along Alondra Boulevard during a standoff with law enforcement in the Los Angeles County city of Compton. PHOTO: REUTERS Demonstrators kneel with their hands raised in front of Los Angeles Metro Police during a protest in Los Angeles, California, on June 8. PHOTO: REUTERS What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles LOS ANGELES - The first of at least 2,000 National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on June 8 morning, ordered in by President Donald Trump to deal with protests against workplace immigration raids after two days of unrest. Any demonstration that got in the way of immigration officials would be considered a 'form of rebellion,' Mr Trump said in his order, issued June 7. The dispatch of troops was an extraordinary escalation that put Los Angeles squarely at the centre of tensions over his administration's immigration crackdown. An expert said it was the first time since 1965 that a president had bypassed a state governor to activate that state's National Guard force for law enforcement or civil unrest purposes. Governor Gavin Newsom of California called Mr Trump's order 'purposefully inflammatory'. He said there was no shortage of law enforcement resources to deal with the protests, and that the federal government was sending the troops because it wanted 'a spectacle'. Protests broke out in Los Angeles on June 6 against a series of raids that appeared to be part of a new phase of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, in which officials say they will focus increasingly on workplaces. Protesters continued demonstrating downtown and in nearby cities on June 7 as law enforcement officers made arrests and in some cases used crowd-control munitions, tear gas and flash-bang grenades against the protesters. Hundreds of National Guard troops had arrived in Los Angeles by June 8 afternoon, and protests flared up again in the city's downtown. Here's what to know: How have the protests developed? The demonstrations began on June 6 after camouflage-clad federal agents began combing the garment district in Los Angeles in search of people suspected of being immigrants in the country without legal permission. The raid, which spread alarm among workers in the city, incited chaotic scenes between protesters, who chanted and threw eggs, and law enforcement officers, who fired pepper spray and crowd-control munitions. Demonstrations continued on June 7, both downtown and in the greater Los Angeles area, including the largely Latino and working-class city of Paramount, about 24km to the south. Protests there were some of the most volatile in the region, with law enforcement officers using flash-bang grenades and firing crowd-control munitions. A firework sent by protesters explodes near by the Los Angeles Sheriff Department officers during immigration protest in Paramount, California, on June 7. PHOTO: AFP Mr Bill Essayli, the Trump administration's top law enforcement official in Southern California, said more than 100 people were arrested on June 6 and at least 20 more were arrested on June 7, mostly in Paramount. A Department of Homeland Security official added Sunday that US officials had arrested eight people in Paramount on June 7 on federal obstruction charges. Two of the eight were minors and have been released from custody, the official said. The streets of Los Angeles were largely quiet on the morning of June 8 as the first National Guard troops began to arrive downtown at the Metropolitan Detention Centre, where the Los Angeles Police Department had detained a number of protesters on June 7. By early afternoon on June 8, hundreds of demonstrators outside the detention centre were facing off with federal law-enforcement officials in riot gear. The officials – including from DHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement – fired canisters of tear gas into the crowd. National Guard troops were also gathered in Paramount, near a Home Depot where protesters had clashed with agents on June 7. Who calls in the national guard? The National Guard is the only branch of the military that can be deployed both by state governors and by the president. Governors almost always control deployment in their states. The Guard operates similarly to the Army Reserve force. Most of its members do not serve full time. They generally hold civilian jobs and attend regular training sessions, and are called into active service only when needed. The National Guard is most often called upon during extreme weather events like hurricanes, floods and wildfires. Troops have sometimes been used to quell civil disturbances at the state governor's request. The National Guard is the only branch of the military that can be deployed both by state governors and by the president. PHOTO: AFP One example was in 1992, when Governor Pete Wilson of California asked President George H.W. Bush to deploy the Guard after riots erupted in Los Angeles over the acquittal of four white police officers in the beating of Mr Rodney King, a black man. Before Mr Trump's move, the last time a president activated a state's National Guard troops for such a purpose without being asked to do so by the state's governor was in 1965, according to Ms Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Centre for Justice, an independent law and policy organization. On that occasion, she said, President Lyndon B. Johnson used troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. What have officials said? Trump administration officials have criticised the state's political leadership over their handling of the protests, while California's Democratic leaders blasted Mr Trump's order as unnecessary and an inappropriate use of power. Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement on the night of June 7 that Mr Trump was deploying the National Guard in response to 'violent mobs' that she said had attacked federal law enforcement and immigration agents. The 2,000 troops would 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' she said. A protester walks through smoke from flash-bang smoke grenades fired by federal agents near a Home Depot in Paramount, California, on June 7. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Mr Trump described the demonstrations, which have been largely peaceful, as 'insurrectionist' on social media on June 8. He did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow him to deploy the US military domestically, and told reporters that there were 'violent people' at the protests and that 'we're not going to let them get away with it'. State and local authorities in California and Los Angeles County have not indicated any need for federal assistance. State attorney general Rob Bonta said on social media that local law enforcement 'have the resources they need to meet the moment' and that Mr Trump's order was 'counterproductive'. Governor Newsom called the president's order 'purposefully inflammatory' and said that Trump had activated the National Guard only because his administration wanted 'a spectacle.' Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles said the National Guard's presence would 'not be helpful'. She said the city was capable of handling protests, adding that she had been in contact with White House officials and Mr Tom Homan, Mr Trump's 'border czar'. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Key US-China trade talks set for Monday in London
FILE PHOTO: The American and Chinese flags are photographed on the negotiating table, during a bilateral meeting between the United States and China, in Geneva, Switzerland, May 10, 2025. KEYSTONE/EDA/Martial Trezzini/Handout via REUTERS/File photo LONDON - Top U.S. and Chinese officials will sit down in London on Monday for talks aimed at defusing the high-stakes trade dispute between the two superpowers that has widened in recent weeks beyond tit-for-tat tariffs to export controls over goods and components critical to global supply chains. At a still-undisclosed venue in London, the two sides will try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing and fostered relief among investors battered for months by U.S. President Donald Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. "The next round of trade talks between the U.S. and China will be held in the UK on Monday," a UK government spokesperson said on Sunday. "We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks." Gathering there will be a U.S. delegation led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and a Chinese contingent helmed by Vice Premier He Lifeng. The second-round of meetings comes four days after Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke by phone, their first direct interaction since Trump's January 20 inauguration. During the more than one-hour-long call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary. But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to "a very positive conclusion," setting the stage for Monday's meeting in London. The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the U.S. of rare earths minerals and magnets. China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. That had become a particular pain point for the U.S. in the weeks after the two sides had struck a preliminary rapprochement in talks held in Switzerland. There, both had agreed to reduce steep import taxes on each other's goods that had had the effect of erecting a trade embargo between the world's No. 1 and 2 economies, but U.S. officials in recent weeks accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments. "We want China and the United States to continue moving forward with the agreement that was struck in Geneva," White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News program "Sunday Morning Futures' on Sunday. "The administration has been monitoring China's compliance with the deal, and we hope that this will move forward to have more comprehensive trade talks." The inclusion at the London talks of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the U.S., is one indication of how central the issue has become for both sides. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks, at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other since Trump's inauguration. That preliminary deal sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and U.S. indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. The S&P 500 Index, which at its lowest point in early April was down nearly 18% after Trump unveiled his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs on goods from across the globe, is now only about 2% below its record high from mid-February. The final third of that rally followed the U.S.-China truce struck in Geneva. Still, that temporary deal did not address broader concerns that strain the bilateral relationship, from the illicit fentanyl trade to the status of democratically governed Taiwan and U.S. complaints about China's state-dominated, export-driven economic model. While the UK government will provide a venue for Monday's discussions, it will not be party to them but will have separate talks later in the week with the Chinese delegation. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
