
Liquor seized from former army officer
Rao admitted to purchasing the liquor from an army canteen in Bengaluru and illegally selling it at a higher price to army personnel in Kurnool. The seized liquor and Rao were taken into custody. Prohibition and Excise Inspector Chandrahas and Sub Inspector Rehana Begum were part of the raid team.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Teacher tapes ‘talkative' 8-year-old's mouth, pokes near eye; suspended
Hyderabad: An 8-year-old boy of a private school in Rangareddy district was allegedly subjected to physical abuse by his teacher for being talkative in the class, said district education officials. Officials said the Class 2 child's teacher gagged him with tape and repeatedly poked near his eye to silence him late July. The abuse came to light only now after Telangana State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (TGSCPCR) stepped in and suspended the teacher, following a complaint from the parents. District education officer P Suseendra Rao said the parents suspected trouble when the boy began refusing to attend school and showing visible distress. "The parents learned of the alleged abuse only after confronting the school management and viewing the classroom's CCTV footage. When the management failed to take any action or offer support, they turned to TGSCPCR," Rao said. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad The parents filmed the footage on their phone and submitted the video evidence with their complaint. Speaking to TOI, TGSCPCR official M Chandana said the school defended the teacher's action as "discipline" for the child being "hyperactive and talking to classmates". The parents, who pay hefty fees, initially sought reassurances on his safety so he could remain enrolled. "No follow-up came. They have now decided to take legal action," Chandana said. Corporal punishment is explicitly banned under the right education law of 2009. It forbids any form of physical or mental harassment in schools, making such conduct a punishable offence if proven. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !


Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
TG BJP lauds apex court's decision to transfer lawyer couple murder case to CBI
Hyderabad: Telangana BJP President N. Ramchander Rao has welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to hand over the investigation of the 2021 murder of advocate couple Gattu Vaman Rao and P. V. Nagamani to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). He said on Wednesday the verdict reflects growing public distrust in the state's investigative agencies and will help restore faith in the judicial system. The lawyer couple was brutally murdered in broad daylight in Peddapalli district, triggering widespread outrage and raising serious concerns about the safety of legal professionals in the state. The Apex Court's decision to transfer the case to the CBI is seen as a significant step toward ensuring justice and accountability. Rao said that the CBI probe would uncover the full facts of the case and ensure that those responsible face strict punishment. He also reiterated his long-standing demand for the introduction of an Advocate Protection Act to safeguard lawyers from such attacks. 'As a former MLC, I had repeatedly urged the previous government to enact the Advocate Protection Act, but the demand was ignored,' Rao said. He called on the current Congress-led state government to fulfill its election manifesto promise and introduce the legislation in the upcoming assembly session. Rao stressed that protecting the legal community is the government's responsibility and affirmed that the BJP would continue to advocate for justice, dignity, and security for lawyers. He said the Supreme Court's intervention should serve as a warning to those who threaten or attack legal professionals and reaffirmed the party's commitment to legal reforms and institutional accountability.


Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
Citing lack of ‘cogent and live proximate link' to suicide, Telangana High Court quashes criminal case against builder
The Telangana High Court recently quashed a criminal petition filed against a city builder who was accused of abetment to suicide of his construction partner and cheating, based on the lack of a 'live proximate link' between the accused's actions and the death. The court also relied on the prosecution's failure to prove fraudulent intent from the inception of the business transaction. The judgment, delivered by Justice Juvvadi Sridevi on August 1, emphasised the necessity of a 'live proximate link' between the alleged instigation and the act of suicide. The court observed that the suicide note, discovered a week and a half after the death, contained no evidence of 'direct or live proximate act of instigation, intentional aid, or active involvement' by the accused. The case stemmed from a business dispute between the petitioner, Nandyala Narendar Reddy, and his construction partner B Lakshmana Rao, who allegedly died by suicide in 2022. The prosecution's case was built on a 'suicide note' found eleven days after Rao's death, which accused Reddy of financial deception and refusing to register Rao's share of flats. The judgment pointed to certain circumstantial inconsistencies, such as the family's initial belief that Rao's death was due to a cardiac arrest and the subsequent cremation without an autopsy, which cast doubt on the case's very foundation. 'Significantly, the so-called suicide note does not contain any direct or live proximate act of instigation, intentional aid, or active involvement on the part of the petitioner-accused that could be construed as abetment within the meaning of Section 107 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), so as to attract the offence under Section 306 (of the) IPC,' the judgment said. Drawing upon a Supreme Court precedent, the court reiterated that 'mere allegations of harassment, discord, or strained relations, in the absence of a specific, proximate, and overt act of incitement or instigation, are legally insufficient to bring home the charge of abetment'. In the absence of any such 'cogent and live proximate evidence', the court found that the foundational ingredients to attract the offence under Section 306 (of the) IPC are clearly lacking. Regarding the cheating charge under Section 420 of the IPC, the court differentiated between a criminal offence and a mere contractual dispute and found that the prosecution failed to establish fraudulent intent at the inception of the business transaction. The ruling reaffirmed the legal distinction that 'mere breach of contract or failure to fulfill a promise, in the absence of such initial fraudulent intent, does not constitute an offence' under Section 420 of the IPC. Highlighting it as a major procedural failure in the police investigation, the court noted the investigating agency's inexplicable omission to interview a crucial witness, Gandem Ranga Rao, the site supervisor who was privy to the business dealings. This failure was deemed a 'serious lapse' and 'fatal to the case of the prosecution.' The court concluded that compelling the petitioner to endure a trial would be a 'sheer abuse of the process of law,' in the absence of any cogent and legally admissible material establishing ingredients of the alleged offences' under sections 306 and 420 of the IPC and consequently dismissed the criminal proceedings.