
‘Tidal wave': How 75 nations face Chinese debt crisis in 2025
Many of the world's poorest countries are due to make record debt repayments to China in 2025 on loans extended a decade ago, at the peak of Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative, a report by the Sydney-based Lowy Institute think tank has found.
Under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a state-backed infrastructure investment programme launched in 2013, Beijing lent billions of dollars to build ports, highways and railroads to connect Asia, Africa and the Americas.
But new lending is drying up. In 2025, debt repayments owed to China by developing countries will amount to $35bn. Of that, $22bn is set to be paid by 75 of the world's poorest countries, putting health and education spending at risk, Lowy concluded.
'For the rest of this decade, China will be more debt collector than banker to the developing world,' said Riley Duke, the report's author.
'Developing countries are grappling with a tidal wave of debt repayments and interest costs to China,' Duke said.
China's BRI, the biggest multilateral development programme ever undertaken by a single country, is one of President Xi Jinping's hallmark foreign policy initiatives.
It focuses primarily on developing country infrastructure projects like power plants, roads and ports, which struggle to receive financial backing from Western financial institutions.
The BRI has turned China into the largest global supplier of bilateral loans, peaking at about $50bn in 2016 – more than all Western creditors combined.
According to the Lowy report, however, paying off these debts is now jeopardising public spending.
'Pressure from Chinese state lending, along with surging repayments to a range of international private creditors, is putting enormous financial strain on developing economies.'
High debt servicing costs can suffocate spending on public services like education and healthcare, and limit their ability to respond to economic and climate shocks.
The 46 least developed countries (LDCs) spent a significant share – about 20 percent – of their tax revenues on external public debt in 2023. Lowy's report implies this will increase even more this year.
For context, Germany used 8.4 percent of its budget to repay debt in 2023.
Lowy also raised questions about whether China will use these debts for 'geopolitical leverage' in the Global South, especially with Washington slashing foreign aid under President Donald Trump.
'As Beijing shifts into the role of debt collector, Western governments remain internally focused, with aid declining and multilateral support waning,' the report said.
While Chinese lending is also beginning to slow down across the developing world, the report said there were two areas that seemed to be bucking the trend.
The first was in nations such as Honduras, Burkina Faso and Solomon Islands, which received massive new loans after switching diplomatic recognition from Taiwan to China.
The other was in countries such as Indonesia and Brazil, where China has signed new loan deals to secure critical minerals and metals for electric batteries.
Beijing's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it was 'not aware of the specifics' of the report but that 'China's investment and financing cooperation with developing countries abides by international conventions'.
Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said 'a small number of countries' sought to blame Beijing for miring developing nations in debt but that 'falsehoods cannot cover up the truth'.
For years, the BRI has been criticised by Western commentators as a way for Beijing to entrap countries with unserviceable debt.
An often-cited example is the Hambantota port – located along vital east-west international shipping routes – in southern Sri Lanka.
Unable to repay a $1.4bn loan for the port's construction, Colombo was forced to lease the facility to a Chinese firm for 99 years in 2017.
China's government has denied accusations it deliberately creates debt traps, and recipient nations have also pushed back, saying China was often a more reliable partner than the West and offered crucial loans when others refused.
Still, China publishes little data on its BRI scheme, and the Lowy Institute said its estimates, based on World Bank data, may underestimate the full scale of China's lending.
In 2021, AidData – a US-based international development research lab – estimated that China was owed a 'hidden debt' of about $385bn.
Challenging the 'debt-trap' narrative, the Rhodium consulting group looked at 38 Chinese debt renegotiations with 24 developing countries in 2019 and concluded that Beijing's leverage was limited, with many of the renegotiations resolved in favour of the borrower.
According to Rhodium, developing countries had restructured roughly $50bn of Chinese loans in the decade before its 2019 study was published, with loan extensions, cheaper financing and debt forgiveness the most frequent outcomes.
Elsewhere, a 2020 study by the China Africa Research Initiative at Johns Hopkins University found that, between 2000 and 2019, China cancelled $3.4bn of debt in Africa and a further $15bn was refinanced. No assets were seized.
Meanwhile, many developing countries remain in hock to Western institutions.
In 2022, the Debt Justice Group estimated that African governments owed three times more to private financial groups than to China, charging double the interest in the process.
'Developing country debt to China is less than what is owed to both private bondholders and multilateral development banks (MDBs),' says Kevin Gallagher, director of the Boston University Global Development Policy Center.
'So, Lowy's focus on China lacks context. The truth is, even if you remove China from the creditor picture, lots of poor countries would still be in debt distress,' Gallagher told Al Jazeera.
Following the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, inflation prompted the United States Federal Reserve, as well as other leading central banks, to hike interest rates.
Attracted to higher yields in the US, investors withdrew their funds from developing country financial assets, raising yield costs and depreciating currencies. Debt repayment costs soared.
Global interest rates have since come down slightly. But according to the UN, developing country borrowing costs are, on average, two to four times higher than in the US and six to 12 times higher than in Germany.
'A crucial aspect about Chinese lending,' said Gallagher, 'is that it tends to be long-term and growth enhancing. That's precisely why a lot of it is focused on infrastructure investment. Western lenders tend to get in and out faster and charge higher rates.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
6 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
China warns US not to ‘play with fire' over Taiwan
China has warned the United States against 'playing with fire' over Taiwan in response to US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth calling the Asian power a 'threat to the region' at a high-profile summit in Singapore. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue on Saturday, Hegseth said China was 'credibly preparing' for military action to shift Asia's power balance, accusing Beijing of rehearsing a potential invasion of Taiwan. China considers Taiwan, a separately governed island, to be a part of its territory and has vowed reunification by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future. Hegseth's remarks provoked a swift rebuke from China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which stressed that Taiwan remains a domestic matter, warning foreign powers against using the issue as leverage. It described US actions in Asia Pacific as turning the region into a 'powder keg'. 'The US should not entertain illusions about using the Taiwan question as a bargaining chip to contain China, nor should it play with fire,' it said. Hegseth had called on allies in the Asia Pacific region, including key security ally Australia, to spend more on defence after warning of the 'real and potentially imminent' threat from China. Calling the US a 'true destabilising' force in the Asia Pacific, Beijing accused Washington of deploying offensive weapons in the South China Sea and aggravating regional tensions. Beijing accused Hegseth of 'vilifying China with defamatory allegations' and promoting a 'Cold War mentality'. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a threat,' the ministry said, adding that it had lodged a formal protest with the US over what it described as 'inflammatory rhetoric'. China and the Philippines contest sovereignty over some islands and atolls in the South China Sea, with growing maritime run-ins between their coastguards as both vie to patrol the waters. Beijing also rejected US claims about threats to maritime navigation, insisting it has consistently promoted dialogue to resolve regional disputes and safeguarded its territorial rights within the bounds of international law. 'The US is the biggest factor undermining peace and stability in the South China Sea,' the statement read. China's Defence Minister Dong Jun skipped the annual Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security forum, with Beijing sending a delegation of lower-ranking representatives instead. It was the first time since 2019 that China has not dispatched its defence minister to the high-level dialogue on regional defence, except when the event was cancelled in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Tensions are already high between China and the US – the world's two biggest economic powers – over Trump's ongoing trade war and tariff threats.


Al Jazeera
16 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
South Korea's snap presidential election 2025: All you need to know
Voters in South Korea are choosing a new president to replace Yoon Suk-yeol who was impeached and removed from office over his brief and ill-fated martial law bid in December. The snap election on June 3 is pivotal, with implications for South Korea's democratic future, as well as its ties with China, the United States and its nuclear armed neighbour, North Korea. The winner – who will serve a single term of five-years – faces the task of addressing the fallout from the martial law decree, which lasted six hours but unleashed political chaos, including mass protests, a riot at a court and three caretaker leaders in six months. The new president will also have to tackle a deepening economic downturn and manage tariff negotiations with the US, which has imposed a 25 percent levy on key exports such as steel, aluminium and automobiles. Here's what you need to know about the June 3 poll: There are six candidates on the ballot, but the main contenders are Lee Jae-myung of the opposition Democratic Party of Korea (DP), and Kim Moon-soo of the governing conservative People Power Party (PPP). Lee, 61, a human rights lawyer-turned-politician, is the clear frontrunner. A Gallup Korea poll on May 28 showed 49 percent of respondents favoured the liberal candidate, while 36 percent said they would vote for Kim, 73, a staunch conservative who served as labour minister in Yoon's government. Trailing in third place is Lee Jun-seok of the conservative New Reform Party, at 9 botched martial law bid has cast a shadow over the race. It put Lee, who lost the last election to Yoon in 2022, back on track for the presidency. The leader of the opposition was instrumental in foiling the president's plan. On December 3, when Yoon declared martial law – in a bid to quash the Democratic Party-dominated parliament, which he portrayed as 'anti-state' and a 'den of criminals' – Lee rushed to the National Assembly and climbed the walls of the building to avoid the hundreds of armed troops deployed there. He livestreamed his exploit, urging supporters to come to the parliament and prevent the arrest of legislators. Despite the troop blockades, enough legislators managed to make it to the parliament and vote to end martial law. The assembly went on to impeach Yoon on December 14. 'This election would not have happened if not for the declaration of martial law by Yoon Suk-yeol and his impeachment,' said Youngshik Bong, research fellow at Yonsei University in Seoul. 'These issues have sucked in all others like a vortex. Everything else is marginal.' On the campaign trail, Lee has pledged to bring to justice anyone involved in Yoon's failed bid and has also promised to introduce tighter controls on the president's ability to declare martial the opposition leader, has also proposed constitutional changes to introduce a four-year, two-term presidency – at the moment, South Korean presidents are only allowed a single term of five years. Lee has also argued for a run-off system for presidential elections, whereby if no candidate secures 50 percent of the popular vote, the top two candidates take on each other in a second round. 'A four-year, two-term presidency would allow for a midterm evaluation of the administration, reinforcing responsibility,' he wrote on Facebook, calling for a constitutional amendment to enable the change. 'Meanwhile, adopting a run-off election system would enhance the legitimacy of democratic governance and help reduce unnecessary social conflict.' The PPP's Kim has accepted Lee's proposals for a constitutional amendment to allow a two-term presidency, but has suggested shortening each term to three martial law bid, however, has left the PPP in crisis and disarray. Infighting plagued the embattled party as it tried to choose the impeached president's successor. Although Kim won the party primary, its leaders tried to replace him with former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo. On the eve of the party's campaign launch, they cancelled Kim's candidacy, only to reinstate him after party members opposed the move. Bong, at Yonsei University, said the infighting as well as divisions in the conservative camp over Yoon's decree has cost it support. 'Kim Moon-soo has not set his position clearly on the martial law declaration,' Bong said. 'He has not distanced himself from the legacy of Yoon, but at the same time, he has not made it clear whether he believes the declaration of martial law was a violation of the constitution. So the PPP has not really had enough energy to mobilise its support bases.' Still, Kim appears to have eroded what was a more than 20 percent point gap with Lee at the start of the campaign. But he has failed to convince the third placed contender – Lee Jun-seok – to abandon his bid and back the PPP to improve its chances. The New Reform Party's Lee, who is 40 years old, said on Tuesday there would be 'no candidate merger' with 'those responsible for the emergency martial law'. Although policy debates have taken a backseat, the outcome of the election could reorient South Korea's approach towards North Korea. The two neighbours are technically in a state of war as the Korean War of 1950-1953 ended in an armistice rather than a peace treaty, and ties between them are at a new low. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has called for rewriting his country's constitution to scrap the longstanding goal of unifying the war-divided nations and described Seoul as an 'invariable principal enemy'. Pyongyang has also severed communication lines, and the two countries have clashed over balloons and drones carrying rubbish and propaganda. Lee of the Democratic Party has promised to ease tensions if elected, including by restoring a military hotline, and committed to maintaining the goal of eliminating nuclear weapons from the Korean Peninsula. Kim, however, has backed Yoon's hardline approach, promising to secure 'pre-emptive deterrence' through tools such as ballistic missiles and the redeployment of US tactical nuclear weapons. He has said he would also seek a path for the country to pursue nuclear armament by securing the right to reprocess nuclear fuel, a key step towards building atomic weapons. The two candidates also differ in their approach to the US, the country's most important security ally, and to China, its biggest trading partner. Lee, who espouses what he calls a pragmatic foreign policy, has said it is crucial to maintain South Korea's alliance with the US and pursue security cooperation with Japan. However, he has pledged to prioritise 'national interests' and said there's 'no need to unnecessarily antagonise China or Russia'.Kim, meanwhile, has questioned Lee's commitment to the US-South Korea alliance, and has promised to hold an immediate summit meeting with US President Donald Trump if elected to discuss tariffs. 'I have a very friendly and trusting relationship,' with the US leader, Kim has said. He has also indicated a willingness to discuss sharing more of the cost of stationing US troops in the country, something Trump has demanded for years. Lee Sung-yoon, board member of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, described the policy differences between the rival camps as 'immutable' and referred to earlier comments by the Democratic Party's Lee, because of which some view him as being soft on China and Russia. 'In the past, Lee has said South Korea should not get involved in China's posture towards Taiwan, and just say thank you to both Beijing and Taiwan and stay out of the conflict. He has said of the trilateral defensive drills among US, Japan and South Korea as 'a defence disaster' and an 'extremely pro-Japanese act'. And more than once he has said that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy incited Russia to invade because he was a political novice who said unfortunate things.' The analyst said Lee has – over the course of the election campaign – tried to walk back some of his statements in a bid to appeal to more moderate voters. However, 'I would venture to guess that people sitting in the councils of power in Washington, DC, or Tokyo or in Kyiv, Ukraine, are not overly jubilant at the prospect of a Lee administration,' he said. Koreans overseas have already cast their ballots, and early voting took place on Thursday and Friday. Large numbers of people turned out for the early vote, including the two frontrunners. According to the National Election Commission, some 44.4 million people in the country of 52 million are eligible to vote. On election day, which is a public holiday, polling stations will open at 6am (22:00 GMT) and close at 8pm (20:00 GMT). Counting will begin immediately and the winner will be known that evening or in the early hours of the following day. The candidate who receives the most votes will be deemed the winner, even if they don't win 50 percent of the votes.


Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
US defence chief warns of China threat as Beijing's top brass skip summit
Singapore – Of the many military officials darting across the lobby of Singapore's Shangri-La Hotel this weekend, there has been one significant absence. China's Defence Minister Dong Jun skipped the annual Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security forum, with Beijing sending a delegation of lower-ranking representatives instead. It was the first time since 2019 that China has not dispatched its defence minister to the high-level dialogue on regional defence, except when the event was cancelled in 2020 and 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Beijing's decision raised eyebrows in Singapore, coming at a time of heightened tensions between China and the United States – the world's two biggest superpowers. Dong's absence meant there was no face-to-face meeting with his US counterpart, Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who had the floor to himself on Saturday when he told the defence forum that the military threat posed by China was potentially imminent. 'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific,' Hegseth told delegates in Singapore. Pointing to China's regular military drills around Taiwan as well as increasingly frequent skirmishes in the South China Sea, Hegseth said Beijing was proactively harassing its neighbours. 'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' Hegseth said. He also pointed to China's growing military assertiveness as a reason for Asian nations to boost their defence spending, pointing to Germany, which has pledged to move towards spending 5 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on defence. 'It doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat,' Hegseth said. The defence chief also looked to reassure Asian allies that Washington was committed to Asia Pacific security despite strained ties in recent months as US President Donald Trump targeted some close allies with hefty trade tariffs. 'America is proud to be back in the Indo-Pacific, and we're here to stay,' he said, opening his speech. Some analysts were quick to play down the severity of Hegseth's warnings about China. 'Short of a very few countries, not many in this part of the world see China as an imminent threat and would up their [defence] spending,' said Dylan Loh, assistant professor in the public policy and global affairs programme at Singapore's Nanyang Technological University. In previous years, the Shangri-La Dialogue had provided a rare platform for meetings between Chinese and US officials in the more informal surroundings that the summit could offer. The structure of the schedule also allowed Beijing's military chiefs to directly respond to the keynote speech from the US defence secretary and to present their narrative to other members of the Asia Pacific. Beijing has remained tight-lipped on the reason for Defence Minister Dong's absence from the forum, fuelling an information void that has been filled by speculation. One theory is that China did not want to send a high-profile delegate to the event at such a sensitive time as Beijing navigates the tariff war with the Trump administration. 'Any sort of faux pas or comments that may go off script can be picked up and picked apart or misconstrued,' said Loh, of Singapore's Nanyang Technological University. 'So the question is why take the risk when US-China relations are at a very delicate point at this moment,' Loh told Al Jazeera. The Shangri-La Dialogue weekend has not always been the easiest occasion for Chinese defence ministers. In recent years, they have faced difficult questions from their counterparts in other countries, who are unhappy with Beijing's increasing assertiveness in the Asia Pacific region. Loh said this could be another factor in Dong's absence from the high-profile event. 'Any Chinese defence minister coming to Singapore now will be exposing himself and the country to political risk,' he said. 'Themes like the South China Sea and possibly Taiwan will emerge, which makes China a convenient target,' Loh added. Dong was appointed as China's defence minister in late 2023, after his predecessor, Li Shangfu, was removed from office. Less than a year into the job, there was speculation surrounding Dong's new position following media reports that he was under investigation as part of a wider investigation into corruption in the Chinese military. Beijing denied the reports, with the minister continuing to maintain a public profile despite the allegations. There has also been intense scrutiny of China's military, following reports of an apparent purge of top-level officials by President Xi Jinping. One of Beijing's most senior generals, He Weidong, was missing from a high-profile political meeting in April, adding to rumours surrounding a possible restructuring in the People's Liberation Army (PLA). Ian Chong, a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie China research centre, said such speculation could be a factor in Dong's no-show in Singapore. 'Because of the domestic turmoil with China's senior military, they perhaps don't want to, or the PLA itself feels that it's not in a position to send somebody senior,' Chong told Al Jazeera. Announcing Dong's absence at a news conference before the summit, Chinese military spokesperson Senior Colonel Zhang Xiaogang maintained that communication channels were still open between defence officials in Washington and Beijing. 'China places great importance on US-China military ties, and is open to communication at different levels,' Zhang said.