Social Security cost-of-living adjustment may be 2.5% in 2026, new estimate shows
Social Security cost-of-living adjustment may be 2.5% in 2026, new estimate shows
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Social Security checks increasing in 2025
The Cost of Living Adjustment is rising in 2025, which will change the amount of money people will receive in their Social Security checks.
Fox - 10 Phoenix
The cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security could be 2.5% in 2026, based on the latest inflation data, new estimates show.
That's up from last month's estimate of 2.4%, said Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst who forecasts 2026 COLA using monthly inflation data. A 2.5% increase would be the same gain beneficiaries received this year, but there's still time for the 2026 estimate to rise because the full impacts of President Donald Trump's tariffs are still unknown.
"This estimate may rise with four more months of data still to come in before the 2026 COLA will be announced in October," Johnson said.
What do tariffs have to do with COLA?
Even though May inflation remained tame, most economists predict Trump's tariffs will raise inflation, which in turn, boosts the COLA.
"Another month goes by with little evidence of tariffs, but the longer-term inflation challenge they pose remains," said Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management.
Ken Kim, senior economist at KPMG, sees inflation peaking above 4% annually in the fall.
That would be sharply higher than the 2.4% annual increase in the May consumer price index, a measure of average changes in goods and services costs.
How much would a 2.5% COLA increase amount to in dollars?
The average monthly Social Security check in May reached a record high $1,948.17. Based on that, a 2.5% increase would raise the monthly benefit by about $40.70.
Roughly 75 million Americans, or about a fifth of the population, receive Social Security benefits.
What is COLA?
COLA is an annual adjustment to benefits meant to keep beneficiaries' purchasing power from being eroded by inflation. The final COLA for the following year is typically announced in October by the Social Security Administration.
How is COLA calculated?
COLA is based on the percentage increase in the consumer price index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers from July through September of the last year as compared to the same three months of the current year. CPI-W tracks the overall inflation rate but can differ slightly.
In May, annual CPI-W rose 2.2%, compared with the 2.4% rise in overall consumer prices.
Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Air India crash refuels Boeing and airline's problems
The fatal crash of a 787 Dreamliner that was being operated by Air India from Ahmedabad in northwestern India to London Gatwick Airport has once again fueled scrutiny of both Boeing and the airline, as the two companies have been trying to emerge from years of crises and poor reputations. The nearly 12-year-old Dreamliner crashed on a densely populated part of the city soon after takeoff, killing 241 of the 242 people on board on Thursday. The total death toll is expected to rise as the plane fell on a medical college hostel and rescue operations are still under way. The crash raises new concerns for Boeing, which continues to face mounting safety issues that have undermined public trust in its aircraft. These challenges come as the Seattle-based aerospace giant grapples with economic pressures from tariffs imposed by United States President Donald Trump, as well as increased regulatory attention that followed its recent safety issues. The reason behind the crash is not yet clear. But it is yet another fatal accident involving a Boeing aircraft, adding to a string of public relations crises that have made many travellers wary of flying on its planes. 'Boeing has become notorious and infamous with flyers at this moment, regardless of the model of the plane. Even the word 'Boeing' triggers a lot of people,' Adnan Bashir, an independent global communications and corporate affairs consultant who specialises in crisis communications, told Al Jazeera. The company's safety reputation began to unravel in October 2018 when a Lion Air flight operating a 737 MAX crashed due to a malfunction in the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a programme designed to prevent stalls. That crash killed all 189 people on board. Just months later, in March 2019, an Ethiopian Airlines flight using the same aircraft model crashed for the same reason, killing all 157 people aboard. Turmoil resurfaced in January 2024, when a door panel detached mid-flight on an Alaska Airlines route between Ontario, California, and Portland, Oregon. But until now, the 787 Dreamliner aircraft had maintained a relatively strong safety record. 'This is the first fatal crash of the 787, so despite all of its problems in the early days and all the production issues that Boeing had with the aeroplane, this has had a perfect safety record up to this point,' aviation expert Scott Hamilton told Al launched in 2011, Boeing has sold more than 2,500 of the model globally. Air India bought 47 of them, and to date, Boeing has delivered 1,189 Dreamliners. The model has faced years of safety-related scrutiny. In 2024, John Barnett, a former Boeing quality manager, was found dead under suspicious circumstances after long voicing concerns about the 787. Barnett had alleged that Boeing cut corners to meet production deadlines, including installing inadequate parts. He also claimed that testing revealed a 25-percent failure rate in the aircraft's emergency oxygen systems. In 2019, The New York Times published an expose that revealed Boeing had pressured workers not to report safety violations, citing internal emails, documents, and employee interviews. More recently, another whistleblower, Sam Salehpour, told lawmakers he was threatened for raising safety concerns about Boeing aircraft. Today's crash is the latest fatal incident to occur under the leadership of Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, who returned from retirement in 2024 to replace Dave Calhoun. Ortberg had pledged to restore the company's safety reputation. Previously, the last fatal Boeing incident occurred in December, when a Jeju Airlines flight crashed after a bird strike, killing 179 of the 181 people on board. Earlier this month, the US Department of Justice reached a settlement with Boeing that allowed the company to avoid prosecution for previous crashes. The deal required Boeing to pay $1.1bn, including investments to improve safety standards and compensation to victims' families. On Wall Street, Boeing's stock dropped nearly 5 percent from the previous day's market close. At this point, experts believe that ultimately, Boeing executives will be careful with their words because of the looming legal challenges they may face if an investigation finds the fault lies with the plane-maker. 'You can almost guarantee there's going to be lawsuits of some sort. Right now, they're likely triaging internal and external communication plans with their legal team. Because anything they say in public right now could be used as evidence. And so what they're going to be doing right now is staying quiet, most likely until more facts come out,' Amanda Orr, founder of the legal and policy communications consultancy firm Orr Strategy Group, told Al Jazeera. In response to today's crash, Boeing said, 'We are in contact with Air India regarding Flight 171 and stand ready to support them … Our thoughts are with the passengers, crew, first responders and all affected.' Boeing did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for comment. For Air India, which has been undergoing a major reinvention in the last few years, today's crash is a major setback in its efforts to rebrand and modernise. Founded in 1932, the airline was nationalised in 1953. After years of financial struggles and mounting debt, Tata Group acquired the airline for $2.2bn in 2022. As India's only long-haul international carrier to Europe and North America, Air India has a strong hold on global travel from across the country. In 2023, the carrier ordered 220 Boeing aircraft, including 20 Dreamliners, 10 777x jets, and 190 of the embattled 737 MAX. For now, Air India is focused on its response to the crash. 'At this moment, our primary focus is on supporting all the affected people and their families. We are doing everything in our power to assist the emergency response teams at the site and to provide all necessary support and care to those impacted,' said N Chandrasekaran, chairperson of Tata Sons, the holding company of Tata Group, in a statement provided to Al Jazeera. 'I express our deep sorrow about this incident. This is a difficult day for all of us at Air India. Our efforts now are focused entirely on the needs of our passengers, crew members, their families and loved ones,' Craig Wilson, the airline's CEO, said in a video statement. The airline has experienced a few fatal accidents in recent years. In 2020, an Air India Express flight skidded off the runway in Kozhikode in India, killing 20. A similar accident in Mangalore involving a 737-800 claimed 156 lives. Despite the shock of today's crash, flying remains one of the safest modes of travel. According to a 2024 study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the risk of dying in a commercial airline accident is one in every 13.7 million passengers. This continues to be the safest decade in aviation history.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
G7: Why there is hope of a Carney-Trump tariff breakthrough at Alberta summit
Global trade will be a major focus at next week's G7 summit as world leaders gather in Alberta, including U.S. President Donald Trump, who will be making his first appearance at a major international event since returning to the White House in January. Experts and ambassadors are expressing some optimism that this type of event could be a difference-maker in convincing Trump to reduce the amount of tariffs charged on imports to the U.S. Any possible concessions on the trade front would be welcomed by countries such as Canada, that are facing economic hardship because of tariffs. "It's issue No. 1," said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. On Wednesday, CBC News and Radio-Canada reported that talks between Prime Minister Mark Carney and Donald Trump are advanced enough that a document containing a draft economic and security agreement has been exchanged between the Prime Minister's Office and the White House. Ottawa is stepping up its efforts in recent weeks to reach an agreement before the end of the G7 summit. Global trade has slowed as a result of the ever-changing tariffs announced by Trump that have targeted various countries and also certain materials, such as steel and aluminum. In response, many countries, including Canada, have enacted their own tariffs. Canada's unemployment rate has climbed to seven per cent, which economists say is a sign the trade war with the U.S. is taking a toll on the job market, especially the manufacturing sector. Trade and tariffs are the "make or break issue" that will determine whether the summit in the Alberta Rocky Mountain village of Kananaskis Country is a success or not, said Kirton. For now, he's hopeful the various leaders' meetings and one-on-one conversations could produce results. "[Trump] likes to deliver big wins and the other G7 leaders are smart enough to deliver agreements which are real wins," said Kirton, pointing to how countries could pledge to increase defence spending and make other commitments, in exchange for lower tariffs on imports into the U.S. World leaders, including Carney, Trump and leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom, as well as the European Union, are meeting in Alberta from June 15 to 17 for talks on a variety of other issues, including climate change and managing rapidly evolving technology. The summit is a high-profile event, yet only involves a handful of world leaders, which is noteworthy, said Gary Mar, CEO of the Canada West Foundation, an Alberta-based think-tank. "One of the reasons the G7 is effective is because it's a small group. It's small enough that it's focused and can really be productive," said Mar, who was part of the welcoming party at the Calgary airport when world leaders arrived for the last summit held in Kananaskis in 2002. Trade was not nearly as contentious at that gathering, but rather promoted as having a profound impact on economic growth and development around the world. At the time, U.S. President George Bush even highlighted the value of trade with Canada during the opening press conference. "We've got a significant relationship together. It's a vibrant, positive friendship," said Bush. "Trade is in the interests of all of us. There are some problems on occasion, but we've got the kind of relationship where we can be very frank about it and try to work them out." The 2002 summit was held less than 12 months after the terrorist attack on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, which is why the main focus was to discuss the war on terrorism and responding to the threat of weapons of mass destruction. Geopolitical tension and conflicts are expected to be one of the talking points at this year's G7, but the tariff situation will likely top the agenda. Trade policy needs to be discussed urgently, said Matthias Lüttenberg, Germany's ambassador to Canada, while on stage at a recent event in Calgary to discuss the G7. Free trade and open markets for Germany is "one of the most important pillars of our economic world view and it's the foundation of prosperity and sustainable growth for all of us," he said. The G7 has an important role to play and the summit has value in producing results on global issues, Lüttenberg said, a sentiment shared by other ambassadors attending the G7 event. "We know how it works and we have achieved so much together already. And I'm not only talking about leader statements, but it's also the practical work," he explained, pointing to the example of how the G7 agreed on certain sanctions against Russia following its invasion of Ukraine, while also working toward how to help Ukraine rebuild. Global economic growth is slowing more than expected only a few months ago as a result of the Trump administration's trade war, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development said earlier this month. The global economy is on pace to slow from 3.3 per cent last year to 2.9 per cent in 2025 because of the tariff fallout, the agency said, trimming its estimates from March for growth of 3.1 per cent this year.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
ABC: Trump Administration Fails To Rescind Biden's Anti-Merit Labor Mandate
WASHINGTON, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Associated Builders and Contractors today responded to the announcement from the Office of Management and Budget that President Donald Trump's administration will continue to enforce former President Joe Biden's anti-competitive policy mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35 million or more. 'This decision cannot be reconciled with the president's philosophies of merit, fairness and nondiscrimination because it inhibits fair and open competition and prioritizes special interests over taxpayers and workers,' said Michael Bellaman, ABC president and CEO. 'Today's memorandum doubles down on an unfair, wasteful, anti-competitive, Biden-era policy that inflates costs and delays critical construction projects, including those important to the defense of our country. 'It is unfortunate that this guidance states that maintaining Biden's PLA mandate final rule is necessary because the Trump administration 'supports the use of PLAs when those agreements are practicable and cost-effective,'' said Bellaman. 'To be clear, this policy is not needed to allow the use of PLAs on federal construction. At no point, under any administration, have federal contractors ever been prevented from voluntarily entering into a PLA when such an agreement makes sense for their workforce. Fair and open competition works because it not only preserves worker choice but also gives contractors the freedom to choose to enter or not enter into a PLA. At the end of the day, it is based on merit and nondiscrimination. Every qualified contractor should have the opportunity to build America. 'This policy effectively excludes the 90% of the U.S. construction workforce that does not belong to a union from nearly all large-scale federal construction contracts, regardless of whether PLAs are 'practicable or cost-effective' on a given project,' said Bellaman. 'The ongoing confusion and legal uncertainty this policy creates will result in unnecessary delays and cost increases to critical national security projects needed to protect our border and rebuild our military, including land ports of entry and military bases.' ABC has long opposed government-mandated PLAs, which force contractors to sign union agreements in order to win federal work. This policy keeps merit shop contractors from bidding on infrastructure projects in their own communities. While ABC members won 54% of federal construction contracts of $35 million or more by value during fiscal years 2009-2024, today's guidance prevents many of these experienced and qualified contractors from delivering public works projects safely, on time and on budget. 'ABC will continue to fight the Biden-era illegal and anti-competitive PLA mandate in court and support our federal contractor members in opposing PLA mandates on any project where they are implemented,' said Bellaman. 'The administration should rescind this PLA mandate executive order immediately.' CONTACT: Erika Walter Associated Builders and Contractors ewalter@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
