logo
What made the cut, what didn't in House version of Ohio budget

What made the cut, what didn't in House version of Ohio budget

Yahoo10-04-2025

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Ohio House members passed the two-year state operating budget on Wednesday, sending what has become a controversial spending bill to the Ohio Senate for consideration.
'It does not go far enough, and we think there's still a lot of reckless cuts and unnecessary cuts in this budget,' Ohio House Minority Leader Allison Russo (D-Upper Arlington) said. 'It is very consequential, and it is consequential in that it will be extremely damaging, especially to the funding of our public schools.'
All about six new laws in Ohio that go into effect today
'I think this is the most consequential budget that I've been [part of],' Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman (R-Lima) said. 'And this is now my 17th year in the General Assembly. It does more things on more fronts than any budget that I've ever had been involved in.'
House Bill 96, as passed by the House, has a property tax relief effort that will bring Ohioans in nearly every district some sort of cut on their bill.
Here's how it works: if you live in a school district that carried over more than 30% of its budget from the previous year, your property tax bill will go down. Ohio House Finance Chair Brian Stewart (R-Ashville) said that will impact Ohioans living in 486 of Ohio's more than 600 school districts.
'Our determination is, if this was in effect already this would have constituted a $4.2 billion property tax relief, cumulatively, in the state of Ohio, for all of our residents,' Stewart said.
Why are so many Chick-fil-A's so close together?
Stewart said this both ensures that schools are not 'hoarding' taxpayer money while bringing Ohioans much-needed relief on their property tax bills, an issue that has been long debated at the Ohio Statehouse.
But Democratic lawmakers warn against this, calling it 'fake' property tax relief.
'[The Republicans'] solution is to rob the schools and give it back to homeowners, so then what happens? The schools are either going to close down, eliminate education opportunities, and/or, probably both, are going to go to the ballot and increase property taxes,' Ohio House Finance Ranking Member Bride Rose Sweeney (D-Westlake) said.
But despite concerns with this being a one-time relief solution, or not true relief, those against the measure said even more, it has not been thoroughly considered.
'It is completely unvetted,' Russo said. 'We had a property tax study commission that looked at hundreds of plans. This was not on it. So, no one has fully discussed how this plan actually impacts districts and responsible school funding in practice.'
Supporters said this will send a strong message to Ohioans that their money is theirs, and does not belong to the schools, or government and said it is just the start of relief lawmakers will work to pass.
How tariffs are expected to raise prices for Ohio consumers
'This is monumental, and this is one step that we, as a legislature, will be taking this year to address property taxes,' Rep. David Thomas (R-Jefferson) said.
Stewart said some of the big spending wins in the budget have to do with educating students. Stewart said this budget will increase funding to Ohio's public schools, spending $20.2 billion over the next two years.
'Those are cold hard facts, this budget increases funding for every single school district in the state of Ohio, period,' Stewart said.
But Sweeney said this will, in the long run, leave schools in the lurch as the state 'walks away' from a funding formula founded several budgets ago.
'What we are doing is arbitrarily walking away from that,' she said. 'So next year we don't have formula anymore. That should be so concerning to everyone, to every property tax owner, every parent or child in the state and teacher.'
The bill also creates a merit scholarship for high schoolers who graduate in the top of their class and decide to go to one of Ohio's public universities, while permitting private universities to participate if they willingly follow provisions of soon-to-be law Senate Bill 1.
OSU President seeks legislative clarity after student visas revoked without notice
One of the more controversial spending portions of the budget is not a direct cost to taxpayers. It is a $600 million bond to help the Cleveland Browns build a new stadium.
'No one in my caucus believes that we need to be funding a Browns stadium at this moment in time when there is so much unmet need in this state,' Russo said. 'And this budget already recklessly and irresponsibly cut so many necessary programs.'
The original text of the bill required the Browns to deposit $38.5 million of a 'security deposit,' but Stewart offered an amendment on the House floor to increase that amount to $50 million.
As it stands, the Browns will have to invest $50 million, which Stewart said is estimated to grow to $250 million over 25 years and will help cover the bond debt if tax revenues from the new stadium fall short of paying for the bonds.
'This is a significant added security for our taxpayers,' Stewart said. 'I believe it will make a good deal even better.'
'The Ohio Statehouse is not a personal piggybank for billionaires,' Rep. Sean Brennan (R-Parma) said.
The amendment was adopted with 55 votes in favor, 15 against and 29 no-votes.
The bill also adds $25,000 each fiscal year to cover costs associated with joining the Midwest Interstate Passenger Rail Compact, something that was in the state transportation budget, but ultimately removed.
'We understand that we may have some difference of opinion with our friends in the other chamber, but we thought this is a reasonable thing to tee up again for discussion,' Stewart said.
Dublin eyeing German-inspired holiday market for Bridge Park in 2026
The bill also adds $100 million for a childcare choice voucher program, something both Republicans and Democrats agree is a bright spot.
'There's a whole host of good provisions, and I would equate that to this body listening to the people of Ohio and to members across the board, unfortunately, it wasn't enough,' Sweeney said. 'I'm still trying to get to a place where we can have a bipartisan vote.'
The budget also puts $150,000 in there to fund the Special Olympics and encourage them to be hosted in Ohio.
'If you look at how states around us have funded the Special Olympics, we're pretty low compared to those other states,' Stewart said. 'I love the Special Olympics. I know that a lot of our colleagues do as well. And so, we felt like it was a good thing to do to bump that up and to show more commitment there.'
While most of the state operating budget spends money, parts of it create new laws or update the Ohio Revised Code, with no price tag attached.
A few of the policies in the budget particularly take aim at the LGBTQ+ community. Those provisions include: policy that Ohio will only recognize two sexes, and they are not changeable; a portion that requires libraries to limit access to LGBTQ+ books; and a prohibition on state agencies from flying certain flags. Those were all added on April 3.
In addition to all of those, the most recent version of the budget prohibits a government entity from placing menstrual products in the men's restroom of a public building. Some Democratic members call those provisions a 'sneak attack' on the LGBTQ+ community, but Republicans call those portions of the budget no brainers.
'Commonsense,' Stewart said. 'You know, men don't need tampons and it is kind of silly that we continue to have certain public entities that want to pretend otherwise.'
'I think we have real problems in this state and that is just not a real problem,' Sweeney said. 'So, I will defer to the fact that we have a workforce shortage. We have our chambers of commerce saying we're losing $5 billion in workforce needs. I don't know what problem that solving, and I just wish we would focus to the needs of the state.'
Why Ohio leaders aren't 'clawing back' grants after Intel delays
A policy that does not cost the state anything – but will cost drivers – raises the motor vehicle registration and renewal fee by $5. The revenue from that will be required to be used by the Ohio State Highway Patrol.
'The state highway patrol has been looking for a more stable funding source; there's been a lot of changes over the years of how they're funded,' Stewart said. 'We had a lot of members that wanted to see a specific source of revenue and the $5 fee there on your license registration is how we've typically done that. And so, it just kind of expands that by $5 to pay for the Highway Patrol.'
The budget also directs the state to ask the federal government for a waiver that would allow Ohio to restrict what Ohioans can spend their SNAP benefits on, specifically eliminating the ability to use SNAP on sugar-sweetened beverages like soda pop.
'I don't think we should have a policy in the state where we're essentially subsidizing diabetes in children by buying pop with food stamps,' Stewart said. 'I think if people are using their own money, they have the freedom to do whatever they want with that money. And you're using the taxpayer's money to buy your food. Then taxpayers have an ability to say, 'we're not going to buy junk food with it.''
'Does this address the realities of food deserts? What if there is no access to healthy foods? Changes like that I don't think should be made in the state budget so we can actually flush [them] out,' Sweeney said. 'If the goal is to make sure that people are having healthier alternatives, we all share that goal. Is this the right way to do it? I'm not sure.'
The budget also creates an age verification program in order to watch pornography, a bill that has been worked on in both this and the last general assembly.
Mail carriers say new contract failed union wishes
'That's a policy that I think has wide support in the caucus,' Stewart said. 'I think, frankly, a lot of people believe that if you're going to have obscene material on the internet, we should at least make sure that those who are not legally allowed to view it are not viewing it.'
The budget also eliminates the Ohio Elections Commission (ELC). That commission's enforcement authority and administrative responsibilities shift to the Ohio Secretary of State for certain candidates and campaign organizations and shifts enforcement authority to county Boards of Elections for local candidates.
The Senate will make its own round of changes, before working to find a compromise with the House. The budget must pass and be signed into law by July 1.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI
Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Ted Cruz proposes withholding broadband funding from states that regulate AI

The Brief Senator Ted Cruz proposed that states attempting to regulate AI should lose federal broadband funding. This proposal is an addition to a House-passed bill aiming for a 10-year ban on state AI regulation. Critics argue Cruz's plan is "undemocratic and cruel," forcing states to choose between broadband access and AI consumer protection. WASHINGTON - U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) proposed on Thursday an alternative punishment for planned legislation that would set a 10-year ban on state regulation of Artificial Intelligence model learning. Under Cruz's budget reconciliation proposal, an attempt to regulate AI would be prohibited from collecting federal funding provided by the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program. The Proposal The U.S. House of Representatives passed their version of House Resolution 1, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act," on May 22. In part, the budget bill would ban state regulation on AI for 10 years. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Cruz authored a budget reconciliation that he says is intended to "fulfill President Trump's agenda." In a summary of the proposal, he refers to state regulation as "strangling AI deployment," comparing it to EU precautions against tech development. Cruz's proposal adds $500 million to the BEAD program, which has already administered $42.45 billion to the states in order to expand high-speed internet access across the country. It also prevents states from receiving any of that funding if they attempt to regulate AI. Dig deeper Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) has recently spoken out against HR 1, saying the anti-regulatory section alone will cost Congress her vote. Greene explained that she discovered the controversial provision, located on pages 278-279 of the bill, only after the House had already passed the legislation. Once the bill returns to the House following Senate deliberations, Greene says she will change sides based on the matter of AI. What they're saying Advocacy group Public Citizen released a commentary on Cruz's proposal, referring to it as a "display of corporate appeasement." In the article, J.B. Branch, a Big Tech accountability advocate, included the following statement: "This is a senatorial temper tantrum masquerading as policy. Americans have loudly rejected Senator Cruz's dangerous proposal to give tech giants a decade of immunity from state regulation. State legislatures, attorneys general, and citizens across all 50 states have demanded that Congress step away from overhauling consumer protections put in place in the absence of federal leadership. But instead of listening to the American people, Senate Republicans threw a fit and tied vital digital funding to corporate impunity. "With this move, Republicans are telling millions of Americans: 'You can have broadband but only if your state gives up the right to protect you from AI abuses.' It's undemocratic and cruel. Republicans would rather give Big Tech a 10-year hall pass to experiment on the American people unchecked, rather than give underserved rural and urban communities the ability to compete in the digital economy. Congress must reject this corporate giveaway and refocus their energy on representing the public interest." In her statements criticizing the anti-regulation portion of HR 1, Greene expressed concerns about developing rapidly evolving tech without checks and balances. "No one can predict what AI will be in one year, let alone 10," Greene said. "But I can tell you this: I'm pro-humanity, not pro-transhumanity. And I will be voting NO on any bill that strips states of their right to protect American jobs and families." What's next HR 1 is expected to continue undergoing changes in the Senate before returning to the House for another vote. Cruz's proposal has yet to be officially added to the legislation. The Source Information in this article comes from public U.S. Congress filings, Public Citizen, and previous FOX 4 coverage.

Vance Says ‘Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein'
Vance Says ‘Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein'

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Vance Says ‘Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein'

Elon Musk, who has not been taking so much ketamine that he can't pee right, had a meltdown about his former bromance partner Donald Trump on his website, X, this week. Vice President J.D. Vance, caught up in the petty feud, has naturally taken Trump's side, including when it comes to allegations about Trump's ties to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As he railed against Trump, Musk escalated his attacks: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' He added: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The posts have since been deleted. Vance, who was speaking with podcaster Theo Von, reacted to the social media broadside in real time. When Von read that post aloud, Vance first responded, 'Man.' 'First of all, absolutely not,' Vance continued. 'Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein… Whatever the Democrats and the media say about him, that's totally BS.' The vice president added that his 'loyalties are always gonna be with the president.' Trump and Musk spent part of the week publicly feuding, just days after the world's richest man and head of Trump's so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, departed the administration. Musk, who spent about $290 million to support Trump and Republicans in the 2024 election, started the attacks by calling Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' a 'disgusting abomination' and 'pork-filled.' 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election… such ingratitude' Musk posted. Trump, famous for his own social media insults, wrote on Truth Social, 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' Musk took it further, bringing up Trump's well-known ties to Epstein. Trump had a long friendship with Epstein and has appeared in multiple photos with him. Musk also appears in a notorious photo with Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the Vanity Fair Oscars party in 2014. The image is frequently circulated on X. Musk has claimed that Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for her role helping Epstein, 'photobombed' him. Trump's Justice Department made Epstein, who died in prison after he was charged with sex trafficking minors, something of a pet issue when Attorney General Pam Bondi promised to release documents in February. She caused MAGA conspiracy theorists — who hope to uncover a Moloch-worshiping cabal among elites — to melt down when nothing that she released was new. She released Epstein's flight logs and his book of contacts, which had both already been made public. Trump told New York Magazine in 2002 that he liked spending time with Epstein. 'I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,' he said. 'He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.' Following Musk's claims, Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) wrote a letter to Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel asking them to 'immediately clarify' whether the claims were true, Axios reported. The White House called the lawmakers 'lunatics.' Joe Rogan also asked Patel about Musk's Epstein claim. Patel said he was 'not participating' in the Trump-Musk discourse. Speaking on Von's podcast, Vance said he thinks Musk is 'an incredible entrepreneur,' adding that Musk and DOGE's 'effort to root out waste, fraud and abuse in our country is really good.' He expressed hope that Musk can mend fences, noting that 'Maybe that's not possible now, because he's gone so nuclear.' He also said Musk was making a mistake to turn against Trump. 'I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever, to be at war with the world's most powerful man, who I think is doing more to save our country than anybody in my lifetime,' Vance said. 'Mom and dad were fighting so he got sent to a friend's house,' reads the top comment on YouTube. More from Rolling Stone Dropkick Murphys and Veterans Rally Against Trump for 'Disrespecting the Vets' 'We Are Taking Away Elon's Friends' Trump Finally Brings Back Illegally Deported Man - to Indict Him Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts
Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he has no desire to fix his relationship with Musk, even after the former 'first buddy' deletes his X posts

President Donald Trump says he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk. He also said Musk would face "serious consequences" if he funds Democrats. Meanwhile, Musk deleted some of his most incendiary X posts on Saturday. It seems Elon Musk won't be President Donald Trump's "first buddy" again anytime soon. Trump told NBC News on Saturday that he has no plans to repair his relationship with Musk after it imploded this week. When asked if their relationship is done, Trump said, simply, "I would assume so, yeah." Trump said he doesn't intend to speak with Musk and said the tech billionaire was "disrespectful to the office of the President." "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President," Trump said. The epic and very public fallout began after Musk criticized Trump's tax bill, which the president calls his "One Big Beautiful Bill." During Thursday's dramatic exchange, which took place mostly on the social media networks each billionaire owns, Trump threatened to terminate Musk's government contracts and subsidies. Musk shot back that Trump was in the so-called "Epstein files" in a now-deleted post. In the NBC interview on Saturday, Trump warned Musk against funding Democratic candidates running against GOP members voting in favor of the bill, saying there will be "serious consequences." "If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that," Trump said. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that." Last month, Musk said he would spend "a lot less" on political campaigns in the future. He spent hundreds of millions in support of Trump in 2024. "If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," Musk said at the Qatar Economic Forum last month. "I do not currently see a reason." Trump's remarks on Saturday came after Musk deleted some X posts from his account. He deleted the post referencing the Epstein files and a video he re-posted that appeared to show Trump partying with Epstein in the 1990s. Musk also deleted an X post in which he called a Trump comment an "obvious lie" and another post saying SpaceX would decommission its Dragon spacecraft "immediately." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Business Insider that passing the tax bill is the president's priority. "President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers, and the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill is critical to helping accomplish that mission," Leavitt said in a statement. Representatives for Musk did not respond to a request for comment from BI. The repercussions from Musk and Trump's dispute were swift, affecting the price of Tesla stock and Dogecoin. A senior White House official told BI that Trump is now considering selling his Tesla. On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance said it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president" during the newest episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von." "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying," Vance said. "I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man." During the interview, Vance said he thinks everything will be fine between the pair if Musk "chills out a little bit." "Hopefully Elon figures it out and comes back into the fold," Vance said, adding that Trump had been a "little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticisms. "But I think he's been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk, and I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine," Vance said. Musk responded to Vance's comment on X on Saturday, writing, simply, "Cool." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store