Starmer hails ‘common sense' EU deal as Brexiteers condemn ‘surrender'
But the Prime Minister faced accusations of betraying Brexit over the extension of fishing rights for European vessels for a further 12 years and closer ties to EU rules.
Sir Keir met European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa at a summit in Lancaster House, London, to seal the deal.
The Prime Minister said: 'It's time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.
'We're ready to work with partners if it means we can improve people's lives here at home.
'So that's what this deal is all about – facing out into the world once again, in the great tradition of this nation.
'Building the relationships we choose, with the partners we choose, and closing deals in the national interest. Because that is what independent, sovereign nations do.'
Sir Keir Starmer and Ursula von der Leyen led high-profile delegations at the summit (Kin Cheung/PA)
Measures include:
– A 12-year extension of fishing arrangements when the current deal ends, allowing European vessels to operate in UK waters under the same terms until 2038.
– An open-ended new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement to slash red tape on food and drink exports and imports between the UK and EU.
– Some routine checks on plant and animal products will be removed completely and British burgers and sausages will once more be allowed into the EU.
– Linking UK and EU emissions-trading schemes which will mean British firms will not be hit by Brussels' carbon tax next year.
– A security and defence partnership will pave the way for UK arms firms to bid for work under the EU's proposed new £150 billion security action for Europe (Safe) fund.
– The UK and EU have agreed to co-operate on a 'youth experience scheme', but British officials insisted numbers would be capped and stays would be time-limited.
– British steel exports will be protected from new EU rules and restrictive tariffs, saving the beleaguered industry £25 million.
In striking the deal, the Prime Minister has had to balance the Government's desperate search for measures to grow the economy with the backlash he will inevitably face from Brexit-supporting voters and political opponents.
The UK-EU Summit was held at Lancaster House in central London (Kin Cheung/PA)
The deal requires 'dynamic alignment' – the UK following rules set by Brussels – in areas covering the SPS deal, emissions trading and potential co-operation in the electricity market.
That would mean the UK complying with rules over which, outside the EU, it would have a very limited influence.
The acceptance of some form of youth mobility programme, allowing young EU citizens to live, work and study in the UK and vice versa, has been politically controversial because of the Government's drive to cut net migration.
Officials insisted the scheme being proposed would not breach the Government's red line of not allowing the return of free movement, pointing to similar deals with Australia and New Zealand.
The 'reset' deal also respects the Government's other red lines of not returning to the customs union or single market, officials said.
But Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said: 'We're becoming a rule-taker from Brussels once again.
'And with no details on any cap or time limits on youth mobility, fears of free movement returning will only increase. This is very concerning.'
Shadow farming minister Robbie Moore accused Sir Keir of 'surrendering access to our British waters to European fishermen'.
'Whose side is he on? When Labour negotiates, Britain loses,' he added.
Reform UK's Nigel Farage said the 12-year deal on access for European boats 'will be the end of the fishing industry'.
Mr Farage's deputy leader Richard Tice said: 'Labour surrenders. Brussels bureaucrats win again.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
19 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
US and China extend trade truce for another 90 days
Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that he signed the executive order for the extension, and that 'all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same'. Beijing at the same time also announced the extension of the tariff pause, according to the Ministry of Commerce. The previous deadline was set to expire at 12.01am on Tuesday. Had that happened the US could have ratcheted up taxes on Chinese imports from an already high 30%, and Beijing could have responded by raising retaliatory levies on US exports to China. The pause buys time for the two countries to work out some of their differences, perhaps clearing the way for a summit later this year between Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, and it has been welcomed by the US companies doing business with China. China said on Tuesday it would extend relief to American companies who were placed on an export control list and an unreliable entities list. After Mr Trump initially announced tariffs in April, China restricted exports of dual-use goods to some American companies, while banning others from trading or investing in China. The Ministry of Commerce said it would stop those restrictions for some companies, while giving others another 90-day extension. Reaching a pact with China remains unfinished business for Mr Trump, who has already upended the global trading system by slapping double-digit taxes – tariffs – on almost every country on earth. The EU, Japan and other trading partners agreed to lopsided trade deals with Mr Trump, accepting once unthinkably US high tariffs (15% on Japanese and EU imports, for instance) to ward off something worse. US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Alex Brandon/AP) In June, the US and China reached an agreement to ease tensions. The US said it would pull back export restrictions on computer chip technology and ethane, a feedstock in petrochemical production, and China agreed to make it easier for US firms to get access to rare earths. 'The US has realised it does not have the upper hand,' said Claire Reade, senior counsel at Arnold & Porter and former assistant US trade representative for China affairs. In May, the US and China had averted an economic catastrophe by reducing massive tariffs they'd slapped on each other's products, which had reached as high as 145% against China and 125% against the US. Those triple-digit tariffs threatened to effectively end trade between the US and China and caused a frightening sell-off in financial markets. In a May meeting in Geneva, America's tariffs went back down to a still-high 30% and China's to 10%. Ms Reade does not expect much beyond limited agreements such as the Chinese saying they will buy more American soybeans and promising to do more to stop the flow of chemicals used to make fentanyl and to allow the continued flow of rare-earth magnets. But the tougher issues will likely linger, and 'the trade war will continue grinding ahead for years into the future', said Jeff Moon, a former US diplomat and trade official.
Glasgow Times
20 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Nicola Sturgeon says she could leave Scotland ‘for a wee while'
The former Scottish first minister said a focus on her political career meant she had had to 'forego' living elsewhere. Speaking as her memoir is published, she suggested she could have a 'perspective shift' by living elsewhere. Her comments come as she prepares to step down as an MSP at next May's Holyrood elections – by which point she will have served 27 years in the Scottish Parliament, including more than eight years as first minister. She was arrested and questioned by police as part of the investigation into SNP finances, but has now been formally cleared. However, her husband, former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell, who she announced her separation from in January this year, has appeared in court charged with alleged embezzlement. Ms Sturgeon announced her separation from her husband Peter Murrell, a former chief executive of the SNP, in January (Andrew Milligan/PA) Ms Sturgeon said she was now at a point in her life where she is 'happy, contented, looking forward to the future'. But she told BBC Breakfast that while she might live elsewhere for a period, she said she would 'never leave Scotland for very long'. She stated: 'Scotland is my home, it is where I belong, it is where my family is.' She added: 'One of the things about being so focused on a political career is that you forego certain things. 'I didn't live outside of Scotland or the UK for any period when I was younger, I think it is healthy to shift your perspective, to see life from a different angle. 'So, maybe for a wee while I will take myself outside of Scotland, give myself that perspective shift, but I am never going to be away for very long.' Speaking about her memoir, titled Frankly, she said it had been 'important to me to tell my story in my words'. The former SNP leader said: 'I hope lots of people read it, I hope they enjoy it, but it is out there now and people can make up their own minds, and that is actually a nice feeling and I am enjoying that.' She added: 'What I have done in this book is put my story in my words. 'There will be people who enjoy reading it, there will be people who don't. There will be people who slag it off who never read it at all. 'But I am really comfortable I have put my story in my words.' She insisted she is 'really proud of what I achieved as first minister', but added that there was 'lots I wish I had done different and done better' during her time in power. But she stressed that after going through 'difficult' times, she has now found 'a real sense of happiness and joy in life'. Asked about her arrest by police in June 2023, she said the period had been 'difficult' and 'horrific', adding that in the police station she 'felt probably at the lowest ebb in my life'. Nicola Sturgeon's book, Frankly, has gone on sale (Craig Meighan/PA) Ms Sturgeon said: 'What the book also recounts is a process of going through that really difficult time and coming out the other end of it, so it is also a story of resilience and strength. 'I hope people can take something from that as well, that you can face these really tough times in your life – and I know people have faced much, much tougher things in life than I have – but you find within yourself a strength.' She also made clear she has 'no doubt at all' that Scotland will become independent – vowing to campaign in any future referendum on the issue. Ms Sturgeon had been a key figure in the campaign leading up to the 2014 vote, which saw Scots vote by 55% to 45% to stay part of the UK. The former SNP leader accepted that her goal of independence 'wasn't delivered in my time in office', but she said: 'It will happen, I am absolutely in no doubt at all.' She stated: 'I write in the book about what I predict, in not that long a timespan, will be a kind of rewired UK, a sort of federation of the nations, and an independent Scotland will be part of that.' While she said she may not lead an independent Scotland, she said she would 'at some point in the next few years' be involved in campaigning for independence in another referendum. Speaking about a future vote, she added: 'If there is – when there is – another decision on Scottish independence, it will be a case of hold me back. I'll be there.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
You think Nicola Sturgeon was divisive? Well, think again
It was the same with Boris Johnson. Rather than supporting Theresa May he worked behind her back to sabotage her Brexit deal in order to become leader. Having achieved that goal he then set about removing from the party those members who expressed concern about his behaviour until his own misconduct proved too much for even his most ardent followers. Is that not a more realistic example of being divisive? It's perhaps worth pointing out that Nicola Sturgeon became SNP leader after the failed 2014 referendum when nationalism was being declared "dead in the water" by many of the same journalists now giving her the "divisive" label. Yet within a year she had secured an unprecedented 56 out of 59 Scottish seats at Westminster. On top of that party membership rose to a reputed 125,000 under her stewardship. That to me is somebody not just winning over people from the disaffected inside her own party, but also persuading voters from other parties to switch allegiance. So how can that be indicative of a "divisive" personality? The Holyrood Gender Recognition Reform Bill is invariably cited as the prime example of this alleged divisive style. But there was division within nearly all the parties. Some Tories defied their leadership to vote in favour whilst some Labour members followed suit to vote against. That polarisation was there simply because of the nature of the subject matter rather than a style of government. Despite that Ms Sturgeon persuaded supporters from all parties to unite behind the bill and get it passed. That's why I'm baffled. Is this some sort of Orwellian reprise where unity becomes the hallmark of division? Robert Menzies, Falkirk. Read more letters The timing is all wrong Nicola Sturgeon and her publishers might have received a more forgiving reception for her new book if they had allowed more time to pass before delivering her take on events. Instead, feelings are still rather raw on a number of issues and our former First Minister's perspective risks merely confirming that on some critical issues she had little time for the viewpoint of those who did not choose to march in step with her. Of course, there must be a great temptation for those whose have worked in public life, with all the scrutiny that can entail, to take the opportunity to put their own spin on the big events of their time in the spotlight. Yet it is becoming clear that for Nicola Sturgeon the whole process is fraught with risks, not least because of the timing of her revelations. The self-identity controversies are still very much with us for example, and someone trying to placate the sensitivities of those on all sides just now is likely to succeed only in further upsetting everyone. Equally, with Alex Salmond's death being less than a year ago, some will feel it a little too soon to be detailing criticisms and negative recollections about someone who would most certainly have vigorously contested each and every complaint. As for all the divisions and stirring of grievance against the rest of the UK in the context of the independence debate, to say the least it is a little grating to hear that Ms Sturgeon might now choose to live where she wanted us all to turn our backs on, particularly for those of us with friends and family there. No doubt the publishers were keen to get this book into print as soon as possible, but it would have perhaps been fairer on the public purse if the former First Minister had resigned as an MSP too at the point she stepped down from the top job, to avoid any appearance that she was taking public money for a full-time role whilst putting most of her time and energy into a personal project. From all that has been reported so far about Frankly, there will at least be plenty of scope for prospective future biographers to get their teeth into given all the selective omissions across the more inglorious elements of Nicola Sturgeon's time in power. Of course her own take has always been that others were to blame, but with that stance she undoubtedly is firmly in the field of fiction, which as luck would have it, is apparently where her writing will next take her. Keith Howell, West Linton. What about education? Given the wall-to-wall coverage and plethora of interviews Nicola Sturgeon has given on the launch of her book it is surprising that no one has asked why she isn't being "judged on education" as she wished when she set out. I think we can all agree that in that primary regard she failed badly by any number of measures. It is very sad that all the focus has been on gender issues, Alex Salmond, Operation Branchform, personal matters and the like and not on her policy failures on education, the NHS, infrastructure, policing, economy and the things that truly matter to the people of Scotland. Ian McNair, Cellardyke. London calling? Really? Possibly the greatest irony coming from Nicola Sturgeon's memoirs is her declaration that 'she loves London' and may even go and live there. If she does, she will avoid the highest tax rates in the UK but of course, more importantly, is free to move to London at any time as a result of the UK Union – the same Union that she has fought tooth and nail to destroy. You couldn't make it up. Richard Allison, Edinburgh. Is there no escape? Yesterday, a friend in England emailed me to say that she had bought tickets for Nicola Sturgeon's book night in the local branch of Toppings. "Am I mad?" asked my friend. My answer was short and sharp. Reaching page 16 of today's Herald (August 12), I have seen four photographs of Ms Surgeon, not to mention her being the subject of your page one headline and the first four contributions to your Letters Pages. I expect that conversation at my golf club will centre on the same. Is there no escape from this all-engulfing madness? David Miller, Milngavie. Was it too soon for Nicola Sturgeon to be criticising Alex Salmond? (Image: PA) In defence of our freedoms You report that Westminster's Victims Minister Alex Davies-Jones said: 'I thank the police for their bravery and their courage in carrying out their diligent duties in the line of public protection' ('Palestine Action supporters 'will feel full force of law', justice minister vows', The Herald, August 12). The police officers on the front line appear to have handled professionally the difficult situation they've been landed with, but how much bravery and courage are involved in leading away women in their seventies or a blind man in a wheelchair? And how much protection do we need from people, average age over 50, sitting peacefully in a public area holding pieces of cardboard? Andy Stenton (Letters, August 12) points out 'this was a peaceful protest against ethnic cleansing and genocide by Israel in Gaza', but it was more than that: it was a protest in support of freedom of speech and freedom to protest about government action or inaction. These are vital freedoms in a properly democratic society. Doug Maughan, Dunblane. Don't let Putin profit With President Trump in Putin's hip pocket it seems doubtful whether a just outcome of the conflict in Ukraine will ever be achieved. It seems to have escape The Donald that the aggressor should never be allowed to profit from his actions. Russia should be made to return to the natural boundaries and be required to finance the reconstruction that will have to follow after any so-called peace deal. Peter D Christie, Newton Mearns.
