Skechers responds to Kizik's ‘baseless' lawsuit
In a press release, Skechers said HFL's allegations, pertaining to its line of Skechers Hands Free Slip-ins, were 'baseless' and rooted in the 'assertion that Kizik created the hands-free footwear category and is the only company that can legally use that century-old idea'.
In the lawsuit, filed with a Texas court, Kizik alleges that Skechers 'knowingly' infringed on four HFL utility patents and two design patents for its slip-in footwear, a line that, according to HFL, was launched without licensing or acknowledging the Kizik brand.
The suit goes on to state that a number of related patents pursued by Skechers have been rejected, a claim Skechers calls 'false', with the company underlining that it has 'obtained more than 140 utility and design patents worldwide, including in the US'.
In a statement, Skechers' president, Michael Greenberg, expressed suspicion over the timing of the lawsuit, which he notes comes shortly after Skechers announced a 9.42 billion dollars merger with 3G Capital.
Despite not receiving 'so much as a letter from Kizik' since launching its Slip-ins line in 2021, Greenberg states that upon the merger's announcement, 'Kizik hires a law firm also used by Nike and attacks our whole Slip-ins product line'.
Greenberg continues: 'We believe that, after all these years of silence, the true motivation for this lawsuit might be found right on the face of Kizik's complaint, where they state that they are looking for a share of the 9.42 dollars billion being paid for Skechers, money Kizik did not earn and does not deserve.'
According to Greenberg, Skechers has become a 'market leader in the hands-free footwear space' through innovating with technology and investing into research and development. As such, Skechers 'will aggressively challenge both the validity of the patents and the infringement claims', he adds.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
Skechers now selling TRACKED shoes for kids with ‘hidden compartment' to monitor their trainers' location on iPhone app
SKECHERS has invented a pair of trainers that let you track the exact location of your children's shoes. The Find My Skechers have a hidden compartment built for a tracking device that monitors where they are at all times. 7 7 7 You can then check their position on a virtual map using a smartphone app no matter where you are in the world These tracker trainers start at £45 in the UK or $52 in the USA. They don't come with the tracker built-in. Instead, you're meant to fit your own Apple AirTag in a secret compartment beneath the heel of the insole. An AirTag typically retails at between £28 and £35 in the UK or $26 to $35 in the USA. The compartment has a screw-tight cover to hide the AirTag, keeping it concealed (and preventing it from falling out). Once the AirTag is set up and placed inside the shoe, you'll be able to follow its position using the Find My app on iPhone. It's a free Apple app that's available on all iPhone models, and lets you track your gadgets – as well as any AirTags that you own. AirTags were originally designed for your keys, bags, or luggage, but you can attach them to almost anything. "Moms and dads, now you can know where your kids shoes are at all times with Skecher's newest Apple AirTag compatible sneakers," said Skechers in an ad for the new shoes. "It's genius. There's a clever, secure, hidden compartment under the insole. Beware 'beacons' people hide on your belongings to 'covertly track' location – iPhone and Androids can 'detect stalkers' "Your child can't feel it, and you can see where your kid's shoes are on the Find My app. "Plus they're machine washable and available to boys and girls. "Look, we all know Skechers is famous for comfort, and now they're giving us comfort of mind when it comes to our kids." The shoes don't show any external branding linked to AirTags. So it won't be obvious that they're location-tracked trainers at a glance. And if you decide not to use the AirTag feature, they'll still work just fine as regular shoes. SAFETY FIRST? In terms of privacy, the shoes will only be as safe as your own Apple account. Anyone with access to your Apple account can view the position of the tracker. But your Apple account should be private, and you can check who is logged in at all times by going into your settings. HOW TO DISABLE A DODGY AIRTAG Found an unknown AirTag? Here's Apple's official advice... IDENTIFY THE AIRTAG If you have found an unknown AirTag, you can follow these steps to see information about it or to disable it: If you have found an AirTag, hold the top of your iPhone or NFC-capable smartphone near the white side of the AirTag until a notification appears. Tap the notification. This opens a website that provides information about the AirTag, including its serial number and the last four digits of the phone number of the person who registered it. This can help you identify the owner, if you know them. You may want to take a screenshot to make sure you can document the information. If the owner marked the AirTag as lost, you may see a message with information about how to contact the owner. To find out more about a set of AirPods, Find My network accessory or compatible Bluetooth location-tracking device that's been separated from its owner, scroll to the bottom of the Items tab, then tap Identify Found Item. DISABLE THE AIRTAG If you want to prevent further tracking, here's what to do. "Push down and twist counterclockwise on the back of the AirTag," Apple says. "Take the cover off and remove the battery. "Once you remove the battery, the location of this AirTag is no longer visible to its owner." Picture Credit: Apple It's also possible to share your AirTag with someone else so that they can see the position of a tracker too. You might want to do this with other people in your family. But if you're worried that someone else might have access, you can just go into the Find My app to see who else can view the AirTag's location. If you want to revoke someone's access to the AirTag, you can do it at any time. 7 Of course, if your child already has an iPhone, you can set them up for tracking on your Find My app too. That way, you can monitor the exact location of their smartphone. BAD TRACK? Parents should also be wary of relying on location-trackers to look after their children. Location-tracking only works if the AirTag is within range of another device. 7 And if the AirTag runs out of battery, it will also fail. AirTags can also be disabled easily by removing the battery, which only takes a few seconds. So although it might give you peace of mind, it's not a guarantee of safety. Apple itself has never recommended using AirTags for monitoring a child's movements. And Skechers has worded its ad to suggest that the tracker system is good for tracking your child's shoes – and doesn't mention monitoring your actual child. 7
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Cricket Australia's mooted BBL sell-off pits big risk against megabucks reward
The timing could not have been better for Todd Greenberg, the new chief executive of Cricket Australia. The month before he settled into his Jolimont office in March this year, his associates at the England and Wales Cricket Board did him an extraordinary favour. Their process to sell minority stakes in teams playing in The Hundred, the short-form franchise cricket competition similar to the Big Bash League, raised £520m ($1.06bn). Greenberg – the respected former NRL and Australian Cricketers' Association CEO – followed Nick Hockley in the role. But while the position as one of the figureheads of Australian sport came with prestige and power, Greenberg was also restricted by the actions of his predecessor. The extension of the local broadcast deal with Foxtel and Channel Seven was signed by Hockley in 2023 amid strained relations between the sport and its free-to-air partner. Whether the roughly $215m per year arrangement was fair value or not, Greenberg came into the role handcuffed: cricket's single biggest revenue line item was locked in until 2031. Seeking options – more so-called 'financial levers' – at the start of his tenure as CEO, Greenberg acted quickly following the The Hundred sale process. Alongside chair Mike Baird, Greenberg commissioned CA's long-time consultants of choice, Boston Consulting Group, to assess the best paths of growth for the BBL. The recommendations of that report were revealed on Tuesday in the Sydney Morning Herald, and include selling a minority stake in the eight BBL teams to private investors. Whether it came from a genuine leak, or a plant by CA to test public support for the controversial proposal, the news has been hailed by proponents of private investment. Player agent and cricket dealmaker, Neil Maxwell, believes the opportunity not only provides access to capital but also new investors' business acumen and networks. 'It shouldn't have taken this long,' he says. 'The BBL has built a decent product, initially it was a second mover [after the IPL], and it had that advantage over other leagues, but it set itself back by not keeping pace with commercial reality. The major factor there is it hasn't been able to compete internationally through one of the main products that people require, and that's access to the best players.' Private equity in the BBL has been considered since 2010, before a ball in the new competition had been bowled. At that time, the CA's head of strategy was Andrew Jones, who now works as a management consultant. A decade later, Jones wrote an article in The Age describing the period titled: 'There is always free cheese in a mousetrap'. The 'free cheese' in a private equity deal is the up-front investment. The 'mousetrap' is the money, control and strategic flexibility lost forever. Selling BBL stakes to private investors was 'the single worst idea in my time in cricket,' Jones wrote in 2021. 'Not much has changed.' Since 2021 however, IPL team valuations continue to rise, and a sale of the Gujarat Titans this year pegs the team at around $1.3bn. There has been increasing investment in franchise T20 leagues such as those in South Africa and the UAE, which compete against the BBL in its traditional summer school holiday window. Eric Windholz, associate professor in Faculty of Law at Monash University and an expert in sports law says CA 'would be derelict in their duties' if they were not monitoring these global trends. 'It's only natural that the authorities in charge of cricket in Australia are looking at what's happening around the world and properly investigating what are the opportunities for cricket here,' he says. But he noted public sentiment remained sceptical about private equity's benefits. 'We, the public, feel like we own the sport, so whenever we hear about private equity coming in to own an asset that we think we own, we obviously have an unease about it,' he says. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion Some of that discomfort may be alleviated by the release of more information about the proposed BBL deals. Selling 49% of a franchise will be too large a share for some states to stomach, even if they retain majority control of an entity valued as high as six figures. The franchises will also require veto rights over the investors. The Adani Group, which had interest in the recent Gujarat Titans sale process, buying a stake in Brisbane Heat is unlikely to go down well. But there are also competing views over how any capital injection would be spent. Under The Hundred's sale, 10% of the revenue was quarantined for grassroots cricket, with the rest split between the counties and the MCC. Much of that money appears set to be used to prevent the collapse of some counties, and reduce hundreds of millions of pounds in debt. Cricket Australia lost $32m in 2023-24, but its cash reserves are set to rise to around $70m after the coming Ashes Tour, largely thanks to the success of red ball cricket. At this stage at least, the sport doesn't need external funding to help prop it up. Some within cricket believe a proportion of any private equity windfall should be placed in a so-called 'future fund' to deliver market returns long into the future, or to provide security for the next pandemic. Some look at the diversified assets of the NRL, which has bought into real estate in recent years, with envy. Others have raised the prospect of infrastructure upgrades within the sport. All agree that at least some needs to be spent on the BBL, to attract more prominent players and improve its global standing. Yet there is concern that cricket's diverse stakeholders may make competing claims on any newfound riches, and turn a once-in-a-lifetime investment injection into a short-term sugar hit. Maxwell, as a player agent, believes athletes must be better paid, but only as part of a broader plan for growth. 'It's not 'pay the players and then build a strategy', it's the other way around,' Maxwell says. 'The players fill that gap and they support that strategy.' Windholz agrees there are positives in having an injection of private capital, 'but the owners of the private capital aren't doing this out of the goodness of their hearts,' he says. 'They want a return on their investment, and that's where the risk lies.'
Fashion United
3 days ago
- Fashion United
Skechers responds to Kizik's ‘baseless' lawsuit
Footwear giant Skechers USA has said it plans to 'vigorously defend the patent suit' launched against it by HandsFree Lab (HFL), the parent company of Kizik. In a press release, Skechers said HFL's allegations, pertaining to its line of Skechers Hands Free Slip-ins, were 'baseless' and rooted in the 'assertion that Kizik created the hands-free footwear category and is the only company that can legally use that century-old idea'. In the lawsuit, filed with a Texas court, Kizik alleges that Skechers 'knowingly' infringed on four HFL utility patents and two design patents for its slip-in footwear, a line that, according to HFL, was launched without licensing or acknowledging the Kizik brand. The suit goes on to state that a number of related patents pursued by Skechers have been rejected, a claim Skechers calls 'false', with the company underlining that it has 'obtained more than 140 utility and design patents worldwide, including in the US'. In a statement, Skechers' president, Michael Greenberg, expressed suspicion over the timing of the lawsuit, which he notes comes shortly after Skechers announced a 9.42 billion dollars merger with 3G Capital. Despite not receiving 'so much as a letter from Kizik' since launching its Slip-ins line in 2021, Greenberg states that upon the merger's announcement, 'Kizik hires a law firm also used by Nike and attacks our whole Slip-ins product line'. Greenberg continues: 'We believe that, after all these years of silence, the true motivation for this lawsuit might be found right on the face of Kizik's complaint, where they state that they are looking for a share of the 9.42 dollars billion being paid for Skechers, money Kizik did not earn and does not deserve.' According to Greenberg, Skechers has become a 'market leader in the hands-free footwear space' through innovating with technology and investing into research and development. As such, Skechers 'will aggressively challenge both the validity of the patents and the infringement claims', he adds.
